Loading…
Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction
This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia 2023-02, Vol.45 (2), p.96-103 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593 |
container_end_page | 103 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 96 |
container_title | Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira Rezende, Karen Pereira Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de Rezende, Guilherme de Castro Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias |
description | This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between the protocols. In general, all protocols suggest that the assessment of fetal vitality must be performed in a multimodally, associating biophysical parameters (such as cardiotocography and fetal biophysical profile) with the Doppler velocimetry parameters of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus. All protocols reinforce that the more severe the fetal condition, the more frequent this assessment should be made. The timely gestational age and mode of delivery to terminate the pregnancy in these cases can vary much between the protocols. Therefore, this paper presents, in a didactic way, the particularities of different protocols for monitoring FGR, in order to help obstetricians to better manage the cases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-0043-1764493 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_19baaf7515c74d22bcab03bd40fec90c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0100_72032023000200096</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_19baaf7515c74d22bcab03bd40fec90c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2792513202</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1vEzEUxC0EoqFw5Yj2yGXL89d6fUIooqFSEVWBs2V77dTR7jrYDlX_-zpNiOjBsuTn-b3RDELvMVxg4PxTbgEYbbHoGJP0BVrgHrpWUipfogVggFYQoGfoTc4bACJoz16jM9pJIRiIBVot47TVKeQ4N8aVe-fm5ibFEm0cc-Njar7rWa_d5ObSRN9cuqLHZpXifblrbl0uKdgS4vwWvfJ6zO7d8T5Hvy-__lp-a69_rK6WX65by3hXWod7C50X1nSdo_0AQjiJvWQWDAHgnhArjRey8wwD4ZYwTLnUxFAMjEt6jq4O3CHqjdqmMOn0oKIO6ukhprXSqQQ7OoWl0doLjrkVbCDEWG2AmoGBd1aCrayLAyvb4MaoNnGX5mpe_dwHp_bBESAUam71yK4KPh8E252Z3GBrJkmPz1w8n8zhTq3jX1Vxou97UQkfj4QU_-xqfGoK2bpx1LOLu6yIkITjp7UndzbFnJPzpz0Y1L57ldW-e3Xsvgo-_O_u9P1f2fQR7JSnNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2792513202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction</title><source>SciELO</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</source><creator>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira ; Rezende, Karen Pereira ; Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de ; Rezende, Guilherme de Castro ; Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</creator><creatorcontrib>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira ; Rezende, Karen Pereira ; Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de ; Rezende, Guilherme de Castro ; Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</creatorcontrib><description>This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between the protocols. In general, all protocols suggest that the assessment of fetal vitality must be performed in a multimodally, associating biophysical parameters (such as cardiotocography and fetal biophysical profile) with the Doppler velocimetry parameters of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus. All protocols reinforce that the more severe the fetal condition, the more frequent this assessment should be made. The timely gestational age and mode of delivery to terminate the pregnancy in these cases can vary much between the protocols. Therefore, this paper presents, in a didactic way, the particularities of different protocols for monitoring FGR, in order to help obstetricians to better manage the cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0100-7203</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1806-9339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-9339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764493</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36977407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda</publisher><subject>Cardiotocography ; Doppler velocimetry ; Female ; Fetal growth restriction ; Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging ; Fetal Growth Retardation - therapy ; Fetus - blood supply ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY ; Pregnancy ; Prematurity ; Protocols ; Review ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasonography, Doppler ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal ; Umbilical Arteries - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2023-02, Vol.45 (2), p.96-103</ispartof><rights>Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).</rights><rights>Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( ) 2023 Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9677-7946 ; 0000-0002-5859-0635 ; 0000-0002-2672-5961 ; 0000-0001-8246-4789 ; 0000-0003-4198-0546</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078887/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078887/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,24131,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977407$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezende, Karen Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezende, Guilherme de Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction</title><title>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</title><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><description>This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between the protocols. In general, all protocols suggest that the assessment of fetal vitality must be performed in a multimodally, associating biophysical parameters (such as cardiotocography and fetal biophysical profile) with the Doppler velocimetry parameters of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus. All protocols reinforce that the more severe the fetal condition, the more frequent this assessment should be made. The timely gestational age and mode of delivery to terminate the pregnancy in these cases can vary much between the protocols. Therefore, this paper presents, in a didactic way, the particularities of different protocols for monitoring FGR, in order to help obstetricians to better manage the cases.</description><subject>Cardiotocography</subject><subject>Doppler velocimetry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal growth restriction</subject><subject>Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fetal Growth Retardation - therapy</subject><subject>Fetus - blood supply</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prematurity</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><subject>Umbilical Arteries - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0100-7203</issn><issn>1806-9339</issn><issn>1806-9339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1vEzEUxC0EoqFw5Yj2yGXL89d6fUIooqFSEVWBs2V77dTR7jrYDlX_-zpNiOjBsuTn-b3RDELvMVxg4PxTbgEYbbHoGJP0BVrgHrpWUipfogVggFYQoGfoTc4bACJoz16jM9pJIRiIBVot47TVKeQ4N8aVe-fm5ibFEm0cc-Njar7rWa_d5ObSRN9cuqLHZpXifblrbl0uKdgS4vwWvfJ6zO7d8T5Hvy-__lp-a69_rK6WX65by3hXWod7C50X1nSdo_0AQjiJvWQWDAHgnhArjRey8wwD4ZYwTLnUxFAMjEt6jq4O3CHqjdqmMOn0oKIO6ukhprXSqQQ7OoWl0doLjrkVbCDEWG2AmoGBd1aCrayLAyvb4MaoNnGX5mpe_dwHp_bBESAUam71yK4KPh8E252Z3GBrJkmPz1w8n8zhTq3jX1Vxou97UQkfj4QU_-xqfGoK2bpx1LOLu6yIkITjp7UndzbFnJPzpz0Y1L57ldW-e3Xsvgo-_O_u9P1f2fQR7JSnNQ</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira</creator><creator>Rezende, Karen Pereira</creator><creator>Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de</creator><creator>Rezende, Guilherme de Castro</creator><creator>Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</creator><general>Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda</general><general>Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9677-7946</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5859-0635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2672-5961</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8246-4789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-0546</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction</title><author>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira ; Rezende, Karen Pereira ; Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de ; Rezende, Guilherme de Castro ; Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cardiotocography</topic><topic>Doppler velocimetry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal growth restriction</topic><topic>Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fetal Growth Retardation - therapy</topic><topic>Fetus - blood supply</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prematurity</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><topic>Umbilical Arteries - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezende, Karen Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezende, Guilherme de Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira</au><au>Rezende, Karen Pereira</au><au>Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de</au><au>Rezende, Guilherme de Castro</au><au>Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction</atitle><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>96-103</pages><issn>0100-7203</issn><issn>1806-9339</issn><eissn>1806-9339</eissn><abstract>This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between the protocols. In general, all protocols suggest that the assessment of fetal vitality must be performed in a multimodally, associating biophysical parameters (such as cardiotocography and fetal biophysical profile) with the Doppler velocimetry parameters of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus. All protocols reinforce that the more severe the fetal condition, the more frequent this assessment should be made. The timely gestational age and mode of delivery to terminate the pregnancy in these cases can vary much between the protocols. Therefore, this paper presents, in a didactic way, the particularities of different protocols for monitoring FGR, in order to help obstetricians to better manage the cases.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda</pub><pmid>36977407</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0043-1764493</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9677-7946</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5859-0635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2672-5961</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8246-4789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-0546</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0100-7203 |
ispartof | Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2023-02, Vol.45 (2), p.96-103 |
issn | 0100-7203 1806-9339 1806-9339 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_19baaf7515c74d22bcab03bd40fec90c |
source | SciELO; PubMed Central; Thieme Connect Journals Open Access |
subjects | Cardiotocography Doppler velocimetry Female Fetal growth restriction Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging Fetal Growth Retardation - therapy Fetus - blood supply Gestational Age Humans OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pregnancy Prematurity Protocols Review Ultrasonography Ultrasonography, Doppler Ultrasonography, Prenatal Umbilical Arteries - diagnostic imaging |
title | Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A26%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Protocols%20for%20Management%20of%20Fetal%20Growth%20Restriction&rft.jtitle=Revista%20Brasileira%20de%20ginecologia%20e%20obstetr%C3%ADcia&rft.au=Leal,%20Caio%20Ribeiro%20Vieira&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=96-103&rft.issn=0100-7203&rft.eissn=1806-9339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0043-1764493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2792513202%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2792513202&rft_id=info:pmid/36977407&rft_scielo_id=S0100_72032023000200096&rfr_iscdi=true |