Loading…

Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction

This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia 2023-02, Vol.45 (2), p.96-103
Main Authors: Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira, Rezende, Karen Pereira, Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de, Rezende, Guilherme de Castro, Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593
container_end_page 103
container_issue 2
container_start_page 96
container_title Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia
container_volume 45
creator Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira
Rezende, Karen Pereira
Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de
Rezende, Guilherme de Castro
Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias
description This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between the protocols. In general, all protocols suggest that the assessment of fetal vitality must be performed in a multimodally, associating biophysical parameters (such as cardiotocography and fetal biophysical profile) with the Doppler velocimetry parameters of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus. All protocols reinforce that the more severe the fetal condition, the more frequent this assessment should be made. The timely gestational age and mode of delivery to terminate the pregnancy in these cases can vary much between the protocols. Therefore, this paper presents, in a didactic way, the particularities of different protocols for monitoring FGR, in order to help obstetricians to better manage the cases.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-0043-1764493
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_19baaf7515c74d22bcab03bd40fec90c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0100_72032023000200096</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_19baaf7515c74d22bcab03bd40fec90c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2792513202</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1vEzEUxC0EoqFw5Yj2yGXL89d6fUIooqFSEVWBs2V77dTR7jrYDlX_-zpNiOjBsuTn-b3RDELvMVxg4PxTbgEYbbHoGJP0BVrgHrpWUipfogVggFYQoGfoTc4bACJoz16jM9pJIRiIBVot47TVKeQ4N8aVe-fm5ibFEm0cc-Njar7rWa_d5ObSRN9cuqLHZpXifblrbl0uKdgS4vwWvfJ6zO7d8T5Hvy-__lp-a69_rK6WX65by3hXWod7C50X1nSdo_0AQjiJvWQWDAHgnhArjRey8wwD4ZYwTLnUxFAMjEt6jq4O3CHqjdqmMOn0oKIO6ukhprXSqQQ7OoWl0doLjrkVbCDEWG2AmoGBd1aCrayLAyvb4MaoNnGX5mpe_dwHp_bBESAUam71yK4KPh8E252Z3GBrJkmPz1w8n8zhTq3jX1Vxou97UQkfj4QU_-xqfGoK2bpx1LOLu6yIkITjp7UndzbFnJPzpz0Y1L57ldW-e3Xsvgo-_O_u9P1f2fQR7JSnNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2792513202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction</title><source>SciELO</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</source><creator>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira ; Rezende, Karen Pereira ; Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de ; Rezende, Guilherme de Castro ; Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</creator><creatorcontrib>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira ; Rezende, Karen Pereira ; Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de ; Rezende, Guilherme de Castro ; Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</creatorcontrib><description>This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between the protocols. In general, all protocols suggest that the assessment of fetal vitality must be performed in a multimodally, associating biophysical parameters (such as cardiotocography and fetal biophysical profile) with the Doppler velocimetry parameters of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus. All protocols reinforce that the more severe the fetal condition, the more frequent this assessment should be made. The timely gestational age and mode of delivery to terminate the pregnancy in these cases can vary much between the protocols. Therefore, this paper presents, in a didactic way, the particularities of different protocols for monitoring FGR, in order to help obstetricians to better manage the cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0100-7203</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1806-9339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-9339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764493</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36977407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda</publisher><subject>Cardiotocography ; Doppler velocimetry ; Female ; Fetal growth restriction ; Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging ; Fetal Growth Retardation - therapy ; Fetus - blood supply ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; OBSTETRICS &amp; GYNECOLOGY ; Pregnancy ; Prematurity ; Protocols ; Review ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasonography, Doppler ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal ; Umbilical Arteries - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2023-02, Vol.45 (2), p.96-103</ispartof><rights>Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).</rights><rights>Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( ) 2023 Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9677-7946 ; 0000-0002-5859-0635 ; 0000-0002-2672-5961 ; 0000-0001-8246-4789 ; 0000-0003-4198-0546</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078887/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078887/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,24131,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977407$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezende, Karen Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezende, Guilherme de Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction</title><title>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</title><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><description>This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between the protocols. In general, all protocols suggest that the assessment of fetal vitality must be performed in a multimodally, associating biophysical parameters (such as cardiotocography and fetal biophysical profile) with the Doppler velocimetry parameters of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus. All protocols reinforce that the more severe the fetal condition, the more frequent this assessment should be made. The timely gestational age and mode of delivery to terminate the pregnancy in these cases can vary much between the protocols. Therefore, this paper presents, in a didactic way, the particularities of different protocols for monitoring FGR, in order to help obstetricians to better manage the cases.</description><subject>Cardiotocography</subject><subject>Doppler velocimetry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal growth restriction</subject><subject>Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fetal Growth Retardation - therapy</subject><subject>Fetus - blood supply</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>OBSTETRICS &amp; GYNECOLOGY</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prematurity</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><subject>Umbilical Arteries - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0100-7203</issn><issn>1806-9339</issn><issn>1806-9339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1vEzEUxC0EoqFw5Yj2yGXL89d6fUIooqFSEVWBs2V77dTR7jrYDlX_-zpNiOjBsuTn-b3RDELvMVxg4PxTbgEYbbHoGJP0BVrgHrpWUipfogVggFYQoGfoTc4bACJoz16jM9pJIRiIBVot47TVKeQ4N8aVe-fm5ibFEm0cc-Njar7rWa_d5ObSRN9cuqLHZpXifblrbl0uKdgS4vwWvfJ6zO7d8T5Hvy-__lp-a69_rK6WX65by3hXWod7C50X1nSdo_0AQjiJvWQWDAHgnhArjRey8wwD4ZYwTLnUxFAMjEt6jq4O3CHqjdqmMOn0oKIO6ukhprXSqQQ7OoWl0doLjrkVbCDEWG2AmoGBd1aCrayLAyvb4MaoNnGX5mpe_dwHp_bBESAUam71yK4KPh8E252Z3GBrJkmPz1w8n8zhTq3jX1Vxou97UQkfj4QU_-xqfGoK2bpx1LOLu6yIkITjp7UndzbFnJPzpz0Y1L57ldW-e3Xsvgo-_O_u9P1f2fQR7JSnNQ</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira</creator><creator>Rezende, Karen Pereira</creator><creator>Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de</creator><creator>Rezende, Guilherme de Castro</creator><creator>Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</creator><general>Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda</general><general>Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9677-7946</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5859-0635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2672-5961</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8246-4789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-0546</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction</title><author>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira ; Rezende, Karen Pereira ; Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de ; Rezende, Guilherme de Castro ; Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cardiotocography</topic><topic>Doppler velocimetry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal growth restriction</topic><topic>Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fetal Growth Retardation - therapy</topic><topic>Fetus - blood supply</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>OBSTETRICS &amp; GYNECOLOGY</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prematurity</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><topic>Umbilical Arteries - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezende, Karen Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezende, Guilherme de Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira</au><au>Rezende, Karen Pereira</au><au>Macedo, Evilane do Carmo Patrício de</au><au>Rezende, Guilherme de Castro</au><au>Corrêa Júnior, Mário Dias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction</atitle><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>96-103</pages><issn>0100-7203</issn><issn>1806-9339</issn><eissn>1806-9339</eissn><abstract>This comprehensive review compares clinical protocols of important entities regarding the management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), published since 2015. Five protocols were chosen for data extraction. There were no relevant differences regarding the diagnosis and classification of FGR between the protocols. In general, all protocols suggest that the assessment of fetal vitality must be performed in a multimodally, associating biophysical parameters (such as cardiotocography and fetal biophysical profile) with the Doppler velocimetry parameters of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus. All protocols reinforce that the more severe the fetal condition, the more frequent this assessment should be made. The timely gestational age and mode of delivery to terminate the pregnancy in these cases can vary much between the protocols. Therefore, this paper presents, in a didactic way, the particularities of different protocols for monitoring FGR, in order to help obstetricians to better manage the cases.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda</pub><pmid>36977407</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0043-1764493</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9677-7946</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5859-0635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2672-5961</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8246-4789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-0546</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0100-7203
ispartof Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2023-02, Vol.45 (2), p.96-103
issn 0100-7203
1806-9339
1806-9339
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_19baaf7515c74d22bcab03bd40fec90c
source SciELO; PubMed Central; Thieme Connect Journals Open Access
subjects Cardiotocography
Doppler velocimetry
Female
Fetal growth restriction
Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnostic imaging
Fetal Growth Retardation - therapy
Fetus - blood supply
Gestational Age
Humans
OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Pregnancy
Prematurity
Protocols
Review
Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography, Doppler
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Umbilical Arteries - diagnostic imaging
title Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A26%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Protocols%20for%20Management%20of%20Fetal%20Growth%20Restriction&rft.jtitle=Revista%20Brasileira%20de%20ginecologia%20e%20obstetr%C3%ADcia&rft.au=Leal,%20Caio%20Ribeiro%20Vieira&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=96-103&rft.issn=0100-7203&rft.eissn=1806-9339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0043-1764493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2792513202%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-e18c06f7cb66e38d077e91f94c0b2005f22c9bf796f41025c241359a2b3104593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2792513202&rft_id=info:pmid/36977407&rft_scielo_id=S0100_72032023000200096&rfr_iscdi=true