Loading…

Membrane sunspace for old buildings refurbishment: environmental impact, economic and building technology's comparison to conventional solutions

This study presents a state of the art and design proposal for membrane sunspaces, as alternative to conventional ones, in glass, commonly used in the functional refurbishment of old buildings. Sunspaces are passive solar systems that can be easily integrated in existing buildings. Enclosing balconi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Macieira, Mónica Raquel Fernandes, Mendonça, Paulo, Guedes, João Miranda
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-fbb54398cce6c8312f3045fb613fdd6efd79a26400fc51f2ab39fba2dc80c9f83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-fbb54398cce6c8312f3045fb613fdd6efd79a26400fc51f2ab39fba2dc80c9f83
container_end_page 8
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title
container_volume 278
creator Macieira, Mónica Raquel Fernandes
Mendonça, Paulo
Guedes, João Miranda
description This study presents a state of the art and design proposal for membrane sunspaces, as alternative to conventional ones, in glass, commonly used in the functional refurbishment of old buildings. Sunspaces are passive solar systems that can be easily integrated in existing buildings. Enclosing balconies with glazing has an impact on existing building functional performance (useful area, thermal performance and acoustic improvement) and it may even postpone the renovation need of the intervened building. However, inevitably, many of old buildings are located in areas with access restrictions and other physical constraints on the movement of materials, components and equipment - that limits its construction and maintenance processes and thus demand for alternative solutions. Glass is being applied in all types of sunspaces, so architects and engineers take for granted that it has to be inevitably used. However, a major weakness of glass is its weight and cost, specially associated with installation complexity, framing systems and accessories needed. The fact that membrane requires less substructure, changes the architectural approach - giving more freedom to design options. Membrane construction technology and installation process could be a practical alternative to traditional construction methods for closing balconies in old buildings. For this research, a full-scale Membrane Alternative Sunspace prototype was implemented into an old building (taken as case study) to evaluate the real construction process aspects and compare it with the common glazed solutions. Results were examined from an environmental, economic and building technology's point of view - regarding production, construction and maintenance phases. First author thanks to FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia - Portugal), MCE (Ministerio da Educacao e Ciencia - Portugal) and ESF (European Social Fund) for supporting the research fellowship with the reference SFRH/BD/104891/2014; and with other authors thanks the financial support from the Project UID/AUR/04509/2013 by FCTMEC by national funding and, when applicable, FEDER co-financing under the new PT2020 partnership agreement - Lab2PT, School of Architecture/University of Minho, Portugal and Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007457 - CONSTRUCT Institute of R&D In Structures and Construction of Faculty of Engineering/University of Porto, Portugal, funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020. Authors also thanks to: owners of the building case study,
doi_str_mv 10.1051/matecconf/201927804002
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1c3ad01be3c64dd2b82367ea6dbb27ac</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1c3ad01be3c64dd2b82367ea6dbb27ac</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2276999614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-fbb54398cce6c8312f3045fb613fdd6efd79a26400fc51f2ab39fba2dc80c9f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUctOHDEQHEVECgJ-AVnKIRc2-DHjGXNDCBIkolwSKTer3bYXr2bsxZ5Zib_IJ8fLRsCpu62qcndV05wz-pXRjl1OMDvEFP0lp0zxfqAtpfxDc8y5ZCsu5J-jd_2n5qyUDaWUCdVT1R83f3-4yWSIjpQlli2gIz5lkkZLzBJGG-K6kOz8kk0oj5OL8xVxcRdyivsBRhKmypoviKtbpCkggfjGJXW7x5jGtH7-Ugimis2hpEjmVKe4qxIhxapS0rjs23LafPQwFnf2v540v-9uf918Xz38_HZ_c_2wQtHxeeWN6VqhBkQncRCMe0HbzhvJhLdWOm97BVxWMzx2zHMwQnkD3OJAUflBnDT3B12bYKO3OUyQn3WCoF8eUl5ryHPA0WmGAixlxgmUrbXcDNXL3oG0xvAesGp9Pmhtc3paXJn1Ji25nlU0571USknWVpQ8oDCnUqqnr78yqvdh6tcw9fswK5EciBkBtjq7XSgzFM0GznXPWibFP-0QpNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2276999614</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Membrane sunspace for old buildings refurbishment: environmental impact, economic and building technology's comparison to conventional solutions</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Macieira, Mónica Raquel Fernandes ; Mendonça, Paulo ; Guedes, João Miranda</creator><contributor>Chastre, C. ; Mendonça, P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Macieira, Mónica Raquel Fernandes ; Mendonça, Paulo ; Guedes, João Miranda ; Chastre, C. ; Mendonça, P.</creatorcontrib><description>This study presents a state of the art and design proposal for membrane sunspaces, as alternative to conventional ones, in glass, commonly used in the functional refurbishment of old buildings. Sunspaces are passive solar systems that can be easily integrated in existing buildings. Enclosing balconies with glazing has an impact on existing building functional performance (useful area, thermal performance and acoustic improvement) and it may even postpone the renovation need of the intervened building. However, inevitably, many of old buildings are located in areas with access restrictions and other physical constraints on the movement of materials, components and equipment - that limits its construction and maintenance processes and thus demand for alternative solutions. Glass is being applied in all types of sunspaces, so architects and engineers take for granted that it has to be inevitably used. However, a major weakness of glass is its weight and cost, specially associated with installation complexity, framing systems and accessories needed. The fact that membrane requires less substructure, changes the architectural approach - giving more freedom to design options. Membrane construction technology and installation process could be a practical alternative to traditional construction methods for closing balconies in old buildings. For this research, a full-scale Membrane Alternative Sunspace prototype was implemented into an old building (taken as case study) to evaluate the real construction process aspects and compare it with the common glazed solutions. Results were examined from an environmental, economic and building technology's point of view - regarding production, construction and maintenance phases. First author thanks to FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia - Portugal), MCE (Ministerio da Educacao e Ciencia - Portugal) and ESF (European Social Fund) for supporting the research fellowship with the reference SFRH/BD/104891/2014; and with other authors thanks the financial support from the Project UID/AUR/04509/2013 by FCTMEC by national funding and, when applicable, FEDER co-financing under the new PT2020 partnership agreement - Lab2PT, School of Architecture/University of Minho, Portugal and Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007457 - CONSTRUCT Institute of R&amp;D In Structures and Construction of Faculty of Engineering/University of Porto, Portugal, funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020. Authors also thanks to: owners of the building case study, that allow the MAS1 full-scale prototype integration on it; and Floret architecture firm that provides case study building designs. Also thanks to Bionova Ltd for provide a One Click LCA student license.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2261-236X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2274-7214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2261-236X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201927804002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Les Ulis: EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Artes ; Balconies ; Building technology ; Buildings ; Cidades e comunidades sustentáveis ; Construction methods ; Economic comparison ; Energias renováveis e acessíveis ; Engenharia e Tecnologia ; Environmental impact ; Environmental impact comparison ; Glass ; Glazing ; Humanidades ; Impact analysis ; Membrane sunspace ; Old buildings refurbishment ; Outras Engenharias e Tecnologias ; Refurbishment ; Science &amp; Technology ; State-of-the-art reviews ; Substructures</subject><ispartof>MATEC Web of Conferences, 2019, Vol.278, p.1-8</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-fbb54398cce6c8312f3045fb613fdd6efd79a26400fc51f2ab39fba2dc80c9f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-fbb54398cce6c8312f3045fb613fdd6efd79a26400fc51f2ab39fba2dc80c9f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2276999614?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Chastre, C.</contributor><contributor>Mendonça, P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Macieira, Mónica Raquel Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guedes, João Miranda</creatorcontrib><title>Membrane sunspace for old buildings refurbishment: environmental impact, economic and building technology's comparison to conventional solutions</title><title>MATEC Web of Conferences</title><description>This study presents a state of the art and design proposal for membrane sunspaces, as alternative to conventional ones, in glass, commonly used in the functional refurbishment of old buildings. Sunspaces are passive solar systems that can be easily integrated in existing buildings. Enclosing balconies with glazing has an impact on existing building functional performance (useful area, thermal performance and acoustic improvement) and it may even postpone the renovation need of the intervened building. However, inevitably, many of old buildings are located in areas with access restrictions and other physical constraints on the movement of materials, components and equipment - that limits its construction and maintenance processes and thus demand for alternative solutions. Glass is being applied in all types of sunspaces, so architects and engineers take for granted that it has to be inevitably used. However, a major weakness of glass is its weight and cost, specially associated with installation complexity, framing systems and accessories needed. The fact that membrane requires less substructure, changes the architectural approach - giving more freedom to design options. Membrane construction technology and installation process could be a practical alternative to traditional construction methods for closing balconies in old buildings. For this research, a full-scale Membrane Alternative Sunspace prototype was implemented into an old building (taken as case study) to evaluate the real construction process aspects and compare it with the common glazed solutions. Results were examined from an environmental, economic and building technology's point of view - regarding production, construction and maintenance phases. First author thanks to FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia - Portugal), MCE (Ministerio da Educacao e Ciencia - Portugal) and ESF (European Social Fund) for supporting the research fellowship with the reference SFRH/BD/104891/2014; and with other authors thanks the financial support from the Project UID/AUR/04509/2013 by FCTMEC by national funding and, when applicable, FEDER co-financing under the new PT2020 partnership agreement - Lab2PT, School of Architecture/University of Minho, Portugal and Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007457 - CONSTRUCT Institute of R&amp;D In Structures and Construction of Faculty of Engineering/University of Porto, Portugal, funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020. Authors also thanks to: owners of the building case study, that allow the MAS1 full-scale prototype integration on it; and Floret architecture firm that provides case study building designs. Also thanks to Bionova Ltd for provide a One Click LCA student license.</description><subject>Artes</subject><subject>Balconies</subject><subject>Building technology</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Cidades e comunidades sustentáveis</subject><subject>Construction methods</subject><subject>Economic comparison</subject><subject>Energias renováveis e acessíveis</subject><subject>Engenharia e Tecnologia</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental impact comparison</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Glazing</subject><subject>Humanidades</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Membrane sunspace</subject><subject>Old buildings refurbishment</subject><subject>Outras Engenharias e Tecnologias</subject><subject>Refurbishment</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>State-of-the-art reviews</subject><subject>Substructures</subject><issn>2261-236X</issn><issn>2274-7214</issn><issn>2261-236X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUctOHDEQHEVECgJ-AVnKIRc2-DHjGXNDCBIkolwSKTer3bYXr2bsxZ5Zib_IJ8fLRsCpu62qcndV05wz-pXRjl1OMDvEFP0lp0zxfqAtpfxDc8y5ZCsu5J-jd_2n5qyUDaWUCdVT1R83f3-4yWSIjpQlli2gIz5lkkZLzBJGG-K6kOz8kk0oj5OL8xVxcRdyivsBRhKmypoviKtbpCkggfjGJXW7x5jGtH7-Ugimis2hpEjmVKe4qxIhxapS0rjs23LafPQwFnf2v540v-9uf918Xz38_HZ_c_2wQtHxeeWN6VqhBkQncRCMe0HbzhvJhLdWOm97BVxWMzx2zHMwQnkD3OJAUflBnDT3B12bYKO3OUyQn3WCoF8eUl5ryHPA0WmGAixlxgmUrbXcDNXL3oG0xvAesGp9Pmhtc3paXJn1Ji25nlU0571USknWVpQ8oDCnUqqnr78yqvdh6tcw9fswK5EciBkBtjq7XSgzFM0GznXPWibFP-0QpNg</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Macieira, Mónica Raquel Fernandes</creator><creator>Mendonça, Paulo</creator><creator>Guedes, João Miranda</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>RCLKO</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Membrane sunspace for old buildings refurbishment: environmental impact, economic and building technology's comparison to conventional solutions</title><author>Macieira, Mónica Raquel Fernandes ; Mendonça, Paulo ; Guedes, João Miranda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-fbb54398cce6c8312f3045fb613fdd6efd79a26400fc51f2ab39fba2dc80c9f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Artes</topic><topic>Balconies</topic><topic>Building technology</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Cidades e comunidades sustentáveis</topic><topic>Construction methods</topic><topic>Economic comparison</topic><topic>Energias renováveis e acessíveis</topic><topic>Engenharia e Tecnologia</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental impact comparison</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Glazing</topic><topic>Humanidades</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Membrane sunspace</topic><topic>Old buildings refurbishment</topic><topic>Outras Engenharias e Tecnologias</topic><topic>Refurbishment</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>State-of-the-art reviews</topic><topic>Substructures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macieira, Mónica Raquel Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guedes, João Miranda</creatorcontrib><collection>RCAAP open access repository</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macieira, Mónica Raquel Fernandes</au><au>Mendonça, Paulo</au><au>Guedes, João Miranda</au><au>Chastre, C.</au><au>Mendonça, P.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Membrane sunspace for old buildings refurbishment: environmental impact, economic and building technology's comparison to conventional solutions</atitle><btitle>MATEC Web of Conferences</btitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>278</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>2261-236X</issn><issn>2274-7214</issn><eissn>2261-236X</eissn><abstract>This study presents a state of the art and design proposal for membrane sunspaces, as alternative to conventional ones, in glass, commonly used in the functional refurbishment of old buildings. Sunspaces are passive solar systems that can be easily integrated in existing buildings. Enclosing balconies with glazing has an impact on existing building functional performance (useful area, thermal performance and acoustic improvement) and it may even postpone the renovation need of the intervened building. However, inevitably, many of old buildings are located in areas with access restrictions and other physical constraints on the movement of materials, components and equipment - that limits its construction and maintenance processes and thus demand for alternative solutions. Glass is being applied in all types of sunspaces, so architects and engineers take for granted that it has to be inevitably used. However, a major weakness of glass is its weight and cost, specially associated with installation complexity, framing systems and accessories needed. The fact that membrane requires less substructure, changes the architectural approach - giving more freedom to design options. Membrane construction technology and installation process could be a practical alternative to traditional construction methods for closing balconies in old buildings. For this research, a full-scale Membrane Alternative Sunspace prototype was implemented into an old building (taken as case study) to evaluate the real construction process aspects and compare it with the common glazed solutions. Results were examined from an environmental, economic and building technology's point of view - regarding production, construction and maintenance phases. First author thanks to FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia - Portugal), MCE (Ministerio da Educacao e Ciencia - Portugal) and ESF (European Social Fund) for supporting the research fellowship with the reference SFRH/BD/104891/2014; and with other authors thanks the financial support from the Project UID/AUR/04509/2013 by FCTMEC by national funding and, when applicable, FEDER co-financing under the new PT2020 partnership agreement - Lab2PT, School of Architecture/University of Minho, Portugal and Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007457 - CONSTRUCT Institute of R&amp;D In Structures and Construction of Faculty of Engineering/University of Porto, Portugal, funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020. Authors also thanks to: owners of the building case study, that allow the MAS1 full-scale prototype integration on it; and Floret architecture firm that provides case study building designs. Also thanks to Bionova Ltd for provide a One Click LCA student license.</abstract><cop>Les Ulis</cop><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/matecconf/201927804002</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2261-236X
ispartof MATEC Web of Conferences, 2019, Vol.278, p.1-8
issn 2261-236X
2274-7214
2261-236X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1c3ad01be3c64dd2b82367ea6dbb27ac
source ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Artes
Balconies
Building technology
Buildings
Cidades e comunidades sustentáveis
Construction methods
Economic comparison
Energias renováveis e acessíveis
Engenharia e Tecnologia
Environmental impact
Environmental impact comparison
Glass
Glazing
Humanidades
Impact analysis
Membrane sunspace
Old buildings refurbishment
Outras Engenharias e Tecnologias
Refurbishment
Science & Technology
State-of-the-art reviews
Substructures
title Membrane sunspace for old buildings refurbishment: environmental impact, economic and building technology's comparison to conventional solutions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T12%3A13%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Membrane%20sunspace%20for%20old%20buildings%20refurbishment:%20environmental%20impact,%20economic%20and%20building%20technology's%20comparison%20to%20conventional%20solutions&rft.btitle=MATEC%20Web%20of%20Conferences&rft.au=Macieira,%20M%C3%B3nica%20Raquel%20Fernandes&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=278&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=2261-236X&rft.eissn=2261-236X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/matecconf/201927804002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2276999614%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-fbb54398cce6c8312f3045fb613fdd6efd79a26400fc51f2ab39fba2dc80c9f83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2276999614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true