Loading…
Trade-offs between ecosystem services and alternative pathways toward sustainability in a tropical dry forest region
The design of strategies aimed at sustainable resource management requires an understanding of the trade-offs between the ecosystem services at stake, to determine appropriate ways in which to navigate them. We assess trade-offs between forage production for cattle ranching and the maintenance of ca...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology and society 2016-12, Vol.21 (4), p.45, Article art45 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-75b616123686e69a7b84414aae6782040501c00813906a9dfe191cb5eda16be83 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | Ecology and society |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Mora, Francisco Balvanera, Patricia García-Frapolli, Eduardo Castillo, Alicia Trilleras, Jenny M. Cohen-Salgado, Daniel Salmerón, Oscar |
description | The design of strategies aimed at sustainable resource management requires an understanding of the trade-offs between the ecosystem services at stake, to determine appropriate ways in which to navigate them. We assess trade-offs between forage production for cattle ranching and the maintenance of carbon stocks or tree diversity in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Trade-offs between pairs of services were assessed by identifying their efficiency frontiers at both site and landscape scales. We also estimated service outcomes under current and hypothetical land-management conditions. We found stark trade-offs between fodder and carbon stocks and between fodder and tree species richness at the site scale. At the landscape scale, the efficiency frontier was concave, with a much less pronounced trade-off in the fodder-species richness case. Our estimates of current service supply levels showed a reduction of 18-21% for C stock and 41-43% for fodder biomass, relative to the maximum feasible values along the efficiency frontier. Choice of the optimum management strategy to reduce such inefficiency depended on deforestation level: secondary forest regeneration was most suitable when deforestation is low, whereas increased fodder productivity in the pastures is best when deforestation is high. Pasture enrichment with forage trees and secondary forest growth are potential management alternatives for achieving sustainability given the range of enabling ecological factors and to balance ecological and social sustainability given the requirements and preferences of local stakeholders. Given that analogous trade-offs are found across the tropics, this work contributes to reconciling tropical forest maintenance and its use for sustainable rural livelihoods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5751/ES-08691-210445 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1cece33f09e8460faf59465e43fb714e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26270024</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1cece33f09e8460faf59465e43fb714e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>26270024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-75b616123686e69a7b84414aae6782040501c00813906a9dfe191cb5eda16be83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1rHDEMhofSQtO0554Khl56mcQaf86xhG0bCPSQ9Gw0Hjn1Mjve2t4s8-87yZZQchAS4tGLpLdpPgK_UEbB5ea25Vb30HbApVSvmjMw3LaCW_P6v_pt866ULeddL2131tS7jCO1KYTCBqpHopmRT2UplXasUH6IngrDeWQ4Vcoz1vhAbI_19xGXwmo6Yh5ZOZSKccYhTrEuLM4MWc1pHz1ObMwLCylTqSzTfUzz--ZNwKnQh3_5vPn1bXN39aO9-fn9-urrTeulgNoaNWjQ0AltNekezWClBIlI2tiOS644eM4tiJ5r7MdA0IMfFI0IeiArzpvrk-6YcOv2Oe4wLy5hdE-NlO8d5hr9RA48eRIi8J6s1DxgUL3UiqQIgwFJq9aXk9Y-pz-H9Ra3i8XTNOFM6VAc2N6INTis6OcX6DYd1s9Nj5RS1golzUpdniifUymZwvOCwN2jo25z654cdSdH14lPp4ltqSk_453uzOqnFH8BzUedow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1855883547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trade-offs between ecosystem services and alternative pathways toward sustainability in a tropical dry forest region</title><source>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Mora, Francisco ; Balvanera, Patricia ; García-Frapolli, Eduardo ; Castillo, Alicia ; Trilleras, Jenny M. ; Cohen-Salgado, Daniel ; Salmerón, Oscar</creator><creatorcontrib>Mora, Francisco ; Balvanera, Patricia ; García-Frapolli, Eduardo ; Castillo, Alicia ; Trilleras, Jenny M. ; Cohen-Salgado, Daniel ; Salmerón, Oscar</creatorcontrib><description>The design of strategies aimed at sustainable resource management requires an understanding of the trade-offs between the ecosystem services at stake, to determine appropriate ways in which to navigate them. We assess trade-offs between forage production for cattle ranching and the maintenance of carbon stocks or tree diversity in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Trade-offs between pairs of services were assessed by identifying their efficiency frontiers at both site and landscape scales. We also estimated service outcomes under current and hypothetical land-management conditions. We found stark trade-offs between fodder and carbon stocks and between fodder and tree species richness at the site scale. At the landscape scale, the efficiency frontier was concave, with a much less pronounced trade-off in the fodder-species richness case. Our estimates of current service supply levels showed a reduction of 18-21% for C stock and 41-43% for fodder biomass, relative to the maximum feasible values along the efficiency frontier. Choice of the optimum management strategy to reduce such inefficiency depended on deforestation level: secondary forest regeneration was most suitable when deforestation is low, whereas increased fodder productivity in the pastures is best when deforestation is high. Pasture enrichment with forage trees and secondary forest growth are potential management alternatives for achieving sustainability given the range of enabling ecological factors and to balance ecological and social sustainability given the requirements and preferences of local stakeholders. Given that analogous trade-offs are found across the tropics, this work contributes to reconciling tropical forest maintenance and its use for sustainable rural livelihoods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1708-3087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-3087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5751/ES-08691-210445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Resilience Alliance</publisher><subject>biodiversity ; Carbon ; cattle ; conservationists ; Deforestation ; Dry forests ; Ecological sustainability ; Ecosystems ; Efficiency ; Fodder ; Forest conservation ; Forest ecology ; Forest growth ; Forest management ; Forests ; Landscape ; Landscapes ; Old growth forests ; Pasture ; Pastures ; peasants ; Plant diversity ; production possibility frontier ; Ranching ; Regeneration ; Resource management ; Species richness ; Sustainability ; Sustainable agriculture ; Sustainable development ; Tradeoff analysis ; Tradeoffs ; Trees ; Tropical environments ; Tropical forests</subject><ispartof>Ecology and society, 2016-12, Vol.21 (4), p.45, Article art45</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Resilience Alliance 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-75b616123686e69a7b84414aae6782040501c00813906a9dfe191cb5eda16be83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26270024$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26270024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,25332,27843,27901,27902,54499,54505,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mora, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balvanera, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Frapolli, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trilleras, Jenny M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen-Salgado, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmerón, Oscar</creatorcontrib><title>Trade-offs between ecosystem services and alternative pathways toward sustainability in a tropical dry forest region</title><title>Ecology and society</title><description>The design of strategies aimed at sustainable resource management requires an understanding of the trade-offs between the ecosystem services at stake, to determine appropriate ways in which to navigate them. We assess trade-offs between forage production for cattle ranching and the maintenance of carbon stocks or tree diversity in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Trade-offs between pairs of services were assessed by identifying their efficiency frontiers at both site and landscape scales. We also estimated service outcomes under current and hypothetical land-management conditions. We found stark trade-offs between fodder and carbon stocks and between fodder and tree species richness at the site scale. At the landscape scale, the efficiency frontier was concave, with a much less pronounced trade-off in the fodder-species richness case. Our estimates of current service supply levels showed a reduction of 18-21% for C stock and 41-43% for fodder biomass, relative to the maximum feasible values along the efficiency frontier. Choice of the optimum management strategy to reduce such inefficiency depended on deforestation level: secondary forest regeneration was most suitable when deforestation is low, whereas increased fodder productivity in the pastures is best when deforestation is high. Pasture enrichment with forage trees and secondary forest growth are potential management alternatives for achieving sustainability given the range of enabling ecological factors and to balance ecological and social sustainability given the requirements and preferences of local stakeholders. Given that analogous trade-offs are found across the tropics, this work contributes to reconciling tropical forest maintenance and its use for sustainable rural livelihoods.</description><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>cattle</subject><subject>conservationists</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Dry forests</subject><subject>Ecological sustainability</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Fodder</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest growth</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Old growth forests</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Pastures</subject><subject>peasants</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>production possibility frontier</subject><subject>Ranching</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Tradeoff analysis</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Tropical environments</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><issn>1708-3087</issn><issn>1708-3087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JFNAL</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1rHDEMhofSQtO0554Khl56mcQaf86xhG0bCPSQ9Gw0Hjn1Mjve2t4s8-87yZZQchAS4tGLpLdpPgK_UEbB5ea25Vb30HbApVSvmjMw3LaCW_P6v_pt866ULeddL2131tS7jCO1KYTCBqpHopmRT2UplXasUH6IngrDeWQ4Vcoz1vhAbI_19xGXwmo6Yh5ZOZSKccYhTrEuLM4MWc1pHz1ObMwLCylTqSzTfUzz--ZNwKnQh3_5vPn1bXN39aO9-fn9-urrTeulgNoaNWjQ0AltNekezWClBIlI2tiOS644eM4tiJ5r7MdA0IMfFI0IeiArzpvrk-6YcOv2Oe4wLy5hdE-NlO8d5hr9RA48eRIi8J6s1DxgUL3UiqQIgwFJq9aXk9Y-pz-H9Ra3i8XTNOFM6VAc2N6INTis6OcX6DYd1s9Nj5RS1golzUpdniifUymZwvOCwN2jo25z654cdSdH14lPp4ltqSk_453uzOqnFH8BzUedow</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Mora, Francisco</creator><creator>Balvanera, Patricia</creator><creator>García-Frapolli, Eduardo</creator><creator>Castillo, Alicia</creator><creator>Trilleras, Jenny M.</creator><creator>Cohen-Salgado, Daniel</creator><creator>Salmerón, Oscar</creator><general>Resilience Alliance</general><scope>JFNAL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>H9R</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Trade-offs between ecosystem services and alternative pathways toward sustainability in a tropical dry forest region</title><author>Mora, Francisco ; Balvanera, Patricia ; García-Frapolli, Eduardo ; Castillo, Alicia ; Trilleras, Jenny M. ; Cohen-Salgado, Daniel ; Salmerón, Oscar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-75b616123686e69a7b84414aae6782040501c00813906a9dfe191cb5eda16be83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>cattle</topic><topic>conservationists</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Dry forests</topic><topic>Ecological sustainability</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Fodder</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest growth</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Old growth forests</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Pastures</topic><topic>peasants</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>production possibility frontier</topic><topic>Ranching</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Tradeoff analysis</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Tropical environments</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mora, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balvanera, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Frapolli, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trilleras, Jenny M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen-Salgado, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmerón, Oscar</creatorcontrib><collection>Jstor Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Illustrata: Natural Sciences</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ecology and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mora, Francisco</au><au>Balvanera, Patricia</au><au>García-Frapolli, Eduardo</au><au>Castillo, Alicia</au><au>Trilleras, Jenny M.</au><au>Cohen-Salgado, Daniel</au><au>Salmerón, Oscar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trade-offs between ecosystem services and alternative pathways toward sustainability in a tropical dry forest region</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and society</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>45</spage><pages>45-</pages><artnum>art45</artnum><issn>1708-3087</issn><eissn>1708-3087</eissn><abstract>The design of strategies aimed at sustainable resource management requires an understanding of the trade-offs between the ecosystem services at stake, to determine appropriate ways in which to navigate them. We assess trade-offs between forage production for cattle ranching and the maintenance of carbon stocks or tree diversity in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Trade-offs between pairs of services were assessed by identifying their efficiency frontiers at both site and landscape scales. We also estimated service outcomes under current and hypothetical land-management conditions. We found stark trade-offs between fodder and carbon stocks and between fodder and tree species richness at the site scale. At the landscape scale, the efficiency frontier was concave, with a much less pronounced trade-off in the fodder-species richness case. Our estimates of current service supply levels showed a reduction of 18-21% for C stock and 41-43% for fodder biomass, relative to the maximum feasible values along the efficiency frontier. Choice of the optimum management strategy to reduce such inefficiency depended on deforestation level: secondary forest regeneration was most suitable when deforestation is low, whereas increased fodder productivity in the pastures is best when deforestation is high. Pasture enrichment with forage trees and secondary forest growth are potential management alternatives for achieving sustainability given the range of enabling ecological factors and to balance ecological and social sustainability given the requirements and preferences of local stakeholders. Given that analogous trade-offs are found across the tropics, this work contributes to reconciling tropical forest maintenance and its use for sustainable rural livelihoods.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Resilience Alliance</pub><doi>10.5751/ES-08691-210445</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1708-3087 |
ispartof | Ecology and society, 2016-12, Vol.21 (4), p.45, Article art45 |
issn | 1708-3087 1708-3087 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1cece33f09e8460faf59465e43fb714e |
source | Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals; PAIS Index; Jstor Journals Open Access; JSTOR |
subjects | biodiversity Carbon cattle conservationists Deforestation Dry forests Ecological sustainability Ecosystems Efficiency Fodder Forest conservation Forest ecology Forest growth Forest management Forests Landscape Landscapes Old growth forests Pasture Pastures peasants Plant diversity production possibility frontier Ranching Regeneration Resource management Species richness Sustainability Sustainable agriculture Sustainable development Tradeoff analysis Tradeoffs Trees Tropical environments Tropical forests |
title | Trade-offs between ecosystem services and alternative pathways toward sustainability in a tropical dry forest region |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A38%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trade-offs%20between%20ecosystem%20services%20and%20alternative%20pathways%20toward%20sustainability%20in%20a%20tropical%20dry%20forest%20region&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20society&rft.au=Mora,%20Francisco&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=45&rft.pages=45-&rft.artnum=art45&rft.issn=1708-3087&rft.eissn=1708-3087&rft_id=info:doi/10.5751/ES-08691-210445&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_doaj_%3E26270024%3C/jstor_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-75b616123686e69a7b84414aae6782040501c00813906a9dfe191cb5eda16be83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1855883547&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26270024&rfr_iscdi=true |