Loading…

Trade-offs between ecosystem services and alternative pathways toward sustainability in a tropical dry forest region

The design of strategies aimed at sustainable resource management requires an understanding of the trade-offs between the ecosystem services at stake, to determine appropriate ways in which to navigate them. We assess trade-offs between forage production for cattle ranching and the maintenance of ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and society 2016-12, Vol.21 (4), p.45, Article art45
Main Authors: Mora, Francisco, Balvanera, Patricia, García-Frapolli, Eduardo, Castillo, Alicia, Trilleras, Jenny M., Cohen-Salgado, Daniel, Salmerón, Oscar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-75b616123686e69a7b84414aae6782040501c00813906a9dfe191cb5eda16be83
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 45
container_title Ecology and society
container_volume 21
creator Mora, Francisco
Balvanera, Patricia
García-Frapolli, Eduardo
Castillo, Alicia
Trilleras, Jenny M.
Cohen-Salgado, Daniel
Salmerón, Oscar
description The design of strategies aimed at sustainable resource management requires an understanding of the trade-offs between the ecosystem services at stake, to determine appropriate ways in which to navigate them. We assess trade-offs between forage production for cattle ranching and the maintenance of carbon stocks or tree diversity in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Trade-offs between pairs of services were assessed by identifying their efficiency frontiers at both site and landscape scales. We also estimated service outcomes under current and hypothetical land-management conditions. We found stark trade-offs between fodder and carbon stocks and between fodder and tree species richness at the site scale. At the landscape scale, the efficiency frontier was concave, with a much less pronounced trade-off in the fodder-species richness case. Our estimates of current service supply levels showed a reduction of 18-21% for C stock and 41-43% for fodder biomass, relative to the maximum feasible values along the efficiency frontier. Choice of the optimum management strategy to reduce such inefficiency depended on deforestation level: secondary forest regeneration was most suitable when deforestation is low, whereas increased fodder productivity in the pastures is best when deforestation is high. Pasture enrichment with forage trees and secondary forest growth are potential management alternatives for achieving sustainability given the range of enabling ecological factors and to balance ecological and social sustainability given the requirements and preferences of local stakeholders. Given that analogous trade-offs are found across the tropics, this work contributes to reconciling tropical forest maintenance and its use for sustainable rural livelihoods.
doi_str_mv 10.5751/ES-08691-210445
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1cece33f09e8460faf59465e43fb714e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26270024</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1cece33f09e8460faf59465e43fb714e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>26270024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-75b616123686e69a7b84414aae6782040501c00813906a9dfe191cb5eda16be83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1rHDEMhofSQtO0554Khl56mcQaf86xhG0bCPSQ9Gw0Hjn1Mjve2t4s8-87yZZQchAS4tGLpLdpPgK_UEbB5ea25Vb30HbApVSvmjMw3LaCW_P6v_pt866ULeddL2131tS7jCO1KYTCBqpHopmRT2UplXasUH6IngrDeWQ4Vcoz1vhAbI_19xGXwmo6Yh5ZOZSKccYhTrEuLM4MWc1pHz1ObMwLCylTqSzTfUzz--ZNwKnQh3_5vPn1bXN39aO9-fn9-urrTeulgNoaNWjQ0AltNekezWClBIlI2tiOS644eM4tiJ5r7MdA0IMfFI0IeiArzpvrk-6YcOv2Oe4wLy5hdE-NlO8d5hr9RA48eRIi8J6s1DxgUL3UiqQIgwFJq9aXk9Y-pz-H9Ra3i8XTNOFM6VAc2N6INTis6OcX6DYd1s9Nj5RS1golzUpdniifUymZwvOCwN2jo25z654cdSdH14lPp4ltqSk_453uzOqnFH8BzUedow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1855883547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trade-offs between ecosystem services and alternative pathways toward sustainability in a tropical dry forest region</title><source>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Mora, Francisco ; Balvanera, Patricia ; García-Frapolli, Eduardo ; Castillo, Alicia ; Trilleras, Jenny M. ; Cohen-Salgado, Daniel ; Salmerón, Oscar</creator><creatorcontrib>Mora, Francisco ; Balvanera, Patricia ; García-Frapolli, Eduardo ; Castillo, Alicia ; Trilleras, Jenny M. ; Cohen-Salgado, Daniel ; Salmerón, Oscar</creatorcontrib><description>The design of strategies aimed at sustainable resource management requires an understanding of the trade-offs between the ecosystem services at stake, to determine appropriate ways in which to navigate them. We assess trade-offs between forage production for cattle ranching and the maintenance of carbon stocks or tree diversity in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Trade-offs between pairs of services were assessed by identifying their efficiency frontiers at both site and landscape scales. We also estimated service outcomes under current and hypothetical land-management conditions. We found stark trade-offs between fodder and carbon stocks and between fodder and tree species richness at the site scale. At the landscape scale, the efficiency frontier was concave, with a much less pronounced trade-off in the fodder-species richness case. Our estimates of current service supply levels showed a reduction of 18-21% for C stock and 41-43% for fodder biomass, relative to the maximum feasible values along the efficiency frontier. Choice of the optimum management strategy to reduce such inefficiency depended on deforestation level: secondary forest regeneration was most suitable when deforestation is low, whereas increased fodder productivity in the pastures is best when deforestation is high. Pasture enrichment with forage trees and secondary forest growth are potential management alternatives for achieving sustainability given the range of enabling ecological factors and to balance ecological and social sustainability given the requirements and preferences of local stakeholders. Given that analogous trade-offs are found across the tropics, this work contributes to reconciling tropical forest maintenance and its use for sustainable rural livelihoods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1708-3087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-3087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5751/ES-08691-210445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Resilience Alliance</publisher><subject>biodiversity ; Carbon ; cattle ; conservationists ; Deforestation ; Dry forests ; Ecological sustainability ; Ecosystems ; Efficiency ; Fodder ; Forest conservation ; Forest ecology ; Forest growth ; Forest management ; Forests ; Landscape ; Landscapes ; Old growth forests ; Pasture ; Pastures ; peasants ; Plant diversity ; production possibility frontier ; Ranching ; Regeneration ; Resource management ; Species richness ; Sustainability ; Sustainable agriculture ; Sustainable development ; Tradeoff analysis ; Tradeoffs ; Trees ; Tropical environments ; Tropical forests</subject><ispartof>Ecology and society, 2016-12, Vol.21 (4), p.45, Article art45</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Resilience Alliance 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-75b616123686e69a7b84414aae6782040501c00813906a9dfe191cb5eda16be83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26270024$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26270024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,25332,27843,27901,27902,54499,54505,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mora, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balvanera, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Frapolli, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trilleras, Jenny M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen-Salgado, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmerón, Oscar</creatorcontrib><title>Trade-offs between ecosystem services and alternative pathways toward sustainability in a tropical dry forest region</title><title>Ecology and society</title><description>The design of strategies aimed at sustainable resource management requires an understanding of the trade-offs between the ecosystem services at stake, to determine appropriate ways in which to navigate them. We assess trade-offs between forage production for cattle ranching and the maintenance of carbon stocks or tree diversity in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Trade-offs between pairs of services were assessed by identifying their efficiency frontiers at both site and landscape scales. We also estimated service outcomes under current and hypothetical land-management conditions. We found stark trade-offs between fodder and carbon stocks and between fodder and tree species richness at the site scale. At the landscape scale, the efficiency frontier was concave, with a much less pronounced trade-off in the fodder-species richness case. Our estimates of current service supply levels showed a reduction of 18-21% for C stock and 41-43% for fodder biomass, relative to the maximum feasible values along the efficiency frontier. Choice of the optimum management strategy to reduce such inefficiency depended on deforestation level: secondary forest regeneration was most suitable when deforestation is low, whereas increased fodder productivity in the pastures is best when deforestation is high. Pasture enrichment with forage trees and secondary forest growth are potential management alternatives for achieving sustainability given the range of enabling ecological factors and to balance ecological and social sustainability given the requirements and preferences of local stakeholders. Given that analogous trade-offs are found across the tropics, this work contributes to reconciling tropical forest maintenance and its use for sustainable rural livelihoods.</description><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>cattle</subject><subject>conservationists</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Dry forests</subject><subject>Ecological sustainability</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Fodder</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest growth</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Old growth forests</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Pastures</subject><subject>peasants</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>production possibility frontier</subject><subject>Ranching</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Tradeoff analysis</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Tropical environments</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><issn>1708-3087</issn><issn>1708-3087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JFNAL</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1rHDEMhofSQtO0554Khl56mcQaf86xhG0bCPSQ9Gw0Hjn1Mjve2t4s8-87yZZQchAS4tGLpLdpPgK_UEbB5ea25Vb30HbApVSvmjMw3LaCW_P6v_pt866ULeddL2131tS7jCO1KYTCBqpHopmRT2UplXasUH6IngrDeWQ4Vcoz1vhAbI_19xGXwmo6Yh5ZOZSKccYhTrEuLM4MWc1pHz1ObMwLCylTqSzTfUzz--ZNwKnQh3_5vPn1bXN39aO9-fn9-urrTeulgNoaNWjQ0AltNekezWClBIlI2tiOS644eM4tiJ5r7MdA0IMfFI0IeiArzpvrk-6YcOv2Oe4wLy5hdE-NlO8d5hr9RA48eRIi8J6s1DxgUL3UiqQIgwFJq9aXk9Y-pz-H9Ra3i8XTNOFM6VAc2N6INTis6OcX6DYd1s9Nj5RS1golzUpdniifUymZwvOCwN2jo25z654cdSdH14lPp4ltqSk_453uzOqnFH8BzUedow</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Mora, Francisco</creator><creator>Balvanera, Patricia</creator><creator>García-Frapolli, Eduardo</creator><creator>Castillo, Alicia</creator><creator>Trilleras, Jenny M.</creator><creator>Cohen-Salgado, Daniel</creator><creator>Salmerón, Oscar</creator><general>Resilience Alliance</general><scope>JFNAL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>H9R</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Trade-offs between ecosystem services and alternative pathways toward sustainability in a tropical dry forest region</title><author>Mora, Francisco ; Balvanera, Patricia ; García-Frapolli, Eduardo ; Castillo, Alicia ; Trilleras, Jenny M. ; Cohen-Salgado, Daniel ; Salmerón, Oscar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-75b616123686e69a7b84414aae6782040501c00813906a9dfe191cb5eda16be83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>cattle</topic><topic>conservationists</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Dry forests</topic><topic>Ecological sustainability</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Fodder</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest growth</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Old growth forests</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Pastures</topic><topic>peasants</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>production possibility frontier</topic><topic>Ranching</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Tradeoff analysis</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Tropical environments</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mora, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balvanera, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Frapolli, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trilleras, Jenny M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen-Salgado, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmerón, Oscar</creatorcontrib><collection>Jstor Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Illustrata: Natural Sciences</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ecology and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mora, Francisco</au><au>Balvanera, Patricia</au><au>García-Frapolli, Eduardo</au><au>Castillo, Alicia</au><au>Trilleras, Jenny M.</au><au>Cohen-Salgado, Daniel</au><au>Salmerón, Oscar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trade-offs between ecosystem services and alternative pathways toward sustainability in a tropical dry forest region</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and society</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>45</spage><pages>45-</pages><artnum>art45</artnum><issn>1708-3087</issn><eissn>1708-3087</eissn><abstract>The design of strategies aimed at sustainable resource management requires an understanding of the trade-offs between the ecosystem services at stake, to determine appropriate ways in which to navigate them. We assess trade-offs between forage production for cattle ranching and the maintenance of carbon stocks or tree diversity in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Trade-offs between pairs of services were assessed by identifying their efficiency frontiers at both site and landscape scales. We also estimated service outcomes under current and hypothetical land-management conditions. We found stark trade-offs between fodder and carbon stocks and between fodder and tree species richness at the site scale. At the landscape scale, the efficiency frontier was concave, with a much less pronounced trade-off in the fodder-species richness case. Our estimates of current service supply levels showed a reduction of 18-21% for C stock and 41-43% for fodder biomass, relative to the maximum feasible values along the efficiency frontier. Choice of the optimum management strategy to reduce such inefficiency depended on deforestation level: secondary forest regeneration was most suitable when deforestation is low, whereas increased fodder productivity in the pastures is best when deforestation is high. Pasture enrichment with forage trees and secondary forest growth are potential management alternatives for achieving sustainability given the range of enabling ecological factors and to balance ecological and social sustainability given the requirements and preferences of local stakeholders. Given that analogous trade-offs are found across the tropics, this work contributes to reconciling tropical forest maintenance and its use for sustainable rural livelihoods.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Resilience Alliance</pub><doi>10.5751/ES-08691-210445</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1708-3087
ispartof Ecology and society, 2016-12, Vol.21 (4), p.45, Article art45
issn 1708-3087
1708-3087
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1cece33f09e8460faf59465e43fb714e
source Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals; PAIS Index; Jstor Journals Open Access; JSTOR
subjects biodiversity
Carbon
cattle
conservationists
Deforestation
Dry forests
Ecological sustainability
Ecosystems
Efficiency
Fodder
Forest conservation
Forest ecology
Forest growth
Forest management
Forests
Landscape
Landscapes
Old growth forests
Pasture
Pastures
peasants
Plant diversity
production possibility frontier
Ranching
Regeneration
Resource management
Species richness
Sustainability
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable development
Tradeoff analysis
Tradeoffs
Trees
Tropical environments
Tropical forests
title Trade-offs between ecosystem services and alternative pathways toward sustainability in a tropical dry forest region
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A38%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trade-offs%20between%20ecosystem%20services%20and%20alternative%20pathways%20toward%20sustainability%20in%20a%20tropical%20dry%20forest%20region&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20society&rft.au=Mora,%20Francisco&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=45&rft.pages=45-&rft.artnum=art45&rft.issn=1708-3087&rft.eissn=1708-3087&rft_id=info:doi/10.5751/ES-08691-210445&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_doaj_%3E26270024%3C/jstor_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-75b616123686e69a7b84414aae6782040501c00813906a9dfe191cb5eda16be83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1855883547&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26270024&rfr_iscdi=true