Loading…
A COMPARISION BETWEEN CROSSBODY STRETCH VERSUS SLEEPER STRETCH IN PERIARTHRITIS OF SHOULDER
Background: Recently Cross body stretch and Sleeper stretch are used to improve internal rotation Range of motion in Shoulder Pathologies. It was proposed to study the effect of cross body stretch and sleeper stretch in subjects with periarthritis of shoulder. Methods: 60 subjects with a mean age of...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of physiotherapy 2015-12, Vol.2 (6) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | International journal of physiotherapy |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Shaik Raheem Saheb Patchava Apparao CH.Ashok Chakravarthy CH.Ganapathi Swamy |
description | Background: Recently Cross body stretch and Sleeper stretch are used to improve internal rotation Range of motion in Shoulder Pathologies. It was proposed to study the effect of cross body stretch and sleeper stretch in subjects with periarthritis of shoulder. Methods: 60 subjects with a mean age of 53 years having clinical diagnosis of Periarthritis of shoulder and full filled the inclusive criteria are taken. After the initial measurements, the subjects are randomly assigned into 2 stretching groups. Group-A performed the Sleeper stretch. Group-B performed a Cross body stretch. Both Groups performed the Stretch in Duration of 6weeks – once daily for 5 repetitions holding each stretch for 30 seconds for 5 days a week. Along with this technique conventional physiotherapy like IFT, overhead pulleys, Pendula exercises, Wall climbing exercises, mariners wheel exercises are performed. After the treatment, subjects were evaluated for their pain profile using visual analogue scale, Goniometer for measuring Range of motion. Results: For within group comparison we used Paired t-test analysis, For Between group comparison we used Independent t-test for statistical analysis. At the end of 6 weeks It was found that subjects treated with cross-body stretch showed significant improvement in terms of VAS scores and Range of motion scores (P=0.000) and patients treated with Sleeper stretch showed significant improvement in terms of VAS scores and Range of motion scores (P=0.000). When compared between Groups the VAS and Range of motion scores showed a significant improvement in Cross body stretch Group than the Sleeper stretch Group (P=0.000). Conclusion: It was concluded that both stretching techniques were found improvement in Range of motion and VAS and Cross-body Stretch showed more Significant improvement than the sleeper Stretch after 6 weeks treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15621/ijphy/2015/v2i6/80763 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>doaj</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1d1e6820e96849f68c6d62b3ef188055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1d1e6820e96849f68c6d62b3ef188055</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_1d1e6820e96849f68c6d62b3ef188055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d151t-3c90fe3c544fb43d2a9fc027e828a83d70181526c90e8a036c3ff5b0a7e17fc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9Tt1OwjAYbYwmEuQVTF9g0p-1-3Y5RpEmk5F2aIwXS9laHcFABjHh7UU0Xp2fnHNyELqn5IEKyei42-w_TmNGqBh_sU6OgSSSX6EB4zFEwLm8vvA0Eikkt2h0OGwIIRQkTyAdoLcM5-XTMjPa6nKBJ6p6UWqBc1NaOymnr9hWRlX5HD8rY1cW20KppTL_tl7gs9SZqeZGV9ricobtvFwVU2Xu0E1w24Mf_eEQrWY_pagoH3WeFVFLBT1GvElJ8LwRcRzWMW-ZS0NDWOKBgQPeJue3VDB5jnlwhMuGhyDWxCWeJqFhfIj07267c5t633efrj_VO9fVF2PXv9euP3bN1te0pV4CIz6VEKdBQiNbydbcBwpAhODfdC5cfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A COMPARISION BETWEEN CROSSBODY STRETCH VERSUS SLEEPER STRETCH IN PERIARTHRITIS OF SHOULDER</title><source>ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources</source><creator>Shaik Raheem Saheb ; Patchava Apparao ; CH.Ashok Chakravarthy ; CH.Ganapathi Swamy</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaik Raheem Saheb ; Patchava Apparao ; CH.Ashok Chakravarthy ; CH.Ganapathi Swamy</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Recently Cross body stretch and Sleeper stretch are used to improve internal rotation Range of motion in Shoulder Pathologies. It was proposed to study the effect of cross body stretch and sleeper stretch in subjects with periarthritis of shoulder. Methods: 60 subjects with a mean age of 53 years having clinical diagnosis of Periarthritis of shoulder and full filled the inclusive criteria are taken. After the initial measurements, the subjects are randomly assigned into 2 stretching groups. Group-A performed the Sleeper stretch. Group-B performed a Cross body stretch. Both Groups performed the Stretch in Duration of 6weeks – once daily for 5 repetitions holding each stretch for 30 seconds for 5 days a week. Along with this technique conventional physiotherapy like IFT, overhead pulleys, Pendula exercises, Wall climbing exercises, mariners wheel exercises are performed. After the treatment, subjects were evaluated for their pain profile using visual analogue scale, Goniometer for measuring Range of motion. Results: For within group comparison we used Paired t-test analysis, For Between group comparison we used Independent t-test for statistical analysis. At the end of 6 weeks It was found that subjects treated with cross-body stretch showed significant improvement in terms of VAS scores and Range of motion scores (P=0.000) and patients treated with Sleeper stretch showed significant improvement in terms of VAS scores and Range of motion scores (P=0.000). When compared between Groups the VAS and Range of motion scores showed a significant improvement in Cross body stretch Group than the Sleeper stretch Group (P=0.000). Conclusion: It was concluded that both stretching techniques were found improvement in Range of motion and VAS and Cross-body Stretch showed more Significant improvement than the sleeper Stretch after 6 weeks treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2349-5987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2348-8336</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15621/ijphy/2015/v2i6/80763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vasinformatics</publisher><subject>cross body ; GTO ; Range of motion ; Stretch ; VAS</subject><ispartof>International journal of physiotherapy, 2015-12, Vol.2 (6)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaik Raheem Saheb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patchava Apparao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CH.Ashok Chakravarthy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CH.Ganapathi Swamy</creatorcontrib><title>A COMPARISION BETWEEN CROSSBODY STRETCH VERSUS SLEEPER STRETCH IN PERIARTHRITIS OF SHOULDER</title><title>International journal of physiotherapy</title><description>Background: Recently Cross body stretch and Sleeper stretch are used to improve internal rotation Range of motion in Shoulder Pathologies. It was proposed to study the effect of cross body stretch and sleeper stretch in subjects with periarthritis of shoulder. Methods: 60 subjects with a mean age of 53 years having clinical diagnosis of Periarthritis of shoulder and full filled the inclusive criteria are taken. After the initial measurements, the subjects are randomly assigned into 2 stretching groups. Group-A performed the Sleeper stretch. Group-B performed a Cross body stretch. Both Groups performed the Stretch in Duration of 6weeks – once daily for 5 repetitions holding each stretch for 30 seconds for 5 days a week. Along with this technique conventional physiotherapy like IFT, overhead pulleys, Pendula exercises, Wall climbing exercises, mariners wheel exercises are performed. After the treatment, subjects were evaluated for their pain profile using visual analogue scale, Goniometer for measuring Range of motion. Results: For within group comparison we used Paired t-test analysis, For Between group comparison we used Independent t-test for statistical analysis. At the end of 6 weeks It was found that subjects treated with cross-body stretch showed significant improvement in terms of VAS scores and Range of motion scores (P=0.000) and patients treated with Sleeper stretch showed significant improvement in terms of VAS scores and Range of motion scores (P=0.000). When compared between Groups the VAS and Range of motion scores showed a significant improvement in Cross body stretch Group than the Sleeper stretch Group (P=0.000). Conclusion: It was concluded that both stretching techniques were found improvement in Range of motion and VAS and Cross-body Stretch showed more Significant improvement than the sleeper Stretch after 6 weeks treatment.</description><subject>cross body</subject><subject>GTO</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Stretch</subject><subject>VAS</subject><issn>2349-5987</issn><issn>2348-8336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9Tt1OwjAYbYwmEuQVTF9g0p-1-3Y5RpEmk5F2aIwXS9laHcFABjHh7UU0Xp2fnHNyELqn5IEKyei42-w_TmNGqBh_sU6OgSSSX6EB4zFEwLm8vvA0Eikkt2h0OGwIIRQkTyAdoLcM5-XTMjPa6nKBJ6p6UWqBc1NaOymnr9hWRlX5HD8rY1cW20KppTL_tl7gs9SZqeZGV9ricobtvFwVU2Xu0E1w24Mf_eEQrWY_pagoH3WeFVFLBT1GvElJ8LwRcRzWMW-ZS0NDWOKBgQPeJue3VDB5jnlwhMuGhyDWxCWeJqFhfIj07267c5t633efrj_VO9fVF2PXv9euP3bN1te0pV4CIz6VEKdBQiNbydbcBwpAhODfdC5cfQ</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Shaik Raheem Saheb</creator><creator>Patchava Apparao</creator><creator>CH.Ashok Chakravarthy</creator><creator>CH.Ganapathi Swamy</creator><general>Vasinformatics</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>A COMPARISION BETWEEN CROSSBODY STRETCH VERSUS SLEEPER STRETCH IN PERIARTHRITIS OF SHOULDER</title><author>Shaik Raheem Saheb ; Patchava Apparao ; CH.Ashok Chakravarthy ; CH.Ganapathi Swamy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d151t-3c90fe3c544fb43d2a9fc027e828a83d70181526c90e8a036c3ff5b0a7e17fc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>cross body</topic><topic>GTO</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Stretch</topic><topic>VAS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaik Raheem Saheb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patchava Apparao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CH.Ashok Chakravarthy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CH.Ganapathi Swamy</creatorcontrib><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of physiotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaik Raheem Saheb</au><au>Patchava Apparao</au><au>CH.Ashok Chakravarthy</au><au>CH.Ganapathi Swamy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A COMPARISION BETWEEN CROSSBODY STRETCH VERSUS SLEEPER STRETCH IN PERIARTHRITIS OF SHOULDER</atitle><jtitle>International journal of physiotherapy</jtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>2349-5987</issn><eissn>2348-8336</eissn><abstract>Background: Recently Cross body stretch and Sleeper stretch are used to improve internal rotation Range of motion in Shoulder Pathologies. It was proposed to study the effect of cross body stretch and sleeper stretch in subjects with periarthritis of shoulder. Methods: 60 subjects with a mean age of 53 years having clinical diagnosis of Periarthritis of shoulder and full filled the inclusive criteria are taken. After the initial measurements, the subjects are randomly assigned into 2 stretching groups. Group-A performed the Sleeper stretch. Group-B performed a Cross body stretch. Both Groups performed the Stretch in Duration of 6weeks – once daily for 5 repetitions holding each stretch for 30 seconds for 5 days a week. Along with this technique conventional physiotherapy like IFT, overhead pulleys, Pendula exercises, Wall climbing exercises, mariners wheel exercises are performed. After the treatment, subjects were evaluated for their pain profile using visual analogue scale, Goniometer for measuring Range of motion. Results: For within group comparison we used Paired t-test analysis, For Between group comparison we used Independent t-test for statistical analysis. At the end of 6 weeks It was found that subjects treated with cross-body stretch showed significant improvement in terms of VAS scores and Range of motion scores (P=0.000) and patients treated with Sleeper stretch showed significant improvement in terms of VAS scores and Range of motion scores (P=0.000). When compared between Groups the VAS and Range of motion scores showed a significant improvement in Cross body stretch Group than the Sleeper stretch Group (P=0.000). Conclusion: It was concluded that both stretching techniques were found improvement in Range of motion and VAS and Cross-body Stretch showed more Significant improvement than the sleeper Stretch after 6 weeks treatment.</abstract><pub>Vasinformatics</pub><doi>10.15621/ijphy/2015/v2i6/80763</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2349-5987 |
ispartof | International journal of physiotherapy, 2015-12, Vol.2 (6) |
issn | 2349-5987 2348-8336 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1d1e6820e96849f68c6d62b3ef188055 |
source | ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources |
subjects | cross body GTO Range of motion Stretch VAS |
title | A COMPARISION BETWEEN CROSSBODY STRETCH VERSUS SLEEPER STRETCH IN PERIARTHRITIS OF SHOULDER |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A07%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20COMPARISION%20BETWEEN%20CROSSBODY%20STRETCH%20VERSUS%20SLEEPER%20STRETCH%20IN%20PERIARTHRITIS%20OF%20SHOULDER&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20physiotherapy&rft.au=Shaik%20Raheem%20Saheb&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=2349-5987&rft.eissn=2348-8336&rft_id=info:doi/10.15621/ijphy/2015/v2i6/80763&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_1d1e6820e96849f68c6d62b3ef188055%3C/doaj%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d151t-3c90fe3c544fb43d2a9fc027e828a83d70181526c90e8a036c3ff5b0a7e17fc23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |