Loading…
Comparison of lidocaine, huffing maneuver and combination of both in prevention fentanyl induced cough before induction of anesthesia: a double-blind, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study
Intravenous bolus injection of fentanyl has been frequently reported to be associated with cough reflex during patient anesthesia. However, the search for the most effective protocol continues. This study aimed to compare the effect of reducing cough reflex after injection of fentanyl in a fusion pr...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC anesthesiology 2021-03, Vol.21 (1), p.92-5, Article 92 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-899bfdc729c22411a8d2a689c9c2fb50ae0080c50c91f904237a756cf3e1d45b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-899bfdc729c22411a8d2a689c9c2fb50ae0080c50c91f904237a756cf3e1d45b3 |
container_end_page | 5 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | BMC anesthesiology |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Dehghanpisheh, Laleh Eghbal, Mohammadhossein Bagheri Baravati, Fatemeh Vatankhah, Pooya |
description | Intravenous bolus injection of fentanyl has been frequently reported to be associated with cough reflex during patient anesthesia. However, the search for the most effective protocol continues. This study aimed to compare the effect of reducing cough reflex after injection of fentanyl in a fusion protocol by combining the injections of lidocaine and Huffing maneuver and comparing with a placebo control group, before anesthesia induction.
This prospective randomized controlled trial study was performed on 400 patients who were divided into four groups of combined protocol (group 1), lidocaine group (group 2), Huffing maneuver group (group 3), and the control receiving normal saline (group 4). Then patients were injected with 2. 5 μg /kg fentanyl and monitored for 2 min regarding their cough reflex, as well as the severity.
In group one, 9 patients (9%), in group two, 45 patients (45%), 22 patients (22%) in group three, and in group four, 75 patients (75%), developed cough reflex following fentanyl injection. Also, 13 patients (13%) developed moderate and 4 (4%) developed severe coughs in the control group reported, while no reports of severe or moderate cough were among the intervention groups. There was a significant difference between the intervention group and the control group both in terms of the rate and severity of the fentanyl-induced cough.
By using a combination of lidocaine injection along and Huffing maneuver, better results can be obtained in reducing the frequency, and also the severity of cough followed by fentanyl injection.
The trial was registered with IRCT.IR (09/03/2018-No. IRCT20141009019470N74 ). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12871-021-01313-w |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1d2e1c26737f4dba80e66826b3594d60</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A657264685</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1d2e1c26737f4dba80e66826b3594d60</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A657264685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-899bfdc729c22411a8d2a689c9c2fb50ae0080c50c91f904237a756cf3e1d45b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkstu1DAUhiMEoqXwAixQJLZN8SWxYxZI1YhLpUpsYG35OuNRYgcnmWp4QV6LM5O2dCQURU7-_P-X4-NTFG8xusK4ZR9GTFqOK0TgxhTT6u5ZcY5rkAhp6PMnz2fFq3HcIoR5i-jL4oxSzmnD-XnxZ5X6QeUwplgmX3bBJqNCdJflZvY-xHXZq-jmnculirY0qdchqiksdp2mTRliOWS3c_GoelhV3Hcg29m4Q2Reb0rtfMpuER_SAB6njRuD-liq0qZZd67SHXgugZjGwYF1B6Vk-HXqw2-gDZ0yTqfKpDjl1HUgjdNs96-LF151o3tzv14UP798_rH6Vt1-_3qzur6tTMPoVLVCaG8NJ8IQUmOsWksUa4WBd68bpBxCLTINMgJ7gWpCueINM546bOtG04viZuHapLZyyKFXeS-TCvIopLyWKk_BdE5iSxw2hHHKfW21apFjrCVM00bUliFgfVpYw6x7Zw10LqvuBHr6JYaNXKed5EJwLg6A9_eAnH7N0Ey5TXOOsH9JGjh8QQRl_1xrBVWF6BPATB9GI69ZwwmrWduA6-o_Lris6wN02_kA-kmALAEDRzVm5x8Lx0ge5lMu8ylhPuVxPuUdhN493fJj5GEg6V_houVM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2514792936</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of lidocaine, huffing maneuver and combination of both in prevention fentanyl induced cough before induction of anesthesia: a double-blind, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Dehghanpisheh, Laleh ; Eghbal, Mohammadhossein ; Bagheri Baravati, Fatemeh ; Vatankhah, Pooya</creator><creatorcontrib>Dehghanpisheh, Laleh ; Eghbal, Mohammadhossein ; Bagheri Baravati, Fatemeh ; Vatankhah, Pooya</creatorcontrib><description>Intravenous bolus injection of fentanyl has been frequently reported to be associated with cough reflex during patient anesthesia. However, the search for the most effective protocol continues. This study aimed to compare the effect of reducing cough reflex after injection of fentanyl in a fusion protocol by combining the injections of lidocaine and Huffing maneuver and comparing with a placebo control group, before anesthesia induction.
This prospective randomized controlled trial study was performed on 400 patients who were divided into four groups of combined protocol (group 1), lidocaine group (group 2), Huffing maneuver group (group 3), and the control receiving normal saline (group 4). Then patients were injected with 2. 5 μg /kg fentanyl and monitored for 2 min regarding their cough reflex, as well as the severity.
In group one, 9 patients (9%), in group two, 45 patients (45%), 22 patients (22%) in group three, and in group four, 75 patients (75%), developed cough reflex following fentanyl injection. Also, 13 patients (13%) developed moderate and 4 (4%) developed severe coughs in the control group reported, while no reports of severe or moderate cough were among the intervention groups. There was a significant difference between the intervention group and the control group both in terms of the rate and severity of the fentanyl-induced cough.
By using a combination of lidocaine injection along and Huffing maneuver, better results can be obtained in reducing the frequency, and also the severity of cough followed by fentanyl injection.
The trial was registered with IRCT.IR (09/03/2018-No. IRCT20141009019470N74 ).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2253</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2253</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01313-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33773577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Airway management ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration & dosage ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects ; Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage ; Combination protocol ; Comparative analysis ; Cough ; Cough - chemically induced ; Cough - prevention & control ; Double-Blind Method ; Double-blind studies ; Exhalation ; Female ; Fentanyl ; Fentanyl - administration & dosage ; Fentanyl - adverse effects ; Huffing maneuver ; Humans ; Injection ; Intervention ; Intravenous administration ; Lidocaine ; Lidocaine - administration & dosage ; Male ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Patients ; Placebos ; Preoperative Care ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>BMC anesthesiology, 2021-03, Vol.21 (1), p.92-5, Article 92</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-899bfdc729c22411a8d2a689c9c2fb50ae0080c50c91f904237a756cf3e1d45b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-899bfdc729c22411a8d2a689c9c2fb50ae0080c50c91f904237a756cf3e1d45b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997790/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2514792936?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,38493,43871,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33773577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dehghanpisheh, Laleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eghbal, Mohammadhossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagheri Baravati, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatankhah, Pooya</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of lidocaine, huffing maneuver and combination of both in prevention fentanyl induced cough before induction of anesthesia: a double-blind, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study</title><title>BMC anesthesiology</title><addtitle>BMC Anesthesiol</addtitle><description>Intravenous bolus injection of fentanyl has been frequently reported to be associated with cough reflex during patient anesthesia. However, the search for the most effective protocol continues. This study aimed to compare the effect of reducing cough reflex after injection of fentanyl in a fusion protocol by combining the injections of lidocaine and Huffing maneuver and comparing with a placebo control group, before anesthesia induction.
This prospective randomized controlled trial study was performed on 400 patients who were divided into four groups of combined protocol (group 1), lidocaine group (group 2), Huffing maneuver group (group 3), and the control receiving normal saline (group 4). Then patients were injected with 2. 5 μg /kg fentanyl and monitored for 2 min regarding their cough reflex, as well as the severity.
In group one, 9 patients (9%), in group two, 45 patients (45%), 22 patients (22%) in group three, and in group four, 75 patients (75%), developed cough reflex following fentanyl injection. Also, 13 patients (13%) developed moderate and 4 (4%) developed severe coughs in the control group reported, while no reports of severe or moderate cough were among the intervention groups. There was a significant difference between the intervention group and the control group both in terms of the rate and severity of the fentanyl-induced cough.
By using a combination of lidocaine injection along and Huffing maneuver, better results can be obtained in reducing the frequency, and also the severity of cough followed by fentanyl injection.
The trial was registered with IRCT.IR (09/03/2018-No. IRCT20141009019470N74 ).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Combination protocol</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cough</subject><subject>Cough - chemically induced</subject><subject>Cough - prevention & control</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Exhalation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>Fentanyl - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Fentanyl - adverse effects</subject><subject>Huffing maneuver</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Lidocaine</subject><subject>Lidocaine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>1471-2253</issn><issn>1471-2253</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkstu1DAUhiMEoqXwAixQJLZN8SWxYxZI1YhLpUpsYG35OuNRYgcnmWp4QV6LM5O2dCQURU7-_P-X4-NTFG8xusK4ZR9GTFqOK0TgxhTT6u5ZcY5rkAhp6PMnz2fFq3HcIoR5i-jL4oxSzmnD-XnxZ5X6QeUwplgmX3bBJqNCdJflZvY-xHXZq-jmnculirY0qdchqiksdp2mTRliOWS3c_GoelhV3Hcg29m4Q2Reb0rtfMpuER_SAB6njRuD-liq0qZZd67SHXgugZjGwYF1B6Vk-HXqw2-gDZ0yTqfKpDjl1HUgjdNs96-LF151o3tzv14UP798_rH6Vt1-_3qzur6tTMPoVLVCaG8NJ8IQUmOsWksUa4WBd68bpBxCLTINMgJ7gWpCueINM546bOtG04viZuHapLZyyKFXeS-TCvIopLyWKk_BdE5iSxw2hHHKfW21apFjrCVM00bUliFgfVpYw6x7Zw10LqvuBHr6JYaNXKed5EJwLg6A9_eAnH7N0Ey5TXOOsH9JGjh8QQRl_1xrBVWF6BPATB9GI69ZwwmrWduA6-o_Lris6wN02_kA-kmALAEDRzVm5x8Lx0ge5lMu8ylhPuVxPuUdhN493fJj5GEg6V_houVM</recordid><startdate>20210327</startdate><enddate>20210327</enddate><creator>Dehghanpisheh, Laleh</creator><creator>Eghbal, Mohammadhossein</creator><creator>Bagheri Baravati, Fatemeh</creator><creator>Vatankhah, Pooya</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210327</creationdate><title>Comparison of lidocaine, huffing maneuver and combination of both in prevention fentanyl induced cough before induction of anesthesia: a double-blind, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study</title><author>Dehghanpisheh, Laleh ; Eghbal, Mohammadhossein ; Bagheri Baravati, Fatemeh ; Vatankhah, Pooya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-899bfdc729c22411a8d2a689c9c2fb50ae0080c50c91f904237a756cf3e1d45b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Combination protocol</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cough</topic><topic>Cough - chemically induced</topic><topic>Cough - prevention & control</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Exhalation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>Fentanyl - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Fentanyl - adverse effects</topic><topic>Huffing maneuver</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Lidocaine</topic><topic>Lidocaine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dehghanpisheh, Laleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eghbal, Mohammadhossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagheri Baravati, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatankhah, Pooya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC anesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dehghanpisheh, Laleh</au><au>Eghbal, Mohammadhossein</au><au>Bagheri Baravati, Fatemeh</au><au>Vatankhah, Pooya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of lidocaine, huffing maneuver and combination of both in prevention fentanyl induced cough before induction of anesthesia: a double-blind, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study</atitle><jtitle>BMC anesthesiology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Anesthesiol</addtitle><date>2021-03-27</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>92-5</pages><artnum>92</artnum><issn>1471-2253</issn><eissn>1471-2253</eissn><abstract>Intravenous bolus injection of fentanyl has been frequently reported to be associated with cough reflex during patient anesthesia. However, the search for the most effective protocol continues. This study aimed to compare the effect of reducing cough reflex after injection of fentanyl in a fusion protocol by combining the injections of lidocaine and Huffing maneuver and comparing with a placebo control group, before anesthesia induction.
This prospective randomized controlled trial study was performed on 400 patients who were divided into four groups of combined protocol (group 1), lidocaine group (group 2), Huffing maneuver group (group 3), and the control receiving normal saline (group 4). Then patients were injected with 2. 5 μg /kg fentanyl and monitored for 2 min regarding their cough reflex, as well as the severity.
In group one, 9 patients (9%), in group two, 45 patients (45%), 22 patients (22%) in group three, and in group four, 75 patients (75%), developed cough reflex following fentanyl injection. Also, 13 patients (13%) developed moderate and 4 (4%) developed severe coughs in the control group reported, while no reports of severe or moderate cough were among the intervention groups. There was a significant difference between the intervention group and the control group both in terms of the rate and severity of the fentanyl-induced cough.
By using a combination of lidocaine injection along and Huffing maneuver, better results can be obtained in reducing the frequency, and also the severity of cough followed by fentanyl injection.
The trial was registered with IRCT.IR (09/03/2018-No. IRCT20141009019470N74 ).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>33773577</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12871-021-01313-w</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2253 |
ispartof | BMC anesthesiology, 2021-03, Vol.21 (1), p.92-5, Article 92 |
issn | 1471-2253 1471-2253 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1d2e1c26737f4dba80e66826b3594d60 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Adult Airway management Anesthesia Anesthesia, General Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration & dosage Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Combination protocol Comparative analysis Cough Cough - chemically induced Cough - prevention & control Double-Blind Method Double-blind studies Exhalation Female Fentanyl Fentanyl - administration & dosage Fentanyl - adverse effects Huffing maneuver Humans Injection Intervention Intravenous administration Lidocaine Lidocaine - administration & dosage Male Medical research Medicine, Experimental Patients Placebos Preoperative Care Prospective Studies |
title | Comparison of lidocaine, huffing maneuver and combination of both in prevention fentanyl induced cough before induction of anesthesia: a double-blind, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T12%3A19%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20lidocaine,%20huffing%20maneuver%20and%20combination%20of%20both%20in%20prevention%20fentanyl%20induced%20cough%20before%20induction%20of%20anesthesia:%20a%20double-blind,%20prospective,%20randomized%20placebo-controlled%20study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20anesthesiology&rft.au=Dehghanpisheh,%20Laleh&rft.date=2021-03-27&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=92-5&rft.artnum=92&rft.issn=1471-2253&rft.eissn=1471-2253&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12871-021-01313-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA657264685%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-899bfdc729c22411a8d2a689c9c2fb50ae0080c50c91f904237a756cf3e1d45b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2514792936&rft_id=info:pmid/33773577&rft_galeid=A657264685&rfr_iscdi=true |