Loading…

The Application of a Foliar Spray Containing Methylobacterium symbioticum Had a Limited Effect on Crop Yield and Nitrogen Recovery in Field and Pot-Grown Maize

In this study, the effectiveness of an inoculant containing a nitrogen (N)-fixing microorganism ( ) was evaluated on maize ( L.) grown both in the field (silage maize) and in pots over two years (2021 and 2022). The field trial included the following two treatments: with (Yes) and without (No) the i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plants (Basel) 2024-10, Vol.13 (20), p.2909
Main Authors: Rodrigues, Manuel Ângelo, Correia, Carlos Manuel, Arrobas, Margarida
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-c39f5d582dfa2007ab446a56daf63aa4c20fd19b115d835cbbad106f6b88c3ad3
container_end_page
container_issue 20
container_start_page 2909
container_title Plants (Basel)
container_volume 13
creator Rodrigues, Manuel Ângelo
Correia, Carlos Manuel
Arrobas, Margarida
description In this study, the effectiveness of an inoculant containing a nitrogen (N)-fixing microorganism ( ) was evaluated on maize ( L.) grown both in the field (silage maize) and in pots over two years (2021 and 2022). The field trial included the following two treatments: with (Yes) and without (No) the inoculant. The pot experiment was designed as a factorial arrangement with two factors: the application of the inoculant (Yes and No) and N applied to the soil (0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 g pot ). In the field, total dry matter yield (DMY) did not differ significantly between treatments, although the average DMY was higher in the inoculant treatment. In pots, the total DMY varied significantly across all N rates but was only significantly affected by the inoculant application in 2022. N fixation estimates in the field were 58.8 and 14.5 kg ha for 2021 and 2022, respectively, representing 23.7% and 9.1% of the N recovered in the aboveground plant parts. In pots, the estimated fixed N values were -49.2 and 199.2 mg pot in 2021 and 2022, respectively, which corresponded to -5.2% and 18.5% of the N found in the aboveground plant parts. Considering the average values obtained across the four cultivation conditions, there was a positive outcome for the treated plants. However, these values cannot be considered significant when compared to nitrogen removal in maize crops. A commercial product should provide an unequivocal and quantitatively relevant contribution to plant nutrition, which did not appear to be the case. Thus, for this inoculant to provide reliable guarantees of positive outcomes for farmers and become a useful tool in promoting more sustainable agriculture, further studies appear necessary. These studies should aim to determine in which crops and under what cultivation conditions the application of the inoculant is truly effective in enhancing N fixation and improving crop productivity.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/plants13202909
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1d71bd3f2a464a2287a85c88c841bb60</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A814406772</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1d71bd3f2a464a2287a85c88c841bb60</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A814406772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-c39f5d582dfa2007ab446a56daf63aa4c20fd19b115d835cbbad106f6b88c3ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktvEzEQx1cIRKvSK0dkiQscUvzY5wlVUdNGSgG15cDJmvUjcbRrb21vIXwZvioOLaFBtS3ZmvnPz57xZNlrgk8Ya_CHoQMbA2EU0wY3z7JDSimbVFVePX90PsiOQ1jjNOq0SPkyO2BNXtR1URxmv25WCp0OQ2cEROMschoBmrnOgEfXg4cNmjobwVhjl-hSxdWmcy2IqLwZexQ2fWtcNCKdL0Cm0IXpTVQSnWmtRESJOPVuQN-M6pLbSvTJRO-WyqIrJdyd8htkLJrt3F9cnJx7992iSzA_1avshYYuqOOH_Sj7Oju7mV5MFp_P59PTxUTkRRUngjW6kEVNpQaKcQVtnpdQlBJ0yQByQbGWpGkJKWTNCtG2IAkuddnWtWAg2VE2v-dKB2s-eNOD33AHhv8xOL_k4FOeneJEVqSVTFPIyxworSuoC5E4dU7atsSJ9fGeNYxtr6RQNnro9qD7HmtWfOnueHodwTUjifDugeDd7ahC5L0JQnXpv5UbA2eEptezsmFJ-vY_6dqN3qZabVW4bApcFv9US0gZGKtdulhsofy0JnmOy6qiSXXyhCpNqXojnFXaJPtewPu9gKSJ6kdcwhgCn19fPQkX3oXgld4VhGC-bWe-384p4M3jMu7kf5uX_QYxK_DC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3120695065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Application of a Foliar Spray Containing Methylobacterium symbioticum Had a Limited Effect on Crop Yield and Nitrogen Recovery in Field and Pot-Grown Maize</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rodrigues, Manuel Ângelo ; Correia, Carlos Manuel ; Arrobas, Margarida</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Manuel Ângelo ; Correia, Carlos Manuel ; Arrobas, Margarida</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the effectiveness of an inoculant containing a nitrogen (N)-fixing microorganism ( ) was evaluated on maize ( L.) grown both in the field (silage maize) and in pots over two years (2021 and 2022). The field trial included the following two treatments: with (Yes) and without (No) the inoculant. The pot experiment was designed as a factorial arrangement with two factors: the application of the inoculant (Yes and No) and N applied to the soil (0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 g pot ). In the field, total dry matter yield (DMY) did not differ significantly between treatments, although the average DMY was higher in the inoculant treatment. In pots, the total DMY varied significantly across all N rates but was only significantly affected by the inoculant application in 2022. N fixation estimates in the field were 58.8 and 14.5 kg ha for 2021 and 2022, respectively, representing 23.7% and 9.1% of the N recovered in the aboveground plant parts. In pots, the estimated fixed N values were -49.2 and 199.2 mg pot in 2021 and 2022, respectively, which corresponded to -5.2% and 18.5% of the N found in the aboveground plant parts. Considering the average values obtained across the four cultivation conditions, there was a positive outcome for the treated plants. However, these values cannot be considered significant when compared to nitrogen removal in maize crops. A commercial product should provide an unequivocal and quantitatively relevant contribution to plant nutrition, which did not appear to be the case. Thus, for this inoculant to provide reliable guarantees of positive outcomes for farmers and become a useful tool in promoting more sustainable agriculture, further studies appear necessary. These studies should aim to determine in which crops and under what cultivation conditions the application of the inoculant is truly effective in enhancing N fixation and improving crop productivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2223-7747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2223-7747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/plants13202909</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39458855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>beneficial microorganisms ; biological nitrogen fixation ; Cereal crops ; Comparative analysis ; Corn ; Crop production ; Crop yield ; Crop yields ; Crops ; Cultivation ; Dry matter ; Effectiveness ; Emissions ; Energy consumption ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental impact ; Eutrophication ; Factorial experiments ; Fertilizers ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Greenhouse gases ; Growth ; Hypotheses ; Legumes ; Manures ; Measurement ; Methylobacterium ; microbial inoculant ; Microorganisms ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen in the body ; Nitrogen removal ; Nitrogen-fixing microorganisms ; Physiological aspects ; plant biostimulant ; Plant layout ; Plant nutrition ; Precipitation ; Rice ; Sustainable agriculture ; Water quality ; Wheat ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Plants (Basel), 2024-10, Vol.13 (20), p.2909</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-c39f5d582dfa2007ab446a56daf63aa4c20fd19b115d835cbbad106f6b88c3ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4652-485X ; 0000-0003-2482-7873 ; 0000-0002-5367-1129</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3120695065/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3120695065?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39458855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Manuel Ângelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia, Carlos Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrobas, Margarida</creatorcontrib><title>The Application of a Foliar Spray Containing Methylobacterium symbioticum Had a Limited Effect on Crop Yield and Nitrogen Recovery in Field and Pot-Grown Maize</title><title>Plants (Basel)</title><addtitle>Plants (Basel)</addtitle><description>In this study, the effectiveness of an inoculant containing a nitrogen (N)-fixing microorganism ( ) was evaluated on maize ( L.) grown both in the field (silage maize) and in pots over two years (2021 and 2022). The field trial included the following two treatments: with (Yes) and without (No) the inoculant. The pot experiment was designed as a factorial arrangement with two factors: the application of the inoculant (Yes and No) and N applied to the soil (0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 g pot ). In the field, total dry matter yield (DMY) did not differ significantly between treatments, although the average DMY was higher in the inoculant treatment. In pots, the total DMY varied significantly across all N rates but was only significantly affected by the inoculant application in 2022. N fixation estimates in the field were 58.8 and 14.5 kg ha for 2021 and 2022, respectively, representing 23.7% and 9.1% of the N recovered in the aboveground plant parts. In pots, the estimated fixed N values were -49.2 and 199.2 mg pot in 2021 and 2022, respectively, which corresponded to -5.2% and 18.5% of the N found in the aboveground plant parts. Considering the average values obtained across the four cultivation conditions, there was a positive outcome for the treated plants. However, these values cannot be considered significant when compared to nitrogen removal in maize crops. A commercial product should provide an unequivocal and quantitatively relevant contribution to plant nutrition, which did not appear to be the case. Thus, for this inoculant to provide reliable guarantees of positive outcomes for farmers and become a useful tool in promoting more sustainable agriculture, further studies appear necessary. These studies should aim to determine in which crops and under what cultivation conditions the application of the inoculant is truly effective in enhancing N fixation and improving crop productivity.</description><subject>beneficial microorganisms</subject><subject>biological nitrogen fixation</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crop yields</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Factorial experiments</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methylobacterium</subject><subject>microbial inoculant</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen in the body</subject><subject>Nitrogen removal</subject><subject>Nitrogen-fixing microorganisms</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>plant biostimulant</subject><subject>Plant layout</subject><subject>Plant nutrition</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>2223-7747</issn><issn>2223-7747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktvEzEQx1cIRKvSK0dkiQscUvzY5wlVUdNGSgG15cDJmvUjcbRrb21vIXwZvioOLaFBtS3ZmvnPz57xZNlrgk8Ya_CHoQMbA2EU0wY3z7JDSimbVFVePX90PsiOQ1jjNOq0SPkyO2BNXtR1URxmv25WCp0OQ2cEROMschoBmrnOgEfXg4cNmjobwVhjl-hSxdWmcy2IqLwZexQ2fWtcNCKdL0Cm0IXpTVQSnWmtRESJOPVuQN-M6pLbSvTJRO-WyqIrJdyd8htkLJrt3F9cnJx7992iSzA_1avshYYuqOOH_Sj7Oju7mV5MFp_P59PTxUTkRRUngjW6kEVNpQaKcQVtnpdQlBJ0yQByQbGWpGkJKWTNCtG2IAkuddnWtWAg2VE2v-dKB2s-eNOD33AHhv8xOL_k4FOeneJEVqSVTFPIyxworSuoC5E4dU7atsSJ9fGeNYxtr6RQNnro9qD7HmtWfOnueHodwTUjifDugeDd7ahC5L0JQnXpv5UbA2eEptezsmFJ-vY_6dqN3qZabVW4bApcFv9US0gZGKtdulhsofy0JnmOy6qiSXXyhCpNqXojnFXaJPtewPu9gKSJ6kdcwhgCn19fPQkX3oXgld4VhGC-bWe-384p4M3jMu7kf5uX_QYxK_DC</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Rodrigues, Manuel Ângelo</creator><creator>Correia, Carlos Manuel</creator><creator>Arrobas, Margarida</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4652-485X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2482-7873</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5367-1129</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>The Application of a Foliar Spray Containing Methylobacterium symbioticum Had a Limited Effect on Crop Yield and Nitrogen Recovery in Field and Pot-Grown Maize</title><author>Rodrigues, Manuel Ângelo ; Correia, Carlos Manuel ; Arrobas, Margarida</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-c39f5d582dfa2007ab446a56daf63aa4c20fd19b115d835cbbad106f6b88c3ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>beneficial microorganisms</topic><topic>biological nitrogen fixation</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crop yields</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Factorial experiments</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methylobacterium</topic><topic>microbial inoculant</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen in the body</topic><topic>Nitrogen removal</topic><topic>Nitrogen-fixing microorganisms</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>plant biostimulant</topic><topic>Plant layout</topic><topic>Plant nutrition</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Manuel Ângelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia, Carlos Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrobas, Margarida</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Plants (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodrigues, Manuel Ângelo</au><au>Correia, Carlos Manuel</au><au>Arrobas, Margarida</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Application of a Foliar Spray Containing Methylobacterium symbioticum Had a Limited Effect on Crop Yield and Nitrogen Recovery in Field and Pot-Grown Maize</atitle><jtitle>Plants (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Plants (Basel)</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>2909</spage><pages>2909-</pages><issn>2223-7747</issn><eissn>2223-7747</eissn><abstract>In this study, the effectiveness of an inoculant containing a nitrogen (N)-fixing microorganism ( ) was evaluated on maize ( L.) grown both in the field (silage maize) and in pots over two years (2021 and 2022). The field trial included the following two treatments: with (Yes) and without (No) the inoculant. The pot experiment was designed as a factorial arrangement with two factors: the application of the inoculant (Yes and No) and N applied to the soil (0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 g pot ). In the field, total dry matter yield (DMY) did not differ significantly between treatments, although the average DMY was higher in the inoculant treatment. In pots, the total DMY varied significantly across all N rates but was only significantly affected by the inoculant application in 2022. N fixation estimates in the field were 58.8 and 14.5 kg ha for 2021 and 2022, respectively, representing 23.7% and 9.1% of the N recovered in the aboveground plant parts. In pots, the estimated fixed N values were -49.2 and 199.2 mg pot in 2021 and 2022, respectively, which corresponded to -5.2% and 18.5% of the N found in the aboveground plant parts. Considering the average values obtained across the four cultivation conditions, there was a positive outcome for the treated plants. However, these values cannot be considered significant when compared to nitrogen removal in maize crops. A commercial product should provide an unequivocal and quantitatively relevant contribution to plant nutrition, which did not appear to be the case. Thus, for this inoculant to provide reliable guarantees of positive outcomes for farmers and become a useful tool in promoting more sustainable agriculture, further studies appear necessary. These studies should aim to determine in which crops and under what cultivation conditions the application of the inoculant is truly effective in enhancing N fixation and improving crop productivity.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39458855</pmid><doi>10.3390/plants13202909</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4652-485X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2482-7873</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5367-1129</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2223-7747
ispartof Plants (Basel), 2024-10, Vol.13 (20), p.2909
issn 2223-7747
2223-7747
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1d71bd3f2a464a2287a85c88c841bb60
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects beneficial microorganisms
biological nitrogen fixation
Cereal crops
Comparative analysis
Corn
Crop production
Crop yield
Crop yields
Crops
Cultivation
Dry matter
Effectiveness
Emissions
Energy consumption
Environmental aspects
Environmental impact
Eutrophication
Factorial experiments
Fertilizers
Gram-negative bacteria
Greenhouse gases
Growth
Hypotheses
Legumes
Manures
Measurement
Methylobacterium
microbial inoculant
Microorganisms
Nitrates
Nitrogen
Nitrogen in the body
Nitrogen removal
Nitrogen-fixing microorganisms
Physiological aspects
plant biostimulant
Plant layout
Plant nutrition
Precipitation
Rice
Sustainable agriculture
Water quality
Wheat
Zea mays
title The Application of a Foliar Spray Containing Methylobacterium symbioticum Had a Limited Effect on Crop Yield and Nitrogen Recovery in Field and Pot-Grown Maize
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A51%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Application%20of%20a%20Foliar%20Spray%20Containing%20Methylobacterium%20symbioticum%20Had%20a%20Limited%20Effect%20on%20Crop%20Yield%20and%20Nitrogen%20Recovery%20in%20Field%20and%20Pot-Grown%20Maize&rft.jtitle=Plants%20(Basel)&rft.au=Rodrigues,%20Manuel%20%C3%82ngelo&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=2909&rft.pages=2909-&rft.issn=2223-7747&rft.eissn=2223-7747&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/plants13202909&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA814406772%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-c39f5d582dfa2007ab446a56daf63aa4c20fd19b115d835cbbad106f6b88c3ad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3120695065&rft_id=info:pmid/39458855&rft_galeid=A814406772&rfr_iscdi=true