Excellent outcomes with Oxford Uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty in anteromedial osteoarthritis patients (≤60 years) at mid-term follow-up

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2021-10, Vol.22 (1), p.1-859, Article 859
• Main Authors: Li, Zhen, Chen, Zhenyue, Wei, Jinqiang, Zeng, Xianzhong, Sun, He, Li, Zehui, Cao, Xuewei
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 60 years; Age groups; Anesthesia; Arthritis; Arthroplasty (knee); Care and treatment; Cartilage; Dehiscence; Impant survivorship; Joint and ligament injuries; Joint replacement surgery; Joint surgery; Knee; Methods; Mid-term follow-up; Minimally invasive surgery; Musculoskeletal diseases; Osteoarthritis; Oxford Uni-compartmental knee Arthroplasty; Patient outcomes; Patient satisfaction; Patients; Prostheses; Range of motion; Statistical analysis; Surgery; Thrombosis; Transplants & implants; Wound dehiscence
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04747-y

Background The use of Oxford uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has rapidly increased worldwide,however,the relevance of younger patients for postoperative function after Oxford UKA remains unclear. The main purpose of our study is to clarify the effectivemess of Oxford UKA in the younger Chinese patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA). Methods We retrospectively enrolled 252 consecutive patients who underwent Oxford UKA for AMOA with a minimum follow-up of 5 years between March 2013 and December 2016. The patients were divided into the younger ([less than or equai to]60 years) and elderly (> 60 years) age groups. The demographic data and surgery variables were recorded and compared. Patient satisfaction grade, range of motion (ROM), Oxford knee score (OKS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Universities Osteoarthritis Index score and postoperative complications were recorded. The 5-year survival of the implants were also compared with TKA revision as the endpoint. Results A total of 252 consecutive patients were recruited, including 96 aged 60 years or less and 156 aged over 60 years. The mean follow-up duration in the younger and elderly groups were 73.6 months (SD,standard deviation, 4.1) and 74.7 months (SD 6.2) respectively. Patient satisfaction rate was high in both groups (P = 0.805). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in postoperative ROM(P = 0.299), OKS(P = 0.117), HSS(P = 0.357) and WOMAC scores(P = 0.151) between the younger and elderly groups (P>0.05). However, the incidence of joint stiffness (P = 0.033) and delayed wound dehiscence (P = 0.026) were significantly different between both groups. Five-year implant survival without revision were also similar in both groups (96.9% vs 97.4%, P = 0.871), and that for the entire cohort was 97.2% (95% CI 95.4-99.6). Conclusion Oxford UKA for AMOA demonstrated favorable results in younger patients aged [less than or equai to]60 years at a minimum 5-year follow-up in terms of patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, implant survival and postoperative complications. Therefore, younger patients might not be considered as an absolute contraindication to Oxford UKA. Keywords: Oxford Uni-compartmental knee Arthroplasty, 60 years, Impant survivorship, Mid-term follow-up