Loading…
Which Body Density Equations Calculate Body Fat Percentage Better in Olympic Wrestlers?—Comparison Study with Air Displacement Plethysmography
Although skinfold-derived equations seem to be practical for field application in estimating body fat percentage (BF%) and minimum body mass in Olympic wrestlers, prediction equations applied first need to be cross-validated in Olympic wrestlers to define the best prediction equation. This study aim...
Saved in:
Published in: | Life (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2021-07, Vol.11 (7), p.707 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-2f4775694832c5e7583e543e702c283cfc70780ed0789de8ab6b09d8c4db30f93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-2f4775694832c5e7583e543e702c283cfc70780ed0789de8ab6b09d8c4db30f93 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 707 |
container_title | Life (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Devrim-Lanpir, Aslı Badem, Ebru Arslanoğlu Işık, Hatice Çakar, Aslıhan Nefes Kabak, Banu Akınoğlu, Bihter Kocahan, Tuğba Hasanoğlu, Adnan Rosemann, Thomas Knechtle, Beat |
description | Although skinfold-derived equations seem to be practical for field application in estimating body fat percentage (BF%) and minimum body mass in Olympic wrestlers, prediction equations applied first need to be cross-validated in Olympic wrestlers to define the best prediction equation. This study aimed to evaluate the most accurate field method to predict BF% in Olympic wrestlers compared to BF% estimated by air displacement plethysmography (ADP). Sixty-one male (body mass 72.4 ± 13.5 kg; height 170.3 ± 7.0 cm; body mass index (BMI) 24.9 ± 3.5 kg.m−2; BF% 8.5 ± 4.9%) and twenty-five female wrestlers (body mass 60.3 ± 9.9 kg; height 161.3 ± 7.1 cm; BMI 23.1 ± 2.5 kg.m−2; BF% 18.7 ± 4.7%) undertook body composition assessments including ADP and nine-site skinfold measurements. Correlations, bias, limits of agreement, and standardized differences between alterations in BF% measured by ADP and other prediction equations were evaluated to validate measures, and multiple regression analyses to develop an Olympic wrestlers-specific prediction formula. The Stewart and Hannan equation for male wrestlers and the Durnin and Womersley equation for female wrestlers provided the most accurate BF% compared to the measured BF% by ADP, with the lowest bias and presented no significant differences between the measured and predicted BF%. A new prediction equation was developed using only abdominal skinfold and sex as variables, predicting 83.2% of the variance. The findings suggest the use of the new wrestler-specific prediction equation proposed in the study as a valid and accurate alternative to ADP to quantify BF% among Olympic wrestlers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/life11070707 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1e1b13cccb0f4e139659e97bd1ad9e4e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1e1b13cccb0f4e139659e97bd1ad9e4e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2554594479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-2f4775694832c5e7583e543e702c283cfc70780ed0789de8ab6b09d8c4db30f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdksFu1DAQhiMEolXpjQewxIUDC3Zsx_EF1G5bqFSplQD1aDnOZOOVE6e2A8qNR-DAE_IkeNkKtdiSbY3_-TTza4riJcFvKZX4nbMdEILFbj8pDkss-IqIUj598D4ojmPc4rwqTqqaPS8OKKM8Z8jD4udtb02PTn27oDMYo00LOr-bdbJ-jGitnZmdTrAXXOiEbiAYGJPe5BikBAHZEV27ZZisQbcBYnIQ4offP36t_TDpYKMf0ec05_TvNvXoxAZ0ZuPktIEhg9CNg9QvcfCboKd-eVE867SLcHx_HxVfL86_rD-trq4_Xq5PrlaGcZ5WZceE4JVkNS0NB8FrCpxRELg0ZU1NZ3J_NYY2n7KFWjdVg2VbG9Y2FHeSHhWXe27r9VZNwQ46LMprq_4GfNgoHZI1DhQB0hBqjGlwx4BQWXEJUjQt0a0EBpn1fs-a5maAdudP0O4R9PHPaHu18d9UTXGVK86A1_eA4O_m7KEabDTgnB7Bz1GVnEtWspqLLH31n3Tr5zBmq3YqlnVM7Lp7s1eZ4GMM0P0rhmC1mxz1cHLoH5DauIc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2554594479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which Body Density Equations Calculate Body Fat Percentage Better in Olympic Wrestlers?—Comparison Study with Air Displacement Plethysmography</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Devrim-Lanpir, Aslı ; Badem, Ebru Arslanoğlu ; Işık, Hatice ; Çakar, Aslıhan Nefes ; Kabak, Banu ; Akınoğlu, Bihter ; Kocahan, Tuğba ; Hasanoğlu, Adnan ; Rosemann, Thomas ; Knechtle, Beat</creator><creatorcontrib>Devrim-Lanpir, Aslı ; Badem, Ebru Arslanoğlu ; Işık, Hatice ; Çakar, Aslıhan Nefes ; Kabak, Banu ; Akınoğlu, Bihter ; Kocahan, Tuğba ; Hasanoğlu, Adnan ; Rosemann, Thomas ; Knechtle, Beat</creatorcontrib><description>Although skinfold-derived equations seem to be practical for field application in estimating body fat percentage (BF%) and minimum body mass in Olympic wrestlers, prediction equations applied first need to be cross-validated in Olympic wrestlers to define the best prediction equation. This study aimed to evaluate the most accurate field method to predict BF% in Olympic wrestlers compared to BF% estimated by air displacement plethysmography (ADP). Sixty-one male (body mass 72.4 ± 13.5 kg; height 170.3 ± 7.0 cm; body mass index (BMI) 24.9 ± 3.5 kg.m−2; BF% 8.5 ± 4.9%) and twenty-five female wrestlers (body mass 60.3 ± 9.9 kg; height 161.3 ± 7.1 cm; BMI 23.1 ± 2.5 kg.m−2; BF% 18.7 ± 4.7%) undertook body composition assessments including ADP and nine-site skinfold measurements. Correlations, bias, limits of agreement, and standardized differences between alterations in BF% measured by ADP and other prediction equations were evaluated to validate measures, and multiple regression analyses to develop an Olympic wrestlers-specific prediction formula. The Stewart and Hannan equation for male wrestlers and the Durnin and Womersley equation for female wrestlers provided the most accurate BF% compared to the measured BF% by ADP, with the lowest bias and presented no significant differences between the measured and predicted BF%. A new prediction equation was developed using only abdominal skinfold and sex as variables, predicting 83.2% of the variance. The findings suggest the use of the new wrestler-specific prediction equation proposed in the study as a valid and accurate alternative to ADP to quantify BF% among Olympic wrestlers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-1729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-1729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/life11070707</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34357079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>anthropometry ; Athletes ; Bias ; BOD POD ; Body composition ; Body density ; Body fat ; Body mass ; Body mass index ; Body size ; Evaluation ; fat mass ; Males ; Mathematical analysis ; Medical equipment ; Menstruation ; Olympic games ; Plethysmography ; Predictions ; Respiration ; skinfolds ; Urine ; Wrestling</subject><ispartof>Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2021-07, Vol.11 (7), p.707</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-2f4775694832c5e7583e543e702c283cfc70780ed0789de8ab6b09d8c4db30f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-2f4775694832c5e7583e543e702c283cfc70780ed0789de8ab6b09d8c4db30f93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9291-017X ; 0000-0002-6436-6306 ; 0000-0002-8214-7895 ; 0000-0003-4486-5092 ; 0000-0002-2412-9103 ; 0000-0002-4267-9950</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2554594479/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2554594479?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Devrim-Lanpir, Aslı</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badem, Ebru Arslanoğlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Işık, Hatice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çakar, Aslıhan Nefes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabak, Banu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akınoğlu, Bihter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocahan, Tuğba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasanoğlu, Adnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosemann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knechtle, Beat</creatorcontrib><title>Which Body Density Equations Calculate Body Fat Percentage Better in Olympic Wrestlers?—Comparison Study with Air Displacement Plethysmography</title><title>Life (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>Although skinfold-derived equations seem to be practical for field application in estimating body fat percentage (BF%) and minimum body mass in Olympic wrestlers, prediction equations applied first need to be cross-validated in Olympic wrestlers to define the best prediction equation. This study aimed to evaluate the most accurate field method to predict BF% in Olympic wrestlers compared to BF% estimated by air displacement plethysmography (ADP). Sixty-one male (body mass 72.4 ± 13.5 kg; height 170.3 ± 7.0 cm; body mass index (BMI) 24.9 ± 3.5 kg.m−2; BF% 8.5 ± 4.9%) and twenty-five female wrestlers (body mass 60.3 ± 9.9 kg; height 161.3 ± 7.1 cm; BMI 23.1 ± 2.5 kg.m−2; BF% 18.7 ± 4.7%) undertook body composition assessments including ADP and nine-site skinfold measurements. Correlations, bias, limits of agreement, and standardized differences between alterations in BF% measured by ADP and other prediction equations were evaluated to validate measures, and multiple regression analyses to develop an Olympic wrestlers-specific prediction formula. The Stewart and Hannan equation for male wrestlers and the Durnin and Womersley equation for female wrestlers provided the most accurate BF% compared to the measured BF% by ADP, with the lowest bias and presented no significant differences between the measured and predicted BF%. A new prediction equation was developed using only abdominal skinfold and sex as variables, predicting 83.2% of the variance. The findings suggest the use of the new wrestler-specific prediction equation proposed in the study as a valid and accurate alternative to ADP to quantify BF% among Olympic wrestlers.</description><subject>anthropometry</subject><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>BOD POD</subject><subject>Body composition</subject><subject>Body density</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>fat mass</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Menstruation</subject><subject>Olympic games</subject><subject>Plethysmography</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>skinfolds</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Wrestling</subject><issn>2075-1729</issn><issn>2075-1729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdksFu1DAQhiMEolXpjQewxIUDC3Zsx_EF1G5bqFSplQD1aDnOZOOVE6e2A8qNR-DAE_IkeNkKtdiSbY3_-TTza4riJcFvKZX4nbMdEILFbj8pDkss-IqIUj598D4ojmPc4rwqTqqaPS8OKKM8Z8jD4udtb02PTn27oDMYo00LOr-bdbJ-jGitnZmdTrAXXOiEbiAYGJPe5BikBAHZEV27ZZisQbcBYnIQ4offP36t_TDpYKMf0ec05_TvNvXoxAZ0ZuPktIEhg9CNg9QvcfCboKd-eVE867SLcHx_HxVfL86_rD-trq4_Xq5PrlaGcZ5WZceE4JVkNS0NB8FrCpxRELg0ZU1NZ3J_NYY2n7KFWjdVg2VbG9Y2FHeSHhWXe27r9VZNwQ46LMprq_4GfNgoHZI1DhQB0hBqjGlwx4BQWXEJUjQt0a0EBpn1fs-a5maAdudP0O4R9PHPaHu18d9UTXGVK86A1_eA4O_m7KEabDTgnB7Bz1GVnEtWspqLLH31n3Tr5zBmq3YqlnVM7Lp7s1eZ4GMM0P0rhmC1mxz1cHLoH5DauIc</recordid><startdate>20210717</startdate><enddate>20210717</enddate><creator>Devrim-Lanpir, Aslı</creator><creator>Badem, Ebru Arslanoğlu</creator><creator>Işık, Hatice</creator><creator>Çakar, Aslıhan Nefes</creator><creator>Kabak, Banu</creator><creator>Akınoğlu, Bihter</creator><creator>Kocahan, Tuğba</creator><creator>Hasanoğlu, Adnan</creator><creator>Rosemann, Thomas</creator><creator>Knechtle, Beat</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-017X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6436-6306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8214-7895</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4486-5092</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2412-9103</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4267-9950</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210717</creationdate><title>Which Body Density Equations Calculate Body Fat Percentage Better in Olympic Wrestlers?—Comparison Study with Air Displacement Plethysmography</title><author>Devrim-Lanpir, Aslı ; Badem, Ebru Arslanoğlu ; Işık, Hatice ; Çakar, Aslıhan Nefes ; Kabak, Banu ; Akınoğlu, Bihter ; Kocahan, Tuğba ; Hasanoğlu, Adnan ; Rosemann, Thomas ; Knechtle, Beat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-2f4775694832c5e7583e543e702c283cfc70780ed0789de8ab6b09d8c4db30f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>anthropometry</topic><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>BOD POD</topic><topic>Body composition</topic><topic>Body density</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>fat mass</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Menstruation</topic><topic>Olympic games</topic><topic>Plethysmography</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>skinfolds</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Wrestling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Devrim-Lanpir, Aslı</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badem, Ebru Arslanoğlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Işık, Hatice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çakar, Aslıhan Nefes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabak, Banu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akınoğlu, Bihter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocahan, Tuğba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasanoğlu, Adnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosemann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knechtle, Beat</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Life (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Devrim-Lanpir, Aslı</au><au>Badem, Ebru Arslanoğlu</au><au>Işık, Hatice</au><au>Çakar, Aslıhan Nefes</au><au>Kabak, Banu</au><au>Akınoğlu, Bihter</au><au>Kocahan, Tuğba</au><au>Hasanoğlu, Adnan</au><au>Rosemann, Thomas</au><au>Knechtle, Beat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which Body Density Equations Calculate Body Fat Percentage Better in Olympic Wrestlers?—Comparison Study with Air Displacement Plethysmography</atitle><jtitle>Life (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2021-07-17</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>707</spage><pages>707-</pages><issn>2075-1729</issn><eissn>2075-1729</eissn><abstract>Although skinfold-derived equations seem to be practical for field application in estimating body fat percentage (BF%) and minimum body mass in Olympic wrestlers, prediction equations applied first need to be cross-validated in Olympic wrestlers to define the best prediction equation. This study aimed to evaluate the most accurate field method to predict BF% in Olympic wrestlers compared to BF% estimated by air displacement plethysmography (ADP). Sixty-one male (body mass 72.4 ± 13.5 kg; height 170.3 ± 7.0 cm; body mass index (BMI) 24.9 ± 3.5 kg.m−2; BF% 8.5 ± 4.9%) and twenty-five female wrestlers (body mass 60.3 ± 9.9 kg; height 161.3 ± 7.1 cm; BMI 23.1 ± 2.5 kg.m−2; BF% 18.7 ± 4.7%) undertook body composition assessments including ADP and nine-site skinfold measurements. Correlations, bias, limits of agreement, and standardized differences between alterations in BF% measured by ADP and other prediction equations were evaluated to validate measures, and multiple regression analyses to develop an Olympic wrestlers-specific prediction formula. The Stewart and Hannan equation for male wrestlers and the Durnin and Womersley equation for female wrestlers provided the most accurate BF% compared to the measured BF% by ADP, with the lowest bias and presented no significant differences between the measured and predicted BF%. A new prediction equation was developed using only abdominal skinfold and sex as variables, predicting 83.2% of the variance. The findings suggest the use of the new wrestler-specific prediction equation proposed in the study as a valid and accurate alternative to ADP to quantify BF% among Olympic wrestlers.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34357079</pmid><doi>10.3390/life11070707</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-017X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6436-6306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8214-7895</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4486-5092</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2412-9103</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4267-9950</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2075-1729 |
ispartof | Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2021-07, Vol.11 (7), p.707 |
issn | 2075-1729 2075-1729 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1e1b13cccb0f4e139659e97bd1ad9e4e |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | anthropometry Athletes Bias BOD POD Body composition Body density Body fat Body mass Body mass index Body size Evaluation fat mass Males Mathematical analysis Medical equipment Menstruation Olympic games Plethysmography Predictions Respiration skinfolds Urine Wrestling |
title | Which Body Density Equations Calculate Body Fat Percentage Better in Olympic Wrestlers?—Comparison Study with Air Displacement Plethysmography |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T15%3A16%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20Body%20Density%20Equations%20Calculate%20Body%20Fat%20Percentage%20Better%20in%20Olympic%20Wrestlers?%E2%80%94Comparison%20Study%20with%20Air%20Displacement%20Plethysmography&rft.jtitle=Life%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Devrim-Lanpir,%20Asl%C4%B1&rft.date=2021-07-17&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=707&rft.pages=707-&rft.issn=2075-1729&rft.eissn=2075-1729&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/life11070707&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2554594479%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-2f4775694832c5e7583e543e702c283cfc70780ed0789de8ab6b09d8c4db30f93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2554594479&rft_id=info:pmid/34357079&rfr_iscdi=true |