Loading…
Direct Measurement of the Ciliary Sulcus Diameter Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Inter-Rater Variability
The determination of sulcus-to-sulcus measurements has been challenging due to the limitations of current approaches. Ultrasound methods are highly operator-dependent and require extensive training, while traditional optical devices cannot visualize structures posterior to the iris. However, modern...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-10, Vol.24 (21), p.6950 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-e28f6af8882222cccc0bd0f3b00872a9aef8306988533e36cd81b2594a6397c33 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 6950 |
container_title | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Eppig, Timo Seer, Manuel Martinez-Abad, Antonio Galvis, Virgilio Schütz, Saskia Tello, Alejandro Rombach, Michiel C Alió, Jorge L |
description | The determination of sulcus-to-sulcus measurements has been challenging due to the limitations of current approaches. Ultrasound methods are highly operator-dependent and require extensive training, while traditional optical devices cannot visualize structures posterior to the iris. However, modern optical anterior segment coherence tomography (AS-OCT) devices are changing this paradigm by identifying some anatomical landmarks posterior to the iris. This study evaluates the reproducibility of optical sulcus measurements in the context of sizing a novel accommodative intraocular lens (IOL). Preoperative OCT scans of patients scheduled for cataract surgery were analyzed regarding the dimensions of the ciliary sulcus using a custom scan method with a clinically available anterior segment optical coherence tomographer. Measurements were compared between two different readers, and various derived parameters were compared. The measurements by both readers were highly correlated (R
> 0.96), and their agreement was excellent (mean difference 0.02 mm with 95% limits of agreement from -0.11 to 0.15 mm). In contrast, the sulcus diameter measurement did not agree well with automatically calculated values, such as the anterior chamber width or white-to-white. This leads to the conclusion that modern swept-source AS-OCT measurements of the ciliary sulcus dimensions are feasible, reproducible, and may be a clinically useful tool. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/s24216950 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1e1f13b020df47938f29738bc3f93364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A815422140</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1e1f13b020df47938f29738bc3f93364</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A815422140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-e28f6af8882222cccc0bd0f3b00872a9aef8306988533e36cd81b2594a6397c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptksFu1DAQQCMEoqVw4AdQJC70kGJ7nMQ-oWpbYKWiStBytRxnvOtVEi92grR_j8OWpYuwD7bs5-eZ0WTZa0ouACR5HxlntJIleZKdUs54IRgjTx_tT7IXMW4IYQAgnmcnIEtaC16fZt2VC2jG_AvqOAXscRhzb_NxjfnCdU6HXf5t6swU8yunexwx5PfRDav8djs6o7t84dcYcDCY3_ner4LernfFckhg8VXP-HcdnG6Sa9y9zJ5Z3UV89bCeZfcfr-8Wn4ub20_LxeVNYUCysUAmbKWtECl0xkwapGmJhYYQUTMtNVoBpJJClAAIlWkFbVgpua5A1gbgLFvuva3XG7UNrk95KK-d-n3gw0rpkMLvUFGkliYzI63ltQRhmaxBNAasBKh4cn3Yu7ZT02NrUoGC7o6kxzeDW6uV_6koLbkoxRzNuwdD8D8mjKPqXTTYdXpAP0UFlImaEy5oQt_-g278FIZUq5mqWJ1Q8Zda6ZSBG6xPH5tZqi5F-pUxykmiLv5Dpdli74wf0Lp0fvTgfP_ABB9jQHtIkhI195k69Fli3zyuyoH801jwC3v2yxY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3126271288</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct Measurement of the Ciliary Sulcus Diameter Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Inter-Rater Variability</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Eppig, Timo ; Seer, Manuel ; Martinez-Abad, Antonio ; Galvis, Virgilio ; Schütz, Saskia ; Tello, Alejandro ; Rombach, Michiel C ; Alió, Jorge L</creator><creatorcontrib>Eppig, Timo ; Seer, Manuel ; Martinez-Abad, Antonio ; Galvis, Virgilio ; Schütz, Saskia ; Tello, Alejandro ; Rombach, Michiel C ; Alió, Jorge L</creatorcontrib><description>The determination of sulcus-to-sulcus measurements has been challenging due to the limitations of current approaches. Ultrasound methods are highly operator-dependent and require extensive training, while traditional optical devices cannot visualize structures posterior to the iris. However, modern optical anterior segment coherence tomography (AS-OCT) devices are changing this paradigm by identifying some anatomical landmarks posterior to the iris. This study evaluates the reproducibility of optical sulcus measurements in the context of sizing a novel accommodative intraocular lens (IOL). Preoperative OCT scans of patients scheduled for cataract surgery were analyzed regarding the dimensions of the ciliary sulcus using a custom scan method with a clinically available anterior segment optical coherence tomographer. Measurements were compared between two different readers, and various derived parameters were compared. The measurements by both readers were highly correlated (R
> 0.96), and their agreement was excellent (mean difference 0.02 mm with 95% limits of agreement from -0.11 to 0.15 mm). In contrast, the sulcus diameter measurement did not agree well with automatically calculated values, such as the anterior chamber width or white-to-white. This leads to the conclusion that modern swept-source AS-OCT measurements of the ciliary sulcus dimensions are feasible, reproducible, and may be a clinically useful tool.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/s24216950</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39517847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cataract ; Cataract Extraction ; Cataracts ; Ciliary Body - diagnostic imaging ; Cornea ; Female ; Haptics ; Humans ; intraocular lens ; Intraocular lenses ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Male ; Measurement ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Nomograms ; Observer Variation ; ocular dimensions ; optical coherence tomography ; Proprietary ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surgery ; Tomography ; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-10, Vol.24 (21), p.6950</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-e28f6af8882222cccc0bd0f3b00872a9aef8306988533e36cd81b2594a6397c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5081-0720 ; 0000-0003-0661-6239 ; 0000-0002-8082-1751 ; 0000-0003-4587-5364</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3126271288/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3126271288?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39517847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eppig, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seer, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Abad, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvis, Virgilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schütz, Saskia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tello, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rombach, Michiel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alió, Jorge L</creatorcontrib><title>Direct Measurement of the Ciliary Sulcus Diameter Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Inter-Rater Variability</title><title>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><description>The determination of sulcus-to-sulcus measurements has been challenging due to the limitations of current approaches. Ultrasound methods are highly operator-dependent and require extensive training, while traditional optical devices cannot visualize structures posterior to the iris. However, modern optical anterior segment coherence tomography (AS-OCT) devices are changing this paradigm by identifying some anatomical landmarks posterior to the iris. This study evaluates the reproducibility of optical sulcus measurements in the context of sizing a novel accommodative intraocular lens (IOL). Preoperative OCT scans of patients scheduled for cataract surgery were analyzed regarding the dimensions of the ciliary sulcus using a custom scan method with a clinically available anterior segment optical coherence tomographer. Measurements were compared between two different readers, and various derived parameters were compared. The measurements by both readers were highly correlated (R
> 0.96), and their agreement was excellent (mean difference 0.02 mm with 95% limits of agreement from -0.11 to 0.15 mm). In contrast, the sulcus diameter measurement did not agree well with automatically calculated values, such as the anterior chamber width or white-to-white. This leads to the conclusion that modern swept-source AS-OCT measurements of the ciliary sulcus dimensions are feasible, reproducible, and may be a clinically useful tool.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cataract</subject><subject>Cataract Extraction</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Ciliary Body - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Haptics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intraocular lens</subject><subject>Intraocular lenses</subject><subject>Lenses, Intraocular</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>ocular dimensions</subject><subject>optical coherence tomography</subject><subject>Proprietary</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>1424-8220</issn><issn>1424-8220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptksFu1DAQQCMEoqVw4AdQJC70kGJ7nMQ-oWpbYKWiStBytRxnvOtVEi92grR_j8OWpYuwD7bs5-eZ0WTZa0ouACR5HxlntJIleZKdUs54IRgjTx_tT7IXMW4IYQAgnmcnIEtaC16fZt2VC2jG_AvqOAXscRhzb_NxjfnCdU6HXf5t6swU8yunexwx5PfRDav8djs6o7t84dcYcDCY3_ner4LernfFckhg8VXP-HcdnG6Sa9y9zJ5Z3UV89bCeZfcfr-8Wn4ub20_LxeVNYUCysUAmbKWtECl0xkwapGmJhYYQUTMtNVoBpJJClAAIlWkFbVgpua5A1gbgLFvuva3XG7UNrk95KK-d-n3gw0rpkMLvUFGkliYzI63ltQRhmaxBNAasBKh4cn3Yu7ZT02NrUoGC7o6kxzeDW6uV_6koLbkoxRzNuwdD8D8mjKPqXTTYdXpAP0UFlImaEy5oQt_-g278FIZUq5mqWJ1Q8Zda6ZSBG6xPH5tZqi5F-pUxykmiLv5Dpdli74wf0Lp0fvTgfP_ABB9jQHtIkhI195k69Fli3zyuyoH801jwC3v2yxY</recordid><startdate>20241029</startdate><enddate>20241029</enddate><creator>Eppig, Timo</creator><creator>Seer, Manuel</creator><creator>Martinez-Abad, Antonio</creator><creator>Galvis, Virgilio</creator><creator>Schütz, Saskia</creator><creator>Tello, Alejandro</creator><creator>Rombach, Michiel C</creator><creator>Alió, Jorge L</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-0720</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0661-6239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8082-1751</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4587-5364</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241029</creationdate><title>Direct Measurement of the Ciliary Sulcus Diameter Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Inter-Rater Variability</title><author>Eppig, Timo ; Seer, Manuel ; Martinez-Abad, Antonio ; Galvis, Virgilio ; Schütz, Saskia ; Tello, Alejandro ; Rombach, Michiel C ; Alió, Jorge L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-e28f6af8882222cccc0bd0f3b00872a9aef8306988533e36cd81b2594a6397c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cataract</topic><topic>Cataract Extraction</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Ciliary Body - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Haptics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intraocular lens</topic><topic>Intraocular lenses</topic><topic>Lenses, Intraocular</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>ocular dimensions</topic><topic>optical coherence tomography</topic><topic>Proprietary</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eppig, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seer, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Abad, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvis, Virgilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schütz, Saskia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tello, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rombach, Michiel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alió, Jorge L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eppig, Timo</au><au>Seer, Manuel</au><au>Martinez-Abad, Antonio</au><au>Galvis, Virgilio</au><au>Schütz, Saskia</au><au>Tello, Alejandro</au><au>Rombach, Michiel C</au><au>Alió, Jorge L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct Measurement of the Ciliary Sulcus Diameter Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Inter-Rater Variability</atitle><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><date>2024-10-29</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>6950</spage><pages>6950-</pages><issn>1424-8220</issn><eissn>1424-8220</eissn><abstract>The determination of sulcus-to-sulcus measurements has been challenging due to the limitations of current approaches. Ultrasound methods are highly operator-dependent and require extensive training, while traditional optical devices cannot visualize structures posterior to the iris. However, modern optical anterior segment coherence tomography (AS-OCT) devices are changing this paradigm by identifying some anatomical landmarks posterior to the iris. This study evaluates the reproducibility of optical sulcus measurements in the context of sizing a novel accommodative intraocular lens (IOL). Preoperative OCT scans of patients scheduled for cataract surgery were analyzed regarding the dimensions of the ciliary sulcus using a custom scan method with a clinically available anterior segment optical coherence tomographer. Measurements were compared between two different readers, and various derived parameters were compared. The measurements by both readers were highly correlated (R
> 0.96), and their agreement was excellent (mean difference 0.02 mm with 95% limits of agreement from -0.11 to 0.15 mm). In contrast, the sulcus diameter measurement did not agree well with automatically calculated values, such as the anterior chamber width or white-to-white. This leads to the conclusion that modern swept-source AS-OCT measurements of the ciliary sulcus dimensions are feasible, reproducible, and may be a clinically useful tool.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39517847</pmid><doi>10.3390/s24216950</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-0720</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0661-6239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8082-1751</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4587-5364</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1424-8220 |
ispartof | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-10, Vol.24 (21), p.6950 |
issn | 1424-8220 1424-8220 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1e1f13b020df47938f29738bc3f93364 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | Aged Cataract Cataract Extraction Cataracts Ciliary Body - diagnostic imaging Cornea Female Haptics Humans intraocular lens Intraocular lenses Lenses, Intraocular Male Measurement Methods Middle Aged Nomograms Observer Variation ocular dimensions optical coherence tomography Proprietary Reproducibility of Results Surgery Tomography Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods Ultrasonic imaging |
title | Direct Measurement of the Ciliary Sulcus Diameter Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Inter-Rater Variability |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A11%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20Measurement%20of%20the%20Ciliary%20Sulcus%20Diameter%20Using%20Optical%20Coherence%20Tomography-Inter-Rater%20Variability&rft.jtitle=Sensors%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Eppig,%20Timo&rft.date=2024-10-29&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=6950&rft.pages=6950-&rft.issn=1424-8220&rft.eissn=1424-8220&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/s24216950&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA815422140%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-e28f6af8882222cccc0bd0f3b00872a9aef8306988533e36cd81b2594a6397c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3126271288&rft_id=info:pmid/39517847&rft_galeid=A815422140&rfr_iscdi=true |