Loading…
Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront
Toronto’s Quayside waterfront regeneration project has become an international reference point for the burgeoning debate about the scope and limits of the digitally enabled ‘smart city’ narrative. The project signals the entry of a Google affiliate into the realm of ‘smart urbanism’ in the most dram...
Saved in:
Published in: | Urban planning 2020-03, Vol.5 (1), p.84-95 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9010d5834456dae075e0580786eb72fd4943e51cbaa4bb3ff617af9a959be043 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9010d5834456dae075e0580786eb72fd4943e51cbaa4bb3ff617af9a959be043 |
container_end_page | 95 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 84 |
container_title | Urban planning |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Morgan, Kevin Webb, Brian |
description | Toronto’s Quayside waterfront regeneration project has become an international reference point for the burgeoning debate about the scope and limits of the digitally enabled ‘smart city’ narrative. The project signals the entry of a Google affiliate into the realm of ‘smart urbanism’ in the most dramatic fashion imaginable, by allowing them to potentially realise their long-running dream for “someone to give us a city and put us in charge.” This article aims to understand this on-going ‘smart city’ experiment through an exploration of the ways in which ‘techno-centric’ narratives and proposed ‘disruptive’ urban innovations are being contested by the city’s civic society. To do this, the article traces the origins and evolution of the partnership between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs and identifies the key issues that have exercised local critics of the plan, including the public/private balance of power, governance, and the planning process. Despite more citizen-centric efforts, there remains a need for appropriate advocates to protect and promote the wider public interest to moderate the tensions that exist between techno-centric and citizen-centric dimensions of smart cities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.17645/up.v5i1.2520 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1e97e9c017744f58b6ea502fabbbf0a3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1e97e9c017744f58b6ea502fabbbf0a3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2511178765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9010d5834456dae075e0580786eb72fd4943e51cbaa4bb3ff617af9a959be043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1LAzEUDKJgqT16D3jemmy-Nt6kaC0UFFoQTyHZTdot62bN7gq99Wfo3-svMW1FPL335g3zJhkArjEaY8Epu-2b8Scr8ThlKToDgxRnJBGcsPN__SUYte0GIYQzwbkgA_A29X5VlfUKdmsLJ2W3vYOzGi6sDvkaeneEX3pTlXnEOxts20Ffw6UPvu78fvfdwv3ua_GuQxcH-Kojxx12V-DC6aq1o986BMvHh-XkKZk_T2eT-3mSEym6RCKMCpYRShkvtEWCWcQyJDJujUhdQSUlluHcaE2NIc5xLLSTWjJpLKJkCGYn2cLrjWpCGZ1sldelOgI-rFS0VuaVVdhKYWWOsBCUOpYZbjVDqdPGGIc0iVo3J60m-I8-vlRtfB_q6F6lDGMs4q-xyEpOrDz4tg3W_V3FSB2zUH2jDlmoQxbkB7_uftY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511178765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Morgan, Kevin ; Webb, Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Kevin ; Webb, Brian</creatorcontrib><description>Toronto’s Quayside waterfront regeneration project has become an international reference point for the burgeoning debate about the scope and limits of the digitally enabled ‘smart city’ narrative. The project signals the entry of a Google affiliate into the realm of ‘smart urbanism’ in the most dramatic fashion imaginable, by allowing them to potentially realise their long-running dream for “someone to give us a city and put us in charge.” This article aims to understand this on-going ‘smart city’ experiment through an exploration of the ways in which ‘techno-centric’ narratives and proposed ‘disruptive’ urban innovations are being contested by the city’s civic society. To do this, the article traces the origins and evolution of the partnership between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs and identifies the key issues that have exercised local critics of the plan, including the public/private balance of power, governance, and the planning process. Despite more citizen-centric efforts, there remains a need for appropriate advocates to protect and promote the wider public interest to moderate the tensions that exist between techno-centric and citizen-centric dimensions of smart cities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2183-7635</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2183-7635</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17645/up.v5i1.2520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lisbon: Cogitatio Press</publisher><subject>Balance of power ; google ; Innovations ; Narratives ; Political participation ; Public interest ; quayside ; sidewalk labs ; Smart cities ; smart city ; smart urbanism ; toronto ; urban planning ; Urbanism</subject><ispartof>Urban planning, 2020-03, Vol.5 (1), p.84-95</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9010d5834456dae075e0580786eb72fd4943e51cbaa4bb3ff617af9a959be043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9010d5834456dae075e0580786eb72fd4943e51cbaa4bb3ff617af9a959be043</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9247-960X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2511178765?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21385,21392,25751,27864,27922,27923,33609,33983,37010,43731,43946,44588</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Brian</creatorcontrib><title>Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront</title><title>Urban planning</title><description>Toronto’s Quayside waterfront regeneration project has become an international reference point for the burgeoning debate about the scope and limits of the digitally enabled ‘smart city’ narrative. The project signals the entry of a Google affiliate into the realm of ‘smart urbanism’ in the most dramatic fashion imaginable, by allowing them to potentially realise their long-running dream for “someone to give us a city and put us in charge.” This article aims to understand this on-going ‘smart city’ experiment through an exploration of the ways in which ‘techno-centric’ narratives and proposed ‘disruptive’ urban innovations are being contested by the city’s civic society. To do this, the article traces the origins and evolution of the partnership between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs and identifies the key issues that have exercised local critics of the plan, including the public/private balance of power, governance, and the planning process. Despite more citizen-centric efforts, there remains a need for appropriate advocates to protect and promote the wider public interest to moderate the tensions that exist between techno-centric and citizen-centric dimensions of smart cities.</description><subject>Balance of power</subject><subject>google</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>quayside</subject><subject>sidewalk labs</subject><subject>Smart cities</subject><subject>smart city</subject><subject>smart urbanism</subject><subject>toronto</subject><subject>urban planning</subject><subject>Urbanism</subject><issn>2183-7635</issn><issn>2183-7635</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1LAzEUDKJgqT16D3jemmy-Nt6kaC0UFFoQTyHZTdot62bN7gq99Wfo3-svMW1FPL335g3zJhkArjEaY8Epu-2b8Scr8ThlKToDgxRnJBGcsPN__SUYte0GIYQzwbkgA_A29X5VlfUKdmsLJ2W3vYOzGi6sDvkaeneEX3pTlXnEOxts20Ffw6UPvu78fvfdwv3ua_GuQxcH-Kojxx12V-DC6aq1o986BMvHh-XkKZk_T2eT-3mSEym6RCKMCpYRShkvtEWCWcQyJDJujUhdQSUlluHcaE2NIc5xLLSTWjJpLKJkCGYn2cLrjWpCGZ1sldelOgI-rFS0VuaVVdhKYWWOsBCUOpYZbjVDqdPGGIc0iVo3J60m-I8-vlRtfB_q6F6lDGMs4q-xyEpOrDz4tg3W_V3FSB2zUH2jDlmoQxbkB7_uftY</recordid><startdate>20200313</startdate><enddate>20200313</enddate><creator>Morgan, Kevin</creator><creator>Webb, Brian</creator><general>Cogitatio Press</general><general>Cogitatio</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9247-960X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200313</creationdate><title>Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront</title><author>Morgan, Kevin ; Webb, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9010d5834456dae075e0580786eb72fd4943e51cbaa4bb3ff617af9a959be043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Balance of power</topic><topic>google</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>quayside</topic><topic>sidewalk labs</topic><topic>Smart cities</topic><topic>smart city</topic><topic>smart urbanism</topic><topic>toronto</topic><topic>urban planning</topic><topic>Urbanism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Urban planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgan, Kevin</au><au>Webb, Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront</atitle><jtitle>Urban planning</jtitle><date>2020-03-13</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>84-95</pages><issn>2183-7635</issn><eissn>2183-7635</eissn><abstract>Toronto’s Quayside waterfront regeneration project has become an international reference point for the burgeoning debate about the scope and limits of the digitally enabled ‘smart city’ narrative. The project signals the entry of a Google affiliate into the realm of ‘smart urbanism’ in the most dramatic fashion imaginable, by allowing them to potentially realise their long-running dream for “someone to give us a city and put us in charge.” This article aims to understand this on-going ‘smart city’ experiment through an exploration of the ways in which ‘techno-centric’ narratives and proposed ‘disruptive’ urban innovations are being contested by the city’s civic society. To do this, the article traces the origins and evolution of the partnership between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs and identifies the key issues that have exercised local critics of the plan, including the public/private balance of power, governance, and the planning process. Despite more citizen-centric efforts, there remains a need for appropriate advocates to protect and promote the wider public interest to moderate the tensions that exist between techno-centric and citizen-centric dimensions of smart cities.</abstract><cop>Lisbon</cop><pub>Cogitatio Press</pub><doi>10.17645/up.v5i1.2520</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9247-960X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2183-7635 |
ispartof | Urban planning, 2020-03, Vol.5 (1), p.84-95 |
issn | 2183-7635 2183-7635 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1e97e9c017744f58b6ea502fabbbf0a3 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; PAIS Index |
subjects | Balance of power Innovations Narratives Political participation Public interest quayside sidewalk labs Smart cities smart city smart urbanism toronto urban planning Urbanism |
title | Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A59%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Googling%20the%20City:%20In%20Search%20of%20the%20Public%20Interest%20on%20Toronto%E2%80%99s%20%E2%80%98Smart%E2%80%99%20Waterfront&rft.jtitle=Urban%20planning&rft.au=Morgan,%20Kevin&rft.date=2020-03-13&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=84-95&rft.issn=2183-7635&rft.eissn=2183-7635&rft_id=info:doi/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2511178765%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9010d5834456dae075e0580786eb72fd4943e51cbaa4bb3ff617af9a959be043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511178765&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |