A scoping review of dietary assessment questionnaires potentially suitable for assessing habitual dietary intake in the National Health and Nutrition Survey, Japan

• Published in: Journal of nutritional science (Cambridge) 2024-02, Vol.13, p.e8, Article e8
• Main Authors: Matsumoto, Mai, Murakami, Kentaro, Yuan, Xiaoyi, Oono, Fumi, Adachi, Riho, Tajima, Ryoko, Okada, Emiko, Nakade, Makiko, Sasaki, Satoshi, Takimoto, Hidemi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Biomarkers; Diet; Dietary intake; Dietary Surveys and Nutritional Epidemiology; Eating; Families & family life; FFQ; Food; Households; Humans; Japan; Nutrients; Nutrition; Nutrition Assessment; Nutrition survey; Nutrition Surveys; Questionnaire-based dietary assessment method; Questionnaires; Reproducibility of Results; Review; Surveys and Questionnaires; Validation studies; Validity
• ISSN: 2048-6790; 2048-6790
• DOI: 10.1017/jns.2024.1

This scoping review aimed to identify questionnaire-based dietary assessment methods for use in the National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHNS) in Japan. The search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Ichushi) to identify questionnaire such as food frequency questionnaire and dietary history questionnaire validated against dietary recalls or food records for the intakes of both food groups and nutrients among Japanese adults. Study quality was assessed based on previously developed criteria. We extracted the questionnaire characteristics and the design and results of the validation studies. We identified 11 questionnaires, with the number of food items ranging from 40 to 196, from 32 articles of good quality. In the validation studies, participants were aged 30–76 years and 90% of the articles used ≥3 d dietary records as reference. The number of nutrients and food groups with a group-level intake difference within 20% against the reference method ranged from 1 to 30 and 1 to 11, respectively. The range of mean correlation coefficients between questionnaire and reference methods were 0.35–0.57 for nutrients and 0.28–0.52 for food groups. When selecting a survey instrument in the NHNS from the 11 existing questionnaires identified in this study, it is important to select one with high group-level comparison and correlation coefficient values on the intended assessment items after scrutinizing the design and results of the validation study. This review may serve as a reference for future studies that explore dietary assessment tools used for assessing dietary intake in specific representative populations.