Study of the Mechanical Behavior of Subcellular Organelles Using a 3D Finite Element Model of the Tensegrity Structure

A tensegrity model can be used to describe the mechanical behavior of living cells. A finite element model (FEM) was used to assess the mechanical contribution of subcellular organelles. Continuum parts like the cytoplasm and membrane were modeled as continuous elements, while the tensegrity was cho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied sciences 2021-01, Vol.11 (1), p.249
Main Authors: Khunsaraki, Gholamreza Mohammadi, Oscuii, Hanieh Niroomand, Voloshin, Arkady
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Atomic force microscopes
Atomic force microscopy
cell mechanics
cell structure
Cytoplasm
Cytoskeleton
Geometry
Load
Mechanical properties
Membranes
Organelles
subcellular organelles
tensegrity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A tensegrity model can be used to describe the mechanical behavior of living cells. A finite element model (FEM) was used to assess the mechanical contribution of subcellular organelles. Continuum parts like the cytoplasm and membrane were modeled as continuous elements, while the tensegrity was chosen to model the cytoskeleton and nucleoskeleton. An atomic force microscope load was implemented to simulate the external load. The cell components were loaded separately to evaluate their mechanical contributions. The analysis started with a single cytoplasm and each of the cell components was added in consecutive steps. The results showed that the cytoskeleton carried the largest part of the reaction force. The cytoplasm was the second important component of the cell’s mechanical response. It was shown that the nucleoskeleton has a stiffer structure than the membrane and cytoplasm. The cytoskeleton supported approximately 90% of the reaction force, while the cytoplasm carried 9% and the shell parts and nucleoskeleton were responsible for about 1%.
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app11010249