Performance enhancement in air gap membrane distillation using heat recovery configurations

• Published in: Results in engineering 2024-12, Vol.24, p.103391, Article 103391
• Main Authors: Zoromba, Mohamed Shafick, Abdel-Aziz, Mohamed Helmy, Attar, Alaa, Bassyouni, M., Elhenawy, Yasser
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Air gap membrane distillation; Cost analysis; Desalination; Experimental study; Heat Recovery
• ISSN: 2590-1230; 2590-1230
• DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103391

•Heat recovery in series reduced power consumption by 29.70 %.•Heat recovery resulted in an increase in water productivity by 37.07 %.•Air gap membrane distillation was used for water salinity 10,000 to 30,000 ppm. Experimental investigations were conducted on an air gap membrane distillation (AGMD) unit to evaluate the impact of heat recovery on system performance. The study utilized a steady-state heat source in conjunction with a spiral air gap membrane module for water desalination. The process was implemented using two configurations aimed to minimize heat loss enhancing productivity, gain output ratio (GOR), and thermal efficiency. The experiments involved feedwater with salt concentrations ranging from 10,000 to 30,000 ppm. The measurements were recorded for inlet and outlet temperatures of the heat source, water productivity, and thermal efficiency at various coolant and water feed flow rates. These configurations effectively addressed critical technical challenges in thermal AGMD systems by optimizing heat recovery. The incorporation of heat recovery resulted in a significant increase in water productivity by 37.07 % compared to systems without heat recovery while maintaining the same initial heat input. The heat recovery in series (HRSS) and parallel (HRPS) configurations resulted in power consumption reductions of approximately 29.7 % and 23.1 %, respectively compared to the conventional configuration (CC) at a flow rate of 12 L/min. The levelized cost of water (LCOW) for the AGMD system was comprehensively evaluated and found to be $ 7.71 per cubic meter. This figure reflected the total cost of water production over the system's operational lifespan including capital expenditures, operating and maintenance costs, and energy consumption. The calculated LCOW provides a clear indicator of the system's economic viability, demonstrating the cost required to produce each cubic meter of water through the AGMD.