Loading…
Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) solution for patients with inflammatory diseases in an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) basket trial
Background Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems are increasingly used in clinical trials to provide evidence of efficacy and tolerability of treatment from the patient perspective. The aim of this study is twofold: (1) to describe how we developed an electronic platform for patients to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of patient-reported outcomes 2023-10, Vol.7 (1), p.98-98, Article 98 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-23875544cb9bc80055374917b5a05f171e0d190bf4a312992cce5cfdeb3c7a9f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-23875544cb9bc80055374917b5a05f171e0d190bf4a312992cce5cfdeb3c7a9f3 |
container_end_page | 98 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 98 |
container_title | Journal of patient-reported outcomes |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | McMullan, Christel Retzer, Ameeta Hughes, Sarah E. Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Bathurst, Camilla Boyd, Alan Coleman, Jamie Davies, Elin Haf Denniston, Alastair K. Dunster, Helen Frost, Chris Harding, Rosie Hunn, Amanda Kyte, Derek Malpass, Rebecca McNamara, Gary Mitchell, Sandra Mittal, Saloni Newsome, Philip N. Price, Gary Rowe, Anna van Reil, Wilma Walker, Anita Wilson, Roger Calvert, Melanie |
description | Background
Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems are increasingly used in clinical trials to provide evidence of efficacy and tolerability of treatment from the patient perspective. The aim of this study is twofold: (1) to describe how we developed an electronic platform for patients to report their symptoms, and (2) to develop and undertake usability testing of an ePRO solution for use in a study of cell therapy seeking to provide early evidence of efficacy and tolerability of treatment and test the feasibility of the system for use in later phase studies.
Methods
An ePRO system was designed to be used in a single arm, multi-centre, phase II basket trial investigating the safety and activity of the use of ORBCEL-C™ in the treatment of patients with inflammatory conditions. ORBCEL-C™ is an enriched Mesenchymal Stromal Cells product isolated from human umbilical cord tissue using CD362+ cell selection. Usability testing sessions were conducted using cognitive interviews and the ‘Think Aloud’ method with patient advisory group members and Research Nurses to assess the usability of the system.
Results
Nine patient partners and seven research nurses took part in one usability testing session. Measures of fatigue and health-related quality of life, the PRO-CTCAE™ and FACT-GP5 global tolerability question were included in the ePRO system. Alert notifications to the clinical team were triggered by PRO-CTCAE™ and FACT-GP5 scores. Patient participants liked the simplicity and responsiveness of the patient-facing app. Two patients were unable to complete the testing session, due to technical issues. Research Nurses suggested minor modifications to improve functionality and the layout of the clinician dashboard and the training materials.
Conclusion
By testing the effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction of our novel ePRO system (PROmics
R
), we learnt that most people with an inflammatory condition found it easy to report their symptoms using an app on their own device. Their experiences using the PROmics
R
ePRO system within a trial environment will be further explored in our upcoming feasibility testing. Research nurses were also positive and found the clinical dashboard easy-to-use. Using ePROs in early phase trials is important in order to provide evidence of therapeutic responses and tolerability, increase the evidence based, and inform methodology development.
Trial registration
: ISRCTN, ISRCTN80103507. Registered 01 April 2022,
https://www.is |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s41687-023-00634-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1f4183a1c1e54a1a8341cfe7200a5ed5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1f4183a1c1e54a1a8341cfe7200a5ed5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2874834695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-23875544cb9bc80055374917b5a05f171e0d190bf4a312992cce5cfdeb3c7a9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks9u1DAQxiMEolXpC3BAlri0h4Adx0l8Qqvyr1KrrtBytibOZNdLEgfbWbRvx6PhbdrScuBka-ab39gzX5K8ZvQdY1Xx3uesqMqUZjyltOB5yp8lx5mgMq1oRp8_uh8lp95vKaVMSikkf5kc8bJiGc_4cfL7I-6ws2OPQyAwNGTyUJvOhD0J6IMZ1sS2MUGwQx2cHYwmIwQT5anD0bqADbFT0LZHcobLbzfnxNtuCsYOpLXuXuzJLxM2xAxtB30Pwbo9aYxH8Ohj9NBh0exg0BG32qCDcU-usTHaDNCRpbPNpAM5W6yul-ekBv8DAwnOQPcqedFC5_H07jxJvn_-tLr4ml7dfLm8WFylWuQspBmvSiHyXNey1hWlQvAyl6ysBVDRspIhbZikdZsDZ5mUmdYodNtgzXUJsuUnyeXMbSxs1ehMD26vLBh1G7BurcAFoztUrM1ZxYFphiIHBhXPmW6xzCgFgY2IrA8za5zqHhsd5-OgewJ9mhnMRq3tTjEqirg3FglndwRnf05xUao3XmPXwYB28iqryjy2LeSh2dt_pFs7uTjVWVWIvMhoVGWzSjvrvcP24TWMqoPh1Gw4FQ2nbg2neCx68_gfDyX39ooCPgt8TA1rdH97_wf7B0lV5DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2874654620</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) solution for patients with inflammatory diseases in an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) basket trial</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access </source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>McMullan, Christel ; Retzer, Ameeta ; Hughes, Sarah E. ; Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee ; Bathurst, Camilla ; Boyd, Alan ; Coleman, Jamie ; Davies, Elin Haf ; Denniston, Alastair K. ; Dunster, Helen ; Frost, Chris ; Harding, Rosie ; Hunn, Amanda ; Kyte, Derek ; Malpass, Rebecca ; McNamara, Gary ; Mitchell, Sandra ; Mittal, Saloni ; Newsome, Philip N. ; Price, Gary ; Rowe, Anna ; van Reil, Wilma ; Walker, Anita ; Wilson, Roger ; Calvert, Melanie</creator><creatorcontrib>McMullan, Christel ; Retzer, Ameeta ; Hughes, Sarah E. ; Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee ; Bathurst, Camilla ; Boyd, Alan ; Coleman, Jamie ; Davies, Elin Haf ; Denniston, Alastair K. ; Dunster, Helen ; Frost, Chris ; Harding, Rosie ; Hunn, Amanda ; Kyte, Derek ; Malpass, Rebecca ; McNamara, Gary ; Mitchell, Sandra ; Mittal, Saloni ; Newsome, Philip N. ; Price, Gary ; Rowe, Anna ; van Reil, Wilma ; Walker, Anita ; Wilson, Roger ; Calvert, Melanie</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems are increasingly used in clinical trials to provide evidence of efficacy and tolerability of treatment from the patient perspective. The aim of this study is twofold: (1) to describe how we developed an electronic platform for patients to report their symptoms, and (2) to develop and undertake usability testing of an ePRO solution for use in a study of cell therapy seeking to provide early evidence of efficacy and tolerability of treatment and test the feasibility of the system for use in later phase studies.
Methods
An ePRO system was designed to be used in a single arm, multi-centre, phase II basket trial investigating the safety and activity of the use of ORBCEL-C™ in the treatment of patients with inflammatory conditions. ORBCEL-C™ is an enriched Mesenchymal Stromal Cells product isolated from human umbilical cord tissue using CD362+ cell selection. Usability testing sessions were conducted using cognitive interviews and the ‘Think Aloud’ method with patient advisory group members and Research Nurses to assess the usability of the system.
Results
Nine patient partners and seven research nurses took part in one usability testing session. Measures of fatigue and health-related quality of life, the PRO-CTCAE™ and FACT-GP5 global tolerability question were included in the ePRO system. Alert notifications to the clinical team were triggered by PRO-CTCAE™ and FACT-GP5 scores. Patient participants liked the simplicity and responsiveness of the patient-facing app. Two patients were unable to complete the testing session, due to technical issues. Research Nurses suggested minor modifications to improve functionality and the layout of the clinician dashboard and the training materials.
Conclusion
By testing the effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction of our novel ePRO system (PROmics
R
), we learnt that most people with an inflammatory condition found it easy to report their symptoms using an app on their own device. Their experiences using the PROmics
R
ePRO system within a trial environment will be further explored in our upcoming feasibility testing. Research nurses were also positive and found the clinical dashboard easy-to-use. Using ePROs in early phase trials is important in order to provide evidence of therapeutic responses and tolerability, increase the evidence based, and inform methodology development.
Trial registration
: ISRCTN, ISRCTN80103507. Registered 01 April 2022,
https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN80103507
Plain English summary
More and more patients tell clinicians how they feel by completing questionnaires electronically. Therefore, it is important to assess how easy it is for patients to do this. In this study, we describe how we developed an electronic platform for patients to report their symptoms and how we tested the usability of this platform with patient partners and research nurses. Once the electronic platform was developed, quality of life and symptoms questionnaires were programmed onto it. Alerts were sent to the clinical team if specific scores were obtained on the symptoms questionnaires. Although two patient partners were not able to finish the testing session because of technical issues, the ones who completed the session liked its simplicity and responsiveness. The research nurses also liked the system and only suggested minor modifications. Following this testing, we refined the electronic platform to test it further in a larger study which investigates the safety and use of a drug. We hope that thanks to this electronic platform, we will obtain useful information on the safety and efficacy of treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2509-8020</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2509-8020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00634-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37812323</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Cognitive interviews ; Early phase advanced therapy trial ; Electronic patient reported outcomes ; Electronics ; Humans ; Inflammatory conditions ; ISRCTN ; ISRCTN80103507 ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nurses ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Patients ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life Research ; Questionnaires ; Usability testing ; User-Centered Design ; User-Computer Interface</subject><ispartof>Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2023-10, Vol.7 (1), p.98-98, Article 98</ispartof><rights>Crown 2023</rights><rights>2023. International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL).</rights><rights>Crown 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-23875544cb9bc80055374917b5a05f171e0d190bf4a312992cce5cfdeb3c7a9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-23875544cb9bc80055374917b5a05f171e0d190bf4a312992cce5cfdeb3c7a9f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0878-1513</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562321/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2874654620?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,38493,43871,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37812323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McMullan, Christel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retzer, Ameeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bathurst, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Elin Haf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denniston, Alastair K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunster, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frost, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Rosie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunn, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyte, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malpass, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Saloni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newsome, Philip N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Reil, Wilma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvert, Melanie</creatorcontrib><title>Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) solution for patients with inflammatory diseases in an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) basket trial</title><title>Journal of patient-reported outcomes</title><addtitle>J Patient Rep Outcomes</addtitle><addtitle>J Patient Rep Outcomes</addtitle><description>Background
Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems are increasingly used in clinical trials to provide evidence of efficacy and tolerability of treatment from the patient perspective. The aim of this study is twofold: (1) to describe how we developed an electronic platform for patients to report their symptoms, and (2) to develop and undertake usability testing of an ePRO solution for use in a study of cell therapy seeking to provide early evidence of efficacy and tolerability of treatment and test the feasibility of the system for use in later phase studies.
Methods
An ePRO system was designed to be used in a single arm, multi-centre, phase II basket trial investigating the safety and activity of the use of ORBCEL-C™ in the treatment of patients with inflammatory conditions. ORBCEL-C™ is an enriched Mesenchymal Stromal Cells product isolated from human umbilical cord tissue using CD362+ cell selection. Usability testing sessions were conducted using cognitive interviews and the ‘Think Aloud’ method with patient advisory group members and Research Nurses to assess the usability of the system.
Results
Nine patient partners and seven research nurses took part in one usability testing session. Measures of fatigue and health-related quality of life, the PRO-CTCAE™ and FACT-GP5 global tolerability question were included in the ePRO system. Alert notifications to the clinical team were triggered by PRO-CTCAE™ and FACT-GP5 scores. Patient participants liked the simplicity and responsiveness of the patient-facing app. Two patients were unable to complete the testing session, due to technical issues. Research Nurses suggested minor modifications to improve functionality and the layout of the clinician dashboard and the training materials.
Conclusion
By testing the effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction of our novel ePRO system (PROmics
R
), we learnt that most people with an inflammatory condition found it easy to report their symptoms using an app on their own device. Their experiences using the PROmics
R
ePRO system within a trial environment will be further explored in our upcoming feasibility testing. Research nurses were also positive and found the clinical dashboard easy-to-use. Using ePROs in early phase trials is important in order to provide evidence of therapeutic responses and tolerability, increase the evidence based, and inform methodology development.
Trial registration
: ISRCTN, ISRCTN80103507. Registered 01 April 2022,
https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN80103507
Plain English summary
More and more patients tell clinicians how they feel by completing questionnaires electronically. Therefore, it is important to assess how easy it is for patients to do this. In this study, we describe how we developed an electronic platform for patients to report their symptoms and how we tested the usability of this platform with patient partners and research nurses. Once the electronic platform was developed, quality of life and symptoms questionnaires were programmed onto it. Alerts were sent to the clinical team if specific scores were obtained on the symptoms questionnaires. Although two patient partners were not able to finish the testing session because of technical issues, the ones who completed the session liked its simplicity and responsiveness. The research nurses also liked the system and only suggested minor modifications. Following this testing, we refined the electronic platform to test it further in a larger study which investigates the safety and use of a drug. We hope that thanks to this electronic platform, we will obtain useful information on the safety and efficacy of treatment.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cognitive interviews</subject><subject>Early phase advanced therapy trial</subject><subject>Electronic patient reported outcomes</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammatory conditions</subject><subject>ISRCTN</subject><subject>ISRCTN80103507</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Usability testing</subject><subject>User-Centered Design</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><issn>2509-8020</issn><issn>2509-8020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks9u1DAQxiMEolXpC3BAlri0h4Adx0l8Qqvyr1KrrtBytibOZNdLEgfbWbRvx6PhbdrScuBka-ab39gzX5K8ZvQdY1Xx3uesqMqUZjyltOB5yp8lx5mgMq1oRp8_uh8lp95vKaVMSikkf5kc8bJiGc_4cfL7I-6ws2OPQyAwNGTyUJvOhD0J6IMZ1sS2MUGwQx2cHYwmIwQT5anD0bqADbFT0LZHcobLbzfnxNtuCsYOpLXuXuzJLxM2xAxtB30Pwbo9aYxH8Ohj9NBh0exg0BG32qCDcU-usTHaDNCRpbPNpAM5W6yul-ekBv8DAwnOQPcqedFC5_H07jxJvn_-tLr4ml7dfLm8WFylWuQspBmvSiHyXNey1hWlQvAyl6ysBVDRspIhbZikdZsDZ5mUmdYodNtgzXUJsuUnyeXMbSxs1ehMD26vLBh1G7BurcAFoztUrM1ZxYFphiIHBhXPmW6xzCgFgY2IrA8za5zqHhsd5-OgewJ9mhnMRq3tTjEqirg3FglndwRnf05xUao3XmPXwYB28iqryjy2LeSh2dt_pFs7uTjVWVWIvMhoVGWzSjvrvcP24TWMqoPh1Gw4FQ2nbg2neCx68_gfDyX39ooCPgt8TA1rdH97_wf7B0lV5DA</recordid><startdate>20231009</startdate><enddate>20231009</enddate><creator>McMullan, Christel</creator><creator>Retzer, Ameeta</creator><creator>Hughes, Sarah E.</creator><creator>Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee</creator><creator>Bathurst, Camilla</creator><creator>Boyd, Alan</creator><creator>Coleman, Jamie</creator><creator>Davies, Elin Haf</creator><creator>Denniston, Alastair K.</creator><creator>Dunster, Helen</creator><creator>Frost, Chris</creator><creator>Harding, Rosie</creator><creator>Hunn, Amanda</creator><creator>Kyte, Derek</creator><creator>Malpass, Rebecca</creator><creator>McNamara, Gary</creator><creator>Mitchell, Sandra</creator><creator>Mittal, Saloni</creator><creator>Newsome, Philip N.</creator><creator>Price, Gary</creator><creator>Rowe, Anna</creator><creator>van Reil, Wilma</creator><creator>Walker, Anita</creator><creator>Wilson, Roger</creator><creator>Calvert, Melanie</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0878-1513</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231009</creationdate><title>Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) solution for patients with inflammatory diseases in an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) basket trial</title><author>McMullan, Christel ; Retzer, Ameeta ; Hughes, Sarah E. ; Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee ; Bathurst, Camilla ; Boyd, Alan ; Coleman, Jamie ; Davies, Elin Haf ; Denniston, Alastair K. ; Dunster, Helen ; Frost, Chris ; Harding, Rosie ; Hunn, Amanda ; Kyte, Derek ; Malpass, Rebecca ; McNamara, Gary ; Mitchell, Sandra ; Mittal, Saloni ; Newsome, Philip N. ; Price, Gary ; Rowe, Anna ; van Reil, Wilma ; Walker, Anita ; Wilson, Roger ; Calvert, Melanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-23875544cb9bc80055374917b5a05f171e0d190bf4a312992cce5cfdeb3c7a9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cognitive interviews</topic><topic>Early phase advanced therapy trial</topic><topic>Electronic patient reported outcomes</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammatory conditions</topic><topic>ISRCTN</topic><topic>ISRCTN80103507</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Usability testing</topic><topic>User-Centered Design</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McMullan, Christel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retzer, Ameeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bathurst, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Elin Haf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denniston, Alastair K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunster, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frost, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Rosie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunn, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyte, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malpass, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Saloni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newsome, Philip N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Reil, Wilma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvert, Melanie</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of patient-reported outcomes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McMullan, Christel</au><au>Retzer, Ameeta</au><au>Hughes, Sarah E.</au><au>Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee</au><au>Bathurst, Camilla</au><au>Boyd, Alan</au><au>Coleman, Jamie</au><au>Davies, Elin Haf</au><au>Denniston, Alastair K.</au><au>Dunster, Helen</au><au>Frost, Chris</au><au>Harding, Rosie</au><au>Hunn, Amanda</au><au>Kyte, Derek</au><au>Malpass, Rebecca</au><au>McNamara, Gary</au><au>Mitchell, Sandra</au><au>Mittal, Saloni</au><au>Newsome, Philip N.</au><au>Price, Gary</au><au>Rowe, Anna</au><au>van Reil, Wilma</au><au>Walker, Anita</au><au>Wilson, Roger</au><au>Calvert, Melanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) solution for patients with inflammatory diseases in an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) basket trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of patient-reported outcomes</jtitle><stitle>J Patient Rep Outcomes</stitle><addtitle>J Patient Rep Outcomes</addtitle><date>2023-10-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>98-98</pages><artnum>98</artnum><issn>2509-8020</issn><eissn>2509-8020</eissn><abstract>Background
Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems are increasingly used in clinical trials to provide evidence of efficacy and tolerability of treatment from the patient perspective. The aim of this study is twofold: (1) to describe how we developed an electronic platform for patients to report their symptoms, and (2) to develop and undertake usability testing of an ePRO solution for use in a study of cell therapy seeking to provide early evidence of efficacy and tolerability of treatment and test the feasibility of the system for use in later phase studies.
Methods
An ePRO system was designed to be used in a single arm, multi-centre, phase II basket trial investigating the safety and activity of the use of ORBCEL-C™ in the treatment of patients with inflammatory conditions. ORBCEL-C™ is an enriched Mesenchymal Stromal Cells product isolated from human umbilical cord tissue using CD362+ cell selection. Usability testing sessions were conducted using cognitive interviews and the ‘Think Aloud’ method with patient advisory group members and Research Nurses to assess the usability of the system.
Results
Nine patient partners and seven research nurses took part in one usability testing session. Measures of fatigue and health-related quality of life, the PRO-CTCAE™ and FACT-GP5 global tolerability question were included in the ePRO system. Alert notifications to the clinical team were triggered by PRO-CTCAE™ and FACT-GP5 scores. Patient participants liked the simplicity and responsiveness of the patient-facing app. Two patients were unable to complete the testing session, due to technical issues. Research Nurses suggested minor modifications to improve functionality and the layout of the clinician dashboard and the training materials.
Conclusion
By testing the effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction of our novel ePRO system (PROmics
R
), we learnt that most people with an inflammatory condition found it easy to report their symptoms using an app on their own device. Their experiences using the PROmics
R
ePRO system within a trial environment will be further explored in our upcoming feasibility testing. Research nurses were also positive and found the clinical dashboard easy-to-use. Using ePROs in early phase trials is important in order to provide evidence of therapeutic responses and tolerability, increase the evidence based, and inform methodology development.
Trial registration
: ISRCTN, ISRCTN80103507. Registered 01 April 2022,
https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN80103507
Plain English summary
More and more patients tell clinicians how they feel by completing questionnaires electronically. Therefore, it is important to assess how easy it is for patients to do this. In this study, we describe how we developed an electronic platform for patients to report their symptoms and how we tested the usability of this platform with patient partners and research nurses. Once the electronic platform was developed, quality of life and symptoms questionnaires were programmed onto it. Alerts were sent to the clinical team if specific scores were obtained on the symptoms questionnaires. Although two patient partners were not able to finish the testing session because of technical issues, the ones who completed the session liked its simplicity and responsiveness. The research nurses also liked the system and only suggested minor modifications. Following this testing, we refined the electronic platform to test it further in a larger study which investigates the safety and use of a drug. We hope that thanks to this electronic platform, we will obtain useful information on the safety and efficacy of treatment.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>37812323</pmid><doi>10.1186/s41687-023-00634-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0878-1513</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2509-8020 |
ispartof | Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2023-10, Vol.7 (1), p.98-98, Article 98 |
issn | 2509-8020 2509-8020 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1f4183a1c1e54a1a8341cfe7200a5ed5 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access ; PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Clinical outcomes Cognitive interviews Early phase advanced therapy trial Electronic patient reported outcomes Electronics Humans Inflammatory conditions ISRCTN ISRCTN80103507 Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nurses Patient Reported Outcome Measures Patients Quality of Life Quality of Life Research Questionnaires Usability testing User-Centered Design User-Computer Interface |
title | Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) solution for patients with inflammatory diseases in an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) basket trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T09%3A27%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20usability%20testing%20of%20an%20electronic%20patient-reported%20outcome%20(ePRO)%20solution%20for%20patients%20with%20inflammatory%20diseases%20in%20an%20Advanced%20Therapy%20Medicinal%20Product%20(ATMP)%20basket%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20patient-reported%20outcomes&rft.au=McMullan,%20Christel&rft.date=2023-10-09&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=98-98&rft.artnum=98&rft.issn=2509-8020&rft.eissn=2509-8020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s41687-023-00634-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2874834695%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-23875544cb9bc80055374917b5a05f171e0d190bf4a312992cce5cfdeb3c7a9f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2874654620&rft_id=info:pmid/37812323&rfr_iscdi=true |