Loading…
Deprescribing: An umbrella review
This umbrella review examined systematic reviews of deprescribing studies by characteristics of intervention, population, medicine, and setting. Clinical and humanistic outcomes, barriers and facilitators, and tools for deprescribing are presented. The Medline database was used. The search was limit...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia) Croatia), 2024-06, Vol.74 (2), p.249-267 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-d09e5dc07ef595a70dd5342807ca203dc59a6b28157cf4f7fd61b73782ea1c2c3 |
container_end_page | 267 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 249 |
container_title | Acta pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia) |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Japelj, Nuša Horvat, Nejc Knez, Lea Kos, Mitja |
description | This umbrella review examined systematic reviews of deprescribing studies by characteristics of intervention, population, medicine, and setting. Clinical and humanistic outcomes, barriers and facilitators, and tools for deprescribing are presented. The Medline database was used. The search was limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English up to April 2022. Reviews reporting deprescribing were included, while those where depre-scribing was not planned and supervised by a healthcare professional were excluded. A total of 94 systematic reviews (23 meta--analyses) were included. Most explored clinical or humanistic outcomes (70/94, 74 %); less explored attitudes, facilitators, or barriers to deprescribing (17/94, 18 %); few focused on tools (8/94, 8.5 %). Reviews assessing clinical or humanistic outcomes were divided into two groups: reviews with
(39/70, 56 %; 16 reviewing specific deprescribing interventions and 23 broad medication optimisation interventions), and reviews with
(31/70, 44 %). Deprescribing was feasible and resulted in a reduction of inappropriate medications in reviews with
. Complex broad medication optimisation interventions were shown to reduce hospitalisation, falls, and mortality rates. In reviews of
a higher frequency of adverse drug withdrawal events underscores the importance of prioritizing patient safety and exercising caution when stopping medicines, particularly in patients with clear and appropriate indications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2478/acph-2024-0011 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_20019d83fe2c473a9dbafd92d7620c65</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_20019d83fe2c473a9dbafd92d7620c65</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3063457857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-d09e5dc07ef595a70dd5342807ca203dc59a6b28157cf4f7fd61b73782ea1c2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUtP4zAUhS3EiEdhyxIVsWETuH7FDmKDeMwgIbGBteXYNyUlbYrdUPHvx5lAZxix8tHV53Mfh5ADCqdMKH1m3eI5Y8BEBkDpBtmhWuRZIaXe_Edvk90YpwBCKc22yDbXmkoGdIccXeMiYHShLuv55Hx8OR93szJg09hxwLcaV3vkR2WbiPsf74g83d48Xv3K7h9-3l1d3mdOgFxmHgqU3oHCShbSKvBecsE0KGcZcO9kYfOSpb7KVaJSlc9pqXiaBy11zPERuRt8fWunZhHqmQ3vprW1-VNow8TYsKxdg4alXQuveYXMCcVt4Utb-YJ5lTNwuUxe2eD1HJx9-WI2VGJwmKThlHOqE38y8IvQvnYYl2ZWR9cfYY5tFw2HnAuptFQJPf4PnbZdmKfL9BSDXCspEnU6UC60MQas1jNQMH1wpg_O9MGZPrj04fDDtitn6Nf4Z1IJuBiAlW2WGDxOQveexN_23zsrwZgo-G8vfKTp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3062068754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deprescribing: An umbrella review</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Japelj, Nuša ; Horvat, Nejc ; Knez, Lea ; Kos, Mitja</creator><creatorcontrib>Japelj, Nuša ; Horvat, Nejc ; Knez, Lea ; Kos, Mitja</creatorcontrib><description>This umbrella review examined systematic reviews of deprescribing studies by characteristics of intervention, population, medicine, and setting. Clinical and humanistic outcomes, barriers and facilitators, and tools for deprescribing are presented. The Medline database was used. The search was limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English up to April 2022. Reviews reporting deprescribing were included, while those where depre-scribing was not planned and supervised by a healthcare professional were excluded. A total of 94 systematic reviews (23 meta--analyses) were included. Most explored clinical or humanistic outcomes (70/94, 74 %); less explored attitudes, facilitators, or barriers to deprescribing (17/94, 18 %); few focused on tools (8/94, 8.5 %). Reviews assessing clinical or humanistic outcomes were divided into two groups: reviews with
(39/70, 56 %; 16 reviewing specific deprescribing interventions and 23 broad medication optimisation interventions), and reviews with
(31/70, 44 %). Deprescribing was feasible and resulted in a reduction of inappropriate medications in reviews with
. Complex broad medication optimisation interventions were shown to reduce hospitalisation, falls, and mortality rates. In reviews of
a higher frequency of adverse drug withdrawal events underscores the importance of prioritizing patient safety and exercising caution when stopping medicines, particularly in patients with clear and appropriate indications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1846-9558</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1330-0075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1846-9558</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/acph-2024-0011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38815201</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACPHEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; deprescription ; Deprescriptions ; drug discontinuation ; drug tapering ; drug withdrawal ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - prevention & control ; Drugs ; Humans ; Inappropriate Prescribing - prevention & control ; Intervention ; Optimization ; Patients ; Polypharmacy ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; umbrella review</subject><ispartof>Acta pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia), 2024-06, Vol.74 (2), p.249-267</ispartof><rights>2024 Nuša Japelj et al., published by Sciendo.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-d09e5dc07ef595a70dd5342807ca203dc59a6b28157cf4f7fd61b73782ea1c2c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7743-2827 ; 0000-0002-6801-6450 ; 0000-0002-6340-9693 ; 0000-0001-8460-276X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3062068754?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38815201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Japelj, Nuša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvat, Nejc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knez, Lea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kos, Mitja</creatorcontrib><title>Deprescribing: An umbrella review</title><title>Acta pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia)</title><addtitle>Acta Pharm</addtitle><description>This umbrella review examined systematic reviews of deprescribing studies by characteristics of intervention, population, medicine, and setting. Clinical and humanistic outcomes, barriers and facilitators, and tools for deprescribing are presented. The Medline database was used. The search was limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English up to April 2022. Reviews reporting deprescribing were included, while those where depre-scribing was not planned and supervised by a healthcare professional were excluded. A total of 94 systematic reviews (23 meta--analyses) were included. Most explored clinical or humanistic outcomes (70/94, 74 %); less explored attitudes, facilitators, or barriers to deprescribing (17/94, 18 %); few focused on tools (8/94, 8.5 %). Reviews assessing clinical or humanistic outcomes were divided into two groups: reviews with
(39/70, 56 %; 16 reviewing specific deprescribing interventions and 23 broad medication optimisation interventions), and reviews with
(31/70, 44 %). Deprescribing was feasible and resulted in a reduction of inappropriate medications in reviews with
. Complex broad medication optimisation interventions were shown to reduce hospitalisation, falls, and mortality rates. In reviews of
a higher frequency of adverse drug withdrawal events underscores the importance of prioritizing patient safety and exercising caution when stopping medicines, particularly in patients with clear and appropriate indications.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>deprescription</subject><subject>Deprescriptions</subject><subject>drug discontinuation</subject><subject>drug tapering</subject><subject>drug withdrawal</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - prevention & control</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inappropriate Prescribing - prevention & control</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polypharmacy</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><subject>umbrella review</subject><issn>1846-9558</issn><issn>1330-0075</issn><issn>1846-9558</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUtP4zAUhS3EiEdhyxIVsWETuH7FDmKDeMwgIbGBteXYNyUlbYrdUPHvx5lAZxix8tHV53Mfh5ADCqdMKH1m3eI5Y8BEBkDpBtmhWuRZIaXe_Edvk90YpwBCKc22yDbXmkoGdIccXeMiYHShLuv55Hx8OR93szJg09hxwLcaV3vkR2WbiPsf74g83d48Xv3K7h9-3l1d3mdOgFxmHgqU3oHCShbSKvBecsE0KGcZcO9kYfOSpb7KVaJSlc9pqXiaBy11zPERuRt8fWunZhHqmQ3vprW1-VNow8TYsKxdg4alXQuveYXMCcVt4Utb-YJ5lTNwuUxe2eD1HJx9-WI2VGJwmKThlHOqE38y8IvQvnYYl2ZWR9cfYY5tFw2HnAuptFQJPf4PnbZdmKfL9BSDXCspEnU6UC60MQas1jNQMH1wpg_O9MGZPrj04fDDtitn6Nf4Z1IJuBiAlW2WGDxOQveexN_23zsrwZgo-G8vfKTp</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Japelj, Nuša</creator><creator>Horvat, Nejc</creator><creator>Knez, Lea</creator><creator>Kos, Mitja</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><general>Hrvatsko farmaceutsko društvo</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>VP8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-2827</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6801-6450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6340-9693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8460-276X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Deprescribing: An umbrella review</title><author>Japelj, Nuša ; Horvat, Nejc ; Knez, Lea ; Kos, Mitja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-d09e5dc07ef595a70dd5342807ca203dc59a6b28157cf4f7fd61b73782ea1c2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>deprescription</topic><topic>Deprescriptions</topic><topic>drug discontinuation</topic><topic>drug tapering</topic><topic>drug withdrawal</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - prevention & control</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inappropriate Prescribing - prevention & control</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polypharmacy</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><topic>umbrella review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Japelj, Nuša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvat, Nejc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knez, Lea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kos, Mitja</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hrcak: Portal of scientific journals of Croatia</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Acta pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Japelj, Nuša</au><au>Horvat, Nejc</au><au>Knez, Lea</au><au>Kos, Mitja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deprescribing: An umbrella review</atitle><jtitle>Acta pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Pharm</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>249-267</pages><issn>1846-9558</issn><issn>1330-0075</issn><eissn>1846-9558</eissn><coden>ACPHEE</coden><abstract>This umbrella review examined systematic reviews of deprescribing studies by characteristics of intervention, population, medicine, and setting. Clinical and humanistic outcomes, barriers and facilitators, and tools for deprescribing are presented. The Medline database was used. The search was limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English up to April 2022. Reviews reporting deprescribing were included, while those where depre-scribing was not planned and supervised by a healthcare professional were excluded. A total of 94 systematic reviews (23 meta--analyses) were included. Most explored clinical or humanistic outcomes (70/94, 74 %); less explored attitudes, facilitators, or barriers to deprescribing (17/94, 18 %); few focused on tools (8/94, 8.5 %). Reviews assessing clinical or humanistic outcomes were divided into two groups: reviews with
(39/70, 56 %; 16 reviewing specific deprescribing interventions and 23 broad medication optimisation interventions), and reviews with
(31/70, 44 %). Deprescribing was feasible and resulted in a reduction of inappropriate medications in reviews with
. Complex broad medication optimisation interventions were shown to reduce hospitalisation, falls, and mortality rates. In reviews of
a higher frequency of adverse drug withdrawal events underscores the importance of prioritizing patient safety and exercising caution when stopping medicines, particularly in patients with clear and appropriate indications.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><pmid>38815201</pmid><doi>10.2478/acph-2024-0011</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-2827</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6801-6450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6340-9693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8460-276X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1846-9558 |
ispartof | Acta pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia), 2024-06, Vol.74 (2), p.249-267 |
issn | 1846-9558 1330-0075 1846-9558 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_20019d83fe2c473a9dbafd92d7620c65 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Clinical trials deprescription Deprescriptions drug discontinuation drug tapering drug withdrawal Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - prevention & control Drugs Humans Inappropriate Prescribing - prevention & control Intervention Optimization Patients Polypharmacy Systematic Reviews as Topic umbrella review |
title | Deprescribing: An umbrella review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T18%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deprescribing:%20An%20umbrella%20review&rft.jtitle=Acta%20pharmaceutica%20(Zagreb,%20Croatia)&rft.au=Japelj,%20Nu%C5%A1a&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=249-267&rft.issn=1846-9558&rft.eissn=1846-9558&rft.coden=ACPHEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/acph-2024-0011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3063457857%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-d09e5dc07ef595a70dd5342807ca203dc59a6b28157cf4f7fd61b73782ea1c2c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3062068754&rft_id=info:pmid/38815201&rfr_iscdi=true |