Loading…
The Population-Wide Risk-Benefit Profile of Extending the Primary COVID-19 Vaccine Course Compared with an mRNA Booster Dose Program
The vaccination program is reducing the burden of COVID-19. However, recently, COVID-19 infections have been increasing across Europe, providing evidence that vaccine efficacy is waning. Consequently, booster doses are required to restore immunity levels. However, the relative risk-benefit ratio of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Vaccines (Basel) 2022-01, Vol.10 (2), p.140 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-2c4731a4d0c81cc2d506ac94618fcd12ff9c8fbe6297a4626288b0afc1b820853 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-2c4731a4d0c81cc2d506ac94618fcd12ff9c8fbe6297a4626288b0afc1b820853 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 140 |
container_title | Vaccines (Basel) |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Shiri, Tinevimbo Evans, Marc Talarico, Carla A Morgan, Angharad R Mussad, Maaz Buck, Philip O McEwan, Phil Strain, William David |
description | The vaccination program is reducing the burden of COVID-19. However, recently, COVID-19 infections have been increasing across Europe, providing evidence that vaccine efficacy is waning. Consequently, booster doses are required to restore immunity levels. However, the relative risk-benefit ratio of boosters, compared to pursuing a primary course in the unvaccinated population, remains uncertain. In this study, a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered (SEIR) transmission model of SARS-CoV-2 was used to investigate the impact of COVID-19 vaccine waning on disease burden, the benefit of a booster vaccine program compared to targeting the unvaccinated population, and the population-wide risk-benefit profile of vaccination. Our data demonstrates that the rate of vaccine efficacy waning has a significant impact on COVID-19 hospitalisations with the greatest effect in populations with lower vaccination coverage. There was greater benefit associated with a booster vaccination strategy compared to targeting the unvaccinated population, once >50% of the population had received their primary vaccination course. The population benefits of vaccination (reduced hospitalisations, long-COVID and deaths) outweighed the risks of myocarditis/pericarditis by an order of magnitude. Vaccination is important in ending the COVID-19 pandemic sooner, and the reduction in hospitalisations, death and long-COVID associated with vaccination significantly outweigh any risks. Despite these obvious benefits some people are vaccine reluctant, and as such remain unvaccinated. However, when most of a population have been vaccinated, a focus on a booster vaccine strategy for this group is likely to offer greater value, than targeting the proportion of the population who choose to remain unvaccinated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/vaccines10020140 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_207a55762e4547f89156b53e1f284a69</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_207a55762e4547f89156b53e1f284a69</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2633848174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-2c4731a4d0c81cc2d506ac94618fcd12ff9c8fbe6297a4626288b0afc1b820853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdks9PFDEUxydGIwS5ezJNvHgZ7a_ptBcTWFA3IUAIorem23nd7TrTLu0M6t0_3FkGCNDLa16_309eX75F8Zbgj4wp_OnGWOsDZIIxxYTjF8UuxbUomWI_Xz667xT7Oa_xeBRhUtSvix1WUcIrpXaLf5crQOdxM7Sm9zGUP3wD6MLnX-UhBHC-R-cpOt8Cig4d_-khND4sUb91Jd-Z9BfNzq7mRyVR6GoaCM3ikPK2dBuToEG_fb9CJqDu4vQAHcaYe0joKOYtIi6T6d4Ur5xpM-zf1b3i-5fjy9m38uTs63x2cFJarnBfUstrRgxvsJXEWtpUWBiruCDS2YZQ55SVbgGCqtpwQQWVcoGNs2QhKZYV2yvmE7eJZq030_w6Gq9vGzEttUm9ty3ocXumqmpBgVe8dlKRSiwqBsRRyY1QI-vzxNoMiw4aC6FPpn0CffoS_Eov442WUmLK6Qj4cAdI8XqA3OvOZwttawLEIWsqGJNckpqP0vfPpOtxxWFc1a2KKEWFGFV4UtkUc07gHoYhWG8To58nZrS8e_yJB8N9Pth_YxW8zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2633199266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Population-Wide Risk-Benefit Profile of Extending the Primary COVID-19 Vaccine Course Compared with an mRNA Booster Dose Program</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Shiri, Tinevimbo ; Evans, Marc ; Talarico, Carla A ; Morgan, Angharad R ; Mussad, Maaz ; Buck, Philip O ; McEwan, Phil ; Strain, William David</creator><creatorcontrib>Shiri, Tinevimbo ; Evans, Marc ; Talarico, Carla A ; Morgan, Angharad R ; Mussad, Maaz ; Buck, Philip O ; McEwan, Phil ; Strain, William David</creatorcontrib><description>The vaccination program is reducing the burden of COVID-19. However, recently, COVID-19 infections have been increasing across Europe, providing evidence that vaccine efficacy is waning. Consequently, booster doses are required to restore immunity levels. However, the relative risk-benefit ratio of boosters, compared to pursuing a primary course in the unvaccinated population, remains uncertain. In this study, a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered (SEIR) transmission model of SARS-CoV-2 was used to investigate the impact of COVID-19 vaccine waning on disease burden, the benefit of a booster vaccine program compared to targeting the unvaccinated population, and the population-wide risk-benefit profile of vaccination. Our data demonstrates that the rate of vaccine efficacy waning has a significant impact on COVID-19 hospitalisations with the greatest effect in populations with lower vaccination coverage. There was greater benefit associated with a booster vaccination strategy compared to targeting the unvaccinated population, once >50% of the population had received their primary vaccination course. The population benefits of vaccination (reduced hospitalisations, long-COVID and deaths) outweighed the risks of myocarditis/pericarditis by an order of magnitude. Vaccination is important in ending the COVID-19 pandemic sooner, and the reduction in hospitalisations, death and long-COVID associated with vaccination significantly outweigh any risks. Despite these obvious benefits some people are vaccine reluctant, and as such remain unvaccinated. However, when most of a population have been vaccinated, a focus on a booster vaccine strategy for this group is likely to offer greater value, than targeting the proportion of the population who choose to remain unvaccinated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-393X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020140</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35214599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Age groups ; boosters ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Disease transmission ; Guillain-Barre syndrome ; Heart diseases ; Hospitalization ; Infections ; modelling ; mRNA ; Myocarditis ; Pandemics ; Pericarditis ; Population ; population risk ; Primary care ; Risk ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Strategy ; Vaccination ; Vaccine efficacy ; Vaccines ; Viral diseases</subject><ispartof>Vaccines (Basel), 2022-01, Vol.10 (2), p.140</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-2c4731a4d0c81cc2d506ac94618fcd12ff9c8fbe6297a4626288b0afc1b820853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-2c4731a4d0c81cc2d506ac94618fcd12ff9c8fbe6297a4626288b0afc1b820853</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6826-418X ; 0000-0002-3898-3669</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2633199266/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2633199266?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25744,27915,27916,37003,37004,38507,43886,44581,53782,53784,74173,74887</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shiri, Tinevimbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talarico, Carla A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Angharad R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussad, Maaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck, Philip O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwan, Phil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strain, William David</creatorcontrib><title>The Population-Wide Risk-Benefit Profile of Extending the Primary COVID-19 Vaccine Course Compared with an mRNA Booster Dose Program</title><title>Vaccines (Basel)</title><addtitle>Vaccines (Basel)</addtitle><description>The vaccination program is reducing the burden of COVID-19. However, recently, COVID-19 infections have been increasing across Europe, providing evidence that vaccine efficacy is waning. Consequently, booster doses are required to restore immunity levels. However, the relative risk-benefit ratio of boosters, compared to pursuing a primary course in the unvaccinated population, remains uncertain. In this study, a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered (SEIR) transmission model of SARS-CoV-2 was used to investigate the impact of COVID-19 vaccine waning on disease burden, the benefit of a booster vaccine program compared to targeting the unvaccinated population, and the population-wide risk-benefit profile of vaccination. Our data demonstrates that the rate of vaccine efficacy waning has a significant impact on COVID-19 hospitalisations with the greatest effect in populations with lower vaccination coverage. There was greater benefit associated with a booster vaccination strategy compared to targeting the unvaccinated population, once >50% of the population had received their primary vaccination course. The population benefits of vaccination (reduced hospitalisations, long-COVID and deaths) outweighed the risks of myocarditis/pericarditis by an order of magnitude. Vaccination is important in ending the COVID-19 pandemic sooner, and the reduction in hospitalisations, death and long-COVID associated with vaccination significantly outweigh any risks. Despite these obvious benefits some people are vaccine reluctant, and as such remain unvaccinated. However, when most of a population have been vaccinated, a focus on a booster vaccine strategy for this group is likely to offer greater value, than targeting the proportion of the population who choose to remain unvaccinated.</description><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>boosters</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Guillain-Barre syndrome</subject><subject>Heart diseases</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>modelling</subject><subject>mRNA</subject><subject>Myocarditis</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pericarditis</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>population risk</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccine efficacy</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><issn>2076-393X</issn><issn>2076-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdks9PFDEUxydGIwS5ezJNvHgZ7a_ptBcTWFA3IUAIorem23nd7TrTLu0M6t0_3FkGCNDLa16_309eX75F8Zbgj4wp_OnGWOsDZIIxxYTjF8UuxbUomWI_Xz667xT7Oa_xeBRhUtSvix1WUcIrpXaLf5crQOdxM7Sm9zGUP3wD6MLnX-UhBHC-R-cpOt8Cig4d_-khND4sUb91Jd-Z9BfNzq7mRyVR6GoaCM3ikPK2dBuToEG_fb9CJqDu4vQAHcaYe0joKOYtIi6T6d4Ur5xpM-zf1b3i-5fjy9m38uTs63x2cFJarnBfUstrRgxvsJXEWtpUWBiruCDS2YZQ55SVbgGCqtpwQQWVcoGNs2QhKZYV2yvmE7eJZq030_w6Gq9vGzEttUm9ty3ocXumqmpBgVe8dlKRSiwqBsRRyY1QI-vzxNoMiw4aC6FPpn0CffoS_Eov442WUmLK6Qj4cAdI8XqA3OvOZwttawLEIWsqGJNckpqP0vfPpOtxxWFc1a2KKEWFGFV4UtkUc07gHoYhWG8To58nZrS8e_yJB8N9Pth_YxW8zQ</recordid><startdate>20220118</startdate><enddate>20220118</enddate><creator>Shiri, Tinevimbo</creator><creator>Evans, Marc</creator><creator>Talarico, Carla A</creator><creator>Morgan, Angharad R</creator><creator>Mussad, Maaz</creator><creator>Buck, Philip O</creator><creator>McEwan, Phil</creator><creator>Strain, William David</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6826-418X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3898-3669</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220118</creationdate><title>The Population-Wide Risk-Benefit Profile of Extending the Primary COVID-19 Vaccine Course Compared with an mRNA Booster Dose Program</title><author>Shiri, Tinevimbo ; Evans, Marc ; Talarico, Carla A ; Morgan, Angharad R ; Mussad, Maaz ; Buck, Philip O ; McEwan, Phil ; Strain, William David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-2c4731a4d0c81cc2d506ac94618fcd12ff9c8fbe6297a4626288b0afc1b820853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>boosters</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Guillain-Barre syndrome</topic><topic>Heart diseases</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>modelling</topic><topic>mRNA</topic><topic>Myocarditis</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pericarditis</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>population risk</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccine efficacy</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shiri, Tinevimbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talarico, Carla A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Angharad R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussad, Maaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck, Philip O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwan, Phil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strain, William David</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Vaccines (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shiri, Tinevimbo</au><au>Evans, Marc</au><au>Talarico, Carla A</au><au>Morgan, Angharad R</au><au>Mussad, Maaz</au><au>Buck, Philip O</au><au>McEwan, Phil</au><au>Strain, William David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Population-Wide Risk-Benefit Profile of Extending the Primary COVID-19 Vaccine Course Compared with an mRNA Booster Dose Program</atitle><jtitle>Vaccines (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccines (Basel)</addtitle><date>2022-01-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>140</spage><pages>140-</pages><issn>2076-393X</issn><eissn>2076-393X</eissn><abstract>The vaccination program is reducing the burden of COVID-19. However, recently, COVID-19 infections have been increasing across Europe, providing evidence that vaccine efficacy is waning. Consequently, booster doses are required to restore immunity levels. However, the relative risk-benefit ratio of boosters, compared to pursuing a primary course in the unvaccinated population, remains uncertain. In this study, a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered (SEIR) transmission model of SARS-CoV-2 was used to investigate the impact of COVID-19 vaccine waning on disease burden, the benefit of a booster vaccine program compared to targeting the unvaccinated population, and the population-wide risk-benefit profile of vaccination. Our data demonstrates that the rate of vaccine efficacy waning has a significant impact on COVID-19 hospitalisations with the greatest effect in populations with lower vaccination coverage. There was greater benefit associated with a booster vaccination strategy compared to targeting the unvaccinated population, once >50% of the population had received their primary vaccination course. The population benefits of vaccination (reduced hospitalisations, long-COVID and deaths) outweighed the risks of myocarditis/pericarditis by an order of magnitude. Vaccination is important in ending the COVID-19 pandemic sooner, and the reduction in hospitalisations, death and long-COVID associated with vaccination significantly outweigh any risks. Despite these obvious benefits some people are vaccine reluctant, and as such remain unvaccinated. However, when most of a population have been vaccinated, a focus on a booster vaccine strategy for this group is likely to offer greater value, than targeting the proportion of the population who choose to remain unvaccinated.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35214599</pmid><doi>10.3390/vaccines10020140</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6826-418X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3898-3669</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2076-393X |
ispartof | Vaccines (Basel), 2022-01, Vol.10 (2), p.140 |
issn | 2076-393X 2076-393X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_207a55762e4547f89156b53e1f284a69 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Age groups boosters Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 vaccines Disease transmission Guillain-Barre syndrome Heart diseases Hospitalization Infections modelling mRNA Myocarditis Pandemics Pericarditis Population population risk Primary care Risk Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Strategy Vaccination Vaccine efficacy Vaccines Viral diseases |
title | The Population-Wide Risk-Benefit Profile of Extending the Primary COVID-19 Vaccine Course Compared with an mRNA Booster Dose Program |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A54%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Population-Wide%20Risk-Benefit%20Profile%20of%20Extending%20the%20Primary%20COVID-19%20Vaccine%20Course%20Compared%20with%20an%20mRNA%20Booster%20Dose%20Program&rft.jtitle=Vaccines%20(Basel)&rft.au=Shiri,%20Tinevimbo&rft.date=2022-01-18&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=140&rft.pages=140-&rft.issn=2076-393X&rft.eissn=2076-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/vaccines10020140&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2633848174%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-2c4731a4d0c81cc2d506ac94618fcd12ff9c8fbe6297a4626288b0afc1b820853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2633199266&rft_id=info:pmid/35214599&rfr_iscdi=true |