Poor physical function in elderly women in low-level aged care is related to muscle strength rather than to measures of sarcopenia

• Published in: Clinical interventions in aging 2011-01, Vol.6, p.67-76
• Main Authors: Woods, Julie L, Iuliano-Burns, Sandra, King, Susannah J, Strauss, Boyd J, Walker, Karen Z
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; aged care; Aged, 80 and over; Aging - physiology; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Cross-Sectional Studies; Elder care; Female; Hip Joint - physiology; Humans; Motor Activity - physiology; muscle strength; Muscle Strength - physiology; Musculoskeletal system; Older people; Original Research; Physical Fitness - physiology; Risk Factors; Sarcopenia; Sarcopenia - epidemiology; Sarcopenia - physiopathology; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1178-1998; 1176-9092; 1178-1998
• DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S16979

To determine the prevalence of sarcopenia and investigate relationships among body composition, muscle strength, and physical function in elderly women in low-level aged care. Sixty-three ambulatory women (mean age 86 years) participated in this cross-sectional study where body composition was determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); ankle, knee, and hip strength by the Nicholas Manual Muscle Tester; and physical function by 'timed up and go' (TUG) and walking speed (WS) over 6 meters. Body composition data from a female reference group (n = 62, mean age 29 years) provided cut-off values for defining sarcopenia. Elderly women had higher body mass index (P < 0.001), lower lean mass (P < 0.001), and higher fat mass (P < 0.01) than the young reference group. Only a small proportion (3.2%) had absolute sarcopenia (defined by appendicular skeletal muscle mass/height squared) whereas 37% had relative sarcopenia class II (defined by percentage skeletal muscle mass). Scores for TUG and WS indicated relatively poor physical function, yet these measures were not associated with muscle mass or indices of sarcopenia. In multivariate analysis, only hip abductor strength predicted both TUG and WS (both P = 0.01). Hip strength is a more important indicator of physical functioning than lean mass. Measurement of hip strength may therefore be a useful screening tool to detect those at risk of functional decline and requirement for additional care. Further longitudinal studies with a range of other strength measures are warranted.