Cycle ergometer and inspiratory muscle training offer modest benefit compared with cycle ergometer alone: a comprehensive assessment in stable COPD patients

• Published in: International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2017-01, Vol.12, p.2655-2668
• Main Authors: Wang, Kai, Zeng, Guang-Qiao, Li, Rui, Luo, Yu-Wen, Wang, Mei, Hu, Yu-He, Xu, Wen-Hui, Zhou, Lu-Qian, Chen, Rong-Chang, Chen, Xin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Analysis; Bicycling; Breathing Exercises; Care and treatment; China; Chronic obstructive lung disease; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Comparative analysis; comprehensive assessment; cycle ergometer; Dynamometers; Dyspnea; exercise performance; Exercise Therapy - methods; Exercise Tolerance; Female; Hospitals; Humans; Inhalation; inspiratory muscle training; Interval training; Lung - physiopathology; Male; Methods; Middle Aged; Muscle strength; Nutritional Status; Original Research; Patients; Physical fitness; Physical therapy; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy; pulmonary rehabilitation; Quality of Life; Recovery of Function; Rehabilitation; Respiratory Muscles - physiopathology; Rest; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Walking
• ISSN: 1178-2005; 1176-9106; 1178-2005
• DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S140093

Cycle ergometer training (CET) has been shown to improve exercise performance of the quadriceps muscles in patients with COPD, and inspiratory muscle training (IMT) may improve the pressure-generating capacity of the inspiratory muscles. However, the effects of combined CET and IMT remain unclear and there is a lack of comprehensive assessment. Eighty-one patients with COPD were randomly allocated to three groups: 28 received 8 weeks of CET + IMT (combined training group), 27 received 8 weeks of CET alone (CET group), and 26 only received 8 weeks of free walking (control group). Comprehensive assessment including respiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity, pulmonary function, dyspnea, quality of life, emotional status, nutritional status, and body mass index, airflow obstruction, and exercise capacity index were measured before and after the pulmonary rehabilitation program. Respiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity, inspiratory capacity, dyspnea, quality of life, depression and anxiety, and nutritional status were all improved in the combined training and CET groups when compared with that in the control group ( 0.05). There were no significant differences in these indices between the patients with malnutrition and normal nutrition after pulmonary rehabilitation program ( >0.05). Combined training is more effective than CET alone for increasing inspiratory muscle strength. IMT may not be useful when combined with CET in patients with weakened inspiratory muscles. Nutritional status had slight impact on the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation. A comprehensive assessment approach can be more objective to evaluate the effects of combined CET and IMT.