The use of wetted perimeter as habitat proxy to assess environmental flows in Southern Quebec rivers (Canada)

• Published in: Ecological indicators 2021-12, Vol.132, p.108283, Article 108283
• Main Authors: Berthot, Laureline, St-Hilaire, André, Caissie, Daniel, El-Jabi, Nassir, Kirby, Judith, Ouellet-Proulx, Sébastien
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Environmental flows; Southern Quebec rivers; Water sharing policy; Wetted perimeter
• ISSN: 1470-160X; 1872-7034
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108283

•A hydraulic study for environmental flows (EF) assessment in Southern Quebec.•The wetted perimeter (WP) can be a tool for local riverine ecosystems protection.•The WP associated to the maximum curvature point is used as a protective threshold.•The WP associated to several potential environmental flows were compared.•Water managers can provide adjusted EF for Southern Quebec rivers. Environmental flows assessment in eastern Canada, and particularly in the province of Quebec, is mainly based on hydrological assessment of historical data during low flow periods. The mean 7-day low flow with return periods of two (7Q2) and ten years (7Q10) are two flow metrics currently used by the Quebec Department of Environment and Fight against Climate Change to prescribe minimum flow and/or maximum water abstraction while maintaining the functions and health of riverine ecosystems. This study investigated the use of the wetted perimeter as an additional environmental flows assessment method. This tool can be used by water managers to maintain the availability of river habitats during low flow periods. Twenty flow metrics were computed for inter-annual, summer and winter periods, for 43 sites from 35 rivers, and analysed to study the changes in wetted perimeter with flow. In addition, the flow associated with maximum curvature (breakpoint) of the flow-wetted perimeter function (QMC) was analyzed. Results provided a better understanding of local changes of river hydraulics and possible aquatic habitat availability associated with different flow metrics. The relevance of using a wetted perimeter threshold (WPSQMC) combined with flow thresholds (Tennant method) was also discussed. The two “fair” Tennant flow thresholds, apart from the twenty flow metrics, would provide sufficient available habitat all year long with corresponding WPSQMC thresholds of 88% and 95% of the 43 river sites. The median discharge for August flow metric for summer and the median discharge for the month with the lowest flow metric value for winter (usually February), provided the highest wetted perimeter in relative terms (72% and 79% respectively of the river sites) compared to the WPSQMC threshold. Using the 7Q2 flow metric would mean maintaining sufficient available habitat for 50%, 60% and 72% of the river sites for respectively inter-annual, summer and winter periods. Considering the single WPSQMC threshold, its associated flow provided the highest values for 16% of the river sites and the second