Loading…
The Comparison of Diagnostic Ability between Blue Laser/Light Imaging and Narrowband Imaging for Sessile Serrated Lesions with or without Dysplasia
Objectives. Diagnostic ability of sessile serrated lesions (SSL) and SSL with dysplasia (SSLD) using blue laser/light imaging (BLI) has not been well examined. We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of BLI for SSL and SSLD using several endoscopic findings compared to those of narrow band imaging (NBI)...
Saved in:
Published in: | Gastroenterology research and practice 2024, Vol.2024, p.2672289-10 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4ad4e476219a45a7552e1e4224bdf165f567261092adc6cb73b2e84218f8bba63 |
container_end_page | 10 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 2672289 |
container_title | Gastroenterology research and practice |
container_volume | 2024 |
creator | Kobayashi, Reo Yoshida, Naohisa Morinaga, Yukiko Hashimoto, Hikaru Tomita, Yuri Sugino, Satoshi Inoue, Ken Hirose, Ryohei Dohi, Osamu Murakami, Takaaki Inada, Yutaka Morimoto, Yasutaka Itoh, Yoshito |
description | Objectives. Diagnostic ability of sessile serrated lesions (SSL) and SSL with dysplasia (SSLD) using blue laser/light imaging (BLI) has not been well examined. We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of BLI for SSL and SSLD using several endoscopic findings compared to those of narrow band imaging (NBI). Materials and Methods. This was a subgroup analysis of prospective studies. 476 suspiciously serrated lesions of ≥2 mm on the proximal colon showing serrated change with magnified NBI or BLI in our institution between 2014 and 2021 were examined histopathologically. After propensity score matching, we evaluated the diagnostic ability of SSL and SSLD of the NBI and BLI groups regarding various endoscopic findings. For WLI findings, granule, depression, and reddish were examined for diagnosing SSLD. For NBI/BLI findings, expanded crypt opening (ECO) or thick and branched vessels (TBV) were examined for diagnosing SSL. Network vessels (NV) and white dendritic change (WDC) defined originally were examined for diagnosing SSLD. Results. Among matched 176 lesions, the sensitivity of lesions with either ECO or TBV for SSL in the NBI/BLI group was 97.5%/98.5% (p=0.668). Those with either WDC or NV for diagnosing SSLD in the groups were 81.0%/88.9% (p=0.667). Regarding the rates of endoscopic findings among 30 SSLD and 290 SSL, there were significant differences in WDC (66.4% vs. 8.6%, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2024/2672289 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_20d67d7272824f31b92e54694dad68cc</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_20d67d7272824f31b92e54694dad68cc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3069175037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4ad4e476219a45a7552e1e4224bdf165f567261092adc6cb73b2e84218f8bba63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2P0zAQhiMEYj_gxhlZ4oK0lNqOv3JCS5ePShUcWCRu1iSepK7SuGsnVP0d_GFS2q5YDpxmNH70yDN6s-wFo28Zk3LKKRdTrjTnpniUnTNl9ETl9MfjU884O8suUlpRqjil8ml2lhtjeF7k59mv2yWSWVhvIPoUOhJqcuOh6ULqfUWuS9_6fkdK7LeIHXnfDkgWkDBOF75Z9mS-hsZ3DYHOkS8QY9iW-_Y0rkMk3zAl3-JYY4QeHVlg8qFLZOv7JRmBfQ1DT252adNC8vAse1JDm_D5sV5m3z9-uJ19niy-fprPrheTSlDeTwQ4gUIrzgoQErSUHBkKzkXpaqZkLcejKEYLDq5SVanzkqMRnJnalCWo_DKbH7wuwMpuol9D3NkA3v4ZhNhYiOMZWrScOqWd5pobLuqclQVHKVQhHDhlqmp0vTu4NkO5Rldh10doH0gfvnR-aZvw0zLGtBFMjobXR0MMdwOm3q59qrBtocMwJJtTVTAtaa5H9NU_6CoMsRtvtaekFlJLPlJvDlQVQ0oR6_vfMGr30bH76NhjdEb85d8b3MOnrIzA1QFY-s7B1v9f9xv_J8xp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3065745752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Comparison of Diagnostic Ability between Blue Laser/Light Imaging and Narrowband Imaging for Sessile Serrated Lesions with or without Dysplasia</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kobayashi, Reo ; Yoshida, Naohisa ; Morinaga, Yukiko ; Hashimoto, Hikaru ; Tomita, Yuri ; Sugino, Satoshi ; Inoue, Ken ; Hirose, Ryohei ; Dohi, Osamu ; Murakami, Takaaki ; Inada, Yutaka ; Morimoto, Yasutaka ; Itoh, Yoshito</creator><contributor>Ardengh, Jose Celso ; Jose Celso Ardengh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Reo ; Yoshida, Naohisa ; Morinaga, Yukiko ; Hashimoto, Hikaru ; Tomita, Yuri ; Sugino, Satoshi ; Inoue, Ken ; Hirose, Ryohei ; Dohi, Osamu ; Murakami, Takaaki ; Inada, Yutaka ; Morimoto, Yasutaka ; Itoh, Yoshito ; Ardengh, Jose Celso ; Jose Celso Ardengh</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. Diagnostic ability of sessile serrated lesions (SSL) and SSL with dysplasia (SSLD) using blue laser/light imaging (BLI) has not been well examined. We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of BLI for SSL and SSLD using several endoscopic findings compared to those of narrow band imaging (NBI). Materials and Methods. This was a subgroup analysis of prospective studies. 476 suspiciously serrated lesions of ≥2 mm on the proximal colon showing serrated change with magnified NBI or BLI in our institution between 2014 and 2021 were examined histopathologically. After propensity score matching, we evaluated the diagnostic ability of SSL and SSLD of the NBI and BLI groups regarding various endoscopic findings. For WLI findings, granule, depression, and reddish were examined for diagnosing SSLD. For NBI/BLI findings, expanded crypt opening (ECO) or thick and branched vessels (TBV) were examined for diagnosing SSL. Network vessels (NV) and white dendritic change (WDC) defined originally were examined for diagnosing SSLD. Results. Among matched 176 lesions, the sensitivity of lesions with either ECO or TBV for SSL in the NBI/BLI group was 97.5%/98.5% (p=0.668). Those with either WDC or NV for diagnosing SSLD in the groups were 81.0%/88.9% (p=0.667). Regarding the rates of endoscopic findings among 30 SSLD and 290 SSL, there were significant differences in WDC (66.4% vs. 8.6%, p<0.001), NV (55.3% vs. 1.4%, p<0.001), and either WDC or NV (86.8% vs. 9.0%, p<0.001). Conclusions. The diagnostic ability of BLI for SSL and SSLD was not different from NBI. NV and WDC were useful for diagnosing SSLD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-6121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-630X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2024/2672289</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38882393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Egypt: Wiley</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Chi-square test ; Classification ; Colorectal cancer ; Endoscopy ; Histopathology ; Lasers ; Light emitting diodes ; Medical screening ; Morphology ; Polyps ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Gastroenterology research and practice, 2024, Vol.2024, p.2672289-10</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Reo Kobayashi et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Reo Kobayashi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Reo Kobayashi et al. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4ad4e476219a45a7552e1e4224bdf165f567261092adc6cb73b2e84218f8bba63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6167-9705</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3065745752/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3065745752?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,25753,27923,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38882393$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ardengh, Jose Celso</contributor><contributor>Jose Celso Ardengh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Reo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Naohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morinaga, Yukiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Hikaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomita, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugino, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirose, Ryohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inada, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimoto, Yasutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Itoh, Yoshito</creatorcontrib><title>The Comparison of Diagnostic Ability between Blue Laser/Light Imaging and Narrowband Imaging for Sessile Serrated Lesions with or without Dysplasia</title><title>Gastroenterology research and practice</title><addtitle>Gastroenterol Res Pract</addtitle><description>Objectives. Diagnostic ability of sessile serrated lesions (SSL) and SSL with dysplasia (SSLD) using blue laser/light imaging (BLI) has not been well examined. We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of BLI for SSL and SSLD using several endoscopic findings compared to those of narrow band imaging (NBI). Materials and Methods. This was a subgroup analysis of prospective studies. 476 suspiciously serrated lesions of ≥2 mm on the proximal colon showing serrated change with magnified NBI or BLI in our institution between 2014 and 2021 were examined histopathologically. After propensity score matching, we evaluated the diagnostic ability of SSL and SSLD of the NBI and BLI groups regarding various endoscopic findings. For WLI findings, granule, depression, and reddish were examined for diagnosing SSLD. For NBI/BLI findings, expanded crypt opening (ECO) or thick and branched vessels (TBV) were examined for diagnosing SSL. Network vessels (NV) and white dendritic change (WDC) defined originally were examined for diagnosing SSLD. Results. Among matched 176 lesions, the sensitivity of lesions with either ECO or TBV for SSL in the NBI/BLI group was 97.5%/98.5% (p=0.668). Those with either WDC or NV for diagnosing SSLD in the groups were 81.0%/88.9% (p=0.667). Regarding the rates of endoscopic findings among 30 SSLD and 290 SSL, there were significant differences in WDC (66.4% vs. 8.6%, p<0.001), NV (55.3% vs. 1.4%, p<0.001), and either WDC or NV (86.8% vs. 9.0%, p<0.001). Conclusions. The diagnostic ability of BLI for SSL and SSLD was not different from NBI. NV and WDC were useful for diagnosing SSLD.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Light emitting diodes</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Polyps</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1687-6121</issn><issn>1687-630X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2P0zAQhiMEYj_gxhlZ4oK0lNqOv3JCS5ePShUcWCRu1iSepK7SuGsnVP0d_GFS2q5YDpxmNH70yDN6s-wFo28Zk3LKKRdTrjTnpniUnTNl9ETl9MfjU884O8suUlpRqjil8ml2lhtjeF7k59mv2yWSWVhvIPoUOhJqcuOh6ULqfUWuS9_6fkdK7LeIHXnfDkgWkDBOF75Z9mS-hsZ3DYHOkS8QY9iW-_Y0rkMk3zAl3-JYY4QeHVlg8qFLZOv7JRmBfQ1DT252adNC8vAse1JDm_D5sV5m3z9-uJ19niy-fprPrheTSlDeTwQ4gUIrzgoQErSUHBkKzkXpaqZkLcejKEYLDq5SVanzkqMRnJnalCWo_DKbH7wuwMpuol9D3NkA3v4ZhNhYiOMZWrScOqWd5pobLuqclQVHKVQhHDhlqmp0vTu4NkO5Rldh10doH0gfvnR-aZvw0zLGtBFMjobXR0MMdwOm3q59qrBtocMwJJtTVTAtaa5H9NU_6CoMsRtvtaekFlJLPlJvDlQVQ0oR6_vfMGr30bH76NhjdEb85d8b3MOnrIzA1QFY-s7B1v9f9xv_J8xp</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Kobayashi, Reo</creator><creator>Yoshida, Naohisa</creator><creator>Morinaga, Yukiko</creator><creator>Hashimoto, Hikaru</creator><creator>Tomita, Yuri</creator><creator>Sugino, Satoshi</creator><creator>Inoue, Ken</creator><creator>Hirose, Ryohei</creator><creator>Dohi, Osamu</creator><creator>Murakami, Takaaki</creator><creator>Inada, Yutaka</creator><creator>Morimoto, Yasutaka</creator><creator>Itoh, Yoshito</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6167-9705</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>The Comparison of Diagnostic Ability between Blue Laser/Light Imaging and Narrowband Imaging for Sessile Serrated Lesions with or without Dysplasia</title><author>Kobayashi, Reo ; Yoshida, Naohisa ; Morinaga, Yukiko ; Hashimoto, Hikaru ; Tomita, Yuri ; Sugino, Satoshi ; Inoue, Ken ; Hirose, Ryohei ; Dohi, Osamu ; Murakami, Takaaki ; Inada, Yutaka ; Morimoto, Yasutaka ; Itoh, Yoshito</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4ad4e476219a45a7552e1e4224bdf165f567261092adc6cb73b2e84218f8bba63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Light emitting diodes</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Polyps</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Reo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Naohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morinaga, Yukiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Hikaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomita, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugino, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirose, Ryohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inada, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimoto, Yasutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Itoh, Yoshito</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Gastroenterology research and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kobayashi, Reo</au><au>Yoshida, Naohisa</au><au>Morinaga, Yukiko</au><au>Hashimoto, Hikaru</au><au>Tomita, Yuri</au><au>Sugino, Satoshi</au><au>Inoue, Ken</au><au>Hirose, Ryohei</au><au>Dohi, Osamu</au><au>Murakami, Takaaki</au><au>Inada, Yutaka</au><au>Morimoto, Yasutaka</au><au>Itoh, Yoshito</au><au>Ardengh, Jose Celso</au><au>Jose Celso Ardengh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Comparison of Diagnostic Ability between Blue Laser/Light Imaging and Narrowband Imaging for Sessile Serrated Lesions with or without Dysplasia</atitle><jtitle>Gastroenterology research and practice</jtitle><addtitle>Gastroenterol Res Pract</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2024</volume><spage>2672289</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>2672289-10</pages><issn>1687-6121</issn><eissn>1687-630X</eissn><abstract>Objectives. Diagnostic ability of sessile serrated lesions (SSL) and SSL with dysplasia (SSLD) using blue laser/light imaging (BLI) has not been well examined. We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of BLI for SSL and SSLD using several endoscopic findings compared to those of narrow band imaging (NBI). Materials and Methods. This was a subgroup analysis of prospective studies. 476 suspiciously serrated lesions of ≥2 mm on the proximal colon showing serrated change with magnified NBI or BLI in our institution between 2014 and 2021 were examined histopathologically. After propensity score matching, we evaluated the diagnostic ability of SSL and SSLD of the NBI and BLI groups regarding various endoscopic findings. For WLI findings, granule, depression, and reddish were examined for diagnosing SSLD. For NBI/BLI findings, expanded crypt opening (ECO) or thick and branched vessels (TBV) were examined for diagnosing SSL. Network vessels (NV) and white dendritic change (WDC) defined originally were examined for diagnosing SSLD. Results. Among matched 176 lesions, the sensitivity of lesions with either ECO or TBV for SSL in the NBI/BLI group was 97.5%/98.5% (p=0.668). Those with either WDC or NV for diagnosing SSLD in the groups were 81.0%/88.9% (p=0.667). Regarding the rates of endoscopic findings among 30 SSLD and 290 SSL, there were significant differences in WDC (66.4% vs. 8.6%, p<0.001), NV (55.3% vs. 1.4%, p<0.001), and either WDC or NV (86.8% vs. 9.0%, p<0.001). Conclusions. The diagnostic ability of BLI for SSL and SSLD was not different from NBI. NV and WDC were useful for diagnosing SSLD.</abstract><cop>Egypt</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>38882393</pmid><doi>10.1155/2024/2672289</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6167-9705</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1687-6121 |
ispartof | Gastroenterology research and practice, 2024, Vol.2024, p.2672289-10 |
issn | 1687-6121 1687-630X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_20d67d7272824f31b92e54694dad68cc |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | Accuracy Chi-square test Classification Colorectal cancer Endoscopy Histopathology Lasers Light emitting diodes Medical screening Morphology Polyps Tumors |
title | The Comparison of Diagnostic Ability between Blue Laser/Light Imaging and Narrowband Imaging for Sessile Serrated Lesions with or without Dysplasia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T12%3A49%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Comparison%20of%20Diagnostic%20Ability%20between%20Blue%20Laser/Light%20Imaging%20and%20Narrowband%20Imaging%20for%20Sessile%20Serrated%20Lesions%20with%20or%20without%20Dysplasia&rft.jtitle=Gastroenterology%20research%20and%20practice&rft.au=Kobayashi,%20Reo&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=2024&rft.spage=2672289&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=2672289-10&rft.issn=1687-6121&rft.eissn=1687-630X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2024/2672289&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3069175037%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4ad4e476219a45a7552e1e4224bdf165f567261092adc6cb73b2e84218f8bba63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3065745752&rft_id=info:pmid/38882393&rfr_iscdi=true |