How well do we assess the adequacy of bending films in scoliosis?: introducing the T1-45B method for assessing the adequacy of bending films

• Published in: Bone & joint open 2023-09, Vol.4 (9), p.689-695
• Main Authors: Lim, Kevin B. L., Lee, Nicole K. L., Yeo, Beatrice S., Lim, Victoria M. M., Ng, Stacy W. L., Mishra, Neeraj
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis; bending effort; bending x-rays; cancers; Curve; deformity surgeons; flexibility assessment; hips; Implant Density; kappa coefficient; mcnemar’s test; Nationwide Survey; optimal bending; paediatric spine; Patient Reported Outcome; radiographers; radiography; scoliosis; spinal radiographs; Spine; thoracic vertebra
• ISSN: 2633-1462; 2633-1462
• DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.49.BJO-2023-0057.R1

Aims: To determine whether side-bending films in scoliosis are assessed for adequacy in clinical practice; and to introduce a novel method for doing so. Methods: Six surgeons and eight radiographers were invited to participate in four online surveys. The generic survey comprised erect and left and right bending radiographs of eight individuals with scoliosis, with an average age of 14.6 years. Respondents were asked to indicate whether each bending film was optimal (adequate) or suboptimal. In the first survey, they were also asked if they currently assessed the adequacy of bending films. A similar second survey was sent out two weeks later, using the same eight cases but in a different order. In the third survey, a guide for assessing bending film adequacy was attached along with the radiographs to introduce the novel T1-45B method, in which the upper endplate of T1 must tilt ≥ 45° from baseline for the study to be considered optimal. A fourth and final survey was subsequently conducted for confirmation. Results: Overall, 12 (86%) of 14 respondents did not use any criteria to assess the bending film adequacy; the remaining two each described a different invalidated method. In total, 12 (86%) of the respondents felt T1-45B was easy to learn and apply. There was fair to substantial intra-rater reliability (k = 0.25 to 0.88) which improved to fair to almost perfect (k = 0.38 to 0.88) post-introduction of the guide. Inter-rater reliability varied considerably among the rater groups but similarly increased following introduction of the guide (kS1 = 0.19 to 0.34, kS2 = 0.33 to 0.43 vs kS3 = 0.49 to 0.5, kS4 = 0.35 to 0.43). Conclusion: Many surgeons and radiographers do not assess spinal bending films for adequacy. We propose that the change in the plane of the upper endplate of T1 on side-bending can be used in this evaluation. In the T1-45B method, a change of ≥ 45° on side bending qualifies as an adequate bend effort. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(9):689–695.