Loading…

Effects of group size and cage enrichment on social behaviour and skin injuries of breeding rabbits housed part-time in group

•Aggressive behaviour among does may lead to injuries when housed in group.•One day after grouping, the incidence of doe and kit injuries was high.•Lower doe injury scores were found in groups of three compared with four does.•Platforms as enrichment were often used by does, and plastic pipes were n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal (Cambridge, England) England), 2023-06, Vol.17 (6), p.100850-100850, Article 100850
Main Authors: Van Damme, Liesbeth G.W., Ampe, Bart, Delezie, Evelyne, Tuyttens, Frank A.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b7daea079cedf78a78811f3ed69530b46a698d8566296ba94ce5282f0950a68e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b7daea079cedf78a78811f3ed69530b46a698d8566296ba94ce5282f0950a68e3
container_end_page 100850
container_issue 6
container_start_page 100850
container_title Animal (Cambridge, England)
container_volume 17
creator Van Damme, Liesbeth G.W.
Ampe, Bart
Delezie, Evelyne
Tuyttens, Frank A.M.
description •Aggressive behaviour among does may lead to injuries when housed in group.•One day after grouping, the incidence of doe and kit injuries was high.•Lower doe injury scores were found in groups of three compared with four does.•Platforms as enrichment were often used by does, and plastic pipes were not.•Submission was the most common agonistic behaviour by does. Housing of breeding does in group pens can result in skin injuries and stress due to maternal protective behaviour and hierarchy fights. Aggression can be partly reduced by using single-litter cages during the first weeks of the reproductive cycle and by delaying the grouping of does with their litters until the kits are older. Hierarchy fights do still occur in these part-time housing systems, however. The present study evaluated the effect of group size and cage enrichment on doe and kit skin injuries and on doe social behaviour. During four cycles, groups of either three or four does with their 22-day-old kits were housed in group pens for 13 days. Pens were assigned one of the following treatments (n = 12 pens per treatment): group of four does with no additional enrichment, four does with additional cage enrichment, three does with no additional enrichment and three does with additional cage enrichment. Cage enrichment was comprised of plastic pipes and elevated platforms. As pen size remained constant, a change in group size also implied a proportional change in stocking density. The number and severity of skin injuries were monitored before grouping and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13 days after grouping. Video recordings from all group pens were scored continuously for doe behaviour during the first 24 h after grouping in the first and second reproduction cycle and for the first 8 h in the third cycle. Four severely injured does needed to be removed after grouping. During the first day after group housing, respectively, 72.6 and 13.0% of the does and kits acquired at least one new skin injury with respect to the onset of group housing. Compared with groups of four, does in groups of three had lower averaged skin injury scores (9.41 versus 8.40, P = 0.004). Of all observed postgrouping social behaviours, submissive behaviour was most frequently observed (42.8%), followed by aggressive behaviour (29.8%), engaging behaviour (25.1%) and non-aggressive social contact (2.3%). Does used the enrichment during 11.1% of the total observation time, during which the platforms were more frequently visited (97.2%) i
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100850
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_21884cfea77344acbe941bf33ad99cd1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1751731123001465</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_21884cfea77344acbe941bf33ad99cd1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2822379602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b7daea079cedf78a78811f3ed69530b46a698d8566296ba94ce5282f0950a68e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU-LFDEQxRtR3HX0G4jk6KXH_OtOchFkWXVhwYuCt1CdVM-k7emMSffCCn53s9PrHMVTQvHqVdX7VdVrRreMsvbdsIUpHGDccspFKVHd0CfVJVMNq5Xg35-e_4xdVC9yHihtDJPyeXUhFG8F4_qy-n3d9-jmTGJPdikuR5LDLyQweeJghwSnFNz-gNNM4kRydAFG0uEe7kJc0kmXf4SJhGlYUsCTT5cQfZh2JEHXheK9j0tGT46Q5noOByzqddjL6lkPY8ZXj--m-vbx-uvV5_r2y6ebqw-3tWsaPded8oBAlXHoe6VBac1YL9C3phG0ky20RnvdtC03bQdGOmy45j01DYVWo9hUN6uvjzDYYyq5pXsbIdhTIaadLbsFN6LlTGvpegSlhJTgOjSSdb0Q4I1xnhWvt6vXMcWfC-bZHkJ2OI4wYbnTci0kV7TR8j-knAtl2gJwU8lV6lLMOWF_3pJR-8DbDnblbR9425V3aXvzOGHpDujPTX8BF8H7VYAl3ruAyWYXcCpBhlS4l_vDvyf8AfQlvjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2822379602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of group size and cage enrichment on social behaviour and skin injuries of breeding rabbits housed part-time in group</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Van Damme, Liesbeth G.W. ; Ampe, Bart ; Delezie, Evelyne ; Tuyttens, Frank A.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Damme, Liesbeth G.W. ; Ampe, Bart ; Delezie, Evelyne ; Tuyttens, Frank A.M.</creatorcontrib><description>•Aggressive behaviour among does may lead to injuries when housed in group.•One day after grouping, the incidence of doe and kit injuries was high.•Lower doe injury scores were found in groups of three compared with four does.•Platforms as enrichment were often used by does, and plastic pipes were not.•Submission was the most common agonistic behaviour by does. Housing of breeding does in group pens can result in skin injuries and stress due to maternal protective behaviour and hierarchy fights. Aggression can be partly reduced by using single-litter cages during the first weeks of the reproductive cycle and by delaying the grouping of does with their litters until the kits are older. Hierarchy fights do still occur in these part-time housing systems, however. The present study evaluated the effect of group size and cage enrichment on doe and kit skin injuries and on doe social behaviour. During four cycles, groups of either three or four does with their 22-day-old kits were housed in group pens for 13 days. Pens were assigned one of the following treatments (n = 12 pens per treatment): group of four does with no additional enrichment, four does with additional cage enrichment, three does with no additional enrichment and three does with additional cage enrichment. Cage enrichment was comprised of plastic pipes and elevated platforms. As pen size remained constant, a change in group size also implied a proportional change in stocking density. The number and severity of skin injuries were monitored before grouping and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13 days after grouping. Video recordings from all group pens were scored continuously for doe behaviour during the first 24 h after grouping in the first and second reproduction cycle and for the first 8 h in the third cycle. Four severely injured does needed to be removed after grouping. During the first day after group housing, respectively, 72.6 and 13.0% of the does and kits acquired at least one new skin injury with respect to the onset of group housing. Compared with groups of four, does in groups of three had lower averaged skin injury scores (9.41 versus 8.40, P = 0.004). Of all observed postgrouping social behaviours, submissive behaviour was most frequently observed (42.8%), followed by aggressive behaviour (29.8%), engaging behaviour (25.1%) and non-aggressive social contact (2.3%). Does used the enrichment during 11.1% of the total observation time, during which the platforms were more frequently visited (97.2%) in comparison to the plastic pipes (2.8%). As shown by the percentage of injured animals on the last day of grouping (does: 61.9% and kits: 18.4%), postgrouping aggression remains a problem that appears difficult to reduce to acceptable levels by reducing group size (and stocking density) or by providing cage enrichment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-7311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-732X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100850</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37263128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aggression ; Animal welfare ; animals ; cages ; Does ; group size ; reproduction ; social behavior ; Stocking density</subject><ispartof>Animal (Cambridge, England), 2023-06, Vol.17 (6), p.100850-100850, Article 100850</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b7daea079cedf78a78811f3ed69530b46a698d8566296ba94ce5282f0950a68e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b7daea079cedf78a78811f3ed69530b46a698d8566296ba94ce5282f0950a68e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1348-218X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731123001465$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3538,27907,27908,45763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37263128$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Damme, Liesbeth G.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ampe, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delezie, Evelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuyttens, Frank A.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of group size and cage enrichment on social behaviour and skin injuries of breeding rabbits housed part-time in group</title><title>Animal (Cambridge, England)</title><addtitle>Animal</addtitle><description>•Aggressive behaviour among does may lead to injuries when housed in group.•One day after grouping, the incidence of doe and kit injuries was high.•Lower doe injury scores were found in groups of three compared with four does.•Platforms as enrichment were often used by does, and plastic pipes were not.•Submission was the most common agonistic behaviour by does. Housing of breeding does in group pens can result in skin injuries and stress due to maternal protective behaviour and hierarchy fights. Aggression can be partly reduced by using single-litter cages during the first weeks of the reproductive cycle and by delaying the grouping of does with their litters until the kits are older. Hierarchy fights do still occur in these part-time housing systems, however. The present study evaluated the effect of group size and cage enrichment on doe and kit skin injuries and on doe social behaviour. During four cycles, groups of either three or four does with their 22-day-old kits were housed in group pens for 13 days. Pens were assigned one of the following treatments (n = 12 pens per treatment): group of four does with no additional enrichment, four does with additional cage enrichment, three does with no additional enrichment and three does with additional cage enrichment. Cage enrichment was comprised of plastic pipes and elevated platforms. As pen size remained constant, a change in group size also implied a proportional change in stocking density. The number and severity of skin injuries were monitored before grouping and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13 days after grouping. Video recordings from all group pens were scored continuously for doe behaviour during the first 24 h after grouping in the first and second reproduction cycle and for the first 8 h in the third cycle. Four severely injured does needed to be removed after grouping. During the first day after group housing, respectively, 72.6 and 13.0% of the does and kits acquired at least one new skin injury with respect to the onset of group housing. Compared with groups of four, does in groups of three had lower averaged skin injury scores (9.41 versus 8.40, P = 0.004). Of all observed postgrouping social behaviours, submissive behaviour was most frequently observed (42.8%), followed by aggressive behaviour (29.8%), engaging behaviour (25.1%) and non-aggressive social contact (2.3%). Does used the enrichment during 11.1% of the total observation time, during which the platforms were more frequently visited (97.2%) in comparison to the plastic pipes (2.8%). As shown by the percentage of injured animals on the last day of grouping (does: 61.9% and kits: 18.4%), postgrouping aggression remains a problem that appears difficult to reduce to acceptable levels by reducing group size (and stocking density) or by providing cage enrichment.</description><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>animals</subject><subject>cages</subject><subject>Does</subject><subject>group size</subject><subject>reproduction</subject><subject>social behavior</subject><subject>Stocking density</subject><issn>1751-7311</issn><issn>1751-732X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU-LFDEQxRtR3HX0G4jk6KXH_OtOchFkWXVhwYuCt1CdVM-k7emMSffCCn53s9PrHMVTQvHqVdX7VdVrRreMsvbdsIUpHGDccspFKVHd0CfVJVMNq5Xg35-e_4xdVC9yHihtDJPyeXUhFG8F4_qy-n3d9-jmTGJPdikuR5LDLyQweeJghwSnFNz-gNNM4kRydAFG0uEe7kJc0kmXf4SJhGlYUsCTT5cQfZh2JEHXheK9j0tGT46Q5noOByzqddjL6lkPY8ZXj--m-vbx-uvV5_r2y6ebqw-3tWsaPded8oBAlXHoe6VBac1YL9C3phG0ky20RnvdtC03bQdGOmy45j01DYVWo9hUN6uvjzDYYyq5pXsbIdhTIaadLbsFN6LlTGvpegSlhJTgOjSSdb0Q4I1xnhWvt6vXMcWfC-bZHkJ2OI4wYbnTci0kV7TR8j-knAtl2gJwU8lV6lLMOWF_3pJR-8DbDnblbR9425V3aXvzOGHpDujPTX8BF8H7VYAl3ruAyWYXcCpBhlS4l_vDvyf8AfQlvjQ</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Van Damme, Liesbeth G.W.</creator><creator>Ampe, Bart</creator><creator>Delezie, Evelyne</creator><creator>Tuyttens, Frank A.M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1348-218X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Effects of group size and cage enrichment on social behaviour and skin injuries of breeding rabbits housed part-time in group</title><author>Van Damme, Liesbeth G.W. ; Ampe, Bart ; Delezie, Evelyne ; Tuyttens, Frank A.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b7daea079cedf78a78811f3ed69530b46a698d8566296ba94ce5282f0950a68e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>animals</topic><topic>cages</topic><topic>Does</topic><topic>group size</topic><topic>reproduction</topic><topic>social behavior</topic><topic>Stocking density</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Damme, Liesbeth G.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ampe, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delezie, Evelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuyttens, Frank A.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Animal (Cambridge, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Damme, Liesbeth G.W.</au><au>Ampe, Bart</au><au>Delezie, Evelyne</au><au>Tuyttens, Frank A.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of group size and cage enrichment on social behaviour and skin injuries of breeding rabbits housed part-time in group</atitle><jtitle>Animal (Cambridge, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Animal</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>100850</spage><epage>100850</epage><pages>100850-100850</pages><artnum>100850</artnum><issn>1751-7311</issn><eissn>1751-732X</eissn><abstract>•Aggressive behaviour among does may lead to injuries when housed in group.•One day after grouping, the incidence of doe and kit injuries was high.•Lower doe injury scores were found in groups of three compared with four does.•Platforms as enrichment were often used by does, and plastic pipes were not.•Submission was the most common agonistic behaviour by does. Housing of breeding does in group pens can result in skin injuries and stress due to maternal protective behaviour and hierarchy fights. Aggression can be partly reduced by using single-litter cages during the first weeks of the reproductive cycle and by delaying the grouping of does with their litters until the kits are older. Hierarchy fights do still occur in these part-time housing systems, however. The present study evaluated the effect of group size and cage enrichment on doe and kit skin injuries and on doe social behaviour. During four cycles, groups of either three or four does with their 22-day-old kits were housed in group pens for 13 days. Pens were assigned one of the following treatments (n = 12 pens per treatment): group of four does with no additional enrichment, four does with additional cage enrichment, three does with no additional enrichment and three does with additional cage enrichment. Cage enrichment was comprised of plastic pipes and elevated platforms. As pen size remained constant, a change in group size also implied a proportional change in stocking density. The number and severity of skin injuries were monitored before grouping and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13 days after grouping. Video recordings from all group pens were scored continuously for doe behaviour during the first 24 h after grouping in the first and second reproduction cycle and for the first 8 h in the third cycle. Four severely injured does needed to be removed after grouping. During the first day after group housing, respectively, 72.6 and 13.0% of the does and kits acquired at least one new skin injury with respect to the onset of group housing. Compared with groups of four, does in groups of three had lower averaged skin injury scores (9.41 versus 8.40, P = 0.004). Of all observed postgrouping social behaviours, submissive behaviour was most frequently observed (42.8%), followed by aggressive behaviour (29.8%), engaging behaviour (25.1%) and non-aggressive social contact (2.3%). Does used the enrichment during 11.1% of the total observation time, during which the platforms were more frequently visited (97.2%) in comparison to the plastic pipes (2.8%). As shown by the percentage of injured animals on the last day of grouping (does: 61.9% and kits: 18.4%), postgrouping aggression remains a problem that appears difficult to reduce to acceptable levels by reducing group size (and stocking density) or by providing cage enrichment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>37263128</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.animal.2023.100850</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1348-218X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-7311
ispartof Animal (Cambridge, England), 2023-06, Vol.17 (6), p.100850-100850, Article 100850
issn 1751-7311
1751-732X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_21884cfea77344acbe941bf33ad99cd1
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aggression
Animal welfare
animals
cages
Does
group size
reproduction
social behavior
Stocking density
title Effects of group size and cage enrichment on social behaviour and skin injuries of breeding rabbits housed part-time in group
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A42%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20group%20size%20and%20cage%20enrichment%20on%20social%20behaviour%20and%20skin%20injuries%20of%20breeding%20rabbits%20housed%20part-time%20in%20group&rft.jtitle=Animal%20(Cambridge,%20England)&rft.au=Van%20Damme,%20Liesbeth%20G.W.&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=100850&rft.epage=100850&rft.pages=100850-100850&rft.artnum=100850&rft.issn=1751-7311&rft.eissn=1751-732X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100850&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2822379602%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-b7daea079cedf78a78811f3ed69530b46a698d8566296ba94ce5282f0950a68e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2822379602&rft_id=info:pmid/37263128&rfr_iscdi=true