Loading…
Narrative review of the role of intravenous fluid in critically sick patients
Background Intravenous fluid administration is regarded as a universal therapy in critical care. It is the mainstay of treatment in patients with dehydration, blood loss, sepsis, electrolyte imbalance, and shock. Crystalloids (for example, normal saline, lactated Ringer’s, Hartmann’s, Normosol, Isol...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Egyptian journal of internal medicine 2024-03, Vol.36 (1), p.35-6, Article 35 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Intravenous fluid administration is regarded as a universal therapy in critical care. It is the mainstay of treatment in patients with dehydration, blood loss, sepsis, electrolyte imbalance, and shock. Crystalloids (for example, normal saline, lactated Ringer’s, Hartmann’s, Normosol, Isolyte, and PlasmaLyte solutions) and colloids (for example, albumin, or synthetic dextrans, gelatins, and starches) are the two types of commonly used IV fluids.
Main text
Resuscitation, replacement, and maintenance are the three main indications for intravenous fluid administration. Despite their widespread use, there is no standard therapeutic dose for IV fluids and clinicians are less familiar with the indications to stop IV fluid administration. Appropriate fluid management to maintain tissue perfusion while avoiding potentially harmful effects of IV fluid administration such as fluid overloading, metabolic acidosis, acute kidney injury, and electrolyte imbalance should be the core principle of treatment.
Conclusion
This review will focus on the role of different types of intravenous fluid in critically ill patients, including their side effects and applications in various types of shock. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2090-9098 1110-7782 2090-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s43162-024-00301-z |