Subjective Effects of Using a Passive Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Industrial Textile Workers

• Published in: Safety (Basel) 2024-09, Vol.10 (3), p.59
• Main Authors: Capodaglio, Edda Maria, Amitrano, Federica, Coccia, Armando, Gabba, Vittorio, Pagano, Gaetano, D'Addio, Giovanni, Panigazzi, Monica
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: arm-support exoskeleton; Biomechanics; Ergonomics; Health aspects; occupational exposure; occupational medicine; overhead work; Pilot projects; Safety and security measures; Subjectivity; Textile workers; Usability; Wool; Workers; Workloads
• ISSN: 2313-576X; 2313-576X
• DOI: 10.3390/safety10030059

Industrial wool textile production exposes workers mainly to the biomechanical loading of the shoulder joint. In this work context, which is characterized by poor machine ergonomics, exposure to biomechanical risk factors, and variable work organization, exoskeletons could facilitate work processes or could be a valuable means to protect workers from overuse injuries. Field evaluation is essential to verify the suitability of specific devices and their acceptance by users. As part of a pilot study, we examined the short-term subjective effects of a passive Arm-Support Exoskeleton (ASE) on workers performing repetitive overhead tasks. In a textile factory, eight workers participated in the study, answering questionnaires after carrying out a work session with (ASE) and without an exoskeleton (FREE). Participants had been using the Paexo exoskeleton for 4.2±5.8 months (min 0–max 12). Subjective evaluations were collected regarding the workload (NASA-TLX) and relief (Borg’s CR10 scale) obtained from the use of the exoskeleton, satisfaction (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)), usability (System Usability Scale (SUS)), and opinions on the ergonomics of the device (Ergonomics questionnaire). Workers reported a high workload (NASA 7.2±1.0) and assessed a 46% reduction in effort on the CR10 in ASE conditions compared to FREE. They expressed high satisfaction with most characteristics of the ASE (100% satisfied with durability and effectiveness), high level of usability (62% of scores above 80, out of a maximum score of 100), and ergonomics of the device (88±12, out of a maximum score of 110). In addition to the objective effects (electromyography (EMG) reduction) already demonstrated in a previous publication, these qualitative results demonstrate a positive perception by textile workers regarding the effectiveness, usability, and suitability of the exoskeleton. The adoption of ASE in the textile industry appears beneficial in the short term, but the impact associated with individual variables and long-term effects remains to be explored.