Loading…
EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult. Our prior research used machine learning on electroencepha...
Saved in:
Published in: | PLOS digital health 2023-07, Vol.2 (7), p.e0000282-e0000282 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-a3600605d799d6ae82d59de859239b1d03fe7e15b2804d32022807bae4208ca93 |
container_end_page | e0000282 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0000282 |
container_title | PLOS digital health |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Caiola, Michael Babu, Avaneesh Ye, Meijun |
description | Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult. Our prior research used machine learning on electroencephalograms (EEGs) to select important features and to classify between normal, TBI, and stroke on an independent dataset from a public repository with an accuracy of 0.71. In this study, we expanded to explore whether featureless and deep learning models can provide better performance in distinguishing between TBI, stroke and normal EEGs by including more comprehensive data extraction tools to drastically increase the size of the training dataset. We compared the performance of models built upon selected features with Linear Discriminative Analysis and ReliefF with several featureless deep learning models. We achieved 0.85 area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) using feature-based models, and 0.84 AUC with featureless models. In addition, we demonstrated that Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) can provide insight into patient-specific EEG classification by highlighting problematic EEG segments during clinical review. Overall, our study suggests that machine learning and deep learning of EEG or its precomputed features can be a useful tool for TBI and stroke detection and classification. Although not surpassing the performance of feature-based models, featureless models reached similar levels without prior computation of a large feature set allowing for faster and cost-efficient deployment, analysis, and classification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000282 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_22d5550a05404aee8b92688a01483397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_22d5550a05404aee8b92688a01483397</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3085662456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-a3600605d799d6ae82d59de859239b1d03fe7e15b2804d32022807bae4208ca93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkl9vFCEUxSdGY5vab2AMiS--7HqBYYAnY5q1Nmniiz6TOwOzsjsDI8zY9NvLdrdNKy_3Auf8wp9TVe8prCmX9PMuLingsJ6s366hDKbYq-qcyUauOJXw-ll_Vl3mvHvQUJCavq3OuKxLy9R5td9srkk3YM6-9x3OPgYSezInXMYy60ib0Afiw25J9wSDJXlOce9In-JIkIQY8uS6g5lMcVqGI2LJPmxJcEvCoZT5LqZ9fle96XHI7vJUL6pf3zY_r76vbn9c31x9vV11TEu2Qt4ANCCs1No26BSzQlunhGZct9QC7510VLRMQW05A1Ya2aKrGagONb-obo5cG3FnpuRHTPcmojcPCzFtDaZyt8EZVthCAIKooUbnVKtZoxQCrRXnWhbWlyNrWtrR2c6F8jTDC-jLneB_m238ayhwJkBAIXw6EVL8s7g8m9Hnzg0DBheXbJjigkkJUBfpx_-kp3_OhoMSTcNq0RRVfVR1KeacXP90GgrmkI5Hlzmkw5zSUWwfnt_kyfSYBf4PMje4xw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3085662456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Caiola, Michael ; Babu, Avaneesh ; Ye, Meijun</creator><contributor>Lu, Henry Horng-Shing</contributor><creatorcontrib>Caiola, Michael ; Babu, Avaneesh ; Ye, Meijun ; Lu, Henry Horng-Shing</creatorcontrib><description>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult. Our prior research used machine learning on electroencephalograms (EEGs) to select important features and to classify between normal, TBI, and stroke on an independent dataset from a public repository with an accuracy of 0.71. In this study, we expanded to explore whether featureless and deep learning models can provide better performance in distinguishing between TBI, stroke and normal EEGs by including more comprehensive data extraction tools to drastically increase the size of the training dataset. We compared the performance of models built upon selected features with Linear Discriminative Analysis and ReliefF with several featureless deep learning models. We achieved 0.85 area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) using feature-based models, and 0.84 AUC with featureless models. In addition, we demonstrated that Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) can provide insight into patient-specific EEG classification by highlighting problematic EEG segments during clinical review. Overall, our study suggests that machine learning and deep learning of EEG or its precomputed features can be a useful tool for TBI and stroke detection and classification. Although not surpassing the performance of feature-based models, featureless models reached similar levels without prior computation of a large feature set allowing for faster and cost-efficient deployment, analysis, and classification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2767-3170</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2767-3170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000282</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37410728</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Brain research ; Classification ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Datasets ; Deep learning ; Disease ; Earth Sciences ; Electroencephalography ; Machine learning ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Neural networks ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Stroke ; Traumatic brain injury</subject><ispartof>PLOS digital health, 2023-07, Vol.2 (7), p.e0000282-e0000282</ispartof><rights>Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-a3600605d799d6ae82d59de859239b1d03fe7e15b2804d32022807bae4208ca93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6355-7963</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10325050/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3085662456?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37410728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Lu, Henry Horng-Shing</contributor><creatorcontrib>Caiola, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babu, Avaneesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Meijun</creatorcontrib><title>EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks</title><title>PLOS digital health</title><addtitle>PLOS Digit Health</addtitle><description>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult. Our prior research used machine learning on electroencephalograms (EEGs) to select important features and to classify between normal, TBI, and stroke on an independent dataset from a public repository with an accuracy of 0.71. In this study, we expanded to explore whether featureless and deep learning models can provide better performance in distinguishing between TBI, stroke and normal EEGs by including more comprehensive data extraction tools to drastically increase the size of the training dataset. We compared the performance of models built upon selected features with Linear Discriminative Analysis and ReliefF with several featureless deep learning models. We achieved 0.85 area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) using feature-based models, and 0.84 AUC with featureless models. In addition, we demonstrated that Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) can provide insight into patient-specific EEG classification by highlighting problematic EEG segments during clinical review. Overall, our study suggests that machine learning and deep learning of EEG or its precomputed features can be a useful tool for TBI and stroke detection and classification. Although not surpassing the performance of feature-based models, featureless models reached similar levels without prior computation of a large feature set allowing for faster and cost-efficient deployment, analysis, and classification.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><issn>2767-3170</issn><issn>2767-3170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkl9vFCEUxSdGY5vab2AMiS--7HqBYYAnY5q1Nmniiz6TOwOzsjsDI8zY9NvLdrdNKy_3Auf8wp9TVe8prCmX9PMuLingsJ6s366hDKbYq-qcyUauOJXw-ll_Vl3mvHvQUJCavq3OuKxLy9R5td9srkk3YM6-9x3OPgYSezInXMYy60ib0Afiw25J9wSDJXlOce9In-JIkIQY8uS6g5lMcVqGI2LJPmxJcEvCoZT5LqZ9fle96XHI7vJUL6pf3zY_r76vbn9c31x9vV11TEu2Qt4ANCCs1No26BSzQlunhGZct9QC7510VLRMQW05A1Ya2aKrGagONb-obo5cG3FnpuRHTPcmojcPCzFtDaZyt8EZVthCAIKooUbnVKtZoxQCrRXnWhbWlyNrWtrR2c6F8jTDC-jLneB_m238ayhwJkBAIXw6EVL8s7g8m9Hnzg0DBheXbJjigkkJUBfpx_-kp3_OhoMSTcNq0RRVfVR1KeacXP90GgrmkI5Hlzmkw5zSUWwfnt_kyfSYBf4PMje4xw</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Caiola, Michael</creator><creator>Babu, Avaneesh</creator><creator>Ye, Meijun</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-7963</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks</title><author>Caiola, Michael ; Babu, Avaneesh ; Ye, Meijun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-a3600605d799d6ae82d59de859239b1d03fe7e15b2804d32022807bae4208ca93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caiola, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babu, Avaneesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Meijun</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLOS digital health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caiola, Michael</au><au>Babu, Avaneesh</au><au>Ye, Meijun</au><au>Lu, Henry Horng-Shing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks</atitle><jtitle>PLOS digital health</jtitle><addtitle>PLOS Digit Health</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0000282</spage><epage>e0000282</epage><pages>e0000282-e0000282</pages><issn>2767-3170</issn><eissn>2767-3170</eissn><abstract>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult. Our prior research used machine learning on electroencephalograms (EEGs) to select important features and to classify between normal, TBI, and stroke on an independent dataset from a public repository with an accuracy of 0.71. In this study, we expanded to explore whether featureless and deep learning models can provide better performance in distinguishing between TBI, stroke and normal EEGs by including more comprehensive data extraction tools to drastically increase the size of the training dataset. We compared the performance of models built upon selected features with Linear Discriminative Analysis and ReliefF with several featureless deep learning models. We achieved 0.85 area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) using feature-based models, and 0.84 AUC with featureless models. In addition, we demonstrated that Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) can provide insight into patient-specific EEG classification by highlighting problematic EEG segments during clinical review. Overall, our study suggests that machine learning and deep learning of EEG or its precomputed features can be a useful tool for TBI and stroke detection and classification. Although not surpassing the performance of feature-based models, featureless models reached similar levels without prior computation of a large feature set allowing for faster and cost-efficient deployment, analysis, and classification.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37410728</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pdig.0000282</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-7963</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2767-3170 |
ispartof | PLOS digital health, 2023-07, Vol.2 (7), p.e0000282-e0000282 |
issn | 2767-3170 2767-3170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_22d5550a05404aee8b92688a01483397 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Biology and Life Sciences Brain research Classification Computer and Information Sciences Datasets Deep learning Disease Earth Sciences Electroencephalography Machine learning Medicine and Health Sciences Neural networks Research and Analysis Methods Stroke Traumatic brain injury |
title | EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A42%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EEG%20classification%20of%20traumatic%20brain%20injury%20and%20stroke%20from%20a%20nonspecific%20population%20using%20neural%20networks&rft.jtitle=PLOS%20digital%20health&rft.au=Caiola,%20Michael&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0000282&rft.epage=e0000282&rft.pages=e0000282-e0000282&rft.issn=2767-3170&rft.eissn=2767-3170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000282&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3085662456%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-a3600605d799d6ae82d59de859239b1d03fe7e15b2804d32022807bae4208ca93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3085662456&rft_id=info:pmid/37410728&rfr_iscdi=true |