Loading…

EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult. Our prior research used machine learning on electroencepha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLOS digital health 2023-07, Vol.2 (7), p.e0000282-e0000282
Main Authors: Caiola, Michael, Babu, Avaneesh, Ye, Meijun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-a3600605d799d6ae82d59de859239b1d03fe7e15b2804d32022807bae4208ca93
container_end_page e0000282
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0000282
container_title PLOS digital health
container_volume 2
creator Caiola, Michael
Babu, Avaneesh
Ye, Meijun
description Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult. Our prior research used machine learning on electroencephalograms (EEGs) to select important features and to classify between normal, TBI, and stroke on an independent dataset from a public repository with an accuracy of 0.71. In this study, we expanded to explore whether featureless and deep learning models can provide better performance in distinguishing between TBI, stroke and normal EEGs by including more comprehensive data extraction tools to drastically increase the size of the training dataset. We compared the performance of models built upon selected features with Linear Discriminative Analysis and ReliefF with several featureless deep learning models. We achieved 0.85 area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) using feature-based models, and 0.84 AUC with featureless models. In addition, we demonstrated that Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) can provide insight into patient-specific EEG classification by highlighting problematic EEG segments during clinical review. Overall, our study suggests that machine learning and deep learning of EEG or its precomputed features can be a useful tool for TBI and stroke detection and classification. Although not surpassing the performance of feature-based models, featureless models reached similar levels without prior computation of a large feature set allowing for faster and cost-efficient deployment, analysis, and classification.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000282
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_22d5550a05404aee8b92688a01483397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_22d5550a05404aee8b92688a01483397</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3085662456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-a3600605d799d6ae82d59de859239b1d03fe7e15b2804d32022807bae4208ca93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkl9vFCEUxSdGY5vab2AMiS--7HqBYYAnY5q1Nmniiz6TOwOzsjsDI8zY9NvLdrdNKy_3Auf8wp9TVe8prCmX9PMuLingsJ6s366hDKbYq-qcyUauOJXw-ll_Vl3mvHvQUJCavq3OuKxLy9R5td9srkk3YM6-9x3OPgYSezInXMYy60ib0Afiw25J9wSDJXlOce9In-JIkIQY8uS6g5lMcVqGI2LJPmxJcEvCoZT5LqZ9fle96XHI7vJUL6pf3zY_r76vbn9c31x9vV11TEu2Qt4ANCCs1No26BSzQlunhGZct9QC7510VLRMQW05A1Ya2aKrGagONb-obo5cG3FnpuRHTPcmojcPCzFtDaZyt8EZVthCAIKooUbnVKtZoxQCrRXnWhbWlyNrWtrR2c6F8jTDC-jLneB_m238ayhwJkBAIXw6EVL8s7g8m9Hnzg0DBheXbJjigkkJUBfpx_-kp3_OhoMSTcNq0RRVfVR1KeacXP90GgrmkI5Hlzmkw5zSUWwfnt_kyfSYBf4PMje4xw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3085662456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Caiola, Michael ; Babu, Avaneesh ; Ye, Meijun</creator><contributor>Lu, Henry Horng-Shing</contributor><creatorcontrib>Caiola, Michael ; Babu, Avaneesh ; Ye, Meijun ; Lu, Henry Horng-Shing</creatorcontrib><description>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult. Our prior research used machine learning on electroencephalograms (EEGs) to select important features and to classify between normal, TBI, and stroke on an independent dataset from a public repository with an accuracy of 0.71. In this study, we expanded to explore whether featureless and deep learning models can provide better performance in distinguishing between TBI, stroke and normal EEGs by including more comprehensive data extraction tools to drastically increase the size of the training dataset. We compared the performance of models built upon selected features with Linear Discriminative Analysis and ReliefF with several featureless deep learning models. We achieved 0.85 area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) using feature-based models, and 0.84 AUC with featureless models. In addition, we demonstrated that Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) can provide insight into patient-specific EEG classification by highlighting problematic EEG segments during clinical review. Overall, our study suggests that machine learning and deep learning of EEG or its precomputed features can be a useful tool for TBI and stroke detection and classification. Although not surpassing the performance of feature-based models, featureless models reached similar levels without prior computation of a large feature set allowing for faster and cost-efficient deployment, analysis, and classification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2767-3170</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2767-3170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000282</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37410728</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Brain research ; Classification ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Datasets ; Deep learning ; Disease ; Earth Sciences ; Electroencephalography ; Machine learning ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Neural networks ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Stroke ; Traumatic brain injury</subject><ispartof>PLOS digital health, 2023-07, Vol.2 (7), p.e0000282-e0000282</ispartof><rights>Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-a3600605d799d6ae82d59de859239b1d03fe7e15b2804d32022807bae4208ca93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6355-7963</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10325050/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3085662456?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37410728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Lu, Henry Horng-Shing</contributor><creatorcontrib>Caiola, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babu, Avaneesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Meijun</creatorcontrib><title>EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks</title><title>PLOS digital health</title><addtitle>PLOS Digit Health</addtitle><description>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult. Our prior research used machine learning on electroencephalograms (EEGs) to select important features and to classify between normal, TBI, and stroke on an independent dataset from a public repository with an accuracy of 0.71. In this study, we expanded to explore whether featureless and deep learning models can provide better performance in distinguishing between TBI, stroke and normal EEGs by including more comprehensive data extraction tools to drastically increase the size of the training dataset. We compared the performance of models built upon selected features with Linear Discriminative Analysis and ReliefF with several featureless deep learning models. We achieved 0.85 area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) using feature-based models, and 0.84 AUC with featureless models. In addition, we demonstrated that Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) can provide insight into patient-specific EEG classification by highlighting problematic EEG segments during clinical review. Overall, our study suggests that machine learning and deep learning of EEG or its precomputed features can be a useful tool for TBI and stroke detection and classification. Although not surpassing the performance of feature-based models, featureless models reached similar levels without prior computation of a large feature set allowing for faster and cost-efficient deployment, analysis, and classification.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><issn>2767-3170</issn><issn>2767-3170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkl9vFCEUxSdGY5vab2AMiS--7HqBYYAnY5q1Nmniiz6TOwOzsjsDI8zY9NvLdrdNKy_3Auf8wp9TVe8prCmX9PMuLingsJ6s366hDKbYq-qcyUauOJXw-ll_Vl3mvHvQUJCavq3OuKxLy9R5td9srkk3YM6-9x3OPgYSezInXMYy60ib0Afiw25J9wSDJXlOce9In-JIkIQY8uS6g5lMcVqGI2LJPmxJcEvCoZT5LqZ9fle96XHI7vJUL6pf3zY_r76vbn9c31x9vV11TEu2Qt4ANCCs1No26BSzQlunhGZct9QC7510VLRMQW05A1Ya2aKrGagONb-obo5cG3FnpuRHTPcmojcPCzFtDaZyt8EZVthCAIKooUbnVKtZoxQCrRXnWhbWlyNrWtrR2c6F8jTDC-jLneB_m238ayhwJkBAIXw6EVL8s7g8m9Hnzg0DBheXbJjigkkJUBfpx_-kp3_OhoMSTcNq0RRVfVR1KeacXP90GgrmkI5Hlzmkw5zSUWwfnt_kyfSYBf4PMje4xw</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Caiola, Michael</creator><creator>Babu, Avaneesh</creator><creator>Ye, Meijun</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-7963</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks</title><author>Caiola, Michael ; Babu, Avaneesh ; Ye, Meijun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-a3600605d799d6ae82d59de859239b1d03fe7e15b2804d32022807bae4208ca93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caiola, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babu, Avaneesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Meijun</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLOS digital health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caiola, Michael</au><au>Babu, Avaneesh</au><au>Ye, Meijun</au><au>Lu, Henry Horng-Shing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks</atitle><jtitle>PLOS digital health</jtitle><addtitle>PLOS Digit Health</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0000282</spage><epage>e0000282</epage><pages>e0000282-e0000282</pages><issn>2767-3170</issn><eissn>2767-3170</eissn><abstract>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult. Our prior research used machine learning on electroencephalograms (EEGs) to select important features and to classify between normal, TBI, and stroke on an independent dataset from a public repository with an accuracy of 0.71. In this study, we expanded to explore whether featureless and deep learning models can provide better performance in distinguishing between TBI, stroke and normal EEGs by including more comprehensive data extraction tools to drastically increase the size of the training dataset. We compared the performance of models built upon selected features with Linear Discriminative Analysis and ReliefF with several featureless deep learning models. We achieved 0.85 area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) using feature-based models, and 0.84 AUC with featureless models. In addition, we demonstrated that Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) can provide insight into patient-specific EEG classification by highlighting problematic EEG segments during clinical review. Overall, our study suggests that machine learning and deep learning of EEG or its precomputed features can be a useful tool for TBI and stroke detection and classification. Although not surpassing the performance of feature-based models, featureless models reached similar levels without prior computation of a large feature set allowing for faster and cost-efficient deployment, analysis, and classification.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37410728</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pdig.0000282</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-7963</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2767-3170
ispartof PLOS digital health, 2023-07, Vol.2 (7), p.e0000282-e0000282
issn 2767-3170
2767-3170
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_22d5550a05404aee8b92688a01483397
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Biology and Life Sciences
Brain research
Classification
Computer and Information Sciences
Datasets
Deep learning
Disease
Earth Sciences
Electroencephalography
Machine learning
Medicine and Health Sciences
Neural networks
Research and Analysis Methods
Stroke
Traumatic brain injury
title EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A42%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EEG%20classification%20of%20traumatic%20brain%20injury%20and%20stroke%20from%20a%20nonspecific%20population%20using%20neural%20networks&rft.jtitle=PLOS%20digital%20health&rft.au=Caiola,%20Michael&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0000282&rft.epage=e0000282&rft.pages=e0000282-e0000282&rft.issn=2767-3170&rft.eissn=2767-3170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000282&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3085662456%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-a3600605d799d6ae82d59de859239b1d03fe7e15b2804d32022807bae4208ca93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3085662456&rft_id=info:pmid/37410728&rfr_iscdi=true