Loading…
Human–Robot Interaction for Improving Fuselage Assembly Tasks: A Case Study
In current industrial systems, automation is a very important aspect for assessing manufacturing production performance related to working times, accuracy of operations and quality. In particular, the introduction of a robotic system in the working area should guarantee some improvements, such as ri...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied sciences 2020-09, Vol.10 (17), p.5757 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e98f8a698035f0f999e8018b9d368dc3a1adef26b16a45f44315c20f9ae17ee83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e98f8a698035f0f999e8018b9d368dc3a1adef26b16a45f44315c20f9ae17ee83 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 5757 |
container_title | Applied sciences |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Laudante, Elena Greco, Alessandro Caterino, Mario Fera, Marcello |
description | In current industrial systems, automation is a very important aspect for assessing manufacturing production performance related to working times, accuracy of operations and quality. In particular, the introduction of a robotic system in the working area should guarantee some improvements, such as risks reduction for human operators, better quality results and a speed increase for production processes. In this context, human action remains still necessary to carry out part of the subtasks, as in the case of composites assembly processes. This study aims at presenting a case study regarding the reorganization of the working activity carried out in workstation in which a composite fuselage panel is assembled in order to demonstrate, by means of simulation tool, that some of the advantages previously listed can be achieved also in aerospace industry. In particular, an entire working process for composite fuselage panel assembling will be simulated and analyzed in order to demonstrate and verify the applicability and effectiveness of human–robot interaction (HRI), focusing on working times and ergonomics and respecting the constraints imposed by standards ISO 10218 and ISO TS 15066. Results show the effectiveness of HRI both in terms of assembly performance, by reducing working times and ergonomics—for which the simulation provides a very low risk index. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/app10175757 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2304177103de439db9e10ea0720c38af</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2304177103de439db9e10ea0720c38af</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2436964162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e98f8a698035f0f999e8018b9d368dc3a1adef26b16a45f44315c20f9ae17ee83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMFKw0AQDaJgqT35AwseJbqbTTa73kqxNqAIWs_LJJktqUk27iZCb_6Df-iXGK1IZw4zDI_35r0gOGf0inNFr6HrGGVpMvZRMIloKkIes_T4YD8NZt5v6ViKccnoJHhYDQ20Xx-fTza3PcnaHh0UfWVbYqwjWdM5-161G7IcPNawQTL3Hpu83pE1-Fd_Q-ZkAR7Jcz-Uu7PgxEDtcfY3p8HL8na9WIX3j3fZYn4fFlzEfYhKGglCScoTQ41SCiVlMlclF7IsODAo0UQiZwLixMQxZ0kRjUBAliJKPg2yPW9pYas7VzXgdtpCpX8P1m00uL4qatQRp6PxlFFeYsxVmStkFIGmES24BDNyXey5RqdvA_peb-3g2vF9HcVcKBEzEY2oyz2qcNZ7h-ZflVH9E78-iJ9_Awm5dr8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2436964162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human–Robot Interaction for Improving Fuselage Assembly Tasks: A Case Study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Laudante, Elena ; Greco, Alessandro ; Caterino, Mario ; Fera, Marcello</creator><creatorcontrib>Laudante, Elena ; Greco, Alessandro ; Caterino, Mario ; Fera, Marcello</creatorcontrib><description>In current industrial systems, automation is a very important aspect for assessing manufacturing production performance related to working times, accuracy of operations and quality. In particular, the introduction of a robotic system in the working area should guarantee some improvements, such as risks reduction for human operators, better quality results and a speed increase for production processes. In this context, human action remains still necessary to carry out part of the subtasks, as in the case of composites assembly processes. This study aims at presenting a case study regarding the reorganization of the working activity carried out in workstation in which a composite fuselage panel is assembled in order to demonstrate, by means of simulation tool, that some of the advantages previously listed can be achieved also in aerospace industry. In particular, an entire working process for composite fuselage panel assembling will be simulated and analyzed in order to demonstrate and verify the applicability and effectiveness of human–robot interaction (HRI), focusing on working times and ergonomics and respecting the constraints imposed by standards ISO 10218 and ISO TS 15066. Results show the effectiveness of HRI both in terms of assembly performance, by reducing working times and ergonomics—for which the simulation provides a very low risk index.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/app10175757</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Aerospace industry ; aerospace production ; Aircraft ; Airframes ; Assembling ; Assembly lines ; Automation ; Case studies ; Composite materials ; Efficiency ; Ergonomics ; Fuselages ; human–robot interaction ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing engineering ; Productivity ; Robotics ; Robots ; Simulation ; Work stations</subject><ispartof>Applied sciences, 2020-09, Vol.10 (17), p.5757</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e98f8a698035f0f999e8018b9d368dc3a1adef26b16a45f44315c20f9ae17ee83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e98f8a698035f0f999e8018b9d368dc3a1adef26b16a45f44315c20f9ae17ee83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2288-3994 ; 0000-0002-3418-355X ; 0000-0002-5856-5704</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2436964162/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2436964162?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laudante, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caterino, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fera, Marcello</creatorcontrib><title>Human–Robot Interaction for Improving Fuselage Assembly Tasks: A Case Study</title><title>Applied sciences</title><description>In current industrial systems, automation is a very important aspect for assessing manufacturing production performance related to working times, accuracy of operations and quality. In particular, the introduction of a robotic system in the working area should guarantee some improvements, such as risks reduction for human operators, better quality results and a speed increase for production processes. In this context, human action remains still necessary to carry out part of the subtasks, as in the case of composites assembly processes. This study aims at presenting a case study regarding the reorganization of the working activity carried out in workstation in which a composite fuselage panel is assembled in order to demonstrate, by means of simulation tool, that some of the advantages previously listed can be achieved also in aerospace industry. In particular, an entire working process for composite fuselage panel assembling will be simulated and analyzed in order to demonstrate and verify the applicability and effectiveness of human–robot interaction (HRI), focusing on working times and ergonomics and respecting the constraints imposed by standards ISO 10218 and ISO TS 15066. Results show the effectiveness of HRI both in terms of assembly performance, by reducing working times and ergonomics—for which the simulation provides a very low risk index.</description><subject>Aerospace industry</subject><subject>aerospace production</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Airframes</subject><subject>Assembling</subject><subject>Assembly lines</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Fuselages</subject><subject>human–robot interaction</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing engineering</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Work stations</subject><issn>2076-3417</issn><issn>2076-3417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMFKw0AQDaJgqT35AwseJbqbTTa73kqxNqAIWs_LJJktqUk27iZCb_6Df-iXGK1IZw4zDI_35r0gOGf0inNFr6HrGGVpMvZRMIloKkIes_T4YD8NZt5v6ViKccnoJHhYDQ20Xx-fTza3PcnaHh0UfWVbYqwjWdM5-161G7IcPNawQTL3Hpu83pE1-Fd_Q-ZkAR7Jcz-Uu7PgxEDtcfY3p8HL8na9WIX3j3fZYn4fFlzEfYhKGglCScoTQ41SCiVlMlclF7IsODAo0UQiZwLixMQxZ0kRjUBAliJKPg2yPW9pYas7VzXgdtpCpX8P1m00uL4qatQRp6PxlFFeYsxVmStkFIGmES24BDNyXey5RqdvA_peb-3g2vF9HcVcKBEzEY2oyz2qcNZ7h-ZflVH9E78-iJ9_Awm5dr8</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Laudante, Elena</creator><creator>Greco, Alessandro</creator><creator>Caterino, Mario</creator><creator>Fera, Marcello</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2288-3994</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3418-355X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5856-5704</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Human–Robot Interaction for Improving Fuselage Assembly Tasks: A Case Study</title><author>Laudante, Elena ; Greco, Alessandro ; Caterino, Mario ; Fera, Marcello</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e98f8a698035f0f999e8018b9d368dc3a1adef26b16a45f44315c20f9ae17ee83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aerospace industry</topic><topic>aerospace production</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Airframes</topic><topic>Assembling</topic><topic>Assembly lines</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Fuselages</topic><topic>human–robot interaction</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing engineering</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Work stations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laudante, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caterino, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fera, Marcello</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laudante, Elena</au><au>Greco, Alessandro</au><au>Caterino, Mario</au><au>Fera, Marcello</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human–Robot Interaction for Improving Fuselage Assembly Tasks: A Case Study</atitle><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>5757</spage><pages>5757-</pages><issn>2076-3417</issn><eissn>2076-3417</eissn><abstract>In current industrial systems, automation is a very important aspect for assessing manufacturing production performance related to working times, accuracy of operations and quality. In particular, the introduction of a robotic system in the working area should guarantee some improvements, such as risks reduction for human operators, better quality results and a speed increase for production processes. In this context, human action remains still necessary to carry out part of the subtasks, as in the case of composites assembly processes. This study aims at presenting a case study regarding the reorganization of the working activity carried out in workstation in which a composite fuselage panel is assembled in order to demonstrate, by means of simulation tool, that some of the advantages previously listed can be achieved also in aerospace industry. In particular, an entire working process for composite fuselage panel assembling will be simulated and analyzed in order to demonstrate and verify the applicability and effectiveness of human–robot interaction (HRI), focusing on working times and ergonomics and respecting the constraints imposed by standards ISO 10218 and ISO TS 15066. Results show the effectiveness of HRI both in terms of assembly performance, by reducing working times and ergonomics—for which the simulation provides a very low risk index.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/app10175757</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2288-3994</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3418-355X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5856-5704</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2076-3417 |
ispartof | Applied sciences, 2020-09, Vol.10 (17), p.5757 |
issn | 2076-3417 2076-3417 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2304177103de439db9e10ea0720c38af |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Aerospace industry aerospace production Aircraft Airframes Assembling Assembly lines Automation Case studies Composite materials Efficiency Ergonomics Fuselages human–robot interaction Manufacturing Manufacturing engineering Productivity Robotics Robots Simulation Work stations |
title | Human–Robot Interaction for Improving Fuselage Assembly Tasks: A Case Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A34%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%E2%80%93Robot%20Interaction%20for%20Improving%20Fuselage%20Assembly%20Tasks:%20A%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=Applied%20sciences&rft.au=Laudante,%20Elena&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=5757&rft.pages=5757-&rft.issn=2076-3417&rft.eissn=2076-3417&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/app10175757&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2436964162%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e98f8a698035f0f999e8018b9d368dc3a1adef26b16a45f44315c20f9ae17ee83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2436964162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |