Loading…
Structural and Functional Differences in the Bacterial Community of Chernozem Soil Under Conventional and Organic Farming Conditions
The conventional farming system, which predominates in most countries, is based on the use of agrochemical deep ploughing and other special methods. However, intensive farming has several negative impacts, including soil and water pollution and reduced biodiversity. The microbial community plays a c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Agriculture (Basel) 2024-12, Vol.14 (12), p.2127 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2227-121a35d1a0428bde81fd5d063e9b8d1a014c1ebc916d1d215846a470514570113 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2127 |
container_title | Agriculture (Basel) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Poshvina, Darya V. Balkin, Alexander S. Teslya, Anastasia V. Dilbaryan, Diana S. Stepanov, Artyom A. Kravchenko, Sergey V. Vasilchenko, Alexey S. |
description | The conventional farming system, which predominates in most countries, is based on the use of agrochemical deep ploughing and other special methods. However, intensive farming has several negative impacts, including soil and water pollution and reduced biodiversity. The microbial community plays a crucial role in maintaining the health of agricultural ecosystems. In this context, we need to study how different agricultural practices affect the structural and functional characteristics of agricultural ecosystems. This study assessed the diversity, structure, and functional characteristics of the soil bacterial community in two different cropping systems. The subjects of the study were soil samples from Chernozem, which had been cultivated using the organic method for 11 years and the conventional method for 20 years. The fields are located in the southern part of the Russian Federation. Our results indicated minimal differences in the microbial diversity and soil community composition between the two systems studied. The profiling of the soil bacterial community revealed differences in the abundances of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Cyanobacteria, which were predominated in the conventional farming system (CFS), while Methylomirabilota and Fusobacteriota were more abundant in the organic farming system (OFS). Bacterial taxa and functional genes associated with nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulphur cycling were found to be more abundant in CFS soils than in OFS soils. The instrumental measurement of soil metabolic activity and microbial biomass content showed that CFS soils had higher microbiome activity than OFS soils. Overall, the study found that the agronomic practices used in conventional farming not only help to maintain the functional properties of the soil microbiome, but also significantly increase its microbiological activity and nutrient bioconversion, compared to organic farming practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/agriculture14122127 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_232aae4b5fa3413aada7c5004497a983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A821601968</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_232aae4b5fa3413aada7c5004497a983</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A821601968</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2227-121a35d1a0428bde81fd5d063e9b8d1a014c1ebc916d1d215846a470514570113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUFv3CAQha2qlRKl-QW5IPW8KQPYmGO67aaRIuWQ5oxmYeywsiHFdqX0nB8e3I2qHgoHhjfvfQJNVV0Av5TS8M_Y5-CWYV4ygQIhQOh31angWm-40uL9P_VJdT5NB16WAdny5rR6uZ_z4koWB4bRs90S3RxSLNevoesoU3Q0sRDZ_EjsC7qZcijNbRrHJYb5maWObR8px_SbRnafwsAeoqdcHPEXxTfWir7LPcbg2A7zGGK_GnxY-9PH6kOHw0Tnb-dZ9bD79mP7fXN7d32zvbrdOCGE3oAAlLUH5Eq0e08tdL72vJFk9u0qg3JAe2eg8eAF1K1qUGleg6o1B5Bn1c2R6xMe7FMOI-ZnmzDYP0LKvcU8BzeQFVIgktrXHUoFEtGjdjXnShmNppWF9enIesrp50LTbA9pyeWvk5WgTLFxUxfX5dHVY4GG2KU5oyvb0xhcitSFol-1AhoOpmlLQB4DLqdpytT9fSZwu47b_mfc8hXrKqCq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149497095</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural and Functional Differences in the Bacterial Community of Chernozem Soil Under Conventional and Organic Farming Conditions</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Poshvina, Darya V. ; Balkin, Alexander S. ; Teslya, Anastasia V. ; Dilbaryan, Diana S. ; Stepanov, Artyom A. ; Kravchenko, Sergey V. ; Vasilchenko, Alexey S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Poshvina, Darya V. ; Balkin, Alexander S. ; Teslya, Anastasia V. ; Dilbaryan, Diana S. ; Stepanov, Artyom A. ; Kravchenko, Sergey V. ; Vasilchenko, Alexey S.</creatorcontrib><description>The conventional farming system, which predominates in most countries, is based on the use of agrochemical deep ploughing and other special methods. However, intensive farming has several negative impacts, including soil and water pollution and reduced biodiversity. The microbial community plays a crucial role in maintaining the health of agricultural ecosystems. In this context, we need to study how different agricultural practices affect the structural and functional characteristics of agricultural ecosystems. This study assessed the diversity, structure, and functional characteristics of the soil bacterial community in two different cropping systems. The subjects of the study were soil samples from Chernozem, which had been cultivated using the organic method for 11 years and the conventional method for 20 years. The fields are located in the southern part of the Russian Federation. Our results indicated minimal differences in the microbial diversity and soil community composition between the two systems studied. The profiling of the soil bacterial community revealed differences in the abundances of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Cyanobacteria, which were predominated in the conventional farming system (CFS), while Methylomirabilota and Fusobacteriota were more abundant in the organic farming system (OFS). Bacterial taxa and functional genes associated with nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulphur cycling were found to be more abundant in CFS soils than in OFS soils. The instrumental measurement of soil metabolic activity and microbial biomass content showed that CFS soils had higher microbiome activity than OFS soils. Overall, the study found that the agronomic practices used in conventional farming not only help to maintain the functional properties of the soil microbiome, but also significantly increase its microbiological activity and nutrient bioconversion, compared to organic farming practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0472</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/agriculture14122127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecology ; Agricultural ecosystems ; Agricultural industry ; Agricultural management ; Agricultural practices ; Agrochemicals ; Bacteria ; Bioconversion ; Biodiversity ; Biological diversity ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Community composition ; Crop production systems ; Crop rotation ; Cropping systems ; Cyanobacteria ; Farming ; Farming systems ; Fertilizers ; Germany ; Intensive farming ; Massachusetts ; Meta-analysis ; Microbiology ; Microbiomes ; Microorganisms ; Nitrogen ; Organic farming ; Organic soils ; Pollution control ; Respiration ; Russia ; soil fertility ; soil health ; soil microbiome ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil pollution ; Soil properties ; soil quality ; Soil structure ; soil tillage ; Soil water ; Soils ; Structure-function relationships ; United States ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Agriculture (Basel), 2024-12, Vol.14 (12), p.2127</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2227-121a35d1a0428bde81fd5d063e9b8d1a014c1ebc916d1d215846a470514570113</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1261-7919 ; 0000-0002-8906-8831 ; 0000-0001-9970-4881 ; 0000-0003-2119-2972</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149497095/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149497095?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,74998</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poshvina, Darya V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balkin, Alexander S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teslya, Anastasia V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dilbaryan, Diana S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepanov, Artyom A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kravchenko, Sergey V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilchenko, Alexey S.</creatorcontrib><title>Structural and Functional Differences in the Bacterial Community of Chernozem Soil Under Conventional and Organic Farming Conditions</title><title>Agriculture (Basel)</title><description>The conventional farming system, which predominates in most countries, is based on the use of agrochemical deep ploughing and other special methods. However, intensive farming has several negative impacts, including soil and water pollution and reduced biodiversity. The microbial community plays a crucial role in maintaining the health of agricultural ecosystems. In this context, we need to study how different agricultural practices affect the structural and functional characteristics of agricultural ecosystems. This study assessed the diversity, structure, and functional characteristics of the soil bacterial community in two different cropping systems. The subjects of the study were soil samples from Chernozem, which had been cultivated using the organic method for 11 years and the conventional method for 20 years. The fields are located in the southern part of the Russian Federation. Our results indicated minimal differences in the microbial diversity and soil community composition between the two systems studied. The profiling of the soil bacterial community revealed differences in the abundances of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Cyanobacteria, which were predominated in the conventional farming system (CFS), while Methylomirabilota and Fusobacteriota were more abundant in the organic farming system (OFS). Bacterial taxa and functional genes associated with nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulphur cycling were found to be more abundant in CFS soils than in OFS soils. The instrumental measurement of soil metabolic activity and microbial biomass content showed that CFS soils had higher microbiome activity than OFS soils. Overall, the study found that the agronomic practices used in conventional farming not only help to maintain the functional properties of the soil microbiome, but also significantly increase its microbiological activity and nutrient bioconversion, compared to organic farming practices.</description><subject>Agricultural ecology</subject><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bioconversion</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological diversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Crop production systems</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Cyanobacteria</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Intensive farming</subject><subject>Massachusetts</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>soil fertility</subject><subject>soil health</subject><subject>soil microbiome</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>soil quality</subject><subject>Soil structure</subject><subject>soil tillage</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>2077-0472</issn><issn>2077-0472</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUFv3CAQha2qlRKl-QW5IPW8KQPYmGO67aaRIuWQ5oxmYeywsiHFdqX0nB8e3I2qHgoHhjfvfQJNVV0Av5TS8M_Y5-CWYV4ygQIhQOh31angWm-40uL9P_VJdT5NB16WAdny5rR6uZ_z4koWB4bRs90S3RxSLNevoesoU3Q0sRDZ_EjsC7qZcijNbRrHJYb5maWObR8px_SbRnafwsAeoqdcHPEXxTfWir7LPcbg2A7zGGK_GnxY-9PH6kOHw0Tnb-dZ9bD79mP7fXN7d32zvbrdOCGE3oAAlLUH5Eq0e08tdL72vJFk9u0qg3JAe2eg8eAF1K1qUGleg6o1B5Bn1c2R6xMe7FMOI-ZnmzDYP0LKvcU8BzeQFVIgktrXHUoFEtGjdjXnShmNppWF9enIesrp50LTbA9pyeWvk5WgTLFxUxfX5dHVY4GG2KU5oyvb0xhcitSFol-1AhoOpmlLQB4DLqdpytT9fSZwu47b_mfc8hXrKqCq</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Poshvina, Darya V.</creator><creator>Balkin, Alexander S.</creator><creator>Teslya, Anastasia V.</creator><creator>Dilbaryan, Diana S.</creator><creator>Stepanov, Artyom A.</creator><creator>Kravchenko, Sergey V.</creator><creator>Vasilchenko, Alexey S.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1261-7919</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8906-8831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9970-4881</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2119-2972</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Structural and Functional Differences in the Bacterial Community of Chernozem Soil Under Conventional and Organic Farming Conditions</title><author>Poshvina, Darya V. ; Balkin, Alexander S. ; Teslya, Anastasia V. ; Dilbaryan, Diana S. ; Stepanov, Artyom A. ; Kravchenko, Sergey V. ; Vasilchenko, Alexey S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2227-121a35d1a0428bde81fd5d063e9b8d1a014c1ebc916d1d215846a470514570113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecology</topic><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bioconversion</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological diversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Crop production systems</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Cyanobacteria</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Intensive farming</topic><topic>Massachusetts</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>soil fertility</topic><topic>soil health</topic><topic>soil microbiome</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>soil quality</topic><topic>Soil structure</topic><topic>soil tillage</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poshvina, Darya V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balkin, Alexander S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teslya, Anastasia V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dilbaryan, Diana S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepanov, Artyom A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kravchenko, Sergey V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilchenko, Alexey S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Agriculture (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poshvina, Darya V.</au><au>Balkin, Alexander S.</au><au>Teslya, Anastasia V.</au><au>Dilbaryan, Diana S.</au><au>Stepanov, Artyom A.</au><au>Kravchenko, Sergey V.</au><au>Vasilchenko, Alexey S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural and Functional Differences in the Bacterial Community of Chernozem Soil Under Conventional and Organic Farming Conditions</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture (Basel)</jtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2127</spage><pages>2127-</pages><issn>2077-0472</issn><eissn>2077-0472</eissn><abstract>The conventional farming system, which predominates in most countries, is based on the use of agrochemical deep ploughing and other special methods. However, intensive farming has several negative impacts, including soil and water pollution and reduced biodiversity. The microbial community plays a crucial role in maintaining the health of agricultural ecosystems. In this context, we need to study how different agricultural practices affect the structural and functional characteristics of agricultural ecosystems. This study assessed the diversity, structure, and functional characteristics of the soil bacterial community in two different cropping systems. The subjects of the study were soil samples from Chernozem, which had been cultivated using the organic method for 11 years and the conventional method for 20 years. The fields are located in the southern part of the Russian Federation. Our results indicated minimal differences in the microbial diversity and soil community composition between the two systems studied. The profiling of the soil bacterial community revealed differences in the abundances of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Cyanobacteria, which were predominated in the conventional farming system (CFS), while Methylomirabilota and Fusobacteriota were more abundant in the organic farming system (OFS). Bacterial taxa and functional genes associated with nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulphur cycling were found to be more abundant in CFS soils than in OFS soils. The instrumental measurement of soil metabolic activity and microbial biomass content showed that CFS soils had higher microbiome activity than OFS soils. Overall, the study found that the agronomic practices used in conventional farming not only help to maintain the functional properties of the soil microbiome, but also significantly increase its microbiological activity and nutrient bioconversion, compared to organic farming practices.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/agriculture14122127</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1261-7919</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8906-8831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9970-4881</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2119-2972</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0472 |
ispartof | Agriculture (Basel), 2024-12, Vol.14 (12), p.2127 |
issn | 2077-0472 2077-0472 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_232aae4b5fa3413aada7c5004497a983 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Agricultural ecology Agricultural ecosystems Agricultural industry Agricultural management Agricultural practices Agrochemicals Bacteria Bioconversion Biodiversity Biological diversity Biomass Carbon Community composition Crop production systems Crop rotation Cropping systems Cyanobacteria Farming Farming systems Fertilizers Germany Intensive farming Massachusetts Meta-analysis Microbiology Microbiomes Microorganisms Nitrogen Organic farming Organic soils Pollution control Respiration Russia soil fertility soil health soil microbiome Soil microorganisms Soil pollution Soil properties soil quality Soil structure soil tillage Soil water Soils Structure-function relationships United States Water pollution |
title | Structural and Functional Differences in the Bacterial Community of Chernozem Soil Under Conventional and Organic Farming Conditions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A15%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20and%20Functional%20Differences%20in%20the%20Bacterial%20Community%20of%20Chernozem%20Soil%20Under%20Conventional%20and%20Organic%20Farming%20Conditions&rft.jtitle=Agriculture%20(Basel)&rft.au=Poshvina,%20Darya%20V.&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2127&rft.pages=2127-&rft.issn=2077-0472&rft.eissn=2077-0472&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/agriculture14122127&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA821601968%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2227-121a35d1a0428bde81fd5d063e9b8d1a014c1ebc916d1d215846a470514570113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149497095&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A821601968&rfr_iscdi=true |