Loading…
Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images
Background This study aimed to compare the amount of artifacts induced by the titanium and zirconium implants on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and assess the effect of different exposure settings on the image quality for both materials. Methods In this experimental study, 30 zirconium and 30...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC medical imaging 2022-09, Vol.22 (1), p.1-156, Article 156 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-693134b9d8236e9e58e936768a131f1d588f6ab7d3303ea01486faaed98dcbf03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-693134b9d8236e9e58e936768a131f1d588f6ab7d3303ea01486faaed98dcbf03 |
container_end_page | 156 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | BMC medical imaging |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Shokri, Abbas Vafaee, Fariborz Haghighat, Leila Shahabi, Shiva Farhadian, Maryam Jamalpour, Mohammad Reza |
description | Background This study aimed to compare the amount of artifacts induced by the titanium and zirconium implants on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and assess the effect of different exposure settings on the image quality for both materials. Methods In this experimental study, 30 zirconium and 30 titanium implants were placed in bovine rib bone blocks. CBCT images were taken in two different fields of view (FOV: 4 x 6 cm.sup.2 and 6 x 8 cm.sup.2) and at two resolutions (133 [micro] and 200 [micro] voxel size). Subsequently, two observers assessed the images and detected the amount of artifacts around the implants through gray values. Data were analyzed by paired t test and independent t test using SPSS 21 and the 0.05 significance level. Results The results showed that titanium implants caused lower amounts of artifacts than zirconium implants, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The larger FOV (6 x 8 cm.sup.2) resulted in a lower amount of artifacts in both groups, although the results were only statistically significant in the zirconium group (P < 0.001). The amount of artifacts was increased when using the 133 [micro] voxel size in both groups, which was only significant in the zirconium group (P < 0.001). Conclusion Our results suggest that zirconium implants induce higher amounts of artifacts than titanium ones. We also concluded that the artifacts could be minimized using the larger FOV and voxel size. Keywords: Artifacts, Cone-beam computed tomography, Titanium, Zirconium |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12880-022-00884-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_23a7abb0ebb5462ebcf90051a7463d9c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A716092943</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_23a7abb0ebb5462ebcf90051a7463d9c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A716092943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-693134b9d8236e9e58e936768a131f1d588f6ab7d3303ea01486faaed98dcbf03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUktv1DAQjhCIlsIf4BSJC5cUP2P7glRVPCpV4gJna_zIrlebONgOYvvrcXYrYBHywZ6Zb77xzHxN8xqja4xl_y5jIiXqECEdQlKyjj9pLjETuCOUkad_vS-aFznvEMJCUva8uaA94oJzfNn8vI3jDCnkOLVxaMvWtzDGZSqrBamEAWzJbZjcYr1rzaF9CMnGKSxjC5NrSyhwNMI472E6Qtsa953xMNbXOC-lJpY4xk2CeXuoSNj4_LJ5NsA--1eP91Xz7eOHr7efu_svn-5ub-47ywQqXa8opswoJwntvfJcekV70UvAFA_YcSmHHoxwlCLqAWEm-wHAOyWdNQOiV83diddF2Ok51erpoCMEfXTEtNFrm3bvNaEgwBjkjeGsJ97YQSHEMQjWU6ds5Xp_4poXM3pn_VQS7M9IzyNT2OpN_KEVY4jz9TNvHwlS_L74XPQYsvX7Ojkfl6yJQEowJCir0Df_QHdxSVMdVUVhzmTdPf6D2kBtIExDrHXtSqpvBO6RIorRirr-D6oe58ewLmsI1X-WQE4JNsWckx9-94iRXrWnT9rTVXv6qD3N6S8QIsuC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2715482881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Shokri, Abbas ; Vafaee, Fariborz ; Haghighat, Leila ; Shahabi, Shiva ; Farhadian, Maryam ; Jamalpour, Mohammad Reza</creator><creatorcontrib>Shokri, Abbas ; Vafaee, Fariborz ; Haghighat, Leila ; Shahabi, Shiva ; Farhadian, Maryam ; Jamalpour, Mohammad Reza</creatorcontrib><description>Background This study aimed to compare the amount of artifacts induced by the titanium and zirconium implants on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and assess the effect of different exposure settings on the image quality for both materials. Methods In this experimental study, 30 zirconium and 30 titanium implants were placed in bovine rib bone blocks. CBCT images were taken in two different fields of view (FOV: 4 x 6 cm.sup.2 and 6 x 8 cm.sup.2) and at two resolutions (133 [micro] and 200 [micro] voxel size). Subsequently, two observers assessed the images and detected the amount of artifacts around the implants through gray values. Data were analyzed by paired t test and independent t test using SPSS 21 and the 0.05 significance level. Results The results showed that titanium implants caused lower amounts of artifacts than zirconium implants, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The larger FOV (6 x 8 cm.sup.2) resulted in a lower amount of artifacts in both groups, although the results were only statistically significant in the zirconium group (P < 0.001). The amount of artifacts was increased when using the 133 [micro] voxel size in both groups, which was only significant in the zirconium group (P < 0.001). Conclusion Our results suggest that zirconium implants induce higher amounts of artifacts than titanium ones. We also concluded that the artifacts could be minimized using the larger FOV and voxel size. Keywords: Artifacts, Cone-beam computed tomography, Titanium, Zirconium</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2342</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2342</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00884-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36057551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Bone implants ; Bones ; Comparative analysis ; Computed tomography ; Cone-beam computed tomography ; CT imaging ; Dental implants ; Dentistry ; Image quality ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Surgical implants ; Titanium ; Tomography ; X-rays ; Zirconium</subject><ispartof>BMC medical imaging, 2022-09, Vol.22 (1), p.1-156, Article 156</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-693134b9d8236e9e58e936768a131f1d588f6ab7d3303ea01486faaed98dcbf03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-693134b9d8236e9e58e936768a131f1d588f6ab7d3303ea01486faaed98dcbf03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0092-0443</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440550/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2715482881?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shokri, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vafaee, Fariborz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghighat, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahabi, Shiva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farhadian, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamalpour, Mohammad Reza</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images</title><title>BMC medical imaging</title><description>Background This study aimed to compare the amount of artifacts induced by the titanium and zirconium implants on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and assess the effect of different exposure settings on the image quality for both materials. Methods In this experimental study, 30 zirconium and 30 titanium implants were placed in bovine rib bone blocks. CBCT images were taken in two different fields of view (FOV: 4 x 6 cm.sup.2 and 6 x 8 cm.sup.2) and at two resolutions (133 [micro] and 200 [micro] voxel size). Subsequently, two observers assessed the images and detected the amount of artifacts around the implants through gray values. Data were analyzed by paired t test and independent t test using SPSS 21 and the 0.05 significance level. Results The results showed that titanium implants caused lower amounts of artifacts than zirconium implants, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The larger FOV (6 x 8 cm.sup.2) resulted in a lower amount of artifacts in both groups, although the results were only statistically significant in the zirconium group (P < 0.001). The amount of artifacts was increased when using the 133 [micro] voxel size in both groups, which was only significant in the zirconium group (P < 0.001). Conclusion Our results suggest that zirconium implants induce higher amounts of artifacts than titanium ones. We also concluded that the artifacts could be minimized using the larger FOV and voxel size. Keywords: Artifacts, Cone-beam computed tomography, Titanium, Zirconium</description><subject>Bone implants</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cone-beam computed tomography</subject><subject>CT imaging</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><subject>Zirconium</subject><issn>1471-2342</issn><issn>1471-2342</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUktv1DAQjhCIlsIf4BSJC5cUP2P7glRVPCpV4gJna_zIrlebONgOYvvrcXYrYBHywZ6Zb77xzHxN8xqja4xl_y5jIiXqECEdQlKyjj9pLjETuCOUkad_vS-aFznvEMJCUva8uaA94oJzfNn8vI3jDCnkOLVxaMvWtzDGZSqrBamEAWzJbZjcYr1rzaF9CMnGKSxjC5NrSyhwNMI472E6Qtsa953xMNbXOC-lJpY4xk2CeXuoSNj4_LJ5NsA--1eP91Xz7eOHr7efu_svn-5ub-47ywQqXa8opswoJwntvfJcekV70UvAFA_YcSmHHoxwlCLqAWEm-wHAOyWdNQOiV83diddF2Ok51erpoCMEfXTEtNFrm3bvNaEgwBjkjeGsJ97YQSHEMQjWU6ds5Xp_4poXM3pn_VQS7M9IzyNT2OpN_KEVY4jz9TNvHwlS_L74XPQYsvX7Ojkfl6yJQEowJCir0Df_QHdxSVMdVUVhzmTdPf6D2kBtIExDrHXtSqpvBO6RIorRirr-D6oe58ewLmsI1X-WQE4JNsWckx9-94iRXrWnT9rTVXv6qD3N6S8QIsuC</recordid><startdate>20220903</startdate><enddate>20220903</enddate><creator>Shokri, Abbas</creator><creator>Vafaee, Fariborz</creator><creator>Haghighat, Leila</creator><creator>Shahabi, Shiva</creator><creator>Farhadian, Maryam</creator><creator>Jamalpour, Mohammad Reza</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0092-0443</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220903</creationdate><title>Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images</title><author>Shokri, Abbas ; Vafaee, Fariborz ; Haghighat, Leila ; Shahabi, Shiva ; Farhadian, Maryam ; Jamalpour, Mohammad Reza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-693134b9d8236e9e58e936768a131f1d588f6ab7d3303ea01486faaed98dcbf03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bone implants</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cone-beam computed tomography</topic><topic>CT imaging</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><topic>Zirconium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shokri, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vafaee, Fariborz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghighat, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahabi, Shiva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farhadian, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamalpour, Mohammad Reza</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC medical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shokri, Abbas</au><au>Vafaee, Fariborz</au><au>Haghighat, Leila</au><au>Shahabi, Shiva</au><au>Farhadian, Maryam</au><au>Jamalpour, Mohammad Reza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images</atitle><jtitle>BMC medical imaging</jtitle><date>2022-09-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>1-156</pages><artnum>156</artnum><issn>1471-2342</issn><eissn>1471-2342</eissn><abstract>Background This study aimed to compare the amount of artifacts induced by the titanium and zirconium implants on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and assess the effect of different exposure settings on the image quality for both materials. Methods In this experimental study, 30 zirconium and 30 titanium implants were placed in bovine rib bone blocks. CBCT images were taken in two different fields of view (FOV: 4 x 6 cm.sup.2 and 6 x 8 cm.sup.2) and at two resolutions (133 [micro] and 200 [micro] voxel size). Subsequently, two observers assessed the images and detected the amount of artifacts around the implants through gray values. Data were analyzed by paired t test and independent t test using SPSS 21 and the 0.05 significance level. Results The results showed that titanium implants caused lower amounts of artifacts than zirconium implants, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The larger FOV (6 x 8 cm.sup.2) resulted in a lower amount of artifacts in both groups, although the results were only statistically significant in the zirconium group (P < 0.001). The amount of artifacts was increased when using the 133 [micro] voxel size in both groups, which was only significant in the zirconium group (P < 0.001). Conclusion Our results suggest that zirconium implants induce higher amounts of artifacts than titanium ones. We also concluded that the artifacts could be minimized using the larger FOV and voxel size. Keywords: Artifacts, Cone-beam computed tomography, Titanium, Zirconium</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>36057551</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12880-022-00884-5</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0092-0443</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2342 |
ispartof | BMC medical imaging, 2022-09, Vol.22 (1), p.1-156, Article 156 |
issn | 1471-2342 1471-2342 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_23a7abb0ebb5462ebcf90051a7463d9c |
source | PMC (PubMed Central); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Bone implants Bones Comparative analysis Computed tomography Cone-beam computed tomography CT imaging Dental implants Dentistry Image quality Software Statistical analysis Surgical implants Titanium Tomography X-rays Zirconium |
title | Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A31%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20amount%20of%20artifacts%20induced%20by%20zirconium%20and%20titanium%20implants%20in%20cone-beam%20computed%20tomography%20images&rft.jtitle=BMC%20medical%20imaging&rft.au=Shokri,%20Abbas&rft.date=2022-09-03&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=1-156&rft.artnum=156&rft.issn=1471-2342&rft.eissn=1471-2342&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12880-022-00884-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA716092943%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-693134b9d8236e9e58e936768a131f1d588f6ab7d3303ea01486faaed98dcbf03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2715482881&rft_id=info:pmid/36057551&rft_galeid=A716092943&rfr_iscdi=true |