Revision Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: An Update on Technique and Outcomes

• Published in: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open 2024-09, Vol.12 (9), p.e6138
• Main Authors: Ratigan, Conor M, Yocum, Derek S, Fuller, Sam M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Hand; Original
• ISSN: 2169-7574; 2169-7574
• DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006138

Carpal tunnel release is among the most frequently conducted upper extremity procedures. While it typically provides patients with improved sensation, decreased pain, and improved function, a small percentage of cases require revision due to failed initial surgery. Consequently, adoption of endoscopic techniques for carpal tunnel revision procedures is beginning to be explored. A retrospective analysis was conducted of postoperative clinical visits and patient-reported outcome measures for four patients who had undergone five endoscopic revision carpal tunnel release procedures (one patient had bilateral disease). All five cases had symptoms consistent with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. One hundred percent (5 of 5) of cases resulted in patients reporting symptom improvement. Postoperative clinical visits and improved patient-reported outcome measures (QuickDash, PROMIS Upper Extremity, VAS Pain, PSEQ, PHQ, and Surgery Satisfaction) scores from baseline to 6 weeks demonstrated successful postoperative function and symptom resolution. Five of five cases resulted in patients resuming normal activities without restrictions within 1-5 weeks, with an average of 3.4 weeks. Preliminary findings suggest the endoscopic revision procedure may be safe and effective for patients with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, extending the indications to include scars proximal to the wrist crease. Moreover, this minimally invasive procedure facilitates a transition back to normal activities and avoids incisions on weight-bearing surfaces of the palm. Adopting endoscopic revision may reduce the need for prolonged postoperative care and physical therapy. However, due to the limited sample size of five patients, further investigation with larger cohorts is warranted to confirm these observations.