Loading…
Economic development, technical change and income distribution: A conversation between Keynesians, Schumpeterians and Structuralists. Introduction to the Special Issue
The original “manifesto” that gave rise to the Structuralist development theory was written for the Economic Commission of Latin America (ECLA, subsequently ECLAC, after incorporating the Caribbean States in 1984) by Raul Prebisch (1949). This work had a strong impact on both the theoretical and pol...
Saved in:
Published in: | PSL quarterly review 2018-06, Vol.71 (285) |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 285 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | PSL quarterly review |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Alberto Botta, Gabriel Porcile, Rafael S.M. Ribeiro |
description | The original “manifesto” that gave rise to the Structuralist development theory was written for the Economic Commission of Latin America (ECLA, subsequently ECLAC, after incorporating the Caribbean States in 1984) by Raul Prebisch (1949). This work had a strong impact on both the theoretical and policy debates and served as a rationale for the efforts at structural change and industrialization that many developing countries adopted in the following decades. By and large, the Latin American Structuralist tradition focuses on how the external constraint disproportionately affects output growth and domestic policies in less developed economies. The existence of bottlenecks in the productive system and labor market dualism characterizing peripheral economies opens space for state intervention and industrial policies as a way to promote structural transformation and economic development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.13133/2037-3643_71.285_1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_248e477393b24d3db43c1540129d3f4c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_248e477393b24d3db43c1540129d3f4c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2101288717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d282t-c56ac4ea7bc9293b61886587b32c4eff6f36a4d2c55d31f954eb49c703be41043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jk1P3DAQhqOqlYoov4CLpV7ZJfbYcdIbQhRWRephy9nyx4Q1SuzUdqj4Rf2b9ULFaeZ9NHrmbZpz2m4pUIBL1oLcQMdBSbplvVD0Q3PyDj--7yA-N2c5e9NyLoXksjtp_t7YGOLsLXH4jFNcZgzlghS0h-Ctnog96PCIRAdHfLBxRuJ8LsmbtfgYvpErUgXPmLI-ZmKw_EEM5Ae-BMxeh3xB9vawzgsWTMf8qtqXtNqyJj1VWd6SXSgpuoqOjhJJOSDZL2h9bbDLecUvzadRTxnP_s_T5uH7za_ru839z9vd9dX9xrGelY0VnbYctTR2YAOYjvZ9J3ppgFU8jt0IneaOWSEc0HEQHA0frGzBIKcth9Nm9-Z1UT-pJflZpxcVtVevIKZHpVPxdkLFeI9cSqhvGHfgDAdLBW8pGxyM3FbX1zfXkuLvFXNRT3FNodZXjNazvpdUwj8fJoxJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2101288717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic development, technical change and income distribution: A conversation between Keynesians, Schumpeterians and Structuralists. Introduction to the Special Issue</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Alberto Botta, Gabriel Porcile, Rafael S.M. Ribeiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Alberto Botta, Gabriel Porcile, Rafael S.M. Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><description>The original “manifesto” that gave rise to the Structuralist development theory was written for the Economic Commission of Latin America (ECLA, subsequently ECLAC, after incorporating the Caribbean States in 1984) by Raul Prebisch (1949). This work had a strong impact on both the theoretical and policy debates and served as a rationale for the efforts at structural change and industrialization that many developing countries adopted in the following decades. By and large, the Latin American Structuralist tradition focuses on how the external constraint disproportionately affects output growth and domestic policies in less developed economies. The existence of bottlenecks in the productive system and labor market dualism characterizing peripheral economies opens space for state intervention and industrial policies as a way to promote structural transformation and economic development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2037-3635</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2037-3643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13133/2037-3643_71.285_1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rome: Associazione Economia Civile</publisher><subject>Developing countries ; Dualism ; Economic development ; Economic models ; Income distribution ; Industrialization ; Labor market ; Latin America ; LDCs ; State intervention ; Structural change ; Structuralism ; technical change ; Transformation</subject><ispartof>PSL quarterly review, 2018-06, Vol.71 (285)</ispartof><rights>Copyright (c) 2018. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2101288717?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,25753,27924,27925,33223,36060,37012,44363,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alberto Botta, Gabriel Porcile, Rafael S.M. Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><title>Economic development, technical change and income distribution: A conversation between Keynesians, Schumpeterians and Structuralists. Introduction to the Special Issue</title><title>PSL quarterly review</title><description>The original “manifesto” that gave rise to the Structuralist development theory was written for the Economic Commission of Latin America (ECLA, subsequently ECLAC, after incorporating the Caribbean States in 1984) by Raul Prebisch (1949). This work had a strong impact on both the theoretical and policy debates and served as a rationale for the efforts at structural change and industrialization that many developing countries adopted in the following decades. By and large, the Latin American Structuralist tradition focuses on how the external constraint disproportionately affects output growth and domestic policies in less developed economies. The existence of bottlenecks in the productive system and labor market dualism characterizing peripheral economies opens space for state intervention and industrial policies as a way to promote structural transformation and economic development.</description><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Dualism</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Industrialization</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Latin America</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>State intervention</subject><subject>Structural change</subject><subject>Structuralism</subject><subject>technical change</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><issn>2037-3635</issn><issn>2037-3643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jk1P3DAQhqOqlYoov4CLpV7ZJfbYcdIbQhRWRephy9nyx4Q1SuzUdqj4Rf2b9ULFaeZ9NHrmbZpz2m4pUIBL1oLcQMdBSbplvVD0Q3PyDj--7yA-N2c5e9NyLoXksjtp_t7YGOLsLXH4jFNcZgzlghS0h-Ctnog96PCIRAdHfLBxRuJ8LsmbtfgYvpErUgXPmLI-ZmKw_EEM5Ae-BMxeh3xB9vawzgsWTMf8qtqXtNqyJj1VWd6SXSgpuoqOjhJJOSDZL2h9bbDLecUvzadRTxnP_s_T5uH7za_ru839z9vd9dX9xrGelY0VnbYctTR2YAOYjvZ9J3ppgFU8jt0IneaOWSEc0HEQHA0frGzBIKcth9Nm9-Z1UT-pJflZpxcVtVevIKZHpVPxdkLFeI9cSqhvGHfgDAdLBW8pGxyM3FbX1zfXkuLvFXNRT3FNodZXjNazvpdUwj8fJoxJ</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Alberto Botta, Gabriel Porcile, Rafael S.M. Ribeiro</creator><general>Associazione Economia Civile</general><general>Associazione Economia civile</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Economic development, technical change and income distribution: A conversation between Keynesians, Schumpeterians and Structuralists. Introduction to the Special Issue</title><author>Alberto Botta, Gabriel Porcile, Rafael S.M. Ribeiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d282t-c56ac4ea7bc9293b61886587b32c4eff6f36a4d2c55d31f954eb49c703be41043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Dualism</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Industrialization</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Latin America</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>State intervention</topic><topic>Structural change</topic><topic>Structuralism</topic><topic>technical change</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alberto Botta, Gabriel Porcile, Rafael S.M. Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PSL quarterly review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alberto Botta, Gabriel Porcile, Rafael S.M. Ribeiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic development, technical change and income distribution: A conversation between Keynesians, Schumpeterians and Structuralists. Introduction to the Special Issue</atitle><jtitle>PSL quarterly review</jtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>285</issue><issn>2037-3635</issn><eissn>2037-3643</eissn><abstract>The original “manifesto” that gave rise to the Structuralist development theory was written for the Economic Commission of Latin America (ECLA, subsequently ECLAC, after incorporating the Caribbean States in 1984) by Raul Prebisch (1949). This work had a strong impact on both the theoretical and policy debates and served as a rationale for the efforts at structural change and industrialization that many developing countries adopted in the following decades. By and large, the Latin American Structuralist tradition focuses on how the external constraint disproportionately affects output growth and domestic policies in less developed economies. The existence of bottlenecks in the productive system and labor market dualism characterizing peripheral economies opens space for state intervention and industrial policies as a way to promote structural transformation and economic development.</abstract><cop>Rome</cop><pub>Associazione Economia Civile</pub><doi>10.13133/2037-3643_71.285_1</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2037-3635 |
ispartof | PSL quarterly review, 2018-06, Vol.71 (285) |
issn | 2037-3635 2037-3643 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_248e477393b24d3db43c1540129d3f4c |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM global; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Developing countries Dualism Economic development Economic models Income distribution Industrialization Labor market Latin America LDCs State intervention Structural change Structuralism technical change Transformation |
title | Economic development, technical change and income distribution: A conversation between Keynesians, Schumpeterians and Structuralists. Introduction to the Special Issue |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T13%3A48%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20development,%20technical%20change%20and%20income%20distribution:%20A%20conversation%20between%20Keynesians,%20Schumpeterians%20and%20Structuralists.%20Introduction%20to%20the%20Special%20Issue&rft.jtitle=PSL%20quarterly%20review&rft.au=Alberto%20Botta,%20Gabriel%20Porcile,%20Rafael%20S.M.%20Ribeiro&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=285&rft.issn=2037-3635&rft.eissn=2037-3643&rft_id=info:doi/10.13133/2037-3643_71.285_1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2101288717%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d282t-c56ac4ea7bc9293b61886587b32c4eff6f36a4d2c55d31f954eb49c703be41043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2101288717&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |