Loading…
Building ties: social capital network analysis of a forest community in a biosphere reserve in Chiapas, Mexico
Governance of the commons depends on the capacity to generate collective action. Networks and rules that foster that collective action have been defined as social capital. However, their causal link is still not fully understood. We use social network analysis to assess social capital, decision-maki...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology and society 2012-09, Vol.17 (3), p.3-3, Article art3 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-7d796138eb65d9aeeab244bbebd34e589d2102c50fe0c13c2154c3387b10190f3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 3 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Ecology and society |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | García-Amado, Luis Rico Pérez, Manuel Ruiz Iniesta-Arandia, Irene Dahringer, Guillaume Reyes, Felipe Barrasa, Sara |
description | Governance of the commons depends on the capacity to generate collective action. Networks and rules that foster that collective action have been defined as social capital. However, their causal link is still not fully understood. We use social network analysis to assess social capital, decision-making, and collective action in a forest-based common pool resource management in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve (Chiapas, Mexico). Our research analyzes the productive networks and the evolution of coffee groups in one community. The network shows some centrality, with richer landholders tending to occupy core positions and poorer landless peasants occupying peripheral ones. This has fostered the community’s environmentally oriented development but has also caused internal conflicts. Market requirements have shaped different but complementary productive networks, where organic coffee commercialization is the main source of bridging ties, which has resulted in more connectivity and resilience. Conservation attitudes, along with the institutional setting of the community, have promoted collective action. The unresolved conflicts, however, still leave some concerns about governance in the future. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5751/es-04855-170303 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2496b7dbc1b6489da35dfad77557f140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26269061</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2496b7dbc1b6489da35dfad77557f140</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>26269061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-7d796138eb65d9aeeab244bbebd34e589d2102c50fe0c13c2154c3387b10190f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNaePQmCFy-xM_uRTY5aqhYKHtTzsl8pCWlTd5OD_961kSKeZhieeZl5CLlCuBdS4NzHDHghRIYSGLATMklNkTEo5Omf_pxcxNgA0JIXdEJmj0Pdunq3uelrHy_JWaXb6Ge_dUo-npbvi5ds_fq8WjysM8tL2WfSyTJHVniTC1dq77WhnBvjjWPci6J0FIFaAZUHi8xSFNwyVkiDgCVUbEpWY67rdKP2od7q8KU6XavDoAsbpUNf29YrysvcSGcsmpynZM2Eq7STUghZIYeUdTdm7UP3OfjYq20drW9bvfPdEBVSisgFZXlCb_-hTTeEXfpUIRRJESDDRM1HyoYuxuCr44EI6ke1Wr6pg2o1qk4b1-NGE_suHHGa07yEJOob5pp2jQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1081700131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building ties: social capital network analysis of a forest community in a biosphere reserve in Chiapas, Mexico</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>García-Amado, Luis Rico ; Pérez, Manuel Ruiz ; Iniesta-Arandia, Irene ; Dahringer, Guillaume ; Reyes, Felipe ; Barrasa, Sara</creator><creatorcontrib>García-Amado, Luis Rico ; Pérez, Manuel Ruiz ; Iniesta-Arandia, Irene ; Dahringer, Guillaume ; Reyes, Felipe ; Barrasa, Sara</creatorcontrib><description>Governance of the commons depends on the capacity to generate collective action. Networks and rules that foster that collective action have been defined as social capital. However, their causal link is still not fully understood. We use social network analysis to assess social capital, decision-making, and collective action in a forest-based common pool resource management in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve (Chiapas, Mexico). Our research analyzes the productive networks and the evolution of coffee groups in one community. The network shows some centrality, with richer landholders tending to occupy core positions and poorer landless peasants occupying peripheral ones. This has fostered the community’s environmentally oriented development but has also caused internal conflicts. Market requirements have shaped different but complementary productive networks, where organic coffee commercialization is the main source of bridging ties, which has resulted in more connectivity and resilience. Conservation attitudes, along with the institutional setting of the community, have promoted collective action. The unresolved conflicts, however, still leave some concerns about governance in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1708-3087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-3087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5751/es-04855-170303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Resilience Alliance</publisher><subject>Coffee ; Collective action ; Commercialization ; community forest management ; Community structure ; Conflicts ; Ecological sustainability ; Ecotourism ; ejido ; Forest ecology ; Forest management ; Human ecology ; Mexico ; Natural resource management ; Natural resources conservation ; Social capital ; social network analysis ; Social networks ; Sustainable forest management</subject><ispartof>Ecology and society, 2012-09, Vol.17 (3), p.3-3, Article art3</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 by the author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Resilience Alliance 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-7d796138eb65d9aeeab244bbebd34e589d2102c50fe0c13c2154c3387b10190f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26269061$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26269061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,25354,27866,27924,27925,54524,54530</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>García-Amado, Luis Rico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Manuel Ruiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iniesta-Arandia, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahringer, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrasa, Sara</creatorcontrib><title>Building ties: social capital network analysis of a forest community in a biosphere reserve in Chiapas, Mexico</title><title>Ecology and society</title><description>Governance of the commons depends on the capacity to generate collective action. Networks and rules that foster that collective action have been defined as social capital. However, their causal link is still not fully understood. We use social network analysis to assess social capital, decision-making, and collective action in a forest-based common pool resource management in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve (Chiapas, Mexico). Our research analyzes the productive networks and the evolution of coffee groups in one community. The network shows some centrality, with richer landholders tending to occupy core positions and poorer landless peasants occupying peripheral ones. This has fostered the community’s environmentally oriented development but has also caused internal conflicts. Market requirements have shaped different but complementary productive networks, where organic coffee commercialization is the main source of bridging ties, which has resulted in more connectivity and resilience. Conservation attitudes, along with the institutional setting of the community, have promoted collective action. The unresolved conflicts, however, still leave some concerns about governance in the future.</description><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>community forest management</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Conflicts</subject><subject>Ecological sustainability</subject><subject>Ecotourism</subject><subject>ejido</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Mexico</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Natural resources conservation</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>social network analysis</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Sustainable forest management</subject><issn>1708-3087</issn><issn>1708-3087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JFNAL</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNaePQmCFy-xM_uRTY5aqhYKHtTzsl8pCWlTd5OD_961kSKeZhieeZl5CLlCuBdS4NzHDHghRIYSGLATMklNkTEo5Omf_pxcxNgA0JIXdEJmj0Pdunq3uelrHy_JWaXb6Ge_dUo-npbvi5ds_fq8WjysM8tL2WfSyTJHVniTC1dq77WhnBvjjWPci6J0FIFaAZUHi8xSFNwyVkiDgCVUbEpWY67rdKP2od7q8KU6XavDoAsbpUNf29YrysvcSGcsmpynZM2Eq7STUghZIYeUdTdm7UP3OfjYq20drW9bvfPdEBVSisgFZXlCb_-hTTeEXfpUIRRJESDDRM1HyoYuxuCr44EI6ke1Wr6pg2o1qk4b1-NGE_suHHGa07yEJOob5pp2jQ</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>García-Amado, Luis Rico</creator><creator>Pérez, Manuel Ruiz</creator><creator>Iniesta-Arandia, Irene</creator><creator>Dahringer, Guillaume</creator><creator>Reyes, Felipe</creator><creator>Barrasa, Sara</creator><general>Resilience Alliance</general><scope>JFNAL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>H9R</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Building ties</title><author>García-Amado, Luis Rico ; Pérez, Manuel Ruiz ; Iniesta-Arandia, Irene ; Dahringer, Guillaume ; Reyes, Felipe ; Barrasa, Sara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-7d796138eb65d9aeeab244bbebd34e589d2102c50fe0c13c2154c3387b10190f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>community forest management</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Conflicts</topic><topic>Ecological sustainability</topic><topic>Ecotourism</topic><topic>ejido</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Natural resources conservation</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>social network analysis</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Sustainable forest management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>García-Amado, Luis Rico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Manuel Ruiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iniesta-Arandia, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahringer, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrasa, Sara</creatorcontrib><collection>Jstor Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Illustrata: Natural Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ecology and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>García-Amado, Luis Rico</au><au>Pérez, Manuel Ruiz</au><au>Iniesta-Arandia, Irene</au><au>Dahringer, Guillaume</au><au>Reyes, Felipe</au><au>Barrasa, Sara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building ties: social capital network analysis of a forest community in a biosphere reserve in Chiapas, Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and society</jtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>3</epage><pages>3-3</pages><artnum>art3</artnum><issn>1708-3087</issn><eissn>1708-3087</eissn><abstract>Governance of the commons depends on the capacity to generate collective action. Networks and rules that foster that collective action have been defined as social capital. However, their causal link is still not fully understood. We use social network analysis to assess social capital, decision-making, and collective action in a forest-based common pool resource management in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve (Chiapas, Mexico). Our research analyzes the productive networks and the evolution of coffee groups in one community. The network shows some centrality, with richer landholders tending to occupy core positions and poorer landless peasants occupying peripheral ones. This has fostered the community’s environmentally oriented development but has also caused internal conflicts. Market requirements have shaped different but complementary productive networks, where organic coffee commercialization is the main source of bridging ties, which has resulted in more connectivity and resilience. Conservation attitudes, along with the institutional setting of the community, have promoted collective action. The unresolved conflicts, however, still leave some concerns about governance in the future.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Resilience Alliance</pub><doi>10.5751/es-04855-170303</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1708-3087 |
ispartof | Ecology and society, 2012-09, Vol.17 (3), p.3-3, Article art3 |
issn | 1708-3087 1708-3087 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2496b7dbc1b6489da35dfad77557f140 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PAIS Index; Jstor Journals Open Access |
subjects | Coffee Collective action Commercialization community forest management Community structure Conflicts Ecological sustainability Ecotourism ejido Forest ecology Forest management Human ecology Mexico Natural resource management Natural resources conservation Social capital social network analysis Social networks Sustainable forest management |
title | Building ties: social capital network analysis of a forest community in a biosphere reserve in Chiapas, Mexico |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A03%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20ties:%20social%20capital%20network%20analysis%20of%20a%20forest%20community%20in%20a%20biosphere%20reserve%20in%20Chiapas,%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20society&rft.au=Garc%C3%ADa-Amado,%20Luis%20Rico&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=3&rft.pages=3-3&rft.artnum=art3&rft.issn=1708-3087&rft.eissn=1708-3087&rft_id=info:doi/10.5751/es-04855-170303&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_doaj_%3E26269061%3C/jstor_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-7d796138eb65d9aeeab244bbebd34e589d2102c50fe0c13c2154c3387b10190f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1081700131&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26269061&rfr_iscdi=true |