Spatial and thematic bias in the scientific literature on farmland birds across the globe

• Published in: European zoological journal 2023-12, Vol.90 (2), p.775-789
• Main Authors: Guerrero-Casado, J., Dylewski, Ł., Rosin, Z. M., Skórka, P., Wuczyński, A., Tobolka, M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural production; Agroecosystems; Biodiversity; biodiversity conservation; bird conservation; Birds; Conservation; Farmland bird conservation (FBC); Geographical distribution; Human impact; scientific production; Species richness; systematic review; Threatened species
• ISSN: 2475-0263; 2475-0255; 2475-0263
• DOI: 10.1080/24750263.2023.2273389

The global biodiversity crisis and constantly growing human impact on the natural environment call for more evidence where conservation actions are the most urgent. As the agricultural lands are under increased pressure of growing human food needs here the literature survey on farmland bird conservation (FBC) was conducted to reveal geographical distribution in research intensity, the topics addressed and to identify potential drivers for the worldwide scientific effort. The Scopus database search has revealed 2290 papers dedicated to FBC from the period 1990–2020. The distribution was spatially uneven with most papers published in Western Europe and North America. Scientific collaboration was also spatially biased in favor of countries located close to each other and having high scientific capacity. The analysis also revealed 139 terms representing main topics raised in FBC research. The number of FBC papers per country was positively correlated with Gross Domestic Production (GDP), the total number of scientific papers, and number of threatened species, and negatively with the GDP from agricultural production, whereas it was not related to area of agricultural lands or bird species richness. Spatial and thematic biases in studies of farmland birds may have important consequences since uneven scientific evidence constrains development of proper conservation solutions and limits their implementation. We conclude that research on FBC should be globally coordinated and flexible enough to undertake burning conservation problems adjusted to regional differences in agriculture, socio-economy, and bird diversity.