Loading…

Pairing virtual reality with dynamic posturography serves to differentiate between patients experiencing visual vertigo

To determine if increased visual dependence can be quantified through its impact on automatic postural responses, we have measured the combined effect on the latencies and magnitudes of postural response kinematics of transient optic flow in the pitch plane with platform rotations and translations....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2007-07, Vol.4 (1), p.24-24, Article 24
Main Authors: Keshner, Emily A, Streepey, Jefferson, Dhaher, Yasin, Hain, Timothy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b582t-b7de5f0726a1c9322800e9cfe8c4bb813123128b9c4a36025bda4ec5d175a10c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b582t-b7de5f0726a1c9322800e9cfe8c4bb813123128b9c4a36025bda4ec5d175a10c3
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
container_volume 4
creator Keshner, Emily A
Streepey, Jefferson
Dhaher, Yasin
Hain, Timothy
description To determine if increased visual dependence can be quantified through its impact on automatic postural responses, we have measured the combined effect on the latencies and magnitudes of postural response kinematics of transient optic flow in the pitch plane with platform rotations and translations. Six healthy (29-31 yrs) and 4 visually sensitive (27-57 yrs) subjects stood on a platform rotated (6 deg of dorsiflexion at 30 deg/sec) or translated (5 cm at 5 deg/sec) for 200 msec. Subjects either had eyes closed or viewed an immersive, stereo, wide field of view virtual environment (scene) moved in upward pitch for a 200 msec period for three 30 sec trials at 5 velocities. RMS values and peak velocities of head, trunk, and head with respect to trunk were calculated. EMG responses of 6 trunk and lower limb muscles were collected and latencies and magnitudes of responses determined. No effect of visual velocity was observed in EMG response latencies and magnitudes. Healthy subjects exhibited significant effects (p < 0.05) of visual field velocity on peak angular velocities of the head. Head and trunk velocities and RMS values of visually sensitive subjects were significantly larger than healthy subjects (p < 0.05), but their responses were not modulated by visual field velocity. When examined individually, patients with no history of vestibular disorder demonstrated exceedingly large head velocities; patients with a history of vestibular disorder exhibited head velocities that fell within the bandwidth of healthy subjects. Differentiation of postural kinematics in visually sensitive subjects when exposed to the combined perturbations suggests that virtual reality technology could be useful for differential diagnosis and specifically designed interventions for individuals whose chief complaint is sensitivity to visual motion.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1743-0003-4-24
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_24ac5a39375c40ac97e9b98f7f75f97e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A167534111</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_24ac5a39375c40ac97e9b98f7f75f97e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A167534111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b582t-b7de5f0726a1c9322800e9cfe8c4bb813123128b9c4a36025bda4ec5d175a10c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5Yhy4pbizyS-IK0qoJUqwQHO1sQZZ11l42B7d7v_Hm931XaFELIlj8fjx-_MuCjeU3JJaVt_oo3gFSGEV6Ji4kVx_uh4-cw-K97EeJcNQaR4XZzRpmaECnZebH-AC24ayo0LaQ1jGRBGl3bl1qVl2e8mWDlTzj6mdfBDgHm5KyOGDcYy-bJ31mLAKTlIWHaYtohTOUNy2RdLvJ8xZNMcHoh7_gZDcoN_W7yyMEZ8d1wvil9fv_y8uq5uv3-7uVrcVp1sWaq6pkdpScNqoEZxxlpCUBmLrRFd11JOWZ5tp4wAXhMmux4EGtnTRgIlhl8UNwdu7-FOz8GtIOy0B6cfHD4MGrIgM6JmAowErngjjSBgVIOqU61tbCNt3mTW5wNrXncr7E3OMcB4Aj09mdxSD36jqRJZN8uAxQHQOf8PwOmJ8Su9b6LeN1GLLDEzPh5FBP97jTHplYsGxxEm9Ouo65bWSkn630Cq6poronLg5SFwgFwFN1mf3zZ59Jh77ye0LvsXtG4kF5TSpwsm-BgD2scMKNH7X_m35g_PC_cUfvyG_A_THOET</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19663909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pairing virtual reality with dynamic posturography serves to differentiate between patients experiencing visual vertigo</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Keshner, Emily A ; Streepey, Jefferson ; Dhaher, Yasin ; Hain, Timothy</creator><creatorcontrib>Keshner, Emily A ; Streepey, Jefferson ; Dhaher, Yasin ; Hain, Timothy</creatorcontrib><description>To determine if increased visual dependence can be quantified through its impact on automatic postural responses, we have measured the combined effect on the latencies and magnitudes of postural response kinematics of transient optic flow in the pitch plane with platform rotations and translations. Six healthy (29-31 yrs) and 4 visually sensitive (27-57 yrs) subjects stood on a platform rotated (6 deg of dorsiflexion at 30 deg/sec) or translated (5 cm at 5 deg/sec) for 200 msec. Subjects either had eyes closed or viewed an immersive, stereo, wide field of view virtual environment (scene) moved in upward pitch for a 200 msec period for three 30 sec trials at 5 velocities. RMS values and peak velocities of head, trunk, and head with respect to trunk were calculated. EMG responses of 6 trunk and lower limb muscles were collected and latencies and magnitudes of responses determined. No effect of visual velocity was observed in EMG response latencies and magnitudes. Healthy subjects exhibited significant effects (p &lt; 0.05) of visual field velocity on peak angular velocities of the head. Head and trunk velocities and RMS values of visually sensitive subjects were significantly larger than healthy subjects (p &lt; 0.05), but their responses were not modulated by visual field velocity. When examined individually, patients with no history of vestibular disorder demonstrated exceedingly large head velocities; patients with a history of vestibular disorder exhibited head velocities that fell within the bandwidth of healthy subjects. Differentiation of postural kinematics in visually sensitive subjects when exposed to the combined perturbations suggests that virtual reality technology could be useful for differential diagnosis and specifically designed interventions for individuals whose chief complaint is sensitivity to visual motion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-0003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-0003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-4-24</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17620142</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Care and treatment ; Case-Control Studies ; Diagnosis ; Electromyography ; Humans ; Influence ; Middle Aged ; Postural Balance ; Posture ; Reaction Time ; Vertigo ; Vertigo - diagnosis ; Vertigo - physiopathology ; Virtual reality ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2007-07, Vol.4 (1), p.24-24, Article 24</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 Keshner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007 Keshner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b582t-b7de5f0726a1c9322800e9cfe8c4bb813123128b9c4a36025bda4ec5d175a10c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b582t-b7de5f0726a1c9322800e9cfe8c4bb813123128b9c4a36025bda4ec5d175a10c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1948002/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1948002/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27911,27912,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17620142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keshner, Emily A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streepey, Jefferson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhaher, Yasin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hain, Timothy</creatorcontrib><title>Pairing virtual reality with dynamic posturography serves to differentiate between patients experiencing visual vertigo</title><title>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Neuroeng Rehabil</addtitle><description>To determine if increased visual dependence can be quantified through its impact on automatic postural responses, we have measured the combined effect on the latencies and magnitudes of postural response kinematics of transient optic flow in the pitch plane with platform rotations and translations. Six healthy (29-31 yrs) and 4 visually sensitive (27-57 yrs) subjects stood on a platform rotated (6 deg of dorsiflexion at 30 deg/sec) or translated (5 cm at 5 deg/sec) for 200 msec. Subjects either had eyes closed or viewed an immersive, stereo, wide field of view virtual environment (scene) moved in upward pitch for a 200 msec period for three 30 sec trials at 5 velocities. RMS values and peak velocities of head, trunk, and head with respect to trunk were calculated. EMG responses of 6 trunk and lower limb muscles were collected and latencies and magnitudes of responses determined. No effect of visual velocity was observed in EMG response latencies and magnitudes. Healthy subjects exhibited significant effects (p &lt; 0.05) of visual field velocity on peak angular velocities of the head. Head and trunk velocities and RMS values of visually sensitive subjects were significantly larger than healthy subjects (p &lt; 0.05), but their responses were not modulated by visual field velocity. When examined individually, patients with no history of vestibular disorder demonstrated exceedingly large head velocities; patients with a history of vestibular disorder exhibited head velocities that fell within the bandwidth of healthy subjects. Differentiation of postural kinematics in visually sensitive subjects when exposed to the combined perturbations suggests that virtual reality technology could be useful for differential diagnosis and specifically designed interventions for individuals whose chief complaint is sensitivity to visual motion.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postural Balance</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Vertigo</subject><subject>Vertigo - diagnosis</subject><subject>Vertigo - physiopathology</subject><subject>Virtual reality</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>1743-0003</issn><issn>1743-0003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5Yhy4pbizyS-IK0qoJUqwQHO1sQZZ11l42B7d7v_Hm931XaFELIlj8fjx-_MuCjeU3JJaVt_oo3gFSGEV6Ji4kVx_uh4-cw-K97EeJcNQaR4XZzRpmaECnZebH-AC24ayo0LaQ1jGRBGl3bl1qVl2e8mWDlTzj6mdfBDgHm5KyOGDcYy-bJ31mLAKTlIWHaYtohTOUNy2RdLvJ8xZNMcHoh7_gZDcoN_W7yyMEZ8d1wvil9fv_y8uq5uv3-7uVrcVp1sWaq6pkdpScNqoEZxxlpCUBmLrRFd11JOWZ5tp4wAXhMmux4EGtnTRgIlhl8UNwdu7-FOz8GtIOy0B6cfHD4MGrIgM6JmAowErngjjSBgVIOqU61tbCNt3mTW5wNrXncr7E3OMcB4Aj09mdxSD36jqRJZN8uAxQHQOf8PwOmJ8Su9b6LeN1GLLDEzPh5FBP97jTHplYsGxxEm9Ouo65bWSkn630Cq6poronLg5SFwgFwFN1mf3zZ59Jh77ye0LvsXtG4kF5TSpwsm-BgD2scMKNH7X_m35g_PC_cUfvyG_A_THOET</recordid><startdate>20070709</startdate><enddate>20070709</enddate><creator>Keshner, Emily A</creator><creator>Streepey, Jefferson</creator><creator>Dhaher, Yasin</creator><creator>Hain, Timothy</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070709</creationdate><title>Pairing virtual reality with dynamic posturography serves to differentiate between patients experiencing visual vertigo</title><author>Keshner, Emily A ; Streepey, Jefferson ; Dhaher, Yasin ; Hain, Timothy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b582t-b7de5f0726a1c9322800e9cfe8c4bb813123128b9c4a36025bda4ec5d175a10c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postural Balance</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Vertigo</topic><topic>Vertigo - diagnosis</topic><topic>Vertigo - physiopathology</topic><topic>Virtual reality</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keshner, Emily A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streepey, Jefferson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhaher, Yasin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hain, Timothy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keshner, Emily A</au><au>Streepey, Jefferson</au><au>Dhaher, Yasin</au><au>Hain, Timothy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pairing virtual reality with dynamic posturography serves to differentiate between patients experiencing visual vertigo</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Neuroeng Rehabil</addtitle><date>2007-07-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>24-24</pages><artnum>24</artnum><issn>1743-0003</issn><eissn>1743-0003</eissn><abstract>To determine if increased visual dependence can be quantified through its impact on automatic postural responses, we have measured the combined effect on the latencies and magnitudes of postural response kinematics of transient optic flow in the pitch plane with platform rotations and translations. Six healthy (29-31 yrs) and 4 visually sensitive (27-57 yrs) subjects stood on a platform rotated (6 deg of dorsiflexion at 30 deg/sec) or translated (5 cm at 5 deg/sec) for 200 msec. Subjects either had eyes closed or viewed an immersive, stereo, wide field of view virtual environment (scene) moved in upward pitch for a 200 msec period for three 30 sec trials at 5 velocities. RMS values and peak velocities of head, trunk, and head with respect to trunk were calculated. EMG responses of 6 trunk and lower limb muscles were collected and latencies and magnitudes of responses determined. No effect of visual velocity was observed in EMG response latencies and magnitudes. Healthy subjects exhibited significant effects (p &lt; 0.05) of visual field velocity on peak angular velocities of the head. Head and trunk velocities and RMS values of visually sensitive subjects were significantly larger than healthy subjects (p &lt; 0.05), but their responses were not modulated by visual field velocity. When examined individually, patients with no history of vestibular disorder demonstrated exceedingly large head velocities; patients with a history of vestibular disorder exhibited head velocities that fell within the bandwidth of healthy subjects. Differentiation of postural kinematics in visually sensitive subjects when exposed to the combined perturbations suggests that virtual reality technology could be useful for differential diagnosis and specifically designed interventions for individuals whose chief complaint is sensitivity to visual motion.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>17620142</pmid><doi>10.1186/1743-0003-4-24</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-0003
ispartof Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2007-07, Vol.4 (1), p.24-24, Article 24
issn 1743-0003
1743-0003
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_24ac5a39375c40ac97e9b98f7f75f97e
source PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Biomechanical Phenomena
Care and treatment
Case-Control Studies
Diagnosis
Electromyography
Humans
Influence
Middle Aged
Postural Balance
Posture
Reaction Time
Vertigo
Vertigo - diagnosis
Vertigo - physiopathology
Virtual reality
Visual Perception
title Pairing virtual reality with dynamic posturography serves to differentiate between patients experiencing visual vertigo
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A22%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pairing%20virtual%20reality%20with%20dynamic%20posturography%20serves%20to%20differentiate%20between%20patients%20experiencing%20visual%20vertigo&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuroengineering%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Keshner,%20Emily%20A&rft.date=2007-07-09&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=24-24&rft.artnum=24&rft.issn=1743-0003&rft.eissn=1743-0003&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1743-0003-4-24&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA167534111%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b582t-b7de5f0726a1c9322800e9cfe8c4bb813123128b9c4a36025bda4ec5d175a10c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19663909&rft_id=info:pmid/17620142&rft_galeid=A167534111&rfr_iscdi=true