Management of haemorrhoids: protocol of an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

• Published in: BMJ open 2020-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e035287-e035287
• Main Authors: Chen, Min, Tang, Tai-Chun, He, Tao-Hong, Du, Yong-Jun, Qin, Di, Zheng, Hui
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analgesics; Chinese medicine; Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Hemorrhoids - surgery; Hemorrhoids - therapy; Life Style; Lifestyles; Meta-analysis; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Pain; Pain Measurement; Patient Satisfaction; Prebiotics; Probiotics; Quality of life; Research Design; Severity of Illness Index; Systematic review; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Varicose veins; Vascular surgery
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035287

IntroductionThe prevalence of haemorrhoidal diseases was high in general population, and many treatments are proposed for the management of haemorrhoids. The treatments include conservative and surgical interventions; the credibility and strength of current evidence of their effectiveness are not comprehensively evaluated. We aim to evaluate the credibility of systematic reviews and meta-analyses that assess the effectiveness of the treatments for haemorrhoidal diseases through an umbrella review.Methods and analysisWe will search Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane library and Web of Science from inception to March 2020 without any language restriction. We will include meta-analyses that examine the effectiveness of treatments in the management of haemorrhoids. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts of retrieved articles, and they will extract data from the included meta-analyses. For each meta-analysis, we will estimate the effect size of a treatment through the random-effect model and the fixed-effect model, and we will evaluate between-study heterogeneity (Cochrane’s Q and I2 statistics) and small-study effect (Egger’s test); we will also estimate the evidence of excess significance bias. Evidence of each treatment will be graded according to prespecified criteria. Methodological quality of each meta-analysis will be evaluated by using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2. The corrected cover area method will be used to assess the impact of overlap in reviews on the findings of the umbrella review.Ethics and disseminationWe will present the results of the umbrella review at conferences and publish the final report in a peer-reviewed journal. The umbrella review does not require ethical approval.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019140702.