Comparative 2D and 3D Ultrastructural Analyses of Dendritic Spines from CA1 Pyramidal Neurons in the Mouse Hippocampus

• Published in: International journal of molecular sciences 2021-01, Vol.22 (3), p.1188
• Main Authors: Colombo, Maria Nicol, Maiellano, Greta, Putignano, Sabrina, Scandella, Lucrezia, Francolini, Maura
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Brain architecture; Brain mapping; CA1 Region, Hippocampal - ultrastructure; Datasets; dendritic spine; Dendritic spines; Dendritic Spines - ultrastructure; Electron microscopy; excitatory synapse; Hippocampus; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Mice; Microscopy, Electron; Morphology; Neural networks; Pyramidal cells; Pyramidal Cells - ultrastructure; Quantitative analysis; Scanning electron microscopy; Signal transduction; Synapses; Synapses - ultrastructure; Synaptic density; Synaptic plasticity; three-dimensional reconstruction; Transmission electron microscopy; Two dimensional analysis; Ultrastructure
• ISSN: 1422-0067; 1661-6596; 1422-0067
• DOI: 10.3390/ijms22031188

Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction from electron microscopy (EM) datasets is a widely used tool that has improved our knowledge of synapse ultrastructure and organization in the brain. Rearrangements of synapse structure following maturation and in synaptic plasticity have been broadly described and, in many cases, the defective architecture of the synapse has been associated to functional impairments. It is therefore important, when studying brain connectivity, to map these rearrangements with the highest accuracy possible, considering the affordability of the different EM approaches to provide solid and reliable data about the structure of such a small complex. The aim of this work is to compare quantitative data from two dimensional (2D) and 3D EM of mouse hippocampal CA1 (apical dendrites), to define whether the results from the two approaches are consistent. We examined asymmetric excitatory synapses focusing on post synaptic density and dendritic spine area and volume as well as spine density, and we compared the results obtained with the two methods. The consistency between the 2D and 3D results questions the need-for many applications-of using volumetric datasets (costly and time consuming in terms of both acquisition and analysis), with respect to the more accessible measurements from 2D EM projections.