Loading…

Prognostic Value of Gai's Plaque Score and Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis

Background: The prognostic valtles of the coronary computed tornography angiography (CCTA) score for predicting future cardiovascular events have been previously demonstrated in numerous studies. However, few studies have used the rich information available from CCTA to detect functionally significa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chinese medical journal 2016-12, Vol.129 (23), p.2792-2796
Main Authors: Zhang, Chuang, Yang, Shuang, Gai, Lu-Yue, Han, Zhi-Qi, Xin, Qian, Yang, Xiao-Bo, Yang, Jun-Jie, Jin, Qin-Hua
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: The prognostic valtles of the coronary computed tornography angiography (CCTA) score for predicting future cardiovascular events have been previously demonstrated in numerous studies. However, few studies have used the rich information available from CCTA to detect functionally significant coronary lesions. We sought to compare the prognostic values of Gai's plaque score and the coronary artery calcium score tCACS) of CCTA for predicting functionally significant coronary lesions, using fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the gold standard. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 107 visually assessed significant coronary lesions in 88 patients (mean age, 59.6 ± 10.2 years: 76.14% of males) wino underwent CCTA, invasive coronary angiography, and invasive FFR nneasurement. An FFR 〈0.80 indicated hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Lesions were divided into two groups using an FFR cutoffvalue of 0.80. We compared Gai's plaque scores and CACS between the two groups and evaluated the correlations of these scores with FFR. The statistical methods included unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Spearman's correlation coefficients. Results: Coronary lesions with FFR 〈0.80 lind Inigtner Gai's scores than those with FFR 〉0.80. Gai's score had the strongest correlation with FFR (r= 0.48, P 〈 0.01 ) and lind a greater area under tlne curve 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.61 0.82: P 〈 0.01 ) than the CACS of whole arteries and a single artery. Conelusions: Botin CACS in a single artery and Gai's plaque score demonstrated a good capacity to assess functionally significant coronary artery stenosis when compared to the gold standard FFR. However, Gai's plaque score was more predictive of FFR 〈0.80. Gai's score cain be easily calculated in daily clinical practice and could be used when considering revascularization.
ISSN:0366-6999
2542-5641
DOI:10.4103/0366-6999.194636