Complementary mechanisms create direction selectivity in the fly

• Published in: eLife 2016-08, Vol.5
• Main Authors: Haag, Juergen, Arenz, Alexander, Serbe, Etienne, Gabbiani, Fabrizio, Borst, Alexander
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; computer model; Data analysis; Drosophila; Drosophila - physiology; Light; Locomotion; Motion detection; motion vision; Neural circuitry; Neurogenetics; Neurons; Neurons - physiology; Neuroscience; Neurosciences; Optic lobe; Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian - physiology; Optics; Photic Stimulation; Photoreceptors; Physiological aspects; Psychomotor Performance; Receptive field; Visual Pathways - physiology
• ISSN: 2050-084X; 2050-084X
• DOI: 10.7554/elife.17421

How neurons become sensitive to the direction of visual motion represents a classic example of neural computation. Two alternative mechanisms have been discussed in the literature so far: preferred direction enhancement, by which responses are amplified when stimuli move along the preferred direction of the cell, and null direction suppression, where one signal inhibits the response to the subsequent one when stimuli move along the opposite, i.e. null direction. Along the processing chain in the Drosophila optic lobe, directional responses first appear in T4 and T5 cells. Visually stimulating sequences of individual columns in the optic lobe with a telescope while recording from single T4 neurons, we find both mechanisms at work implemented in different sub-regions of the receptive field. This finding explains the high degree of directional selectivity found already in the fly's primary motion-sensing neurons and marks an important step in our understanding of elementary motion detection.