Loading…

Impact of perioperative factors on nadir serum prostate‐specific antigen levels after holmium laser enucleation of prostate

Objective To investigate the relationship of preoperative prostate size, urinary retention, positive urine culture, and histopathological evidence of prostatitis or incidental prostate cancer on baseline and 3‐month nadir prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) value after Holmium laser enucleation of prost...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJUI compass 2021-05, Vol.2 (3), p.202-210
Main Authors: Martos, Mary, Katz, Jonathan E., Parmar, Madhumita, Jain, Anika, Soodana‐Prakash, Nachiketh, Punnen, Sanoj, Gonzalgo, Mark L., Miao, Feng, Reis, Isildinha M., Smith, Nicholas, Shah, Hemendra N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-afd416ccc8ec172dcd19eb09c14ff842badf38363b36973a70ddca25174da04d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-afd416ccc8ec172dcd19eb09c14ff842badf38363b36973a70ddca25174da04d3
container_end_page 210
container_issue 3
container_start_page 202
container_title BJUI compass
container_volume 2
creator Martos, Mary
Katz, Jonathan E.
Parmar, Madhumita
Jain, Anika
Soodana‐Prakash, Nachiketh
Punnen, Sanoj
Gonzalgo, Mark L.
Miao, Feng
Reis, Isildinha M.
Smith, Nicholas
Shah, Hemendra N.
description Objective To investigate the relationship of preoperative prostate size, urinary retention, positive urine culture, and histopathological evidence of prostatitis or incidental prostate cancer on baseline and 3‐month nadir prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) value after Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). Patients and methods Data from 90 patients who underwent a HoLEP by En‐bloc technique were analyzed. PSA values at baseline and at 3‐month follow‐up, preoperative urinary retention and urine culture status, weight of resected tissue, and histopathological evidence of prostatitis or prostate cancer were recorded. We performed univariable and multivariable gamma‐regression analyses to determine the impact of the aforementioned perioperative variables on preoperative PSA, 3‐month postoperative PSA, and change in PSA. Results Serum PSA reduced significantly at 3 months from 6.3 ± 5.9 ng/mL to 0.6 ± 0.6 ng/mL. On both univariable and multivariable analysis, 3‐month nadir level was independent of all preoperative factors examined, except preoperative urinary retention status. Although patients with smaller prostate (resected tissue weight 80 g) (77.67% vs 89.06%; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bco2.68
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_25da246d62074202b02e4b89b9f96674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_25da246d62074202b02e4b89b9f96674</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2890705575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-afd416ccc8ec172dcd19eb09c14ff842badf38363b36973a70ddca25174da04d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk9rFDEUwAdRbGmL30ACHjyUbfNvksxF0KXqQqEXPYdM8rLNMjMZk5mVHgp-BD9jP4lZdy3twUsSXn75vZe8VNUbgi8IxvSytZFeCPWiOqZCqQWvqXj5ZH1UneW8wYVkhEmGX1dHrOayJowcV_erfjR2QtGjEVKIZTBT2ALyJRpTRnFAg3EhoQxp7tGYYp7MBA-_fucRbPDBIjNMYQ0D6mALXUbGT5DQbez6UA50phxEMMy2g2Iuul2qg-W0euVNl-HsMJ9U3z9ffVt-XVzffFktP14vLBdCLYx3nAhrrQJLJHXWkQZa3FjCvVectsZ5pphgLRONZEZi56yhNZHcGcwdO6lWe6-LZqPHFHqT7nQ0Qf8NxLTWJk2hlKhp7QzlwgmKJaeYtpgCb1XTNr4RQvLi-rB3jXPbg7MwTMl0z6TPd4Zwq9dxq1WjlGBNEbw7CFL8MUOe9CbOaSj311Q1WOK6lnWh3u8pW94qJ_CPGQjWu7brXdu1UIV8-7SgR-5fkwtwvgd-hg7u_ufRn5Y35c-wP-Lgues</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2890705575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of perioperative factors on nadir serum prostate‐specific antigen levels after holmium laser enucleation of prostate</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><creator>Martos, Mary ; Katz, Jonathan E. ; Parmar, Madhumita ; Jain, Anika ; Soodana‐Prakash, Nachiketh ; Punnen, Sanoj ; Gonzalgo, Mark L. ; Miao, Feng ; Reis, Isildinha M. ; Smith, Nicholas ; Shah, Hemendra N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martos, Mary ; Katz, Jonathan E. ; Parmar, Madhumita ; Jain, Anika ; Soodana‐Prakash, Nachiketh ; Punnen, Sanoj ; Gonzalgo, Mark L. ; Miao, Feng ; Reis, Isildinha M. ; Smith, Nicholas ; Shah, Hemendra N.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To investigate the relationship of preoperative prostate size, urinary retention, positive urine culture, and histopathological evidence of prostatitis or incidental prostate cancer on baseline and 3‐month nadir prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) value after Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). Patients and methods Data from 90 patients who underwent a HoLEP by En‐bloc technique were analyzed. PSA values at baseline and at 3‐month follow‐up, preoperative urinary retention and urine culture status, weight of resected tissue, and histopathological evidence of prostatitis or prostate cancer were recorded. We performed univariable and multivariable gamma‐regression analyses to determine the impact of the aforementioned perioperative variables on preoperative PSA, 3‐month postoperative PSA, and change in PSA. Results Serum PSA reduced significantly at 3 months from 6.3 ± 5.9 ng/mL to 0.6 ± 0.6 ng/mL. On both univariable and multivariable analysis, 3‐month nadir level was independent of all preoperative factors examined, except preoperative urinary retention status. Although patients with smaller prostate (resected tissue weight &lt;40 g) had less percentile reduction in PSA when compared with those with larger prostate (resected tissue weight &gt;80 g) (77.67% vs 89.06%; P &lt; .001), patients from both these groups noted a similar PSA nadir level after 3 months (0.54 vs 0.56 ng/dL). The drop in PSA level after HoLEP remained stable up to 1‐year follow‐up. Conclusions PSA nadir 3 months after HoLEP remains relatively consistent across patients, regardless of preoperative prostate size, PSA value, urine culture status, and histopathological evidence of prostatitis or incidental prostate cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2688-4526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2688-4526</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bco2.68</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35475131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Antigens ; Biopsy ; Bladder ; Cancer surgery ; endoscopic enucleation for prostate ; Endoscopy ; Generalized linear models ; HoLEP ; Hyperplasia ; Kruskal-Wallis test ; laser prostatectomy ; Lasers ; Medical screening ; Original ; Patients ; Prostate cancer ; prostate cancer screening ; Radiation therapy ; serum PSA ; transurethral resection of prostate ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Urinary retention ; Urine ; Urological surgery</subject><ispartof>BJUI compass, 2021-05, Vol.2 (3), p.202-210</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-afd416ccc8ec172dcd19eb09c14ff842badf38363b36973a70ddca25174da04d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-afd416ccc8ec172dcd19eb09c14ff842badf38363b36973a70ddca25174da04d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4273-5502 ; 0000-0001-8175-790X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2890705575/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2890705575?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martos, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jonathan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Madhumita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Anika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soodana‐Prakash, Nachiketh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punnen, Sanoj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalgo, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Isildinha M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Hemendra N.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of perioperative factors on nadir serum prostate‐specific antigen levels after holmium laser enucleation of prostate</title><title>BJUI compass</title><addtitle>BJUI Compass</addtitle><description>Objective To investigate the relationship of preoperative prostate size, urinary retention, positive urine culture, and histopathological evidence of prostatitis or incidental prostate cancer on baseline and 3‐month nadir prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) value after Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). Patients and methods Data from 90 patients who underwent a HoLEP by En‐bloc technique were analyzed. PSA values at baseline and at 3‐month follow‐up, preoperative urinary retention and urine culture status, weight of resected tissue, and histopathological evidence of prostatitis or prostate cancer were recorded. We performed univariable and multivariable gamma‐regression analyses to determine the impact of the aforementioned perioperative variables on preoperative PSA, 3‐month postoperative PSA, and change in PSA. Results Serum PSA reduced significantly at 3 months from 6.3 ± 5.9 ng/mL to 0.6 ± 0.6 ng/mL. On both univariable and multivariable analysis, 3‐month nadir level was independent of all preoperative factors examined, except preoperative urinary retention status. Although patients with smaller prostate (resected tissue weight &lt;40 g) had less percentile reduction in PSA when compared with those with larger prostate (resected tissue weight &gt;80 g) (77.67% vs 89.06%; P &lt; .001), patients from both these groups noted a similar PSA nadir level after 3 months (0.54 vs 0.56 ng/dL). The drop in PSA level after HoLEP remained stable up to 1‐year follow‐up. Conclusions PSA nadir 3 months after HoLEP remains relatively consistent across patients, regardless of preoperative prostate size, PSA value, urine culture status, and histopathological evidence of prostatitis or incidental prostate cancer.</description><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>endoscopic enucleation for prostate</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>HoLEP</subject><subject>Hyperplasia</subject><subject>Kruskal-Wallis test</subject><subject>laser prostatectomy</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>prostate cancer screening</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>serum PSA</subject><subject>transurethral resection of prostate</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Urinary retention</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><issn>2688-4526</issn><issn>2688-4526</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk9rFDEUwAdRbGmL30ACHjyUbfNvksxF0KXqQqEXPYdM8rLNMjMZk5mVHgp-BD9jP4lZdy3twUsSXn75vZe8VNUbgi8IxvSytZFeCPWiOqZCqQWvqXj5ZH1UneW8wYVkhEmGX1dHrOayJowcV_erfjR2QtGjEVKIZTBT2ALyJRpTRnFAg3EhoQxp7tGYYp7MBA-_fucRbPDBIjNMYQ0D6mALXUbGT5DQbez6UA50phxEMMy2g2Iuul2qg-W0euVNl-HsMJ9U3z9ffVt-XVzffFktP14vLBdCLYx3nAhrrQJLJHXWkQZa3FjCvVectsZ5pphgLRONZEZi56yhNZHcGcwdO6lWe6-LZqPHFHqT7nQ0Qf8NxLTWJk2hlKhp7QzlwgmKJaeYtpgCb1XTNr4RQvLi-rB3jXPbg7MwTMl0z6TPd4Zwq9dxq1WjlGBNEbw7CFL8MUOe9CbOaSj311Q1WOK6lnWh3u8pW94qJ_CPGQjWu7brXdu1UIV8-7SgR-5fkwtwvgd-hg7u_ufRn5Y35c-wP-Lgues</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Martos, Mary</creator><creator>Katz, Jonathan E.</creator><creator>Parmar, Madhumita</creator><creator>Jain, Anika</creator><creator>Soodana‐Prakash, Nachiketh</creator><creator>Punnen, Sanoj</creator><creator>Gonzalgo, Mark L.</creator><creator>Miao, Feng</creator><creator>Reis, Isildinha M.</creator><creator>Smith, Nicholas</creator><creator>Shah, Hemendra N.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-5502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8175-790X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Impact of perioperative factors on nadir serum prostate‐specific antigen levels after holmium laser enucleation of prostate</title><author>Martos, Mary ; Katz, Jonathan E. ; Parmar, Madhumita ; Jain, Anika ; Soodana‐Prakash, Nachiketh ; Punnen, Sanoj ; Gonzalgo, Mark L. ; Miao, Feng ; Reis, Isildinha M. ; Smith, Nicholas ; Shah, Hemendra N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-afd416ccc8ec172dcd19eb09c14ff842badf38363b36973a70ddca25174da04d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>endoscopic enucleation for prostate</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>HoLEP</topic><topic>Hyperplasia</topic><topic>Kruskal-Wallis test</topic><topic>laser prostatectomy</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>prostate cancer screening</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>serum PSA</topic><topic>transurethral resection of prostate</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Urinary retention</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martos, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jonathan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Madhumita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Anika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soodana‐Prakash, Nachiketh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punnen, Sanoj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalgo, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Isildinha M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Hemendra N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Free Backfiles(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BJUI compass</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martos, Mary</au><au>Katz, Jonathan E.</au><au>Parmar, Madhumita</au><au>Jain, Anika</au><au>Soodana‐Prakash, Nachiketh</au><au>Punnen, Sanoj</au><au>Gonzalgo, Mark L.</au><au>Miao, Feng</au><au>Reis, Isildinha M.</au><au>Smith, Nicholas</au><au>Shah, Hemendra N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of perioperative factors on nadir serum prostate‐specific antigen levels after holmium laser enucleation of prostate</atitle><jtitle>BJUI compass</jtitle><addtitle>BJUI Compass</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>202-210</pages><issn>2688-4526</issn><eissn>2688-4526</eissn><abstract>Objective To investigate the relationship of preoperative prostate size, urinary retention, positive urine culture, and histopathological evidence of prostatitis or incidental prostate cancer on baseline and 3‐month nadir prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) value after Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). Patients and methods Data from 90 patients who underwent a HoLEP by En‐bloc technique were analyzed. PSA values at baseline and at 3‐month follow‐up, preoperative urinary retention and urine culture status, weight of resected tissue, and histopathological evidence of prostatitis or prostate cancer were recorded. We performed univariable and multivariable gamma‐regression analyses to determine the impact of the aforementioned perioperative variables on preoperative PSA, 3‐month postoperative PSA, and change in PSA. Results Serum PSA reduced significantly at 3 months from 6.3 ± 5.9 ng/mL to 0.6 ± 0.6 ng/mL. On both univariable and multivariable analysis, 3‐month nadir level was independent of all preoperative factors examined, except preoperative urinary retention status. Although patients with smaller prostate (resected tissue weight &lt;40 g) had less percentile reduction in PSA when compared with those with larger prostate (resected tissue weight &gt;80 g) (77.67% vs 89.06%; P &lt; .001), patients from both these groups noted a similar PSA nadir level after 3 months (0.54 vs 0.56 ng/dL). The drop in PSA level after HoLEP remained stable up to 1‐year follow‐up. Conclusions PSA nadir 3 months after HoLEP remains relatively consistent across patients, regardless of preoperative prostate size, PSA value, urine culture status, and histopathological evidence of prostatitis or incidental prostate cancer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35475131</pmid><doi>10.1002/bco2.68</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-5502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8175-790X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2688-4526
ispartof BJUI compass, 2021-05, Vol.2 (3), p.202-210
issn 2688-4526
2688-4526
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_25da246d62074202b02e4b89b9f96674
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central(OpenAccess); Wiley Open Access
subjects Antigens
Biopsy
Bladder
Cancer surgery
endoscopic enucleation for prostate
Endoscopy
Generalized linear models
HoLEP
Hyperplasia
Kruskal-Wallis test
laser prostatectomy
Lasers
Medical screening
Original
Patients
Prostate cancer
prostate cancer screening
Radiation therapy
serum PSA
transurethral resection of prostate
Tumors
Ultrasonic imaging
Urinary retention
Urine
Urological surgery
title Impact of perioperative factors on nadir serum prostate‐specific antigen levels after holmium laser enucleation of prostate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A13%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20perioperative%20factors%20on%20nadir%20serum%20prostate%E2%80%90specific%20antigen%20levels%20after%20holmium%20laser%20enucleation%20of%20prostate&rft.jtitle=BJUI%20compass&rft.au=Martos,%20Mary&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=202-210&rft.issn=2688-4526&rft.eissn=2688-4526&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bco2.68&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2890705575%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-afd416ccc8ec172dcd19eb09c14ff842badf38363b36973a70ddca25174da04d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2890705575&rft_id=info:pmid/35475131&rfr_iscdi=true