Loading…
Contraceptive Use Measured in a National Population-Based Approach: Cross-Sectional Study of Administrative Versus Survey Data
Prescribed contraception is used worldwide by over 400 million women of reproductive age. Monitoring contraceptive use is a major public health issue that usually relies on population-based surveys. However, these surveys are conducted on average every 6 years and do not allow close follow-up of con...
Saved in:
Published in: | JMIR public health and surveillance 2024-07, Vol.10, p.e45030 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-85d243864e2cca4d238b5fc2dc20056993d263b4e0f8182c7f74057522f4227d3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | e45030 |
container_title | JMIR public health and surveillance |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Congy, Juliette Rahib, Delphine Leroy, Céline Bouyer, Jean de La Rochebrochard, Elise |
description | Prescribed contraception is used worldwide by over 400 million women of reproductive age. Monitoring contraceptive use is a major public health issue that usually relies on population-based surveys. However, these surveys are conducted on average every 6 years and do not allow close follow-up of contraceptive use. Moreover, their sample size is often too limited for the study of specific population subgroups such as people with low income. Health administrative data could be an innovative and less costly source to study contraceptive use.
We aimed to explore the potential of health administrative data to study prescribed contraceptive use and compare these data with observations based on survey data.
We selected all women aged 15-49 years, covered by French health insurance and living in France, in the health administrative database, which covers 98% of the resident population (n=14,788,124), and in the last French population-based representative survey, the Health Barometer Survey, conducted in 2016 (n=4285). In health administrative data, contraceptive use was recorded with detailed information on the product delivered, whereas in the survey, it was self-declared by the women. In both sources, the prevalence of contraceptive use was estimated globally for all prescribed contraceptives and by type of contraceptive: oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices (IUDs), and implants. Prevalences were analyzed by age.
There were more low-income women in health administrative data than in the population-based survey (1,576,066/14,770,256, 11% vs 188/4285, 7%, respectively; P |
doi_str_mv | 10.2196/45030 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_25ef594b6664426a87ed139ec4fb8967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_25ef594b6664426a87ed139ec4fb8967</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3085131845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-85d243864e2cca4d238b5fc2dc20056993d263b4e0f8182c7f74057522f4227d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkt9v0zAQxyMEYlPpv4AsISR4CPhXHIcXVMpgk8oPqYxXy7Eva6o0zuykUl_42-ekZdrmF9t3n_uez3dJMif4AyWF-MgzzPCz5JwyUaS0EPj5g_NZMg9hizEmQjImi5fJGSswy_Ocnyf_lq7tvTbQ9fUe0HUA9AN0GDxYVLdIo5-6r12rG_TbdUMzXdIvOkT3ouu802bzCS29CyFdgzmh636wB-QqtLC7uq1DTDCp_wUfhoDWg9_DAX3VvX6VvKh0E2B-2mfJ9beLP8vLdPXr-9VysUoNwwSnMrOUMyk4UGM0t5TJMqsMtYZinImiYJYKVnLAlSSSmrzKOc7yjNKKU5pbNkuujrrW6a3qfL3T_qCcrtVkcP5Gad_XpgFFM6iygpdCCM6p0DIHS1gBhlelLEQetT4ftbqh3IE1MH5g80j0saetN-rG7RUhsZi4osL7o8LmSdzlYqVGG-YxOZZyP7LvTtm8ux0g9GpXBwNNo1twQ1AMS0YpprG3s-TNE3TrBh8bMlEZYUTyLFJvj5QZu-ahun8BwWqcJjVNU-RePyzznvo_O-wOhw7B6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3085131845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contraceptive Use Measured in a National Population-Based Approach: Cross-Sectional Study of Administrative Versus Survey Data</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Congy, Juliette ; Rahib, Delphine ; Leroy, Céline ; Bouyer, Jean ; de La Rochebrochard, Elise</creator><creatorcontrib>Congy, Juliette ; Rahib, Delphine ; Leroy, Céline ; Bouyer, Jean ; de La Rochebrochard, Elise</creatorcontrib><description>Prescribed contraception is used worldwide by over 400 million women of reproductive age. Monitoring contraceptive use is a major public health issue that usually relies on population-based surveys. However, these surveys are conducted on average every 6 years and do not allow close follow-up of contraceptive use. Moreover, their sample size is often too limited for the study of specific population subgroups such as people with low income. Health administrative data could be an innovative and less costly source to study contraceptive use.
We aimed to explore the potential of health administrative data to study prescribed contraceptive use and compare these data with observations based on survey data.
We selected all women aged 15-49 years, covered by French health insurance and living in France, in the health administrative database, which covers 98% of the resident population (n=14,788,124), and in the last French population-based representative survey, the Health Barometer Survey, conducted in 2016 (n=4285). In health administrative data, contraceptive use was recorded with detailed information on the product delivered, whereas in the survey, it was self-declared by the women. In both sources, the prevalence of contraceptive use was estimated globally for all prescribed contraceptives and by type of contraceptive: oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices (IUDs), and implants. Prevalences were analyzed by age.
There were more low-income women in health administrative data than in the population-based survey (1,576,066/14,770,256, 11% vs 188/4285, 7%, respectively; P<.001). In health administrative data, 47.6% (7034,710/14,770,256; 95% CI 47.6%-47.7%) of women aged 15-49 years used a prescribed contraceptive versus 50.5% (2297/4285; 95% CI 49.1%-52.0%) in the population-based survey. Considering prevalences by the type of contraceptive in health administrative data versus survey data, they were 26.9% (95% CI 26.9%-26.9%) versus 27.7% (95% CI 26.4%-29.0%) for oral contraceptives, 17.7% (95% CI 17.7%-17.8%) versus 19.6% (95% CI 18.5%-20.8%) for IUDs, and 3% (95% CI 3.0%-3.0%) versus 3.2% (95% CI 2.7%-3.7%) for implants. In both sources, the same overall tendency in prevalence was observed for these 3 contraceptives. Implants remained little used at all ages, oral contraceptives were highly used among young women, whereas IUD use was low among young women.
Compared with survey data, health administrative data exhibited the same overall tendencies for oral contraceptives, IUDs, and implants. One of the main strengths of health administrative data is the high quality of information on contraceptive use and the large number of observations, allowing studies of subgroups of population. Health administrative data therefore appear as a promising new source to monitor contraception in a population-based approach. They could open new perspectives for research and be a valuable new asset to guide public policies on reproductive and sexual health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2369-2960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2369-2960</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2196/45030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39037774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: JMIR Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Birth control ; Contraception - methods ; Contraception - statistics & numerical data ; Contraception Behavior - statistics & numerical data ; Contraceptives ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; France - epidemiology ; Gynecology and obstetrics ; Health insurance ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Intrauterine devices ; IUD ; Life Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Oral administration ; Original Paper ; Polls & surveys ; Public health ; Public policy ; Reproductive health ; Santé publique et épidémiologie ; Sexual health ; Teenagers ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>JMIR public health and surveillance, 2024-07, Vol.10, p.e45030</ispartof><rights>Juliette Congy, Delphine Rahib, Céline Leroy, Jean Bouyer, Elise de La Rochebrochard. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 22.07.2024.</rights><rights>2024. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>Juliette Congy, Delphine Rahib, Céline Leroy, Jean Bouyer, Elise de La Rochebrochard. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 22.07.2024. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-85d243864e2cca4d238b5fc2dc20056993d263b4e0f8182c7f74057522f4227d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9187-0690 ; 0000-0002-1639-7335 ; 0000-0002-9197-3427 ; 0000-0003-4861-0783 ; 0000-0001-9080-8262</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3085131845/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3085131845?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793,74284,74998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39037774$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04664088$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Congy, Juliette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahib, Delphine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leroy, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouyer, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de La Rochebrochard, Elise</creatorcontrib><title>Contraceptive Use Measured in a National Population-Based Approach: Cross-Sectional Study of Administrative Versus Survey Data</title><title>JMIR public health and surveillance</title><addtitle>JMIR Public Health Surveill</addtitle><description>Prescribed contraception is used worldwide by over 400 million women of reproductive age. Monitoring contraceptive use is a major public health issue that usually relies on population-based surveys. However, these surveys are conducted on average every 6 years and do not allow close follow-up of contraceptive use. Moreover, their sample size is often too limited for the study of specific population subgroups such as people with low income. Health administrative data could be an innovative and less costly source to study contraceptive use.
We aimed to explore the potential of health administrative data to study prescribed contraceptive use and compare these data with observations based on survey data.
We selected all women aged 15-49 years, covered by French health insurance and living in France, in the health administrative database, which covers 98% of the resident population (n=14,788,124), and in the last French population-based representative survey, the Health Barometer Survey, conducted in 2016 (n=4285). In health administrative data, contraceptive use was recorded with detailed information on the product delivered, whereas in the survey, it was self-declared by the women. In both sources, the prevalence of contraceptive use was estimated globally for all prescribed contraceptives and by type of contraceptive: oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices (IUDs), and implants. Prevalences were analyzed by age.
There were more low-income women in health administrative data than in the population-based survey (1,576,066/14,770,256, 11% vs 188/4285, 7%, respectively; P<.001). In health administrative data, 47.6% (7034,710/14,770,256; 95% CI 47.6%-47.7%) of women aged 15-49 years used a prescribed contraceptive versus 50.5% (2297/4285; 95% CI 49.1%-52.0%) in the population-based survey. Considering prevalences by the type of contraceptive in health administrative data versus survey data, they were 26.9% (95% CI 26.9%-26.9%) versus 27.7% (95% CI 26.4%-29.0%) for oral contraceptives, 17.7% (95% CI 17.7%-17.8%) versus 19.6% (95% CI 18.5%-20.8%) for IUDs, and 3% (95% CI 3.0%-3.0%) versus 3.2% (95% CI 2.7%-3.7%) for implants. In both sources, the same overall tendency in prevalence was observed for these 3 contraceptives. Implants remained little used at all ages, oral contraceptives were highly used among young women, whereas IUD use was low among young women.
Compared with survey data, health administrative data exhibited the same overall tendencies for oral contraceptives, IUDs, and implants. One of the main strengths of health administrative data is the high quality of information on contraceptive use and the large number of observations, allowing studies of subgroups of population. Health administrative data therefore appear as a promising new source to monitor contraception in a population-based approach. They could open new perspectives for research and be a valuable new asset to guide public policies on reproductive and sexual health.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Contraception - methods</subject><subject>Contraception - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Contraception Behavior - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Contraceptives</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gynecology and obstetrics</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intrauterine devices</subject><subject>IUD</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oral administration</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><subject>Sexual health</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2369-2960</issn><issn>2369-2960</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkt9v0zAQxyMEYlPpv4AsISR4CPhXHIcXVMpgk8oPqYxXy7Eva6o0zuykUl_42-ekZdrmF9t3n_uez3dJMif4AyWF-MgzzPCz5JwyUaS0EPj5g_NZMg9hizEmQjImi5fJGSswy_Ocnyf_lq7tvTbQ9fUe0HUA9AN0GDxYVLdIo5-6r12rG_TbdUMzXdIvOkT3ouu802bzCS29CyFdgzmh636wB-QqtLC7uq1DTDCp_wUfhoDWg9_DAX3VvX6VvKh0E2B-2mfJ9beLP8vLdPXr-9VysUoNwwSnMrOUMyk4UGM0t5TJMqsMtYZinImiYJYKVnLAlSSSmrzKOc7yjNKKU5pbNkuujrrW6a3qfL3T_qCcrtVkcP5Gad_XpgFFM6iygpdCCM6p0DIHS1gBhlelLEQetT4ftbqh3IE1MH5g80j0saetN-rG7RUhsZi4osL7o8LmSdzlYqVGG-YxOZZyP7LvTtm8ux0g9GpXBwNNo1twQ1AMS0YpprG3s-TNE3TrBh8bMlEZYUTyLFJvj5QZu-ahun8BwWqcJjVNU-RePyzznvo_O-wOhw7B6Q</recordid><startdate>20240722</startdate><enddate>20240722</enddate><creator>Congy, Juliette</creator><creator>Rahib, Delphine</creator><creator>Leroy, Céline</creator><creator>Bouyer, Jean</creator><creator>de La Rochebrochard, Elise</creator><general>JMIR Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-0690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1639-7335</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9197-3427</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4861-0783</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9080-8262</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240722</creationdate><title>Contraceptive Use Measured in a National Population-Based Approach: Cross-Sectional Study of Administrative Versus Survey Data</title><author>Congy, Juliette ; Rahib, Delphine ; Leroy, Céline ; Bouyer, Jean ; de La Rochebrochard, Elise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-85d243864e2cca4d238b5fc2dc20056993d263b4e0f8182c7f74057522f4227d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Contraception - methods</topic><topic>Contraception - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Contraception Behavior - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Contraceptives</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gynecology and obstetrics</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intrauterine devices</topic><topic>IUD</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oral administration</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><topic>Sexual health</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Congy, Juliette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahib, Delphine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leroy, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouyer, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de La Rochebrochard, Elise</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>JMIR public health and surveillance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Congy, Juliette</au><au>Rahib, Delphine</au><au>Leroy, Céline</au><au>Bouyer, Jean</au><au>de La Rochebrochard, Elise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contraceptive Use Measured in a National Population-Based Approach: Cross-Sectional Study of Administrative Versus Survey Data</atitle><jtitle>JMIR public health and surveillance</jtitle><addtitle>JMIR Public Health Surveill</addtitle><date>2024-07-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>e45030</spage><pages>e45030-</pages><issn>2369-2960</issn><eissn>2369-2960</eissn><abstract>Prescribed contraception is used worldwide by over 400 million women of reproductive age. Monitoring contraceptive use is a major public health issue that usually relies on population-based surveys. However, these surveys are conducted on average every 6 years and do not allow close follow-up of contraceptive use. Moreover, their sample size is often too limited for the study of specific population subgroups such as people with low income. Health administrative data could be an innovative and less costly source to study contraceptive use.
We aimed to explore the potential of health administrative data to study prescribed contraceptive use and compare these data with observations based on survey data.
We selected all women aged 15-49 years, covered by French health insurance and living in France, in the health administrative database, which covers 98% of the resident population (n=14,788,124), and in the last French population-based representative survey, the Health Barometer Survey, conducted in 2016 (n=4285). In health administrative data, contraceptive use was recorded with detailed information on the product delivered, whereas in the survey, it was self-declared by the women. In both sources, the prevalence of contraceptive use was estimated globally for all prescribed contraceptives and by type of contraceptive: oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices (IUDs), and implants. Prevalences were analyzed by age.
There were more low-income women in health administrative data than in the population-based survey (1,576,066/14,770,256, 11% vs 188/4285, 7%, respectively; P<.001). In health administrative data, 47.6% (7034,710/14,770,256; 95% CI 47.6%-47.7%) of women aged 15-49 years used a prescribed contraceptive versus 50.5% (2297/4285; 95% CI 49.1%-52.0%) in the population-based survey. Considering prevalences by the type of contraceptive in health administrative data versus survey data, they were 26.9% (95% CI 26.9%-26.9%) versus 27.7% (95% CI 26.4%-29.0%) for oral contraceptives, 17.7% (95% CI 17.7%-17.8%) versus 19.6% (95% CI 18.5%-20.8%) for IUDs, and 3% (95% CI 3.0%-3.0%) versus 3.2% (95% CI 2.7%-3.7%) for implants. In both sources, the same overall tendency in prevalence was observed for these 3 contraceptives. Implants remained little used at all ages, oral contraceptives were highly used among young women, whereas IUD use was low among young women.
Compared with survey data, health administrative data exhibited the same overall tendencies for oral contraceptives, IUDs, and implants. One of the main strengths of health administrative data is the high quality of information on contraceptive use and the large number of observations, allowing studies of subgroups of population. Health administrative data therefore appear as a promising new source to monitor contraception in a population-based approach. They could open new perspectives for research and be a valuable new asset to guide public policies on reproductive and sexual health.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>JMIR Publications</pub><pmid>39037774</pmid><doi>10.2196/45030</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-0690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1639-7335</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9197-3427</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4861-0783</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9080-8262</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2369-2960 |
ispartof | JMIR public health and surveillance, 2024-07, Vol.10, p.e45030 |
issn | 2369-2960 2369-2960 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_25ef594b6664426a87ed139ec4fb8967 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Birth control Contraception - methods Contraception - statistics & numerical data Contraception Behavior - statistics & numerical data Contraceptives Cross-Sectional Studies Female France - epidemiology Gynecology and obstetrics Health insurance Human health and pathology Humans Intrauterine devices IUD Life Sciences Middle Aged Oral administration Original Paper Polls & surveys Public health Public policy Reproductive health Santé publique et épidémiologie Sexual health Teenagers Womens health Young Adult |
title | Contraceptive Use Measured in a National Population-Based Approach: Cross-Sectional Study of Administrative Versus Survey Data |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A21%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contraceptive%20Use%20Measured%20in%20a%20National%20Population-Based%20Approach:%20Cross-Sectional%20Study%20of%20Administrative%20Versus%20Survey%20Data&rft.jtitle=JMIR%20public%20health%20and%20surveillance&rft.au=Congy,%20Juliette&rft.date=2024-07-22&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=e45030&rft.pages=e45030-&rft.issn=2369-2960&rft.eissn=2369-2960&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196/45030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3085131845%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-85d243864e2cca4d238b5fc2dc20056993d263b4e0f8182c7f74057522f4227d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3085131845&rft_id=info:pmid/39037774&rfr_iscdi=true |