Loading…

Observational retrospective study of UK national success, risks and costs for 319,105 IVF/ICSI and 30,669 IUI treatment cycles

ObjectiveTo compare success rates, associated risks and cost-effectiveness between intrauterine insemination (IUI) and in vitro fertilisation (IVF).DesignRetrospective observational study.SettingThe UK from 2012 to 2016.ParticipantsData from Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority’s freedom of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ open 2020-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e034566-e034566
Main Authors: Bahadur, Gulam, Homburg, Roy, Bosmans, Judith E, Huirne, Judith A F, Hinstridge, Peter, Jayaprakasan, Kanna, Racich, Paul, Alam, Rakib, Karapanos, Ioannis, Illahibuccus, Afeeza, Al-Habib, Ansam, Jauniaux, Eric
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectiveTo compare success rates, associated risks and cost-effectiveness between intrauterine insemination (IUI) and in vitro fertilisation (IVF).DesignRetrospective observational study.SettingThe UK from 2012 to 2016.ParticipantsData from Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority’s freedom of information request for 2012–2016 for IVF/ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection)and IUI as practiced in 319 105 IVF/ICSI and 30 669 IUI cycles. Direct-cost calculations for maternal and neonatal expenditure per live birth (LB) was constructed using the cost of multiple birth model, with inflation-adjusted Bank of England index-linked data. A second direct-cost analysis evaluating the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) was modelled using the 2016 national mean (baseline) IVF and IUI success rates.Outcome measuresLB, risks from IVF and IUI, and costs to gain 1 LB.ResultsThis largest comprehensive analysis integrating success, risks and costs at a national level shows IUI is safer and more cost-effective than IVF treatment.IVF LB/cycle success was significantly better than IUI at 26.96% versus 11.49% (p
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034566