Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation devices in the removal of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals

To evaluate the efficacy of different sonic and ultrasonic devices in the elimination of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals. A resin model of a transparent radicular canal filled with dentin debris was used. Five groups were tested, namely: Group 1 - ultrasonic insert 15.02;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied oral science 2019-01, Vol.27, p.e20180045-e20180045
Main Authors: Plotino, Gianluca, Grande, Nicola M, Mercade, Montse, Cortese, Teresa, Staffoli, Simone, Gambarini, Gianluca, Testarelli, Luca
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dental Instruments - standards
Dentin
Dentistry
DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Disinfection
Edetic Acid - chemistry
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
Humans
Irrigation
Materials Testing
Original
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Root canal
Root Canal Irrigants - chemistry
Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation
Root Canal Preparation - methods
Sodium hypochlorite
Sodium Hypochlorite - chemistry
Sonication - instrumentation
Sonication - methods
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surface Properties
Therapeutic Irrigation - instrumentation
Therapeutic Irrigation - methods
Time Factors
Ultrasonic Therapy - instrumentation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate the efficacy of different sonic and ultrasonic devices in the elimination of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals. A resin model of a transparent radicular canal filled with dentin debris was used. Five groups were tested, namely: Group 1 - ultrasonic insert 15.02; Group 2 - ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI K; Group 3 - ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI S; Group 4 - sonic insert 20/28 Eddy on a vibrating sonic air-scaler handpiece; Group 5 - 20.02 K-file inserted on a Safety M4 handpiece. Two different irrigants (5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA) and 3 different times of activation (20, 40, and 60 seconds) were tested. Means and standard deviations were calculated and statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests (p
ISSN:1678-7757
1678-7765
1678-7765
DOI:10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0045