Impact of Stylet Bend Angle on the Performance of Orotracheal Intubation by Emergency Response Nurses: A Randomized Simulation Study

Aim: To determine the effect of stylet bend angle on the time to tracheal intubation and the success rate by emergency response nurses in a simulated situation.Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted. Each participant performed six intubation attempts, three with 30° and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Eurasian journal of emergency medicine 2018-06, Vol.17 (2), p.45-49
Main Authors: Golaghaie, Farzaneh, Momeni, Reza, Jafarimanesh, Hadi, Golestanieraghi, Majid, Golitaleb, Mohamad, Rafiei, Fatemeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical outcomes
direct laryngoscopy
Emergency medical care
Emergency response team
endotracheal intubation
Intubation
Laryngoscopy
Nurses
stylet
Throat
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 49
container_issue 2
container_start_page 45
container_title Eurasian journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 17
creator Golaghaie, Farzaneh
Momeni, Reza
Jafarimanesh, Hadi
Golestanieraghi, Majid
Golitaleb, Mohamad
Rafiei, Fatemeh
description Aim: To determine the effect of stylet bend angle on the time to tracheal intubation and the success rate by emergency response nurses in a simulated situation.Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted. Each participant performed six intubation attempts, three with 30° and three with 60° stylet angles. Each stylet angle was tested totally 105 times. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze data.Results: The overall success rate of simulated tracheal intubations was 94%. The mean time to successful intubation (in seconds) was 10.99±18.80 and 13.04±18.82 for 30° and 60° stylet bend angles, respectively. The 30° stylet bend angle significantly reduced the time to intubation (p
doi_str_mv 10.5152/eajem.2018.78942
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_26a6ed4414f7452f895e961eb8db3312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_26a6ed4414f7452f895e961eb8db3312</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2092842224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5568e1d725ea90106c239c6c26ad18c42f48c844e4bb75a9bd6286449f8cce803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkDFPwzAQhSMEEhV0Z7TEnGI7dmKzlapApYqiFubIsS9tqsQOjjOEmR9OoF3enZ7efTq9KLojeMYJpw-gjtDMKCZilgnJ6EU0oYTJOMVMXJ53LnB2HU277ogxppRxKZNJ9LNqWqUDciXahaGGgJ7AGjS3-xqQsygcAL2DL51vlNXwl9t4F7zSB1A1WtnQFypUY7IY0LIBvwerB7SFrnW2A_TW-w66RzRHW2WNa6pvMGhXNX19utqF3gy30VWp6g6m53kTfT4vPxav8XrzslrM17FOqAwx56kAYjLKQUlMcKppIvWoqTJEaEZLJrRgDFhRZFzJwqRUpIzJUmgNAic30erENU4d89ZXjfJD7lSV_xvO73PlQ6VryEdmCoYxwsqMcVoKyUGmBAphiiQhdGTdn1itd189dCE_ut7b8f2cYkkFo2PHyS8G1n1c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2092842224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Stylet Bend Angle on the Performance of Orotracheal Intubation by Emergency Response Nurses: A Randomized Simulation Study</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Golaghaie, Farzaneh ; Momeni, Reza ; Jafarimanesh, Hadi ; Golestanieraghi, Majid ; Golitaleb, Mohamad ; Rafiei, Fatemeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Golaghaie, Farzaneh ; Momeni, Reza ; Jafarimanesh, Hadi ; Golestanieraghi, Majid ; Golitaleb, Mohamad ; Rafiei, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: To determine the effect of stylet bend angle on the time to tracheal intubation and the success rate by emergency response nurses in a simulated situation.Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted. Each participant performed six intubation attempts, three with 30° and three with 60° stylet angles. Each stylet angle was tested totally 105 times. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze data.Results: The overall success rate of simulated tracheal intubations was 94%. The mean time to successful intubation (in seconds) was 10.99±18.80 and 13.04±18.82 for 30° and 60° stylet bend angles, respectively. The 30° stylet bend angle significantly reduced the time to intubation (p&lt;0.01).Conclusion: Using the 30° stylet bend angle resulted in faster tracheal intubation by the emergency response nurses in the simulated situation.Cite this article as: Golaghaie F, Momeni R, Jafarimanesh H, Golestanieraghi M, Golitaleb M, Rafiei F. Impact of Stylet Bend Angle on the Performance of Orotracheal Intubation by Emergency Response Nurses: A Randomized Simulation Study. Eurasian J Emerg Med 2018; 17: 45-9.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2149-5807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2149-6048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5152/eajem.2018.78942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ankara: Galenos Publishing House</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; direct laryngoscopy ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency response team ; endotracheal intubation ; Intubation ; Laryngoscopy ; Nurses ; stylet ; Throat</subject><ispartof>Eurasian journal of emergency medicine, 2018-06, Vol.17 (2), p.45-49</ispartof><rights>2018. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at http://www.akademikaciltip.com/eng/sayfalar/114/Copyright</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2092842224/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2092842224?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Golaghaie, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momeni, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafarimanesh, Hadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golestanieraghi, Majid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golitaleb, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rafiei, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Stylet Bend Angle on the Performance of Orotracheal Intubation by Emergency Response Nurses: A Randomized Simulation Study</title><title>Eurasian journal of emergency medicine</title><description>Aim: To determine the effect of stylet bend angle on the time to tracheal intubation and the success rate by emergency response nurses in a simulated situation.Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted. Each participant performed six intubation attempts, three with 30° and three with 60° stylet angles. Each stylet angle was tested totally 105 times. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze data.Results: The overall success rate of simulated tracheal intubations was 94%. The mean time to successful intubation (in seconds) was 10.99±18.80 and 13.04±18.82 for 30° and 60° stylet bend angles, respectively. The 30° stylet bend angle significantly reduced the time to intubation (p&lt;0.01).Conclusion: Using the 30° stylet bend angle resulted in faster tracheal intubation by the emergency response nurses in the simulated situation.Cite this article as: Golaghaie F, Momeni R, Jafarimanesh H, Golestanieraghi M, Golitaleb M, Rafiei F. Impact of Stylet Bend Angle on the Performance of Orotracheal Intubation by Emergency Response Nurses: A Randomized Simulation Study. Eurasian J Emerg Med 2018; 17: 45-9.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>direct laryngoscopy</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency response team</subject><subject>endotracheal intubation</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Laryngoscopy</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>stylet</subject><subject>Throat</subject><issn>2149-5807</issn><issn>2149-6048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNotkDFPwzAQhSMEEhV0Z7TEnGI7dmKzlapApYqiFubIsS9tqsQOjjOEmR9OoF3enZ7efTq9KLojeMYJpw-gjtDMKCZilgnJ6EU0oYTJOMVMXJ53LnB2HU277ogxppRxKZNJ9LNqWqUDciXahaGGgJ7AGjS3-xqQsygcAL2DL51vlNXwl9t4F7zSB1A1WtnQFypUY7IY0LIBvwerB7SFrnW2A_TW-w66RzRHW2WNa6pvMGhXNX19utqF3gy30VWp6g6m53kTfT4vPxav8XrzslrM17FOqAwx56kAYjLKQUlMcKppIvWoqTJEaEZLJrRgDFhRZFzJwqRUpIzJUmgNAic30erENU4d89ZXjfJD7lSV_xvO73PlQ6VryEdmCoYxwsqMcVoKyUGmBAphiiQhdGTdn1itd189dCE_ut7b8f2cYkkFo2PHyS8G1n1c</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Golaghaie, Farzaneh</creator><creator>Momeni, Reza</creator><creator>Jafarimanesh, Hadi</creator><creator>Golestanieraghi, Majid</creator><creator>Golitaleb, Mohamad</creator><creator>Rafiei, Fatemeh</creator><general>Galenos Publishing House</general><general>Galenos Yayinevi</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Impact of Stylet Bend Angle on the Performance of Orotracheal Intubation by Emergency Response Nurses: A Randomized Simulation Study</title><author>Golaghaie, Farzaneh ; Momeni, Reza ; Jafarimanesh, Hadi ; Golestanieraghi, Majid ; Golitaleb, Mohamad ; Rafiei, Fatemeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5568e1d725ea90106c239c6c26ad18c42f48c844e4bb75a9bd6286449f8cce803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>direct laryngoscopy</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency response team</topic><topic>endotracheal intubation</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Laryngoscopy</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>stylet</topic><topic>Throat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Golaghaie, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momeni, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafarimanesh, Hadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golestanieraghi, Majid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golitaleb, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rafiei, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Eurasian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Golaghaie, Farzaneh</au><au>Momeni, Reza</au><au>Jafarimanesh, Hadi</au><au>Golestanieraghi, Majid</au><au>Golitaleb, Mohamad</au><au>Rafiei, Fatemeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Stylet Bend Angle on the Performance of Orotracheal Intubation by Emergency Response Nurses: A Randomized Simulation Study</atitle><jtitle>Eurasian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>45-49</pages><issn>2149-5807</issn><eissn>2149-6048</eissn><abstract>Aim: To determine the effect of stylet bend angle on the time to tracheal intubation and the success rate by emergency response nurses in a simulated situation.Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted. Each participant performed six intubation attempts, three with 30° and three with 60° stylet angles. Each stylet angle was tested totally 105 times. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze data.Results: The overall success rate of simulated tracheal intubations was 94%. The mean time to successful intubation (in seconds) was 10.99±18.80 and 13.04±18.82 for 30° and 60° stylet bend angles, respectively. The 30° stylet bend angle significantly reduced the time to intubation (p&lt;0.01).Conclusion: Using the 30° stylet bend angle resulted in faster tracheal intubation by the emergency response nurses in the simulated situation.Cite this article as: Golaghaie F, Momeni R, Jafarimanesh H, Golestanieraghi M, Golitaleb M, Rafiei F. Impact of Stylet Bend Angle on the Performance of Orotracheal Intubation by Emergency Response Nurses: A Randomized Simulation Study. Eurasian J Emerg Med 2018; 17: 45-9.</abstract><cop>Ankara</cop><pub>Galenos Publishing House</pub><doi>10.5152/eajem.2018.78942</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2149-5807
ispartof Eurasian journal of emergency medicine, 2018-06, Vol.17 (2), p.45-49
issn 2149-5807
2149-6048
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_26a6ed4414f7452f895e961eb8db3312
source ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Clinical outcomes
direct laryngoscopy
Emergency medical care
Emergency response team
endotracheal intubation
Intubation
Laryngoscopy
Nurses
stylet
Throat
title Impact of Stylet Bend Angle on the Performance of Orotracheal Intubation by Emergency Response Nurses: A Randomized Simulation Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A39%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Stylet%20Bend%20Angle%20on%20the%20Performance%20of%20Orotracheal%20Intubation%20by%20Emergency%20Response%20Nurses:%20A%20Randomized%20Simulation%20Study&rft.jtitle=Eurasian%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Golaghaie,%20Farzaneh&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=45-49&rft.issn=2149-5807&rft.eissn=2149-6048&rft_id=info:doi/10.5152/eajem.2018.78942&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2092842224%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5568e1d725ea90106c239c6c26ad18c42f48c844e4bb75a9bd6286449f8cce803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2092842224&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true