Methods and Ethics in Qualitative Research Exploring Young Children’s Voice: A Systematic Review

Young children have rights; they are agents and active constructors of their social worlds. Despite well-established theoretical foundations, the ‘methods’ and ‘ethics’ of qualitative research to elicit young children’s voice require further exploration to ensure young children are central to our re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of qualitative methods 2023-01, Vol.22
Main Authors: Sun, Yihan, Blewitt, Claire, Edwards, Susan, Fraser, Alexandra, Newman, Shannon, Cornelius, Julia, Skouteris, Helen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Childhood
Children
Early childhood education
Ethics
Indigenous peoples
Innovations
Qualitative research
Research ethics
Systematic review
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Young children have rights; they are agents and active constructors of their social worlds. Despite well-established theoretical foundations, the ‘methods’ and ‘ethics’ of qualitative research to elicit young children’s voice require further exploration to ensure young children are central to our research endeavors. This systematic review examined studies that sought to capture young children’s (3–6 years) voice in Early Childhood Education and Care settings. Fifty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Interview was found to be the most common strategy; this is often coupled with other child-friendly methods. Findings suggest that young children are increasingly listened to; however, there appears to be a need to further promote children’s agency and the inclusion of assent-seeking as an ongoing process. Gaps in methods supporting the inclusion of children with additional needs and Indigenous children are also evident. In addition, advancing non-permanent methods of meaning making to support children’s participation appears ripe for methodological innovation.
ISSN:1609-4069
1609-4069
DOI:10.1177/16094069231152449