Loading…
3D Structural Topology Optimization Using ESO, SESO and SERA: Comparison and an Extension to Flexible Mechanisms
This article investigates the study of Topology Optimization (TO) in 3D elasticity problems to determine the optimal topology by applying the evolutionary methods of Smoothing Evolutionary Structural Optimization (SESO), Sequential Element Rejection and Admission (SERA), and Evolutionary Structural...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied sciences 2023-05, Vol.13 (10), p.6215 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 6215 |
container_title | Applied sciences |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Simonetti, Hélio Luiz Almeida, Valério S. Neves, Francisco de Assis das Almeida, Virgil Del Duca Cutrim, Marlan D. S. |
description | This article investigates the study of Topology Optimization (TO) in 3D elasticity problems to determine the optimal topology by applying the evolutionary methods of Smoothing Evolutionary Structural Optimization (SESO), Sequential Element Rejection and Admission (SERA), and Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO). These procedures were implemented in MATLAB code as an extension of Top3d implemented for SIMP by using the eight-node hexahedral finite element formulation in three-dimensional elastostatic structures. The approaches conducted in the present study are demonstrated with numerical examples involving the compliance minimization criterion. Further, a brief synthesis of flexible mechanisms was studied to emphasize the performance of complaint mechanisms measured in terms of two design specifications/functionalities: mechanical and geometrical advantages, which are the highlights of this article. To show the gains of the proposed methods, numerical results obtained are compared with Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/app13106215 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_27035e65da5a48708d4717d12da90f51</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A752311044</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_27035e65da5a48708d4717d12da90f51</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A752311044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUV1rGzEQPEoLDWme-gcEfWydaqXT6a5vxnXaQIqhTp7FWh-uzJ10lWRI8usr16VkF3aXYWZ2YZvmPdBrzgf6GecZONCOgXjVXDAquwVvQb5-Mb9trnI-0BoD8B7oRTPzr2Rb0lGXY8KR3Mc5jnH_RDZz8ZN_xuJjIA_Zhz1ZbzefyLZWgsHU4efyC1nFacbkcyWdQAxk_VhsyCdVieRmtI9-N1ryw-pfGHye8rvmjcMx26t__bJ5uFnfr74v7jbfblfLu4VuKS8LiwhaazDWaun6bgfOMYMdc3THhoH3EgGQWgCBstVUWC2clgZ3SI0Ukl82t2dfE_Gg5uQnTE8qold_gZj2ClPxerSKScqF7YRBgW0vaW9aCdJA3TdQJ6B6fTh7zSn-Ptpc1CEeU6jnK9bDwGQvu76yrs-sPVZTH1wsCXVNYyevY7DOV3wpBeMAtG2r4ONZoFPMOVn3_0yg6vRS9eKl_A-0m5Jz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2819278768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>3D Structural Topology Optimization Using ESO, SESO and SERA: Comparison and an Extension to Flexible Mechanisms</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz ; Almeida, Valério S. ; Neves, Francisco de Assis das ; Almeida, Virgil Del Duca ; Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz ; Almeida, Valério S. ; Neves, Francisco de Assis das ; Almeida, Virgil Del Duca ; Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</creatorcontrib><description>This article investigates the study of Topology Optimization (TO) in 3D elasticity problems to determine the optimal topology by applying the evolutionary methods of Smoothing Evolutionary Structural Optimization (SESO), Sequential Element Rejection and Admission (SERA), and Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO). These procedures were implemented in MATLAB code as an extension of Top3d implemented for SIMP by using the eight-node hexahedral finite element formulation in three-dimensional elastostatic structures. The approaches conducted in the present study are demonstrated with numerical examples involving the compliance minimization criterion. Further, a brief synthesis of flexible mechanisms was studied to emphasize the performance of complaint mechanisms measured in terms of two design specifications/functionalities: mechanical and geometrical advantages, which are the highlights of this article. To show the gains of the proposed methods, numerical results obtained are compared with Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/app13106215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Additive manufacturing ; Compliance ; Elastostatics ; ESO ; Evolution ; Hexahedral finite elements ; Isotropic material ; MATLAB ; Methods ; Modulus of elasticity ; Numerical methods ; Optimization ; Sensitivity analysis ; SERA ; SESO ; SIMP ; Topology ; Topology optimization ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Applied sciences, 2023-05, Vol.13 (10), p.6215</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4440-0439 ; 0000-0003-2735-1751 ; 0000-0003-3796-1924</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2819278768/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2819278768?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Valério S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Francisco de Assis das</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Virgil Del Duca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</creatorcontrib><title>3D Structural Topology Optimization Using ESO, SESO and SERA: Comparison and an Extension to Flexible Mechanisms</title><title>Applied sciences</title><description>This article investigates the study of Topology Optimization (TO) in 3D elasticity problems to determine the optimal topology by applying the evolutionary methods of Smoothing Evolutionary Structural Optimization (SESO), Sequential Element Rejection and Admission (SERA), and Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO). These procedures were implemented in MATLAB code as an extension of Top3d implemented for SIMP by using the eight-node hexahedral finite element formulation in three-dimensional elastostatic structures. The approaches conducted in the present study are demonstrated with numerical examples involving the compliance minimization criterion. Further, a brief synthesis of flexible mechanisms was studied to emphasize the performance of complaint mechanisms measured in terms of two design specifications/functionalities: mechanical and geometrical advantages, which are the highlights of this article. To show the gains of the proposed methods, numerical results obtained are compared with Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) models.</description><subject>Additive manufacturing</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Elastostatics</subject><subject>ESO</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Hexahedral finite elements</subject><subject>Isotropic material</subject><subject>MATLAB</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Numerical methods</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>SERA</subject><subject>SESO</subject><subject>SIMP</subject><subject>Topology</subject><subject>Topology optimization</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2076-3417</issn><issn>2076-3417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUV1rGzEQPEoLDWme-gcEfWydaqXT6a5vxnXaQIqhTp7FWh-uzJ10lWRI8usr16VkF3aXYWZ2YZvmPdBrzgf6GecZONCOgXjVXDAquwVvQb5-Mb9trnI-0BoD8B7oRTPzr2Rb0lGXY8KR3Mc5jnH_RDZz8ZN_xuJjIA_Zhz1ZbzefyLZWgsHU4efyC1nFacbkcyWdQAxk_VhsyCdVieRmtI9-N1ryw-pfGHye8rvmjcMx26t__bJ5uFnfr74v7jbfblfLu4VuKS8LiwhaazDWaun6bgfOMYMdc3THhoH3EgGQWgCBstVUWC2clgZ3SI0Ukl82t2dfE_Gg5uQnTE8qold_gZj2ClPxerSKScqF7YRBgW0vaW9aCdJA3TdQJ6B6fTh7zSn-Ptpc1CEeU6jnK9bDwGQvu76yrs-sPVZTH1wsCXVNYyevY7DOV3wpBeMAtG2r4ONZoFPMOVn3_0yg6vRS9eKl_A-0m5Jz</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz</creator><creator>Almeida, Valério S.</creator><creator>Neves, Francisco de Assis das</creator><creator>Almeida, Virgil Del Duca</creator><creator>Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-0439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2735-1751</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3796-1924</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>3D Structural Topology Optimization Using ESO, SESO and SERA: Comparison and an Extension to Flexible Mechanisms</title><author>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz ; Almeida, Valério S. ; Neves, Francisco de Assis das ; Almeida, Virgil Del Duca ; Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Additive manufacturing</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Elastostatics</topic><topic>ESO</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Hexahedral finite elements</topic><topic>Isotropic material</topic><topic>MATLAB</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Numerical methods</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>SERA</topic><topic>SESO</topic><topic>SIMP</topic><topic>Topology</topic><topic>Topology optimization</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Valério S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Francisco de Assis das</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Virgil Del Duca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz</au><au>Almeida, Valério S.</au><au>Neves, Francisco de Assis das</au><au>Almeida, Virgil Del Duca</au><au>Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>3D Structural Topology Optimization Using ESO, SESO and SERA: Comparison and an Extension to Flexible Mechanisms</atitle><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>6215</spage><pages>6215-</pages><issn>2076-3417</issn><eissn>2076-3417</eissn><abstract>This article investigates the study of Topology Optimization (TO) in 3D elasticity problems to determine the optimal topology by applying the evolutionary methods of Smoothing Evolutionary Structural Optimization (SESO), Sequential Element Rejection and Admission (SERA), and Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO). These procedures were implemented in MATLAB code as an extension of Top3d implemented for SIMP by using the eight-node hexahedral finite element formulation in three-dimensional elastostatic structures. The approaches conducted in the present study are demonstrated with numerical examples involving the compliance minimization criterion. Further, a brief synthesis of flexible mechanisms was studied to emphasize the performance of complaint mechanisms measured in terms of two design specifications/functionalities: mechanical and geometrical advantages, which are the highlights of this article. To show the gains of the proposed methods, numerical results obtained are compared with Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) models.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/app13106215</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-0439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2735-1751</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3796-1924</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2076-3417 |
ispartof | Applied sciences, 2023-05, Vol.13 (10), p.6215 |
issn | 2076-3417 2076-3417 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_27035e65da5a48708d4717d12da90f51 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Additive manufacturing Compliance Elastostatics ESO Evolution Hexahedral finite elements Isotropic material MATLAB Methods Modulus of elasticity Numerical methods Optimization Sensitivity analysis SERA SESO SIMP Topology Topology optimization Variables |
title | 3D Structural Topology Optimization Using ESO, SESO and SERA: Comparison and an Extension to Flexible Mechanisms |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A02%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=3D%20Structural%20Topology%20Optimization%20Using%20ESO,%20SESO%20and%20SERA:%20Comparison%20and%20an%20Extension%20to%20Flexible%20Mechanisms&rft.jtitle=Applied%20sciences&rft.au=Simonetti,%20H%C3%A9lio%20Luiz&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=6215&rft.pages=6215-&rft.issn=2076-3417&rft.eissn=2076-3417&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/app13106215&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA752311044%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2819278768&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A752311044&rfr_iscdi=true |