Loading…

3D Structural Topology Optimization Using ESO, SESO and SERA: Comparison and an Extension to Flexible Mechanisms

This article investigates the study of Topology Optimization (TO) in 3D elasticity problems to determine the optimal topology by applying the evolutionary methods of Smoothing Evolutionary Structural Optimization (SESO), Sequential Element Rejection and Admission (SERA), and Evolutionary Structural...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied sciences 2023-05, Vol.13 (10), p.6215
Main Authors: Simonetti, Hélio Luiz, Almeida, Valério S., Neves, Francisco de Assis das, Almeida, Virgil Del Duca, Cutrim, Marlan D. S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 6215
container_title Applied sciences
container_volume 13
creator Simonetti, Hélio Luiz
Almeida, Valério S.
Neves, Francisco de Assis das
Almeida, Virgil Del Duca
Cutrim, Marlan D. S.
description This article investigates the study of Topology Optimization (TO) in 3D elasticity problems to determine the optimal topology by applying the evolutionary methods of Smoothing Evolutionary Structural Optimization (SESO), Sequential Element Rejection and Admission (SERA), and Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO). These procedures were implemented in MATLAB code as an extension of Top3d implemented for SIMP by using the eight-node hexahedral finite element formulation in three-dimensional elastostatic structures. The approaches conducted in the present study are demonstrated with numerical examples involving the compliance minimization criterion. Further, a brief synthesis of flexible mechanisms was studied to emphasize the performance of complaint mechanisms measured in terms of two design specifications/functionalities: mechanical and geometrical advantages, which are the highlights of this article. To show the gains of the proposed methods, numerical results obtained are compared with Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) models.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/app13106215
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_27035e65da5a48708d4717d12da90f51</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A752311044</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_27035e65da5a48708d4717d12da90f51</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A752311044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUV1rGzEQPEoLDWme-gcEfWydaqXT6a5vxnXaQIqhTp7FWh-uzJ10lWRI8usr16VkF3aXYWZ2YZvmPdBrzgf6GecZONCOgXjVXDAquwVvQb5-Mb9trnI-0BoD8B7oRTPzr2Rb0lGXY8KR3Mc5jnH_RDZz8ZN_xuJjIA_Zhz1ZbzefyLZWgsHU4efyC1nFacbkcyWdQAxk_VhsyCdVieRmtI9-N1ryw-pfGHye8rvmjcMx26t__bJ5uFnfr74v7jbfblfLu4VuKS8LiwhaazDWaun6bgfOMYMdc3THhoH3EgGQWgCBstVUWC2clgZ3SI0Ukl82t2dfE_Gg5uQnTE8qold_gZj2ClPxerSKScqF7YRBgW0vaW9aCdJA3TdQJ6B6fTh7zSn-Ptpc1CEeU6jnK9bDwGQvu76yrs-sPVZTH1wsCXVNYyevY7DOV3wpBeMAtG2r4ONZoFPMOVn3_0yg6vRS9eKl_A-0m5Jz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2819278768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>3D Structural Topology Optimization Using ESO, SESO and SERA: Comparison and an Extension to Flexible Mechanisms</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz ; Almeida, Valério S. ; Neves, Francisco de Assis das ; Almeida, Virgil Del Duca ; Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz ; Almeida, Valério S. ; Neves, Francisco de Assis das ; Almeida, Virgil Del Duca ; Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</creatorcontrib><description>This article investigates the study of Topology Optimization (TO) in 3D elasticity problems to determine the optimal topology by applying the evolutionary methods of Smoothing Evolutionary Structural Optimization (SESO), Sequential Element Rejection and Admission (SERA), and Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO). These procedures were implemented in MATLAB code as an extension of Top3d implemented for SIMP by using the eight-node hexahedral finite element formulation in three-dimensional elastostatic structures. The approaches conducted in the present study are demonstrated with numerical examples involving the compliance minimization criterion. Further, a brief synthesis of flexible mechanisms was studied to emphasize the performance of complaint mechanisms measured in terms of two design specifications/functionalities: mechanical and geometrical advantages, which are the highlights of this article. To show the gains of the proposed methods, numerical results obtained are compared with Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/app13106215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Additive manufacturing ; Compliance ; Elastostatics ; ESO ; Evolution ; Hexahedral finite elements ; Isotropic material ; MATLAB ; Methods ; Modulus of elasticity ; Numerical methods ; Optimization ; Sensitivity analysis ; SERA ; SESO ; SIMP ; Topology ; Topology optimization ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Applied sciences, 2023-05, Vol.13 (10), p.6215</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4440-0439 ; 0000-0003-2735-1751 ; 0000-0003-3796-1924</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2819278768/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2819278768?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Valério S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Francisco de Assis das</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Virgil Del Duca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</creatorcontrib><title>3D Structural Topology Optimization Using ESO, SESO and SERA: Comparison and an Extension to Flexible Mechanisms</title><title>Applied sciences</title><description>This article investigates the study of Topology Optimization (TO) in 3D elasticity problems to determine the optimal topology by applying the evolutionary methods of Smoothing Evolutionary Structural Optimization (SESO), Sequential Element Rejection and Admission (SERA), and Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO). These procedures were implemented in MATLAB code as an extension of Top3d implemented for SIMP by using the eight-node hexahedral finite element formulation in three-dimensional elastostatic structures. The approaches conducted in the present study are demonstrated with numerical examples involving the compliance minimization criterion. Further, a brief synthesis of flexible mechanisms was studied to emphasize the performance of complaint mechanisms measured in terms of two design specifications/functionalities: mechanical and geometrical advantages, which are the highlights of this article. To show the gains of the proposed methods, numerical results obtained are compared with Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) models.</description><subject>Additive manufacturing</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Elastostatics</subject><subject>ESO</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Hexahedral finite elements</subject><subject>Isotropic material</subject><subject>MATLAB</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Numerical methods</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>SERA</subject><subject>SESO</subject><subject>SIMP</subject><subject>Topology</subject><subject>Topology optimization</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2076-3417</issn><issn>2076-3417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUV1rGzEQPEoLDWme-gcEfWydaqXT6a5vxnXaQIqhTp7FWh-uzJ10lWRI8usr16VkF3aXYWZ2YZvmPdBrzgf6GecZONCOgXjVXDAquwVvQb5-Mb9trnI-0BoD8B7oRTPzr2Rb0lGXY8KR3Mc5jnH_RDZz8ZN_xuJjIA_Zhz1ZbzefyLZWgsHU4efyC1nFacbkcyWdQAxk_VhsyCdVieRmtI9-N1ryw-pfGHye8rvmjcMx26t__bJ5uFnfr74v7jbfblfLu4VuKS8LiwhaazDWaun6bgfOMYMdc3THhoH3EgGQWgCBstVUWC2clgZ3SI0Ukl82t2dfE_Gg5uQnTE8qold_gZj2ClPxerSKScqF7YRBgW0vaW9aCdJA3TdQJ6B6fTh7zSn-Ptpc1CEeU6jnK9bDwGQvu76yrs-sPVZTH1wsCXVNYyevY7DOV3wpBeMAtG2r4ONZoFPMOVn3_0yg6vRS9eKl_A-0m5Jz</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz</creator><creator>Almeida, Valério S.</creator><creator>Neves, Francisco de Assis das</creator><creator>Almeida, Virgil Del Duca</creator><creator>Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-0439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2735-1751</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3796-1924</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>3D Structural Topology Optimization Using ESO, SESO and SERA: Comparison and an Extension to Flexible Mechanisms</title><author>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz ; Almeida, Valério S. ; Neves, Francisco de Assis das ; Almeida, Virgil Del Duca ; Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Additive manufacturing</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Elastostatics</topic><topic>ESO</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Hexahedral finite elements</topic><topic>Isotropic material</topic><topic>MATLAB</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Numerical methods</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>SERA</topic><topic>SESO</topic><topic>SIMP</topic><topic>Topology</topic><topic>Topology optimization</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Valério S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Francisco de Assis das</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Virgil Del Duca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simonetti, Hélio Luiz</au><au>Almeida, Valério S.</au><au>Neves, Francisco de Assis das</au><au>Almeida, Virgil Del Duca</au><au>Cutrim, Marlan D. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>3D Structural Topology Optimization Using ESO, SESO and SERA: Comparison and an Extension to Flexible Mechanisms</atitle><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>6215</spage><pages>6215-</pages><issn>2076-3417</issn><eissn>2076-3417</eissn><abstract>This article investigates the study of Topology Optimization (TO) in 3D elasticity problems to determine the optimal topology by applying the evolutionary methods of Smoothing Evolutionary Structural Optimization (SESO), Sequential Element Rejection and Admission (SERA), and Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO). These procedures were implemented in MATLAB code as an extension of Top3d implemented for SIMP by using the eight-node hexahedral finite element formulation in three-dimensional elastostatic structures. The approaches conducted in the present study are demonstrated with numerical examples involving the compliance minimization criterion. Further, a brief synthesis of flexible mechanisms was studied to emphasize the performance of complaint mechanisms measured in terms of two design specifications/functionalities: mechanical and geometrical advantages, which are the highlights of this article. To show the gains of the proposed methods, numerical results obtained are compared with Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) models.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/app13106215</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-0439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2735-1751</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3796-1924</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-3417
ispartof Applied sciences, 2023-05, Vol.13 (10), p.6215
issn 2076-3417
2076-3417
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_27035e65da5a48708d4717d12da90f51
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Additive manufacturing
Compliance
Elastostatics
ESO
Evolution
Hexahedral finite elements
Isotropic material
MATLAB
Methods
Modulus of elasticity
Numerical methods
Optimization
Sensitivity analysis
SERA
SESO
SIMP
Topology
Topology optimization
Variables
title 3D Structural Topology Optimization Using ESO, SESO and SERA: Comparison and an Extension to Flexible Mechanisms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A02%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=3D%20Structural%20Topology%20Optimization%20Using%20ESO,%20SESO%20and%20SERA:%20Comparison%20and%20an%20Extension%20to%20Flexible%20Mechanisms&rft.jtitle=Applied%20sciences&rft.au=Simonetti,%20H%C3%A9lio%20Luiz&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=6215&rft.pages=6215-&rft.issn=2076-3417&rft.eissn=2076-3417&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/app13106215&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA752311044%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-eaa1ccc1deec7f86b1ff2da62f0b299387a11a0e115a74c05ec5fc7daba0d7573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2819278768&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A752311044&rfr_iscdi=true