Loading…

High dose Senna or Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two methods of colon preparation for colon cleansing in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: In this prospective randomized investigator-blinded trial, consecutive outpatients indicated for elective colonoscopy were randomized int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of research in medical sciences 2011-02, Vol.16 (2), p.149-155
Main Authors: Shavakhi, Ahmad, Kianinia, Mahsa, Torabi, Golara, Nemati, Amin, Saeidian, Behrouz, Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz, Madjlesi, Faezeh, Navaei, Parsa, Rashidinejad, Farzaneh, Minakari, Mohammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 155
container_issue 2
container_start_page 149
container_title Journal of research in medical sciences
container_volume 16
creator Shavakhi, Ahmad
Kianinia, Mahsa
Torabi, Golara
Nemati, Amin
Saeidian, Behrouz
Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz
Madjlesi, Faezeh
Navaei, Parsa
Rashidinejad, Farzaneh
Minakari, Mohammad
description Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two methods of colon preparation for colon cleansing in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: In this prospective randomized investigator-blinded trial, consecutive outpatients indicated for elective colonoscopy were randomized into two groups. Patients in Senna group took 24 tablets of 11 mg Senna in two divided doses 24 hour before colonoscopy. In Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) group they solved 4 sachets in 4 liters of water the day before the procedure and were asked to drink 250 ml every 15 minutes. The overall quality of colon cleansing was evaluated using the Aronchick scoring scale. Difficulty of the procedure, patients′ tolerance and compliance and adverse events were also evaluated. Results: 322 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the quality of colon cleansing, patients′ tolerance, compliance and the difficulty of the procedure between two groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar between two groups except for abdominal pain that was more severe in Senna group (p < 0.05) and nausea and vomiting that was more common in PEG group (p < 0.05) Conclusions: In conclusion we deduce that Senna has the same efficacy and patient′s acceptance as Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) and it could be prescribed as an alternative method for bowel preparation.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_272ba59681cf4cfb94bf699e1ccce338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_272ba59681cf4cfb94bf699e1ccce338</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2290272771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d326t-9b8240b908610f9725f375752e0064e49c8014c1fbf29d456a6e20eff996503f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1qHDEQhAeTYDu230H4lBwG9D8jHwLBrNcGQwyxz0Kjae1q0UoTjXZh8hR55Ih4Lz5Vd1XzQfVZc0k6JtqOMPnpNBOlxEXzZZ53GHMqBTtvLijFilDKL5u_j36zRWOaAf2CGA1KGb2ksKBV2S4BIqB1WGwK6OvLav0NuRpDAFv8EVC1U0yzTdOCpgyTyab4FO-QqWuap9NZNnFMe_8HRuTjEebiN6ak3A7Bx7Gatqq3JqCSvQnXzWdnwgw3J71q3h5Wr_eP7fPP9dP9j-d2ZFSWVg095XhQuJcEO9VR4VgnOkEBY8mBK9tjwi1xg6Nq5EIaCRSDc0pJgZljV83TO3dMZqen7PcmLzoZr_8bKW-0ycXbAJp2dDBCyZ5Yx60bFB-cVAqItRYY6yvr-ztrOgx7GC3Ekk34AP2YRL_Vm3TUjBJOlayA2xMgp9-H-iK9S4cca3_dCylFx3vM_gEq85Tq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>856657480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High dose Senna or Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial</title><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</source><creator>Shavakhi, Ahmad ; Kianinia, Mahsa ; Torabi, Golara ; Nemati, Amin ; Saeidian, Behrouz ; Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz ; Madjlesi, Faezeh ; Navaei, Parsa ; Rashidinejad, Farzaneh ; Minakari, Mohammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Shavakhi, Ahmad ; Kianinia, Mahsa ; Torabi, Golara ; Nemati, Amin ; Saeidian, Behrouz ; Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz ; Madjlesi, Faezeh ; Navaei, Parsa ; Rashidinejad, Farzaneh ; Minakari, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two methods of colon preparation for colon cleansing in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: In this prospective randomized investigator-blinded trial, consecutive outpatients indicated for elective colonoscopy were randomized into two groups. Patients in Senna group took 24 tablets of 11 mg Senna in two divided doses 24 hour before colonoscopy. In Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) group they solved 4 sachets in 4 liters of water the day before the procedure and were asked to drink 250 ml every 15 minutes. The overall quality of colon cleansing was evaluated using the Aronchick scoring scale. Difficulty of the procedure, patients′ tolerance and compliance and adverse events were also evaluated. Results: 322 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the quality of colon cleansing, patients′ tolerance, compliance and the difficulty of the procedure between two groups (p &gt; 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar between two groups except for abdominal pain that was more severe in Senna group (p &lt; 0.05) and nausea and vomiting that was more common in PEG group (p &lt; 0.05) Conclusions: In conclusion we deduce that Senna has the same efficacy and patient′s acceptance as Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) and it could be prescribed as an alternative method for bowel preparation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1735-1995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1735-7136</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22091224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Isfahan: Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Adverse effects ; Clinical trial ; Colon cleansing ; Colon preparation ; Original ; Poly ethylene glycol ; Senna</subject><ispartof>Journal of research in medical sciences, 2011-02, Vol.16 (2), p.149-155</ispartof><rights>Copyright Dr Ali Akbari Sari, Director of The Commission for Accreditation &amp; Improvement of Iranian Medical Journals Feb 2011</rights><rights>Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214296/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/856657480?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,36991,44569,53770,53772</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shavakhi, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kianinia, Mahsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torabi, Golara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemati, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeidian, Behrouz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madjlesi, Faezeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navaei, Parsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashidinejad, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minakari, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><title>High dose Senna or Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial</title><title>Journal of research in medical sciences</title><description>Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two methods of colon preparation for colon cleansing in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: In this prospective randomized investigator-blinded trial, consecutive outpatients indicated for elective colonoscopy were randomized into two groups. Patients in Senna group took 24 tablets of 11 mg Senna in two divided doses 24 hour before colonoscopy. In Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) group they solved 4 sachets in 4 liters of water the day before the procedure and were asked to drink 250 ml every 15 minutes. The overall quality of colon cleansing was evaluated using the Aronchick scoring scale. Difficulty of the procedure, patients′ tolerance and compliance and adverse events were also evaluated. Results: 322 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the quality of colon cleansing, patients′ tolerance, compliance and the difficulty of the procedure between two groups (p &gt; 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar between two groups except for abdominal pain that was more severe in Senna group (p &lt; 0.05) and nausea and vomiting that was more common in PEG group (p &lt; 0.05) Conclusions: In conclusion we deduce that Senna has the same efficacy and patient′s acceptance as Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) and it could be prescribed as an alternative method for bowel preparation.</description><subject>Adverse effects</subject><subject>Clinical trial</subject><subject>Colon cleansing</subject><subject>Colon preparation</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Poly ethylene glycol</subject><subject>Senna</subject><issn>1735-1995</issn><issn>1735-7136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkM1qHDEQhAeTYDu230H4lBwG9D8jHwLBrNcGQwyxz0Kjae1q0UoTjXZh8hR55Ih4Lz5Vd1XzQfVZc0k6JtqOMPnpNBOlxEXzZZ53GHMqBTtvLijFilDKL5u_j36zRWOaAf2CGA1KGb2ksKBV2S4BIqB1WGwK6OvLav0NuRpDAFv8EVC1U0yzTdOCpgyTyab4FO-QqWuap9NZNnFMe_8HRuTjEebiN6ak3A7Bx7Gatqq3JqCSvQnXzWdnwgw3J71q3h5Wr_eP7fPP9dP9j-d2ZFSWVg095XhQuJcEO9VR4VgnOkEBY8mBK9tjwi1xg6Nq5EIaCRSDc0pJgZljV83TO3dMZqen7PcmLzoZr_8bKW-0ycXbAJp2dDBCyZ5Yx60bFB-cVAqItRYY6yvr-ztrOgx7GC3Ekk34AP2YRL_Vm3TUjBJOlayA2xMgp9-H-iK9S4cca3_dCylFx3vM_gEq85Tq</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Shavakhi, Ahmad</creator><creator>Kianinia, Mahsa</creator><creator>Torabi, Golara</creator><creator>Nemati, Amin</creator><creator>Saeidian, Behrouz</creator><creator>Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz</creator><creator>Madjlesi, Faezeh</creator><creator>Navaei, Parsa</creator><creator>Rashidinejad, Farzaneh</creator><creator>Minakari, Mohammad</creator><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>High dose Senna or Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial</title><author>Shavakhi, Ahmad ; Kianinia, Mahsa ; Torabi, Golara ; Nemati, Amin ; Saeidian, Behrouz ; Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz ; Madjlesi, Faezeh ; Navaei, Parsa ; Rashidinejad, Farzaneh ; Minakari, Mohammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d326t-9b8240b908610f9725f375752e0064e49c8014c1fbf29d456a6e20eff996503f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adverse effects</topic><topic>Clinical trial</topic><topic>Colon cleansing</topic><topic>Colon preparation</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Poly ethylene glycol</topic><topic>Senna</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shavakhi, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kianinia, Mahsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torabi, Golara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemati, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeidian, Behrouz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madjlesi, Faezeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navaei, Parsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashidinejad, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minakari, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of research in medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shavakhi, Ahmad</au><au>Kianinia, Mahsa</au><au>Torabi, Golara</au><au>Nemati, Amin</au><au>Saeidian, Behrouz</au><au>Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz</au><au>Madjlesi, Faezeh</au><au>Navaei, Parsa</au><au>Rashidinejad, Farzaneh</au><au>Minakari, Mohammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High dose Senna or Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of research in medical sciences</jtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>149-155</pages><issn>1735-1995</issn><eissn>1735-7136</eissn><abstract>Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two methods of colon preparation for colon cleansing in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: In this prospective randomized investigator-blinded trial, consecutive outpatients indicated for elective colonoscopy were randomized into two groups. Patients in Senna group took 24 tablets of 11 mg Senna in two divided doses 24 hour before colonoscopy. In Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) group they solved 4 sachets in 4 liters of water the day before the procedure and were asked to drink 250 ml every 15 minutes. The overall quality of colon cleansing was evaluated using the Aronchick scoring scale. Difficulty of the procedure, patients′ tolerance and compliance and adverse events were also evaluated. Results: 322 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the quality of colon cleansing, patients′ tolerance, compliance and the difficulty of the procedure between two groups (p &gt; 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar between two groups except for abdominal pain that was more severe in Senna group (p &lt; 0.05) and nausea and vomiting that was more common in PEG group (p &lt; 0.05) Conclusions: In conclusion we deduce that Senna has the same efficacy and patient′s acceptance as Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) and it could be prescribed as an alternative method for bowel preparation.</abstract><cop>Isfahan</cop><pub>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>22091224</pmid><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1735-1995
ispartof Journal of research in medical sciences, 2011-02, Vol.16 (2), p.149-155
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_272ba59681cf4cfb94bf699e1ccce338
source IngentaConnect Journals; PubMed Central; ProQuest Publicly Available Content database
subjects Adverse effects
Clinical trial
Colon cleansing
Colon preparation
Original
Poly ethylene glycol
Senna
title High dose Senna or Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A54%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%20dose%20Senna%20or%20Poly%20Ethylene%20Glycol%20(PEG)%20for%20elective%20colonoscopy%20preparation:%20a%20prospective%20randomized%20investigator-blinded%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20research%20in%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Shavakhi,%20Ahmad&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=149-155&rft.issn=1735-1995&rft.eissn=1735-7136&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2290272771%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d326t-9b8240b908610f9725f375752e0064e49c8014c1fbf29d456a6e20eff996503f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=856657480&rft_id=info:pmid/22091224&rfr_iscdi=true