Loading…
High dose Senna or Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two methods of colon preparation for colon cleansing in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: In this prospective randomized investigator-blinded trial, consecutive outpatients indicated for elective colonoscopy were randomized int...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of research in medical sciences 2011-02, Vol.16 (2), p.149-155 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 155 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 149 |
container_title | Journal of research in medical sciences |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Shavakhi, Ahmad Kianinia, Mahsa Torabi, Golara Nemati, Amin Saeidian, Behrouz Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz Madjlesi, Faezeh Navaei, Parsa Rashidinejad, Farzaneh Minakari, Mohammad |
description | Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two methods of colon preparation for colon cleansing in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: In this prospective randomized investigator-blinded trial, consecutive outpatients indicated for elective colonoscopy were randomized into two groups. Patients in Senna group took 24 tablets of 11 mg Senna in two divided doses 24 hour before colonoscopy. In Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) group they solved 4 sachets in 4 liters of water the day before the procedure and were asked to drink 250 ml every 15 minutes. The overall quality of colon cleansing was evaluated using the Aronchick scoring scale. Difficulty of the procedure, patients′ tolerance and compliance and adverse events were also evaluated. Results: 322 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the quality of colon cleansing, patients′ tolerance, compliance and the difficulty of the procedure between two groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar between two groups except for abdominal pain that was more severe in Senna group (p < 0.05) and nausea and vomiting that was more common in PEG group (p < 0.05) Conclusions: In conclusion we deduce that Senna has the same efficacy and patient′s acceptance as Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) and it could be prescribed as an alternative method for bowel preparation. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_272ba59681cf4cfb94bf699e1ccce338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_272ba59681cf4cfb94bf699e1ccce338</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2290272771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d326t-9b8240b908610f9725f375752e0064e49c8014c1fbf29d456a6e20eff996503f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1qHDEQhAeTYDu230H4lBwG9D8jHwLBrNcGQwyxz0Kjae1q0UoTjXZh8hR55Ih4Lz5Vd1XzQfVZc0k6JtqOMPnpNBOlxEXzZZ53GHMqBTtvLijFilDKL5u_j36zRWOaAf2CGA1KGb2ksKBV2S4BIqB1WGwK6OvLav0NuRpDAFv8EVC1U0yzTdOCpgyTyab4FO-QqWuap9NZNnFMe_8HRuTjEebiN6ak3A7Bx7Gatqq3JqCSvQnXzWdnwgw3J71q3h5Wr_eP7fPP9dP9j-d2ZFSWVg095XhQuJcEO9VR4VgnOkEBY8mBK9tjwi1xg6Nq5EIaCRSDc0pJgZljV83TO3dMZqen7PcmLzoZr_8bKW-0ycXbAJp2dDBCyZ5Yx60bFB-cVAqItRYY6yvr-ztrOgx7GC3Ekk34AP2YRL_Vm3TUjBJOlayA2xMgp9-H-iK9S4cca3_dCylFx3vM_gEq85Tq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>856657480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High dose Senna or Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial</title><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</source><creator>Shavakhi, Ahmad ; Kianinia, Mahsa ; Torabi, Golara ; Nemati, Amin ; Saeidian, Behrouz ; Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz ; Madjlesi, Faezeh ; Navaei, Parsa ; Rashidinejad, Farzaneh ; Minakari, Mohammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Shavakhi, Ahmad ; Kianinia, Mahsa ; Torabi, Golara ; Nemati, Amin ; Saeidian, Behrouz ; Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz ; Madjlesi, Faezeh ; Navaei, Parsa ; Rashidinejad, Farzaneh ; Minakari, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two methods of colon preparation for colon cleansing in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: In this prospective randomized investigator-blinded trial, consecutive outpatients indicated for elective colonoscopy were randomized into two groups. Patients in Senna group took 24 tablets of 11 mg Senna in two divided doses 24 hour before colonoscopy. In Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) group they solved 4 sachets in 4 liters of water the day before the procedure and were asked to drink 250 ml every 15 minutes. The overall quality of colon cleansing was evaluated using the Aronchick scoring scale. Difficulty of the procedure, patients′ tolerance and compliance and adverse events were also evaluated. Results: 322 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the quality of colon cleansing, patients′ tolerance, compliance and the difficulty of the procedure between two groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar between two groups except for abdominal pain that was more severe in Senna group (p < 0.05) and nausea and vomiting that was more common in PEG group (p < 0.05) Conclusions: In conclusion we deduce that Senna has the same efficacy and patient′s acceptance as Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) and it could be prescribed as an alternative method for bowel preparation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1735-1995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1735-7136</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22091224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Isfahan: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Adverse effects ; Clinical trial ; Colon cleansing ; Colon preparation ; Original ; Poly ethylene glycol ; Senna</subject><ispartof>Journal of research in medical sciences, 2011-02, Vol.16 (2), p.149-155</ispartof><rights>Copyright Dr Ali Akbari Sari, Director of The Commission for Accreditation & Improvement of Iranian Medical Journals Feb 2011</rights><rights>Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3214296/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/856657480?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,36991,44569,53770,53772</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shavakhi, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kianinia, Mahsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torabi, Golara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemati, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeidian, Behrouz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madjlesi, Faezeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navaei, Parsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashidinejad, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minakari, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><title>High dose Senna or Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial</title><title>Journal of research in medical sciences</title><description>Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two methods of colon preparation for colon cleansing in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: In this prospective randomized investigator-blinded trial, consecutive outpatients indicated for elective colonoscopy were randomized into two groups. Patients in Senna group took 24 tablets of 11 mg Senna in two divided doses 24 hour before colonoscopy. In Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) group they solved 4 sachets in 4 liters of water the day before the procedure and were asked to drink 250 ml every 15 minutes. The overall quality of colon cleansing was evaluated using the Aronchick scoring scale. Difficulty of the procedure, patients′ tolerance and compliance and adverse events were also evaluated. Results: 322 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the quality of colon cleansing, patients′ tolerance, compliance and the difficulty of the procedure between two groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar between two groups except for abdominal pain that was more severe in Senna group (p < 0.05) and nausea and vomiting that was more common in PEG group (p < 0.05) Conclusions: In conclusion we deduce that Senna has the same efficacy and patient′s acceptance as Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) and it could be prescribed as an alternative method for bowel preparation.</description><subject>Adverse effects</subject><subject>Clinical trial</subject><subject>Colon cleansing</subject><subject>Colon preparation</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Poly ethylene glycol</subject><subject>Senna</subject><issn>1735-1995</issn><issn>1735-7136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkM1qHDEQhAeTYDu230H4lBwG9D8jHwLBrNcGQwyxz0Kjae1q0UoTjXZh8hR55Ih4Lz5Vd1XzQfVZc0k6JtqOMPnpNBOlxEXzZZ53GHMqBTtvLijFilDKL5u_j36zRWOaAf2CGA1KGb2ksKBV2S4BIqB1WGwK6OvLav0NuRpDAFv8EVC1U0yzTdOCpgyTyab4FO-QqWuap9NZNnFMe_8HRuTjEebiN6ak3A7Bx7Gatqq3JqCSvQnXzWdnwgw3J71q3h5Wr_eP7fPP9dP9j-d2ZFSWVg095XhQuJcEO9VR4VgnOkEBY8mBK9tjwi1xg6Nq5EIaCRSDc0pJgZljV83TO3dMZqen7PcmLzoZr_8bKW-0ycXbAJp2dDBCyZ5Yx60bFB-cVAqItRYY6yvr-ztrOgx7GC3Ekk34AP2YRL_Vm3TUjBJOlayA2xMgp9-H-iK9S4cca3_dCylFx3vM_gEq85Tq</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Shavakhi, Ahmad</creator><creator>Kianinia, Mahsa</creator><creator>Torabi, Golara</creator><creator>Nemati, Amin</creator><creator>Saeidian, Behrouz</creator><creator>Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz</creator><creator>Madjlesi, Faezeh</creator><creator>Navaei, Parsa</creator><creator>Rashidinejad, Farzaneh</creator><creator>Minakari, Mohammad</creator><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>High dose Senna or Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial</title><author>Shavakhi, Ahmad ; Kianinia, Mahsa ; Torabi, Golara ; Nemati, Amin ; Saeidian, Behrouz ; Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz ; Madjlesi, Faezeh ; Navaei, Parsa ; Rashidinejad, Farzaneh ; Minakari, Mohammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d326t-9b8240b908610f9725f375752e0064e49c8014c1fbf29d456a6e20eff996503f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adverse effects</topic><topic>Clinical trial</topic><topic>Colon cleansing</topic><topic>Colon preparation</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Poly ethylene glycol</topic><topic>Senna</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shavakhi, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kianinia, Mahsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torabi, Golara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemati, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeidian, Behrouz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madjlesi, Faezeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navaei, Parsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashidinejad, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minakari, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of research in medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shavakhi, Ahmad</au><au>Kianinia, Mahsa</au><au>Torabi, Golara</au><au>Nemati, Amin</au><au>Saeidian, Behrouz</au><au>Hoseinzadeh, Maryamnaz</au><au>Madjlesi, Faezeh</au><au>Navaei, Parsa</au><au>Rashidinejad, Farzaneh</au><au>Minakari, Mohammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High dose Senna or Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of research in medical sciences</jtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>149-155</pages><issn>1735-1995</issn><eissn>1735-7136</eissn><abstract>Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two methods of colon preparation for colon cleansing in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: In this prospective randomized investigator-blinded trial, consecutive outpatients indicated for elective colonoscopy were randomized into two groups. Patients in Senna group took 24 tablets of 11 mg Senna in two divided doses 24 hour before colonoscopy. In Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) group they solved 4 sachets in 4 liters of water the day before the procedure and were asked to drink 250 ml every 15 minutes. The overall quality of colon cleansing was evaluated using the Aronchick scoring scale. Difficulty of the procedure, patients′ tolerance and compliance and adverse events were also evaluated. Results: 322 patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the quality of colon cleansing, patients′ tolerance, compliance and the difficulty of the procedure between two groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar between two groups except for abdominal pain that was more severe in Senna group (p < 0.05) and nausea and vomiting that was more common in PEG group (p < 0.05) Conclusions: In conclusion we deduce that Senna has the same efficacy and patient′s acceptance as Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) and it could be prescribed as an alternative method for bowel preparation.</abstract><cop>Isfahan</cop><pub>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>22091224</pmid><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1735-1995 |
ispartof | Journal of research in medical sciences, 2011-02, Vol.16 (2), p.149-155 |
issn | 1735-1995 1735-7136 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_272ba59681cf4cfb94bf699e1ccce338 |
source | IngentaConnect Journals; PubMed Central; ProQuest Publicly Available Content database |
subjects | Adverse effects Clinical trial Colon cleansing Colon preparation Original Poly ethylene glycol Senna |
title | High dose Senna or Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator-blinded clinical trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A54%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%20dose%20Senna%20or%20Poly%20Ethylene%20Glycol%20(PEG)%20for%20elective%20colonoscopy%20preparation:%20a%20prospective%20randomized%20investigator-blinded%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20research%20in%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Shavakhi,%20Ahmad&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=149-155&rft.issn=1735-1995&rft.eissn=1735-7136&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2290272771%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d326t-9b8240b908610f9725f375752e0064e49c8014c1fbf29d456a6e20eff996503f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=856657480&rft_id=info:pmid/22091224&rfr_iscdi=true |