Loading…

What is the interference in “verbal interference”?

Research on the interrelation between language and other components of cognition makes frequent use of verbal interference paradigms. In this, participants are engaged in a primary nonverbal task, while simultaneously repeating non-sense syllables from memory or playback to occupy their articulatory...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta psychologica 2022-10, Vol.230, p.103774-103774, Article 103774
Main Authors: Gerwien, Johannes, von Stutterheim, Christiane, Rummel, Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-db042f1215e2d4dd38c3fd994cb49ec6828c43daf4c85eb4d0f4bbf802f7c4db3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-db042f1215e2d4dd38c3fd994cb49ec6828c43daf4c85eb4d0f4bbf802f7c4db3
container_end_page 103774
container_issue
container_start_page 103774
container_title Acta psychologica
container_volume 230
creator Gerwien, Johannes
von Stutterheim, Christiane
Rummel, Jan
description Research on the interrelation between language and other components of cognition makes frequent use of verbal interference paradigms. In this, participants are engaged in a primary nonverbal task, while simultaneously repeating non-sense syllables from memory or playback to occupy their articulatory buffer, which is assumed to block internal language use. However, language production involves different subprocesses and levels of representation, and no previous study has explicitly investigated which of these are affected by an occupied articulatory buffer. Thus, the current study addresses the question whether an occupied articulatory buffer significantly interferes with conceptualization. In Experiment 1, speakers name simple objects as fast and as accurately as they can under three conditions. In an interference condition, the verbalization task runs in parallel to a secondary, syllable memorization/recall task, which was expected to induce a situation in which the articulatory buffer temporarily holds phonological information while speakers engage in conceptualization. The articulatory buffer was not occupied in two control conditions. In Experiment 2, speakers performed a similar but more complex task. They verbally responded to visual depictions of actions, again under an interference condition and two control conditions. Results obtained in both experiments suggested no interference. Taken together, the findings suggest that an occupied articulatory buffer does not significantly affect conceptualization.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103774
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_27c073bc0f6b4bc3b5451977591c647b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S000169182200289X</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_27c073bc0f6b4bc3b5451977591c647b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2726407979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-db042f1215e2d4dd38c3fd994cb49ec6828c43daf4c85eb4d0f4bbf802f7c4db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlKBDEQQIMoOC5_4GGOXnrM1p3ORRFxA8GL4jEklYqToWd6TFrBmx-iP-eX2G2L4MVTUdur4hFywOiMUVYdLWYWunV-nXHKeV8SSskNMmG1EkXFtdokE0opKyrN6m2yk_OiTyXTbEKqh7ntpjFPuzlO46rDFDDhCoZk-vn2_oLJ2eZP5_Pt42SPbAXbZNz_ibvk_uL87uyquLm9vD47vSlA1KwrvKOSB8ZZidxL70UNInitJTipEaqa1yCFt0FCXaKTngbpXKgpDwqkd2KXXI9c39qFWae4tOnVtDaa70KbHo1NXYQGDVdAlXBAQ-WkA-FKWTKtVKkZVFINrMORtU7t0zPmzixjBmwau8L2OfcAXkmqtNL9qBxHIbU5Jwy_pxk1g3KzMKNyMyg3o_J-7Xhcw17JS8RkMsRBmY8Joet_jv8DvgDnhY0V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2726407979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is the interference in “verbal interference”?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gerwien, Johannes ; von Stutterheim, Christiane ; Rummel, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Gerwien, Johannes ; von Stutterheim, Christiane ; Rummel, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Research on the interrelation between language and other components of cognition makes frequent use of verbal interference paradigms. In this, participants are engaged in a primary nonverbal task, while simultaneously repeating non-sense syllables from memory or playback to occupy their articulatory buffer, which is assumed to block internal language use. However, language production involves different subprocesses and levels of representation, and no previous study has explicitly investigated which of these are affected by an occupied articulatory buffer. Thus, the current study addresses the question whether an occupied articulatory buffer significantly interferes with conceptualization. In Experiment 1, speakers name simple objects as fast and as accurately as they can under three conditions. In an interference condition, the verbalization task runs in parallel to a secondary, syllable memorization/recall task, which was expected to induce a situation in which the articulatory buffer temporarily holds phonological information while speakers engage in conceptualization. The articulatory buffer was not occupied in two control conditions. In Experiment 2, speakers performed a similar but more complex task. They verbally responded to visual depictions of actions, again under an interference condition and two control conditions. Results obtained in both experiments suggested no interference. Taken together, the findings suggest that an occupied articulatory buffer does not significantly affect conceptualization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Articulatory suppression ; Dual task ; Inner speech ; Language production ; Verbal interference</subject><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 2022-10, Vol.230, p.103774-103774, Article 103774</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-db042f1215e2d4dd38c3fd994cb49ec6828c43daf4c85eb4d0f4bbf802f7c4db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-db042f1215e2d4dd38c3fd994cb49ec6828c43daf4c85eb4d0f4bbf802f7c4db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000169182200289X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3535,27903,27904,45759</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gerwien, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Stutterheim, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rummel, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>What is the interference in “verbal interference”?</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><description>Research on the interrelation between language and other components of cognition makes frequent use of verbal interference paradigms. In this, participants are engaged in a primary nonverbal task, while simultaneously repeating non-sense syllables from memory or playback to occupy their articulatory buffer, which is assumed to block internal language use. However, language production involves different subprocesses and levels of representation, and no previous study has explicitly investigated which of these are affected by an occupied articulatory buffer. Thus, the current study addresses the question whether an occupied articulatory buffer significantly interferes with conceptualization. In Experiment 1, speakers name simple objects as fast and as accurately as they can under three conditions. In an interference condition, the verbalization task runs in parallel to a secondary, syllable memorization/recall task, which was expected to induce a situation in which the articulatory buffer temporarily holds phonological information while speakers engage in conceptualization. The articulatory buffer was not occupied in two control conditions. In Experiment 2, speakers performed a similar but more complex task. They verbally responded to visual depictions of actions, again under an interference condition and two control conditions. Results obtained in both experiments suggested no interference. Taken together, the findings suggest that an occupied articulatory buffer does not significantly affect conceptualization.</description><subject>Articulatory suppression</subject><subject>Dual task</subject><subject>Inner speech</subject><subject>Language production</subject><subject>Verbal interference</subject><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlKBDEQQIMoOC5_4GGOXnrM1p3ORRFxA8GL4jEklYqToWd6TFrBmx-iP-eX2G2L4MVTUdur4hFywOiMUVYdLWYWunV-nXHKeV8SSskNMmG1EkXFtdokE0opKyrN6m2yk_OiTyXTbEKqh7ntpjFPuzlO46rDFDDhCoZk-vn2_oLJ2eZP5_Pt42SPbAXbZNz_ibvk_uL87uyquLm9vD47vSlA1KwrvKOSB8ZZidxL70UNInitJTipEaqa1yCFt0FCXaKTngbpXKgpDwqkd2KXXI9c39qFWae4tOnVtDaa70KbHo1NXYQGDVdAlXBAQ-WkA-FKWTKtVKkZVFINrMORtU7t0zPmzixjBmwau8L2OfcAXkmqtNL9qBxHIbU5Jwy_pxk1g3KzMKNyMyg3o_J-7Xhcw17JS8RkMsRBmY8Joet_jv8DvgDnhY0V</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Gerwien, Johannes</creator><creator>von Stutterheim, Christiane</creator><creator>Rummel, Jan</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>What is the interference in “verbal interference”?</title><author>Gerwien, Johannes ; von Stutterheim, Christiane ; Rummel, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-db042f1215e2d4dd38c3fd994cb49ec6828c43daf4c85eb4d0f4bbf802f7c4db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Articulatory suppression</topic><topic>Dual task</topic><topic>Inner speech</topic><topic>Language production</topic><topic>Verbal interference</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gerwien, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Stutterheim, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rummel, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gerwien, Johannes</au><au>von Stutterheim, Christiane</au><au>Rummel, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is the interference in “verbal interference”?</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>230</volume><spage>103774</spage><epage>103774</epage><pages>103774-103774</pages><artnum>103774</artnum><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><abstract>Research on the interrelation between language and other components of cognition makes frequent use of verbal interference paradigms. In this, participants are engaged in a primary nonverbal task, while simultaneously repeating non-sense syllables from memory or playback to occupy their articulatory buffer, which is assumed to block internal language use. However, language production involves different subprocesses and levels of representation, and no previous study has explicitly investigated which of these are affected by an occupied articulatory buffer. Thus, the current study addresses the question whether an occupied articulatory buffer significantly interferes with conceptualization. In Experiment 1, speakers name simple objects as fast and as accurately as they can under three conditions. In an interference condition, the verbalization task runs in parallel to a secondary, syllable memorization/recall task, which was expected to induce a situation in which the articulatory buffer temporarily holds phonological information while speakers engage in conceptualization. The articulatory buffer was not occupied in two control conditions. In Experiment 2, speakers performed a similar but more complex task. They verbally responded to visual depictions of actions, again under an interference condition and two control conditions. Results obtained in both experiments suggested no interference. Taken together, the findings suggest that an occupied articulatory buffer does not significantly affect conceptualization.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103774</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6918
ispartof Acta psychologica, 2022-10, Vol.230, p.103774-103774, Article 103774
issn 0001-6918
1873-6297
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_27c073bc0f6b4bc3b5451977591c647b
source ScienceDirect Journals; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Articulatory suppression
Dual task
Inner speech
Language production
Verbal interference
title What is the interference in “verbal interference”?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A12%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20the%20interference%20in%20%E2%80%9Cverbal%20interference%E2%80%9D?&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Gerwien,%20Johannes&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=230&rft.spage=103774&rft.epage=103774&rft.pages=103774-103774&rft.artnum=103774&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103774&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2726407979%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-db042f1215e2d4dd38c3fd994cb49ec6828c43daf4c85eb4d0f4bbf802f7c4db3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2726407979&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true