Loading…
A comparative evaluation of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion after the administration of betamethasone gel versus lidocaine jelly—a prospective study
Background Post-operative sore throat, cough, and hoarseness of voice constitute the major pharyngolaryngeal morbidities following General anesthesia with an endotracheal tube since its introduction. Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity has been reported following the use of supraglottic airway devices as we...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ain-Shams journal of anesthesiology 2022-10, Vol.14 (1), p.1-7, Article 75 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-e7a5fd8b21c6e8f85af78611d45213597fd4e0d2ee27f42f7ed3a95bf397501c3 |
container_end_page | 7 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Ain-Shams journal of anesthesiology |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Elumalai, Vinoth Kumar Nair, Venu Gopal Achuthan Devi, Bramanandhan Radhika Nair, Jagathnath Krishna Kumara Pillai Mohanan |
description | Background
Post-operative sore throat, cough, and hoarseness of voice constitute the major pharyngolaryngeal morbidities following General anesthesia with an endotracheal tube since its introduction. Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity has been reported following the use of supraglottic airway devices as well, with less frequency and severity. Lidocaine jelly, a time-tested lubricating agent with local anesthetic effects is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity. Steroid gel application over the endotracheal tube is an effective alternative. The aim of this work is to compare betamethasone gel and lidocaine jelly in their effects leading to the causation of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity when applied to I-gel, a commonly used supraglottic airway device in practice now.
Results
Both betamethasone gel and Lidocaine jelly were found to be equally efficacious in controlling pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion. Though the incidence of post-operative sore throat (POST) was lower in the B group in the first 2 h (
P
=0.895) and 6 h (
P
=0.582) postoperatively, it was not significant. Similar results with cough (
P
=0.362) and hoarseness of voice (
P
=0.123) found after 2 h were also not statistically significant.
Conclusions
Both betamethasone gel and lidocaine jelly reduced the incidence and severity of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion and was found comparable.
Trial registration
CTRI/2017/10/010058
. Registered 11th October 2017. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s42077-022-00275-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_27c97438edbf4c8c91a9f11dbc0e29a6</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_27c97438edbf4c8c91a9f11dbc0e29a6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2726761596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-e7a5fd8b21c6e8f85af78611d45213597fd4e0d2ee27f42f7ed3a95bf397501c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQjBBIrHb3BzhZ4hywnTiOj6sVj5FW4sJK3CzHbs945MTBdgbNjY_gM_gqvgRPghZOnLrVqqru6qqqVwS_IaTv3qaWYs5rTGmNMeWs7p5VVxQLXAvKvjz_p39Z3aZ0xBgTxkTf4avq5x3SYZxVVNmdAMFJ-aW0YULBovmg4nnaB78WUB6NIQ7OuHxGNngfvrlpj3b1HjxyU4K4EpXNEFE-AFJmdJNLOT4pDpDVCPmgUpgAXXgniGlJyDsTtHJleATvz7--_1BojiHNoNfDUl7M-aZ6YZVPcPunXleP7999vv9YP3z6sLu_e6h1Q3CugStmTT9Qojvobc-U5X1HiGkZJQ0T3JoWsKEAlNuWWg6mUYINthGcYaKb62q36ZqgjnKObiwPkEE5uQ5C3EtVvGoPknIteNv0YAbb6l4LooQtqwaNgQrVFa3Xm1Zx83WBlOUxLHEq5xcu7XhHmLig6IbSxXOKYJ-2EiwvIcstZFlClmvI8kJqNlIq4JJP_Cv9H9Zv5eWwrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2726761596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative evaluation of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion after the administration of betamethasone gel versus lidocaine jelly—a prospective study</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess)</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Elumalai, Vinoth Kumar ; Nair, Venu Gopal Achuthan ; Devi, Bramanandhan Radhika ; Nair, Jagathnath Krishna Kumara Pillai Mohanan</creator><creatorcontrib>Elumalai, Vinoth Kumar ; Nair, Venu Gopal Achuthan ; Devi, Bramanandhan Radhika ; Nair, Jagathnath Krishna Kumara Pillai Mohanan</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Post-operative sore throat, cough, and hoarseness of voice constitute the major pharyngolaryngeal morbidities following General anesthesia with an endotracheal tube since its introduction. Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity has been reported following the use of supraglottic airway devices as well, with less frequency and severity. Lidocaine jelly, a time-tested lubricating agent with local anesthetic effects is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity. Steroid gel application over the endotracheal tube is an effective alternative. The aim of this work is to compare betamethasone gel and lidocaine jelly in their effects leading to the causation of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity when applied to I-gel, a commonly used supraglottic airway device in practice now.
Results
Both betamethasone gel and Lidocaine jelly were found to be equally efficacious in controlling pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion. Though the incidence of post-operative sore throat (POST) was lower in the B group in the first 2 h (
P
=0.895) and 6 h (
P
=0.582) postoperatively, it was not significant. Similar results with cough (
P
=0.362) and hoarseness of voice (
P
=0.123) found after 2 h were also not statistically significant.
Conclusions
Both betamethasone gel and lidocaine jelly reduced the incidence and severity of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion and was found comparable.
Trial registration
CTRI/2017/10/010058
. Registered 11th October 2017.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-925X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1687-7934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-925X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s42077-022-00275-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>2% lidocaine ; Airway management ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesiology ; Betamethasone dipropionate 0.05 ; Critical Care Medicine ; General anesthesia ; I-gel ; Intensive ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Morbidity ; Original Article ; Patients ; Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity ; Postoperative period ; Steroids ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Ain-Shams journal of anesthesiology, 2022-10, Vol.14 (1), p.1-7, Article 75</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-e7a5fd8b21c6e8f85af78611d45213597fd4e0d2ee27f42f7ed3a95bf397501c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2064-4674</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2726761596?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elumalai, Vinoth Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, Venu Gopal Achuthan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devi, Bramanandhan Radhika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, Jagathnath Krishna Kumara Pillai Mohanan</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative evaluation of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion after the administration of betamethasone gel versus lidocaine jelly—a prospective study</title><title>Ain-Shams journal of anesthesiology</title><addtitle>Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol</addtitle><description>Background
Post-operative sore throat, cough, and hoarseness of voice constitute the major pharyngolaryngeal morbidities following General anesthesia with an endotracheal tube since its introduction. Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity has been reported following the use of supraglottic airway devices as well, with less frequency and severity. Lidocaine jelly, a time-tested lubricating agent with local anesthetic effects is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity. Steroid gel application over the endotracheal tube is an effective alternative. The aim of this work is to compare betamethasone gel and lidocaine jelly in their effects leading to the causation of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity when applied to I-gel, a commonly used supraglottic airway device in practice now.
Results
Both betamethasone gel and Lidocaine jelly were found to be equally efficacious in controlling pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion. Though the incidence of post-operative sore throat (POST) was lower in the B group in the first 2 h (
P
=0.895) and 6 h (
P
=0.582) postoperatively, it was not significant. Similar results with cough (
P
=0.362) and hoarseness of voice (
P
=0.123) found after 2 h were also not statistically significant.
Conclusions
Both betamethasone gel and lidocaine jelly reduced the incidence and severity of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion and was found comparable.
Trial registration
CTRI/2017/10/010058
. Registered 11th October 2017.</description><subject>2% lidocaine</subject><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Betamethasone dipropionate 0.05</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>General anesthesia</subject><subject>I-gel</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity</subject><subject>Postoperative period</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2090-925X</issn><issn>1687-7934</issn><issn>2090-925X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQjBBIrHb3BzhZ4hywnTiOj6sVj5FW4sJK3CzHbs945MTBdgbNjY_gM_gqvgRPghZOnLrVqqru6qqqVwS_IaTv3qaWYs5rTGmNMeWs7p5VVxQLXAvKvjz_p39Z3aZ0xBgTxkTf4avq5x3SYZxVVNmdAMFJ-aW0YULBovmg4nnaB78WUB6NIQ7OuHxGNngfvrlpj3b1HjxyU4K4EpXNEFE-AFJmdJNLOT4pDpDVCPmgUpgAXXgniGlJyDsTtHJleATvz7--_1BojiHNoNfDUl7M-aZ6YZVPcPunXleP7999vv9YP3z6sLu_e6h1Q3CugStmTT9Qojvobc-U5X1HiGkZJQ0T3JoWsKEAlNuWWg6mUYINthGcYaKb62q36ZqgjnKObiwPkEE5uQ5C3EtVvGoPknIteNv0YAbb6l4LooQtqwaNgQrVFa3Xm1Zx83WBlOUxLHEq5xcu7XhHmLig6IbSxXOKYJ-2EiwvIcstZFlClmvI8kJqNlIq4JJP_Cv9H9Zv5eWwrg</recordid><startdate>20221020</startdate><enddate>20221020</enddate><creator>Elumalai, Vinoth Kumar</creator><creator>Nair, Venu Gopal Achuthan</creator><creator>Devi, Bramanandhan Radhika</creator><creator>Nair, Jagathnath Krishna Kumara Pillai Mohanan</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2064-4674</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221020</creationdate><title>A comparative evaluation of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion after the administration of betamethasone gel versus lidocaine jelly—a prospective study</title><author>Elumalai, Vinoth Kumar ; Nair, Venu Gopal Achuthan ; Devi, Bramanandhan Radhika ; Nair, Jagathnath Krishna Kumara Pillai Mohanan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-e7a5fd8b21c6e8f85af78611d45213597fd4e0d2ee27f42f7ed3a95bf397501c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>2% lidocaine</topic><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Betamethasone dipropionate 0.05</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>General anesthesia</topic><topic>I-gel</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity</topic><topic>Postoperative period</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elumalai, Vinoth Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, Venu Gopal Achuthan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devi, Bramanandhan Radhika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, Jagathnath Krishna Kumara Pillai Mohanan</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ain-Shams journal of anesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elumalai, Vinoth Kumar</au><au>Nair, Venu Gopal Achuthan</au><au>Devi, Bramanandhan Radhika</au><au>Nair, Jagathnath Krishna Kumara Pillai Mohanan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative evaluation of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion after the administration of betamethasone gel versus lidocaine jelly—a prospective study</atitle><jtitle>Ain-Shams journal of anesthesiology</jtitle><stitle>Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol</stitle><date>2022-10-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><artnum>75</artnum><issn>2090-925X</issn><issn>1687-7934</issn><eissn>2090-925X</eissn><abstract>Background
Post-operative sore throat, cough, and hoarseness of voice constitute the major pharyngolaryngeal morbidities following General anesthesia with an endotracheal tube since its introduction. Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity has been reported following the use of supraglottic airway devices as well, with less frequency and severity. Lidocaine jelly, a time-tested lubricating agent with local anesthetic effects is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity. Steroid gel application over the endotracheal tube is an effective alternative. The aim of this work is to compare betamethasone gel and lidocaine jelly in their effects leading to the causation of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity when applied to I-gel, a commonly used supraglottic airway device in practice now.
Results
Both betamethasone gel and Lidocaine jelly were found to be equally efficacious in controlling pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion. Though the incidence of post-operative sore throat (POST) was lower in the B group in the first 2 h (
P
=0.895) and 6 h (
P
=0.582) postoperatively, it was not significant. Similar results with cough (
P
=0.362) and hoarseness of voice (
P
=0.123) found after 2 h were also not statistically significant.
Conclusions
Both betamethasone gel and lidocaine jelly reduced the incidence and severity of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion and was found comparable.
Trial registration
CTRI/2017/10/010058
. Registered 11th October 2017.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1186/s42077-022-00275-6</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2064-4674</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2090-925X |
ispartof | Ain-Shams journal of anesthesiology, 2022-10, Vol.14 (1), p.1-7, Article 75 |
issn | 2090-925X 1687-7934 2090-925X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_27c97438edbf4c8c91a9f11dbc0e29a6 |
source | Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess); Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | 2% lidocaine Airway management Anesthesia Anesthesiology Betamethasone dipropionate 0.05 Critical Care Medicine General anesthesia I-gel Intensive Medicine Medicine & Public Health Morbidity Original Article Patients Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity Postoperative period Steroids Surgery |
title | A comparative evaluation of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity following I-gel insertion after the administration of betamethasone gel versus lidocaine jelly—a prospective study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A51%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20pharyngolaryngeal%20morbidity%20following%20I-gel%20insertion%20after%20the%20administration%20of%20betamethasone%20gel%20versus%20lidocaine%20jelly%E2%80%94a%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Ain-Shams%20journal%20of%20anesthesiology&rft.au=Elumalai,%20Vinoth%20Kumar&rft.date=2022-10-20&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.artnum=75&rft.issn=2090-925X&rft.eissn=2090-925X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s42077-022-00275-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2726761596%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-e7a5fd8b21c6e8f85af78611d45213597fd4e0d2ee27f42f7ed3a95bf397501c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2726761596&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |