Loading…
Species‐specific DNA distribution in spruce–beech forest soil
Environmental DNA consists of species‐specific intracellular and extracellular fractions, whose content and information may not be similar in all environments. In forest soil, in particular, the biogeochemical fate of DNA originated by plant litter input has been extensively reviewed, but species‐sp...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental DNA (Hoboken, N.J.) N.J.), 2022-09, Vol.4 (5), p.1120-1135 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-b210885b9085421c53cc58df8293f688924fff5a5b0658632a5031ba669e4baa3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-b210885b9085421c53cc58df8293f688924fff5a5b0658632a5031ba669e4baa3 |
container_end_page | 1135 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1120 |
container_title | Environmental DNA (Hoboken, N.J.) |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Foscari, Alessandro Alberti, Giorgio Zotti, Maurizio Incerti, Guido |
description | Environmental DNA consists of species‐specific intracellular and extracellular fractions, whose content and information may not be similar in all environments. In forest soil, in particular, the biogeochemical fate of DNA originated by plant litter input has been extensively reviewed, but species‐specific persistence and distribution still await to be quantified. In the present work, based on the purification of extracellular and intracellular DNA fractions from forest soil samples representing 3 soil horizons at 36 randomized locations differing for stand composition (either beech‐ or spruce‐dominated, and mixed), followed by exDNA metabarcoding with the rbcL marker, we provide a clear picture of species‐specific plant DNA distribution, and explore plant community composition and diversity along the explored gradient and the soil profile. We did not find significant differences in intra‐ vs. extracellular total DNA distribution, with a progressive depletion with soil depth positively associated with soil organic C and N content and negatively associated with soil pH and mineral content. Species‐specific DNA distribution was horizontally dependent on beech and spruce basal area aboveground, while extracellular DNA showed peculiar species‐specific vertical patterns. Proportion of Fagus sylvatica DNA increased with depth in beech stand soil, and Picea abies DNA decreased in spruce stand soil, respectively, possibly linked to species‐specific differences in leaf litter decomposition dynamics and root litter contributions. Finally, our approach by metabarcoding provided a faithful, although incomplete, picture of the local plant diversity, suggesting that such technique could positively integrate traditional biodiversity inventory studies based on expert field assessments.
Extracellular DNA in forest soil declines with depth reflecting organic C turnover. Beech and spruce DNA vertical distributions in soil follow species‐specific patterns, as related to litter and soil traits. Litter decomposition and water dynamics control plant DNA persistence below ground. DNA metabarcoding provides reliable taxonomic inventories of forest plant community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/edn3.307 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_27d6640a51a44f839f4f6833b1e2eb7a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_27d6640a51a44f839f4f6833b1e2eb7a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2718535937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-b210885b9085421c53cc58df8293f688924fff5a5b0658632a5031ba669e4baa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhQdRsGjBRxhw42Zqfmcyy9JWLZS6UNchySSaMk7GZAbpro8g-IZ9EjNWxI2re7l8OefkJMkFBBMIALrWVYMnGBRHyQjluMhISfDxn_00GYewARGFBQQYjpLpQ6uV1WG_-wjDZqxK5-tpWtnQeSv7zromtU0aWt8rvd99Sq3VS2qc16FLg7P1eXJiRB30-GeeJU83i8fZXba6v13OpqtM4TLaSwQBY1SWgFGCoKJYKcoqw1CJTc5YiYgxhgoqQU5ZjpGgMaAUeV5qIoXAZ8nyoFs5seGtt6_Cb7kTln8fnH_mwndW1ZqjospzAgSFghDDcGlItMBYQo20LAaty4NW691bH3_CN673TYwf30JGMY2RI3V1oJR3IXhtfl0h4EPffOibx74jmh3Qd1vr7b8cX8zXeOC_APF6gCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718535937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Species‐specific DNA distribution in spruce–beech forest soil</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Foscari, Alessandro ; Alberti, Giorgio ; Zotti, Maurizio ; Incerti, Guido</creator><creatorcontrib>Foscari, Alessandro ; Alberti, Giorgio ; Zotti, Maurizio ; Incerti, Guido</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental DNA consists of species‐specific intracellular and extracellular fractions, whose content and information may not be similar in all environments. In forest soil, in particular, the biogeochemical fate of DNA originated by plant litter input has been extensively reviewed, but species‐specific persistence and distribution still await to be quantified. In the present work, based on the purification of extracellular and intracellular DNA fractions from forest soil samples representing 3 soil horizons at 36 randomized locations differing for stand composition (either beech‐ or spruce‐dominated, and mixed), followed by exDNA metabarcoding with the rbcL marker, we provide a clear picture of species‐specific plant DNA distribution, and explore plant community composition and diversity along the explored gradient and the soil profile. We did not find significant differences in intra‐ vs. extracellular total DNA distribution, with a progressive depletion with soil depth positively associated with soil organic C and N content and negatively associated with soil pH and mineral content. Species‐specific DNA distribution was horizontally dependent on beech and spruce basal area aboveground, while extracellular DNA showed peculiar species‐specific vertical patterns. Proportion of Fagus sylvatica DNA increased with depth in beech stand soil, and Picea abies DNA decreased in spruce stand soil, respectively, possibly linked to species‐specific differences in leaf litter decomposition dynamics and root litter contributions. Finally, our approach by metabarcoding provided a faithful, although incomplete, picture of the local plant diversity, suggesting that such technique could positively integrate traditional biodiversity inventory studies based on expert field assessments.
Extracellular DNA in forest soil declines with depth reflecting organic C turnover. Beech and spruce DNA vertical distributions in soil follow species‐specific patterns, as related to litter and soil traits. Litter decomposition and water dynamics control plant DNA persistence below ground. DNA metabarcoding provides reliable taxonomic inventories of forest plant community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2637-4943</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2637-4943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/edn3.307</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Beech ; Biodiversity ; Community composition ; Composition ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Depletion ; DNA ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental DNA ; extracellular DNA purification ; Fagus sylvatica ; Forest soils ; Geographical distribution ; Intracellular ; Leaf litter ; Organic soils ; Organisms ; permutational multivariate analysis of variance ; Picea abies ; Plant communities ; Plant diversity ; plant metabarcoding ; Precipitation ; rbcL ; Soil chemistry ; Soil depth ; Soil horizons ; Soil pH ; Soil profiles ; Soil properties ; Species ; Taxonomy ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Environmental DNA (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022-09, Vol.4 (5), p.1120-1135</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-b210885b9085421c53cc58df8293f688924fff5a5b0658632a5031ba669e4baa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-b210885b9085421c53cc58df8293f688924fff5a5b0658632a5031ba669e4baa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1288-8708</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2718535937/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2718535937?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,46052,46476,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Foscari, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberti, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zotti, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Incerti, Guido</creatorcontrib><title>Species‐specific DNA distribution in spruce–beech forest soil</title><title>Environmental DNA (Hoboken, N.J.)</title><description>Environmental DNA consists of species‐specific intracellular and extracellular fractions, whose content and information may not be similar in all environments. In forest soil, in particular, the biogeochemical fate of DNA originated by plant litter input has been extensively reviewed, but species‐specific persistence and distribution still await to be quantified. In the present work, based on the purification of extracellular and intracellular DNA fractions from forest soil samples representing 3 soil horizons at 36 randomized locations differing for stand composition (either beech‐ or spruce‐dominated, and mixed), followed by exDNA metabarcoding with the rbcL marker, we provide a clear picture of species‐specific plant DNA distribution, and explore plant community composition and diversity along the explored gradient and the soil profile. We did not find significant differences in intra‐ vs. extracellular total DNA distribution, with a progressive depletion with soil depth positively associated with soil organic C and N content and negatively associated with soil pH and mineral content. Species‐specific DNA distribution was horizontally dependent on beech and spruce basal area aboveground, while extracellular DNA showed peculiar species‐specific vertical patterns. Proportion of Fagus sylvatica DNA increased with depth in beech stand soil, and Picea abies DNA decreased in spruce stand soil, respectively, possibly linked to species‐specific differences in leaf litter decomposition dynamics and root litter contributions. Finally, our approach by metabarcoding provided a faithful, although incomplete, picture of the local plant diversity, suggesting that such technique could positively integrate traditional biodiversity inventory studies based on expert field assessments.
Extracellular DNA in forest soil declines with depth reflecting organic C turnover. Beech and spruce DNA vertical distributions in soil follow species‐specific patterns, as related to litter and soil traits. Litter decomposition and water dynamics control plant DNA persistence below ground. DNA metabarcoding provides reliable taxonomic inventories of forest plant community.</description><subject>Beech</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental DNA</subject><subject>extracellular DNA purification</subject><subject>Fagus sylvatica</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Intracellular</subject><subject>Leaf litter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Organisms</subject><subject>permutational multivariate analysis of variance</subject><subject>Picea abies</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>plant metabarcoding</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>rbcL</subject><subject>Soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soil depth</subject><subject>Soil horizons</subject><subject>Soil pH</subject><subject>Soil profiles</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>2637-4943</issn><issn>2637-4943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhQdRsGjBRxhw42Zqfmcyy9JWLZS6UNchySSaMk7GZAbpro8g-IZ9EjNWxI2re7l8OefkJMkFBBMIALrWVYMnGBRHyQjluMhISfDxn_00GYewARGFBQQYjpLpQ6uV1WG_-wjDZqxK5-tpWtnQeSv7zromtU0aWt8rvd99Sq3VS2qc16FLg7P1eXJiRB30-GeeJU83i8fZXba6v13OpqtM4TLaSwQBY1SWgFGCoKJYKcoqw1CJTc5YiYgxhgoqQU5ZjpGgMaAUeV5qIoXAZ8nyoFs5seGtt6_Cb7kTln8fnH_mwndW1ZqjospzAgSFghDDcGlItMBYQo20LAaty4NW691bH3_CN673TYwf30JGMY2RI3V1oJR3IXhtfl0h4EPffOibx74jmh3Qd1vr7b8cX8zXeOC_APF6gCA</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Foscari, Alessandro</creator><creator>Alberti, Giorgio</creator><creator>Zotti, Maurizio</creator><creator>Incerti, Guido</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1288-8708</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Species‐specific DNA distribution in spruce–beech forest soil</title><author>Foscari, Alessandro ; Alberti, Giorgio ; Zotti, Maurizio ; Incerti, Guido</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-b210885b9085421c53cc58df8293f688924fff5a5b0658632a5031ba669e4baa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Beech</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental DNA</topic><topic>extracellular DNA purification</topic><topic>Fagus sylvatica</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Intracellular</topic><topic>Leaf litter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Organisms</topic><topic>permutational multivariate analysis of variance</topic><topic>Picea abies</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>plant metabarcoding</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>rbcL</topic><topic>Soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soil depth</topic><topic>Soil horizons</topic><topic>Soil pH</topic><topic>Soil profiles</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Foscari, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberti, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zotti, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Incerti, Guido</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental DNA (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Foscari, Alessandro</au><au>Alberti, Giorgio</au><au>Zotti, Maurizio</au><au>Incerti, Guido</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Species‐specific DNA distribution in spruce–beech forest soil</atitle><jtitle>Environmental DNA (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1120</spage><epage>1135</epage><pages>1120-1135</pages><issn>2637-4943</issn><eissn>2637-4943</eissn><abstract>Environmental DNA consists of species‐specific intracellular and extracellular fractions, whose content and information may not be similar in all environments. In forest soil, in particular, the biogeochemical fate of DNA originated by plant litter input has been extensively reviewed, but species‐specific persistence and distribution still await to be quantified. In the present work, based on the purification of extracellular and intracellular DNA fractions from forest soil samples representing 3 soil horizons at 36 randomized locations differing for stand composition (either beech‐ or spruce‐dominated, and mixed), followed by exDNA metabarcoding with the rbcL marker, we provide a clear picture of species‐specific plant DNA distribution, and explore plant community composition and diversity along the explored gradient and the soil profile. We did not find significant differences in intra‐ vs. extracellular total DNA distribution, with a progressive depletion with soil depth positively associated with soil organic C and N content and negatively associated with soil pH and mineral content. Species‐specific DNA distribution was horizontally dependent on beech and spruce basal area aboveground, while extracellular DNA showed peculiar species‐specific vertical patterns. Proportion of Fagus sylvatica DNA increased with depth in beech stand soil, and Picea abies DNA decreased in spruce stand soil, respectively, possibly linked to species‐specific differences in leaf litter decomposition dynamics and root litter contributions. Finally, our approach by metabarcoding provided a faithful, although incomplete, picture of the local plant diversity, suggesting that such technique could positively integrate traditional biodiversity inventory studies based on expert field assessments.
Extracellular DNA in forest soil declines with depth reflecting organic C turnover. Beech and spruce DNA vertical distributions in soil follow species‐specific patterns, as related to litter and soil traits. Litter decomposition and water dynamics control plant DNA persistence below ground. DNA metabarcoding provides reliable taxonomic inventories of forest plant community.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/edn3.307</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1288-8708</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2637-4943 |
ispartof | Environmental DNA (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022-09, Vol.4 (5), p.1120-1135 |
issn | 2637-4943 2637-4943 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_27d6640a51a44f839f4f6833b1e2eb7a |
source | Access via ProQuest (Open Access); Wiley Online Library Open Access |
subjects | Beech Biodiversity Community composition Composition Deoxyribonucleic acid Depletion DNA Environmental conditions Environmental DNA extracellular DNA purification Fagus sylvatica Forest soils Geographical distribution Intracellular Leaf litter Organic soils Organisms permutational multivariate analysis of variance Picea abies Plant communities Plant diversity plant metabarcoding Precipitation rbcL Soil chemistry Soil depth Soil horizons Soil pH Soil profiles Soil properties Species Taxonomy Trees |
title | Species‐specific DNA distribution in spruce–beech forest soil |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A54%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Species%E2%80%90specific%20DNA%20distribution%20in%20spruce%E2%80%93beech%20forest%20soil&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20DNA%20(Hoboken,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Foscari,%20Alessandro&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1120&rft.epage=1135&rft.pages=1120-1135&rft.issn=2637-4943&rft.eissn=2637-4943&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/edn3.307&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2718535937%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-b210885b9085421c53cc58df8293f688924fff5a5b0658632a5031ba669e4baa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718535937&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |