Loading…

Selective Vulnerability of the Cochlear Basal Turn to Acrylonitrile and Noise

Exposure to acrylonitrile, a high-production industrial chemical, can promote noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in the rat even though this agent does not itself produce permanent hearing loss. The mechanism by which acrylonitrile promotes NIHL includes oxidative stress as antioxidant drugs can part...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Toxicology 2009-01, Vol.2009 (2009), p.93-102
Main Authors: Pouyatos, B., Gearhart, C. A., Nelson-Miller, A., Fulton, S., Fechter, Laurence D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a594t-8cf98b802d16c03add1b7733f8ff0984714585e1eb8b7241dad5289499a4306b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a594t-8cf98b802d16c03add1b7733f8ff0984714585e1eb8b7241dad5289499a4306b3
container_end_page 102
container_issue 2009
container_start_page 93
container_title Journal of Toxicology
container_volume 2009
creator Pouyatos, B.
Gearhart, C. A.
Nelson-Miller, A.
Fulton, S.
Fechter, Laurence D.
description Exposure to acrylonitrile, a high-production industrial chemical, can promote noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in the rat even though this agent does not itself produce permanent hearing loss. The mechanism by which acrylonitrile promotes NIHL includes oxidative stress as antioxidant drugs can partially protect the cochlea from acrylonitrile+noise. Acrylonitrile depletes glutathione levels while noise can increase the formation of reactive oxygen species. It was previously noted that the high-frequency or basal turn of the cochlea was particularly vulnerable to the combined effects of acrylonitrile and noise when the octave band noise (OBN) was centered at 8 kHz. Normally, such a noise would be expected to yield damage at a more apical region of the cochlea. The present study was designed to determine whether the basal cochlea is selectively sensitive to acrylonitrile or whether, by adjusting the frequency of the noise band, it would be possible to control the region of the auditory impairment. Rats were exposed to one of three different OBNs centered at different frequencies (4 kHz, 110 dB and 8 or 16 kHz at 97 dB) for 5 days, with and without administration of acrylonitrile (50 mg/kg/day). The noise was set to cause limited NIHL by itself. Auditory function was monitored by recording distortion products, by compound action potentials, and by performing cochlear histology. While the ACN-only and noise-only exposures induced no or little permanent auditory loss, the three exposures to acrylonitrile+noise produced similar auditory and cochlear impairments above 16 kHz, despite the fact that the noise exposures covered 2 octaves. These observations show that the basal cochlea is much more sensitive to acrylonitrile+noise than the apical partition. They provide an initial basis for distinguishing the pattern of cochlear injury that results from noise exposure from that which occurs due to the combined effects of noise and a chemical contaminant.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2009/908596
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_27db9b1ab55149d4b8b339fd61cb8dc4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>P20160519003_200912_201707060046_201707060046_93_102</airiti_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_27db9b1ab55149d4b8b339fd61cb8dc4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>734275592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a594t-8cf98b802d16c03add1b7733f8ff0984714585e1eb8b7241dad5289499a4306b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkclvEzEUh0cIREvhxBk04oIECn3e7QtSiVgqyiJRuFrepnHljItnUpT_HifTBsKFk5f36XvP_jXNYwSvEGLsGAOoYwWSKX6nOURcipnEwO7e7pFCB82DYbgE4BSUuN8cYEAEBJeHzadvIQU3xuvQ_lilPhRjY4rjus1dOy5CO89ukYIp7RszmNSer0rfjrk9cWWdch_HElNoTe_bzzkO4WFzrzNpCI9u1qPm-7u35_MPs7Mv70_nJ2czwxQdZ9J1SloJ2CPugBjvkRWCkE52HShJBaJMsoCClVZgirzxDEtFlTKUALfkqDmdvD6bS31V4tKUtc4m6u1FLhfalDG6FDQW3iqLjGUMUeVpVRKiOs-Rs9I7Wl2vJ9fVyi6Dd6Efi0l70v1KHxf6Il9rLEERzKvg-Y2g5J-rMIx6GQcXUjJ9yKtBC0KxYEzhSj77h7zM9UPrT2nJONQnbnUvJ8iVPAwldLtREOhN4HoTuJ4Cr_TTv6ffsbcJV-DFBCxi782v-B_bkwkOFQmd2cEMag6b-sepbmKJY_wz_tfajwNDCoBsjQhvRhAggANQvn9QpHbH5DfRSs_E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>856028926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selective Vulnerability of the Cochlear Basal Turn to Acrylonitrile and Noise</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pouyatos, B. ; Gearhart, C. A. ; Nelson-Miller, A. ; Fulton, S. ; Fechter, Laurence D.</creator><contributor>Fosch, M. Teresa Colomina</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pouyatos, B. ; Gearhart, C. A. ; Nelson-Miller, A. ; Fulton, S. ; Fechter, Laurence D. ; Fosch, M. Teresa Colomina</creatorcontrib><description>Exposure to acrylonitrile, a high-production industrial chemical, can promote noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in the rat even though this agent does not itself produce permanent hearing loss. The mechanism by which acrylonitrile promotes NIHL includes oxidative stress as antioxidant drugs can partially protect the cochlea from acrylonitrile+noise. Acrylonitrile depletes glutathione levels while noise can increase the formation of reactive oxygen species. It was previously noted that the high-frequency or basal turn of the cochlea was particularly vulnerable to the combined effects of acrylonitrile and noise when the octave band noise (OBN) was centered at 8 kHz. Normally, such a noise would be expected to yield damage at a more apical region of the cochlea. The present study was designed to determine whether the basal cochlea is selectively sensitive to acrylonitrile or whether, by adjusting the frequency of the noise band, it would be possible to control the region of the auditory impairment. Rats were exposed to one of three different OBNs centered at different frequencies (4 kHz, 110 dB and 8 or 16 kHz at 97 dB) for 5 days, with and without administration of acrylonitrile (50 mg/kg/day). The noise was set to cause limited NIHL by itself. Auditory function was monitored by recording distortion products, by compound action potentials, and by performing cochlear histology. While the ACN-only and noise-only exposures induced no or little permanent auditory loss, the three exposures to acrylonitrile+noise produced similar auditory and cochlear impairments above 16 kHz, despite the fact that the noise exposures covered 2 octaves. These observations show that the basal cochlea is much more sensitive to acrylonitrile+noise than the apical partition. They provide an initial basis for distinguishing the pattern of cochlear injury that results from noise exposure from that which occurs due to the combined effects of noise and a chemical contaminant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-8191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-8205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2009/908596</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20130768</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Limiteds</publisher><ispartof>Journal of Toxicology, 2009-01, Vol.2009 (2009), p.93-102</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009</rights><rights>Copyright © 2009 B. Pouyatos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2009 B. Pouyatos et al. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a594t-8cf98b802d16c03add1b7733f8ff0984714585e1eb8b7241dad5289499a4306b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a594t-8cf98b802d16c03add1b7733f8ff0984714585e1eb8b7241dad5289499a4306b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/856028926/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/856028926?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20130768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Fosch, M. Teresa Colomina</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pouyatos, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gearhart, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson-Miller, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fechter, Laurence D.</creatorcontrib><title>Selective Vulnerability of the Cochlear Basal Turn to Acrylonitrile and Noise</title><title>Journal of Toxicology</title><addtitle>J Toxicol</addtitle><description>Exposure to acrylonitrile, a high-production industrial chemical, can promote noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in the rat even though this agent does not itself produce permanent hearing loss. The mechanism by which acrylonitrile promotes NIHL includes oxidative stress as antioxidant drugs can partially protect the cochlea from acrylonitrile+noise. Acrylonitrile depletes glutathione levels while noise can increase the formation of reactive oxygen species. It was previously noted that the high-frequency or basal turn of the cochlea was particularly vulnerable to the combined effects of acrylonitrile and noise when the octave band noise (OBN) was centered at 8 kHz. Normally, such a noise would be expected to yield damage at a more apical region of the cochlea. The present study was designed to determine whether the basal cochlea is selectively sensitive to acrylonitrile or whether, by adjusting the frequency of the noise band, it would be possible to control the region of the auditory impairment. Rats were exposed to one of three different OBNs centered at different frequencies (4 kHz, 110 dB and 8 or 16 kHz at 97 dB) for 5 days, with and without administration of acrylonitrile (50 mg/kg/day). The noise was set to cause limited NIHL by itself. Auditory function was monitored by recording distortion products, by compound action potentials, and by performing cochlear histology. While the ACN-only and noise-only exposures induced no or little permanent auditory loss, the three exposures to acrylonitrile+noise produced similar auditory and cochlear impairments above 16 kHz, despite the fact that the noise exposures covered 2 octaves. These observations show that the basal cochlea is much more sensitive to acrylonitrile+noise than the apical partition. They provide an initial basis for distinguishing the pattern of cochlear injury that results from noise exposure from that which occurs due to the combined effects of noise and a chemical contaminant.</description><issn>1687-8191</issn><issn>1687-8205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkclvEzEUh0cIREvhxBk04oIECn3e7QtSiVgqyiJRuFrepnHljItnUpT_HifTBsKFk5f36XvP_jXNYwSvEGLsGAOoYwWSKX6nOURcipnEwO7e7pFCB82DYbgE4BSUuN8cYEAEBJeHzadvIQU3xuvQ_lilPhRjY4rjus1dOy5CO89ukYIp7RszmNSer0rfjrk9cWWdch_HElNoTe_bzzkO4WFzrzNpCI9u1qPm-7u35_MPs7Mv70_nJ2czwxQdZ9J1SloJ2CPugBjvkRWCkE52HShJBaJMsoCClVZgirzxDEtFlTKUALfkqDmdvD6bS31V4tKUtc4m6u1FLhfalDG6FDQW3iqLjGUMUeVpVRKiOs-Rs9I7Wl2vJ9fVyi6Dd6Efi0l70v1KHxf6Il9rLEERzKvg-Y2g5J-rMIx6GQcXUjJ9yKtBC0KxYEzhSj77h7zM9UPrT2nJONQnbnUvJ8iVPAwldLtREOhN4HoTuJ4Cr_TTv6ffsbcJV-DFBCxi782v-B_bkwkOFQmd2cEMag6b-sepbmKJY_wz_tfajwNDCoBsjQhvRhAggANQvn9QpHbH5DfRSs_E</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Pouyatos, B.</creator><creator>Gearhart, C. A.</creator><creator>Nelson-Miller, A.</creator><creator>Fulton, S.</creator><creator>Fechter, Laurence D.</creator><general>Hindawi Limiteds</general><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>188</scope><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Selective Vulnerability of the Cochlear Basal Turn to Acrylonitrile and Noise</title><author>Pouyatos, B. ; Gearhart, C. A. ; Nelson-Miller, A. ; Fulton, S. ; Fechter, Laurence D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a594t-8cf98b802d16c03add1b7733f8ff0984714585e1eb8b7241dad5289499a4306b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pouyatos, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gearhart, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson-Miller, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fechter, Laurence D.</creatorcontrib><collection>華藝線上圖書館</collection><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of Toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pouyatos, B.</au><au>Gearhart, C. A.</au><au>Nelson-Miller, A.</au><au>Fulton, S.</au><au>Fechter, Laurence D.</au><au>Fosch, M. Teresa Colomina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selective Vulnerability of the Cochlear Basal Turn to Acrylonitrile and Noise</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>J Toxicol</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>2009</volume><issue>2009</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>93-102</pages><issn>1687-8191</issn><eissn>1687-8205</eissn><abstract>Exposure to acrylonitrile, a high-production industrial chemical, can promote noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in the rat even though this agent does not itself produce permanent hearing loss. The mechanism by which acrylonitrile promotes NIHL includes oxidative stress as antioxidant drugs can partially protect the cochlea from acrylonitrile+noise. Acrylonitrile depletes glutathione levels while noise can increase the formation of reactive oxygen species. It was previously noted that the high-frequency or basal turn of the cochlea was particularly vulnerable to the combined effects of acrylonitrile and noise when the octave band noise (OBN) was centered at 8 kHz. Normally, such a noise would be expected to yield damage at a more apical region of the cochlea. The present study was designed to determine whether the basal cochlea is selectively sensitive to acrylonitrile or whether, by adjusting the frequency of the noise band, it would be possible to control the region of the auditory impairment. Rats were exposed to one of three different OBNs centered at different frequencies (4 kHz, 110 dB and 8 or 16 kHz at 97 dB) for 5 days, with and without administration of acrylonitrile (50 mg/kg/day). The noise was set to cause limited NIHL by itself. Auditory function was monitored by recording distortion products, by compound action potentials, and by performing cochlear histology. While the ACN-only and noise-only exposures induced no or little permanent auditory loss, the three exposures to acrylonitrile+noise produced similar auditory and cochlear impairments above 16 kHz, despite the fact that the noise exposures covered 2 octaves. These observations show that the basal cochlea is much more sensitive to acrylonitrile+noise than the apical partition. They provide an initial basis for distinguishing the pattern of cochlear injury that results from noise exposure from that which occurs due to the combined effects of noise and a chemical contaminant.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Limiteds</pub><pmid>20130768</pmid><doi>10.1155/2009/908596</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1687-8191
ispartof Journal of Toxicology, 2009-01, Vol.2009 (2009), p.93-102
issn 1687-8191
1687-8205
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_27db9b1ab55149d4b8b339fd61cb8dc4
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
title Selective Vulnerability of the Cochlear Basal Turn to Acrylonitrile and Noise
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A59%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective%20Vulnerability%20of%20the%20Cochlear%20Basal%20Turn%20to%20Acrylonitrile%20and%20Noise&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Toxicology&rft.au=Pouyatos,%20B.&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=2009&rft.issue=2009&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=93-102&rft.issn=1687-8191&rft.eissn=1687-8205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2009/908596&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E734275592%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a594t-8cf98b802d16c03add1b7733f8ff0984714585e1eb8b7241dad5289499a4306b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=856028926&rft_id=info:pmid/20130768&rft_airiti_id=P20160519003_200912_201707060046_201707060046_93_102&rfr_iscdi=true