Virtual surgical planning is a useful tool in the surgical management of mandibular condylar fractures

• Published in: Chinese journal of traumatology 2022-05, Vol.25 (3), p.151-155
• Main Authors: Shakya, Shubhechha, Li, Kai-De, Huang, Dou, Liu, Zuo-Qiang, Zhang, Xiao, Liu, Lei
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anatomical reduction; Average distance of deviation; Condylar fractures; Female; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods; Fractures, Comminuted; Humans; Male; Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging; Mandibular Condyle - surgery; Mandibular Fractures - diagnostic imaging; Mandibular Fractures - surgery; Original; Prospective Studies; Surgical management; Treatment Outcome; Virtual surgical planning
• ISSN: 1008-1275; 1008-1275
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.12.002

The aim of this study is to evaluate the application value of virtual surgical planning in the management of mandibular condylar fractures and to provide a reliable reference. This was a prospective randomized controlled study and recruited 50 patients requiring surgical treatment for their mandibular condylar fractures. The inclusion criteria were patients (1) diagnosed with a condylar fracture by two clinically experienced doctors and required surgical treatment; (2) have given consent for the surgical treatment; and (3) had no contraindications to the surgery. Patients were excluded from this study if: (1) they were diagnosed with a non-dislocated or only slightly dislocated condylar fracture; (2) the comminuted condylar fracture was too severe to be treated with internal reduction and fixation; or (3) patients could not complete follow-up for 3 months. There were 33 male and 17 female patients with 33 unilateral condylar fractures and 17 bilateral condylar fractures included. The 50 patients were randomly (random number) divided into control group (25 patients with 35 sides of condylar fractures) and experimental group (25 patients with 32 sides of condylar fractures). Virtual surgical planning was used in the experimental group, but only clinical experience was used in the control group. The patients were followed up for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after operation. Variables including the rate of perfect reduction by radiological analysis, the average distance of deviation between preoperative and postoperative CT measurements using Geomagic software and postoperative clinical examinations (e.g., mouth opening, occlusion) were investigated for outcome measurement. SPSS 19 was adopted for data analysis. The average operation time was 180.60 min in the experimental group and 223.2 min in the control group. One week postoperatively, CT images showed that the anatomic reduction rate was 90.63% (29/32) in the experimental group and 68.57% (24/35) in the control group, revealing significant difference (X2 = 4.919, p = 0.027). Geomagic comparative analysis revealed that the average distance of deviation was also much smaller in the experimental group than that in the control group (0.639 mm vs. 0.995 mm; t = 3.824, p